Connect with us

Published

on

close video FOX Business Flash top headlines for May 16

Check out what’s clicking on FoxBusiness.com

Some kids decide to leave the nest once they graduate high school, others may to stay home and live with their parents – but at what cost?

The hashtag "parents charging rent" on TikTok has reached more than 59.7 billion views, according to data found by FOX Business.

This current trend has ignited a debate, leading many to find this parental decision to have a negative effect on the parent-child relationship.

MORE PARENTS ARE MOVING IN WITH THEIR KIDS THANKS TO THE 'REVERSE-BOOMERANG EFFECT'

Erika and Cody Archie from Gatesville, Texas, took to TikTok to share their thoughts on the subject after their daughter, Kylee Deason, 19, graduated from high school in May 2022 and quickly began paying her parents rent on June 1.

Kylee Deason graduated in May 2022. She decided to stay at home and work full time, leading her parents to start charging her rent. (Erika Archie / Fox News)

The Archies had told their daughter that if she was not going to enroll in college but rather work a full-time job and live at home, they would be charging her $200 a month for rent, Cody Archie told FOX Business.

"The purpose behind [charging her rent] was to get her to realize that everything is not free … and start to prepare her for adulthood. As you go into the workforce, you're going to have to be responsible for your own rent and food," he said.

Kylee Deason lived at home with her parents for nine months, paying $200 a month, which is significantly cheaper than other rental properties in the area, Cody Archie said.

8 IN 10 PARENTS CLAIM THEY'D RATHER HAVE MOTHER'S DAY OR FATHER'S DAY GIFT MONEY GO TO KIDS: REPORT

She moved out this year, but her parents said the time spent at home prepared their daughter for the next steps of adulthood and independence.

Cody and Erika Archie shared their parenting method on TikTok, which received both criticism and support after they revealed that their daughter, Kylee Deason, center, paid them $200 per month in rent after she graduated from high school. (Erika Archie / Fox News)

"I think she has gained more perspective on how much things in the real world cost," Erika Archie said.

The Archies call themselves "Dave Ramsey fans" and helped Kylee Deason develop an envelope system as encouraged by the popular personal finance expert. From an early age, she had her three envelopes: save, spend and give.

Cody Archie said he sat down with Kylee to discuss her financial future and help show her what it takes to make a living.

PET FISH FEE AT MISSOURI APARTMENT COMPLEX SHOCKS POTENTIAL RENTER; ERROR 'WILL BE CORRECTED SOON'

Cody and Erika Archie revealed on TikTok that their daughter would pay $200 if she decided to buy her own groceries, otherwise her monthly charge would be $300.

Their video garnered more than 720,000 views, with many agreeing with the Archies and others finding the situation to be problematic.

“I think she has gained more perspective on how much things in the real world cost.” – Erika Archie

"I don't know. My parents did this with me, and it almost ruined our relationship. Made me feel like they care more about money more than me," one viewer commented.

"My parents did this to me, Feels more like a punishment more than anything" another user added.

In the midst of the controversy, some agreed with the Archie's methods.

3 IN 4 PARENTS DIPPED INTO PERSONAL FUNDS TO HELP THEIR ADULT CHILDREN DURING THE PANDEMIC

"I don't see anything wrong with it. It helps them learn responsibility," one viewer commented.

"Responsibility and accountability. Well done and I will do the same with my son," another added.

A study in 2022 by Lending Tree reported “85% of parents would let their children move back in as adults or have previously done so, and most (73%) wouldnt charge them rent.” (iStock / iStock)

The online lending marketplace, Lending Tree, reported in September 2022 that "85% of parents would let their children move back in as adults or have previously done so, and most (73%) wouldn’t charge them rent."

The report added that the 73% of parents who wouldn't charge rent would still expect their children to make some financial contribution to household bills or groceries.

LIVING TOGETHER: MORE PARENTS ARE MOVING IN WITH THEIR ADULT CHILDREN, SURVEY FINDS

"It’s interesting that since 2011 there has been an upward trend of almost half of individuals ages 18 to 24 living with their parents the majority of the time," Brooke Webb-Gennusa, a licensed clinical therapist, told FOX Business.

A licensed clinical therapist told FOX Business that the relationship aspect between a parent and child in this scenario must be a priority and communication between both parties can play a large role in how the two interact. (iStock / iStock)

"Understandable that in 2020, during the beginning stages of the pandemic, individuals between 25 and 34 were more likely to live with their parents than in previous years," she said.

Webb-Gennusa acknowledged the debate on the topic and how what's right for one family may not be right for another.

"Enabling [doing for someone without a plan in place for them to learn to do it themselves] decreases when families work together to develop a plan that leads to personal independence," she continued.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

"This needs to accurately reflect the child’s ability level and is an important goal of the parent-child relationship."

Kylee Deason has since moved out of her parents’ home, but she learned a great deal about financial prioritization while paying her mom and dad rent. (Erika Archie / Fox News)

The relationship aspect between a parent and child in this scenario must be a priority and communication between both parties can play a large role in how the two interact, Webb-Gennusa noted.

