The US House of Representatives and Senate voted to restore tariffs on solar panels made in four Southeast Asian countries. President Joe Biden just vetoed that legislation. And good thing, because that legislation would have seriously injured the young US solar industry.
May 16: President Joe Biden has vetoed legislation passed by the US Senate and House to restore tariffs on solar panels. It was only Biden’s third veto in his presidency. He stated today on the White House’s briefing room page:
The [solar tariff waiver] rule implements a temporary, 24-month bridge to make sure that when these new [US] factories are operational, we have a thriving solar installation industry ready to deploy American-made solar products to homes, businesses, and communities across the Nation. Given the progress we are making on American solar, I do not intend to extend the tariff suspension at the conclusion of the 2-year period in June 2024.
Passage of this resolution bets against American innovation. It would undermine these efforts and create deep uncertainty for American businesses and workers in the solar industry.
Therefore, I am vetoing this resolution.
Congress overriding Biden’s veto appears unlikely, as it would need two-thirds majorities in the House and Senate.
George Hershman, CEO of SOLV Energy, the US’s largest utility-scale solar contractor, said in response to the veto:
President Biden’s veto of this harmful resolution is a victory for U.S. solar companies and the growing solar workforce. Repealing the two-year moratorium of new solar tariffs would have created business uncertainty, placed tens of thousands of clean energy jobs at risk, and stalled solar projects across the country.
And Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), said:
President Biden’s veto has helped preserve our nation’s clean energy progress and prevented a bill from becoming law that would have eliminated 30,000 American jobs, including 4,000 solar manufacturing jobs.
All sides of this debate can agree that we need to deploy American energy and manufacture those components and technologies in America. Every metric shows that the Biden administration’s policies are working to achieve both goals, and we thank the President for taking this action and protecting the livelihoods of 255,000 solar and storage workers nationwide.
May 3: The US Senate today voted to restore tariffs on solar panels. The vote was 56-41, with nine Democrats voting in favor. President Joe Biden has vowed to veto the legislation.
Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), said:
Any legislation that threatens 30,000 American jobs and weakens our nation’s energy security to this degree should be dead on arrival.
Energy workers across the country are looking to President Biden to protect their livelihoods. We urge the President to quickly and decisively veto this damaging resolution.
April 28: The 221-202 bipartisan vote sends the measure to the Democratic-controlled Senate – 12 Democrats voted for it, and 8 Republicans voted against it. President Joe Biden has said he will veto the legislation.
In 2022, President Joe Biden waived tariffs on solar products made in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam while the US Department of Commerce (DOC) conducted an investigation into whether those imports were circumventing duties on goods made in China, thus violating US law. The DOC is expected to issue its decision next week.
The majority of legislators voted for this measure to boost US solar manufacturers who say they can’t compete with cheaper solar products made in Asia. But while that’s well intended, it’s very poorly executed, due to timing.
The bottom line is, US solar manufacturing is growing, and it does need legislative support – the Inflation Reduction Act does that. But US solar manufacturing is nowhere near robust enough to supply the huge and growing domestic demand for solar products. That’s why Biden waived the tariff – to keep the supply chain going while US domestic manufacturing ramps up.
The reinstated tariffs are going to boost costs for US solar developers and slow down the supply chain, and thus solar developments needed to fight climate change. We don’t have time to delay the fight against climate change.
While this might seem protective to US solar manufacturing, it’s harmful to US solar installation, which currently employs many more Americans than manufacturing does.
In short, the House made a bad decision that could seriously harm the US solar industry.
George Hershman, CEO of SOLV Energy, the US’s largest utility-scale solar provider, said in an email statement today:
This resolution could put companies on the hook to pay more than a billion dollars in retroactive tariffs and jeopardize tens of thousands of jobs across the country. President Biden’s pause on new solar tariffs provided a much-needed bridge for companies to deploy clean energy and keep American workers on the payroll as the US builds out a dramatic ramp-up in our domestic solar manufacturing sector.
And Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), also issued a statement:
Today the House of Representatives failed America’s 255,000 solar workers and put the near-term impact of the IRA at risk. The legislation will impose $1 billion in retroactive tariffs and cause 30,000 Americans to lose their jobs this year.
The two-year solar tariff moratorium was imposed as a strategic bridge to stand up U.S.-based manufacturing capacity while allowing developers to keep building projects and move us toward our clean energy goals. Companies are making massive investments in manufacturing facilities across the country thanks to the IRA, and all this legislation serves to do is undercut American businesses as they invest billions in capital and seek to employ thousands of workers.
We are urging senators to see through this political charade and examine the facts at hand.
The US cannot produce enough solar panels and cells to meet demand, and the remaining 14 months of this moratorium gives us time to close the gap. The United States can get there and become a global leader in clean energy manufacturing and development. Overturning the moratorium at this stage puts that future at risk.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you’re finding a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage. EnergySage is a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions and save 20 to 30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and you share your phone number with them. Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
NIO executives shared details of the Chinese automaker’s third EV brand, Firefly, as well as what the new marque will call its first model. The news comes about one month before Firefly officially launches in China during its parent company’s 10th annual NIO Day event.
Firefly is a new affordable boutique EV brand spun out by Chinese automaker NIO. We’ve been awaiting the marque’s official launch for years after NIO divulged plans for two new all-electric sub-brands in the works. The first was codenamed “Alps” and was scheduled to launch in mid-2024 in China and Europe.
Even with tariffs being imposed on Chinese-built EVs entering the EU, NIO conveyed confidence in its new Firefly marque as the automaker’s co-founder and president Qin Lihong shared that the new models will be priced between RMB 100,000 ($13,800) and RMB 200,000 ($27,500).
Up until now, we’ve only seen camouflaged images of what a Firefly BEV might look like as we await the anticipated launch, which we learned is coming on December 21, 2024, during the automaker’s tenth annual NIO Day event.
Today, however, we’ve learned the name of the first Firefly model and when NIO expects to begin delivering it to customers.
NIO’s first Firefly EV model will adopt the same name
Following the posting of NIO’s Q3 2024 financial results, the automaker’s executives completed an earnings call, which offered some new details about the Firefly EV brand. The company confirmed that NIO’s third EV brand will adopt the Firefly codename used internally in the past years.
Furthermore, NIO confirmed the first EV model under the new brand will be called the Firefly as well, describing the new marque as a symbol of NIO’s innovation and sophistication, but in a smaller package.
NIO also said its Firefly EVs will exceed customer expectations in design, safety, space, intelligence, and energy efficiency. Additionally, NIO executives shared plans for a new product cycle that will include deliveries under both its Onvo and Firefly brands, enabling faster global growth.
Per NIO, the Firefly EV from Firefly will begin deliveries in China in the first half of 2025, with future expansions to other markets to follow. We will get our first look at the new model and (hopefully) learn what it will cost during NIO’s tenth annual NIO Day event on December 21. The company is already teasing the event, which usually includes new product debuts and other exciting developments. Per the NIO Weibo page:
Today, the prelude to NIO’s 10th anniversary and NIO Day 2024 has officially begun. With the theme of ‘Together & Further,’ we will continue to share with you the ten-year story of NIO and its users. At this year’s NIO Day, NIO’s third brand ‘FIREFLY Firefly’ will also be officially released, and will continue to adopt the ‘rechargeable, replaceable and upgradeable’ pure electric technology route.
That last part could be read as reassurance that NIO’s new EV sub-brand will continue to focus on BEVs only, despite previous reports that the Chinese automaker is working on an extended-range hybrid. NIO has publicly denied those reports. All eyes will be on NIO Day 2024 next month. Check back in with Electrek for a full recap.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Gary Wang, a former executive of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, who testified against founder Sam Bankman-Fried, attends his sentencing on fraud charges at the United States District Court in Manhattan in New York City, U.S., November 20, 2024.
Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters
Gary Wang, co-founder and ex-technology chief of FTX, was sentenced Wednesday to time served and three years of supervised release on each of the four counts he pled guilty to, becoming the fifth and final ex-employee of the collapsed crypto exchange to be punished. Wang was also ordered to forfeit $11 billion, the same as the other co-defendants.
Wang, who took the stand in the trial against his former boss Sam Bankman-Fried, faced a maximum sentence of 50 years for the four criminal counts he pleaded guilty to, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit commodities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud.
After FTX’s former engineering chief Nishad Singh successfully avoided prison time when he was sentenced by Judge Lewis Kaplan last month, Wang was seeking the same sentence citing his nearly immediate cooperation with the government.
When given the opportunity to address the court, Wang said he was deeply sorry to all the customers and investors in FTX.
“I took the easy path, the cowardly path, instead of doing the right thing,” Wang said in a short address to the court, as he clutched a single printed piece of paper that he never referenced from the podium.
“I will spend the rest of my life trying to make amends,” he added.
Wang’s parents, as well as his wife, who is expecting their first child, were in court to support him.
Attorneys for Wang say he didn’t have full visibility on the crimes, unlike the other cooperating witnesses, and didn’t know that FTX’s sister hedge fund Alameda Research was taking customer money until after the scheme was underway.
The government was also seeking leniency for Wang.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicolas Roos described Wang as the easiest cooperating witness he had ever worked with, and he credited Wang for essentially deciphering half of the case for the Government by meticulously unpacking the complicated code used by FTX that allowed for the customer money to be taken off the exchange.
In the sentencing submission, prosecutors added that since testifying against the former FTX CEO, Wang has “put his extraordinary computer programing skills to use in detecting potential fraud in the stock and cryptocurrency markets,” and has built an interface that the government has started using for detecting potential fraud by publicly traded companies.
In addition, “Wang has also been working on a tool for detection of potential illegal activity in cryptocurrency markets, which in the event Wang is sentenced to a period of time served, the Government understands he will complete as part of his ongoing cooperation.”