"Having assertive communication, even when it is uncomfortable, increases the chances of having a positive outcome while reducing passive-aggressive tendencies that lead to frustration and resentment," she said.

READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS

Continue Reading

Politics

UK to scrap warships, military helicopters and fleet of drones to save money despite threats abroad

Published

on

By

UK to scrap warships, military helicopters and fleet of drones to save money despite threats abroad

The UK will scrap five warships, dozens of military helicopters and a fleet of drones to save money despite growing threats from Russia and a war raging in Europe.

John Healey, the defence secretary, announced the dramatic move in parliament on Wednesday, saying it would save up to half a billion pounds over the next five years.

The defence secretary described the equipment being axed as “outdated” and said the “common sense” decision to retire them was long overdue.

Ukraine war latest: Follow live

He signalled the decision was part of a plan to restructure and modernise the armed forces, which have already been significantly reduced in size following decades of cost-saving cuts, with new capabilities due to come online to replace the gaps.

“We face increasing global threats,” Mr Healey said in a written statement that was released at the same time as he addressed MPs.

“War in Europe, growing Russian aggression, conflict in the Middle East and technology changing the nature of warfare. As a result, defence needs increased resilience and readiness for the future.”

More on Army

At the same time, though, he said the defence budget faced “serious financial pressures”.

Defence Secretary John Healey speaking in parliament on Wednesday
Image:
Defence Secretary John Healey speaking in parliament on Wednesday

He repeated a pledge that the government would set out a course to lift the defence budget to 2.5% of national income – but yet again without giving a date.

The defence secretary then spelt out what “difficult decisions” meant in reality.

“To ensure that Britain is kept secure at home and strong abroad in a changing world, defence needs to make changes too. Difficult decisions are required,” he said.

The weapons systems on the chopping block are:

• The Royal Navy’s two amphibious assault ships, HMS Albion and HMS Bulwark. They will be taken out of service at the end of the year – around a decade early in a blow to the ability of the Royal Marines to launch land assaults from the sea.
• A fleet of 17 Royal Air Force Puma helicopters, as well as 14 of the military’s oldest Chinook helicopters
• A fleet of 46 Watchkeeper drones – each worth about £5m – barely six years since they entered into service
• HMS Northumberland, a Type 23 frigate, which is in need of costly repairs and has already operated well beyond an 18-year out-of-service date
• Two large Royal Fleet Auxiliary ships, RFA Wave Knight and RFA Wave Ruler – vessels which carry fuel and supplies to enable the Royal Navy’s aircraft carriers to operate around the world.

Mr Healey also hinted that further cuts would follow.

“These will not be the last difficult decisions I will have to make, to fix the defence inheritance that we were left with,” he told MPs.

HMS Albion, a British Royal Navy amphibious assault ship, arrives at Harumi Pier in Tokyo, Japan August 3, 2018. REUTERS/Toru Hanai
Image:
HMS Albion is due for the chopping block. File pic: Reuters

HMS Bulwark.
Pic: PA
Image:
HMS Bulwark. Pic: PA

The announcement, while uncomfortable, is designed to be the least damaging way to reduce costs while retaining capability.

It comes ahead of a plan by the government to publish a sweeping new review of defence in the spring, which is being drawn up by an external team and is expected to recommend extensive changes across the army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force.

The Ministry of Defence says that the equipment that is being axed – the term used is “accelerated retirement” – was selected because it is outdated and military chiefs need to focus finite money and personnel instead on the weapons systems most suited to modern warfare.

However, Russia’s war in Ukraine has demonstrated that old, outdated weapons are better than no weapons at all.

‘Wars of national survival’



Sean Bell

Military analyst

@BellusUK

Sky News’ military analyst offered his opinion on the announcement from the defence secretary.

Speaking on Sky News Today with Kamali Melbourne, he said: “There’s two things that jump out.

“There’s a reconfiguration going on in defence, it’s become a more dangerous world.

“For like 30 years defence has been about wars of choice, expeditionary wars, going out.

“So we’ve needed transport, we’ve needed landing ships to take people away.

“While the purists would say you need to wait for the Defence Review to conclude, it’s common sense that the direction of travel is less about wars of choice and more about wars of national survival, then you need to make every pound you spend focus on that.

“Therefore, if you’ve got some ships and equipment that’s just moribund and waiting, it costs you to keep that in dry dock and keep it maintained.

“[There’s] one thing that’s not being talked about… if you look at it from a grand strategic perspective, 6% of the defence budget is largely spent on the deterrent, the nuclear capability. We’re in the middle of a period where we’re changing and upgrading the capability and in broad handfuls, we’re spending another 6% to replace it.

“In addition, £3bn is coming out to go to Ukraine… so rather than 6% of the defence budget, it’s something like 18% that’s not available for conventional military capability in other words a significant cut.

“Somehow you’ve got to square the books.”

The Russian armed forces have relied heavily on old tanks, artillery guns and helicopters to fight after the weapons they used in the first weeks and months of the war were destroyed.

It takes years to build warships and helicopters.