Roos also noted that Wang was the first FTX employee to walk through the government’s door but the last to be sentenced, as the FTX criminal proceedings come to a close.
In March, Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison and ordered to pay $11 billion — the harshest punishment from Judge Kaplan.
Alameda’s ex-CEO Caroline Ellison, who was the star witness in Bankman-Fried’s prosecution and his ex-girlfriend, was sentenced to two years in prison for her role in the crime. And Ryan Salame, another former top lieutenant of Bankman-Fried, was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison in May — beyond the upper limit recommended by prosecutors.
All FTX former executives have faced sentencing before Judge Kaplan. The no-nonsense 78-year-old judge is a veteran of the Southern District of New York and has presided over some of the biggest cases to roll through the courthouse at 500 Pearl Street in downtown Manhattan.
“I’ve never seen anything quite like what happened here,” Kaplan said of Wang’s cooperation. “You’re entitled to a lot of credit.”
Ford is slashing another 4,000 jobs in Europe as it struggles to keep pace with the market’s shift to electric vehicles (EVs). The American automaker said a “highly disruptive” EV market and new competition are causing significant losses in the region. Ford’s announcement comes as China’s leading EV maker, BYD, is quickly catching up in global deliveries.
Ford is cutting more jobs in Europe amid EV struggles
“Ford has been in Europe for more than 100 years,” the company’s European vice president for Transportation and Partnerships, Dave Johnston, said on Wednesday.
As the market shifts to EVs and new competition arises, Ford is fighting for its share. The company has incurred “significant losses” in recent years amid a “highly disruptive” influx of new EV challengers.
Ford plans to cut another 4,000 jobs in Europe by the end of 2027 as part of its restructuring. The company blamed the “weak economic situation” and “lower-than-expected” demand for electric cars.
The planned cuts will primarily affect Germany, but some will also affect the UK. Ford said in a press release that other European markets will see “minimal reductions. “
Ford is also slowing the output of its new electric Explorer and Capri, both of which were built at its revamped Cologne EV plant in Germany.
Last week, German newspaper Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger (via Automobilwoche) reported that the plant’s employees would be put on short-term work hours. A Ford spokesperson confirmed the move, citing a “rapidly deteriorating” EV market.
Ford confirmed the plans on Wednesday, saying it will result in short-term working days at the Cologne plant in the first quarter of 2025.
An urgent call to action
In a letter to the German government, Ford’s CFO, John Lawler, reiterated the company’s commitment to Europe and the 2035 emissions target. However, he also issued an urgent call to action for all stakeholders to work together to advance the transition. Lawler added:
What we lack in Europe and Germany is an unmistakable, clear policy agenda to advance e-mobility, such as public investments in charging infrastructure, meaningful incentives to help consumers make the shift to electrified vehicles, improving cost competitiveness for manufacturers, and greater flexibility in meeting CO2 compliance targets.
Despite the restructuring, Ford still wants to be a player in Europe. The next generation of Ford vehicles in Europe will be “software-defined” with a “differentiated” design.
The company will focus on its commercial Ford Pro business while competing in select passenger vehicle segments to drive profit growth.
Ford invested $2 billion into its Cologne plant to prepare it for EV production. After the first electric Explorer rolled off the assembly line in June, Ford added its second EV, the new Capri, just last month.
The American automaker has drastically downsized leadership in Germany this year. Earlier this month, Ford lost two of its most experienced leadership team members. It’s now down to two directors from nine earlier this year.
Electrek’s Take
Ford’s restructuring in Europe comes as EV leaders, like China’s BYD, continue gaining ground in the global auto market.
After dominating its home market, BYD and other Chinese EV makers are looking overseas to drive growth.
BYD is already a leading EV brand in key regions like Southeast Asia and Central and South America, but it expects sales to accelerate in the next few months. The EV giant opened its first manufacturing plant in Thailand earlier this year, and more are planned for Hungary, Brazil, Mexico, Pakistan, and Turkey.
According to Bloomberg, BYD is rapidly approaching Ford in global deliveries. Although BYD is best known for its low-cost EVs, like the Seagull, which starts at under $10,000 (69,800 yuan) in China, it’s quickly expanding into new segments like pickup trucks, mid-size SUVs, and luxury models.
Ford’s CEO Jim Farley warned rivals earlier this year that if they fail to keep up with the Chinese, “20% to 30% of your revenue is at risk.”
“As the CEO of a company that had trouble competing with the Japanese and the South Koreans, we have to fix this problem,” Farley said.
While Ford’s Model e EV unit is on track to lose between $5 billion and $5.5 billion this year, BYD just reported a record $1.6 billion (RMB 11.6 billion) in Q3 net income amid surging EV sales. October was BYD’s eighth straight record sales month, with over 500,000 passenger vehicles sold for the first time.
Ford is betting on smaller, more affordable EVs to turn things around with its new low-cost platform. The first EV model powered by the platform, a new electric truck, is due out in 2027.
Can Ford turn things around? Or will it be too little too late? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.