Sir Keir Starmer will face uncomfortable challenges at the sight of amphibious assault vessels and Chinook transport helicopters being sold off or scrapped regardless of how old they are.

Yet it costs money to keep equipment in storage just in case it is needed.

Limited funds allocated to defence mean that military chiefs appear to have decided that scrapping weapons early is the least worst option.

The decision to scrap the British Army’s Mark 1 version of the Watchkeeper drone at a time when drones are such a dominant asset on the battlefield may also be tricky to defend.

A Watchkeeper drone on display in France in 2012.
File pic: AP
Image:
A Watchkeeper drone on display in France in 2012. File pic: AP

However, the programme has been beset by delays, cost overruns and flaws.

The first Watchkeeper drones only started operating around 2018 – some eight years late.

They also struggle to operate in poor weather conditions – limiting their utility.

The rapid pace of evolving technology in drone warfare – where the development cycle is a mere six to eight weeks – means that the technology inside Watchkeeper, which was conceived of more than 14 years ago, may well be easily defeated in a fight.

It is understood that scrapping the aircraft means that the army will be able to focus money on developing new innovative drone capabilities.

Continue Reading

Politics

Ukraine fires UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles at targets inside Russia

Published

on

By

Ukraine fires UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles at targets inside Russia

Ukraine has fired British-supplied Storm Shadow missiles into Russia, a source has told Sky News.

The UK and Ukraine have not yet confirmed the use of the long-range weapons in Russia but their deployment has been widely reported in British media.

Footage has been posted on Telegram reportedly showing wreckage from one of the missiles in Russia’s Kursk region, which borders Ukraine.

The Storm Shadow cruise missile is on display at the Paris Air Show in, June 2023 Pic: AP
Image:
A Storm Shadow cruise missile on display in June 2023. Pic: AP

Ukraine war: Follow latest updates

The UK had previously said that British tanks, anti-tank missiles and other military equipment could be used inside Russia as part of Ukraine’s defence – but had kept restrictions on the use of long-range missiles.

It comes just days after US President Joe Biden authorised the same policy shift.

Russia’s defence ministry said on Tuesday that Ukraine had fired six US-supplied Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) in the Bryansk region.

A Russian state news agency cited the ministry as saying the missiles caused no casualties.

Missiles will have a ‘marginal effect’

Sky News’ security and defence editor Deborah Haynes says Ukraine’s allies have been pursuing a strategy of ambiguity and “it remains to be seen whether we get official confirmation on this from the UK or from Ukraine”.

“There is also the uncomfortable reality that Ukraine’s stockpile of Storm Shadow missiles is severely limited, so their use will only have a marginal effect.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From 2023: What are Storm Shadow missiles?

Embassies shut over air attack fears

Meanwhile, Sky’s military analyst Sean Bell says he would be amazed if this attack really marks the first time such a missile has been used by Ukraine to hit inside Russia.

“I would be quite surprised if they haven’t been used for selected targets further on [into Russia] because they are… very, very effective at striking Russian logistics hubs, headquarters, ammunition dumps,” he said.

Earlier, the US and some other Western embassies in Kyiv closed amid fears Russia was preparing a major air attack on the Ukrainian capital.

Read more from Sky News:
Son of Norway’s crown princess in court
Rust premieres three years after fatal shooting
Chinese vessel tracked over Baltic Sea cable fault

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had been asking Kyiv’s allies to give his troops the capability to strike deeper behind Russian lines for over a year.

Mr Biden’s change of policy is linked to changing tactics by the Russians, which began deploying North Korean ground troops to supplement its own forces.

The White House is set to announce more military aid for Ukraine worth up to $275m (£217m), the US defence secretary has said.

Lloyd Austin said the support would “meet critical battlefield needs” and would include munitions for rocket systems, artillery and tank weapons, along with anti-personnel landmines.

Russian politician Maria Butina and the son of Donald Trump, the US president-elect, both warned the move could spark the start of a third world war.

Vladimir Putin lowered the threshold required for the use of nuclear weapons after America’s decision on long-range missiles for Ukraine, adding to fears the conflict could escalate.

Continue Reading

World

Spain to legalise about 300,000 undocumented migrants a year

Published

on

By

Spain to legalise about 300,000 undocumented migrants a year

Spain is to legalise about 300,000 undocumented migrants a year – at a time that many European countries are seeking to limit or deter migration.

The policy, approved on Tuesday by Spain’s left-wing minority coalition government, aims to tackle the country’s ageing workforce and low birthrate.

Around 250,000 registered foreign workers a year are needed to maintain the country’s welfare state, according to migration minister Elma Saiz.

The scheme, due to run from May next year until 2027, will allow foreigners living in Spain without proper documentation to obtain work permits and residency.

The exact number of foreigners living in Spain without documentation is unclear.

However, around 54,000 undocumented migrants reached Spain so far this year by sea or land, according to government figures.

Many arrive via the Canary Islands, a Spanish archipelago located off the coast of northwestern Africa.

Spain's Minister of Inclusion, Social Security and Migration, Elma Saiz. Pic: AP
Image:
Spain’s minister of inclusion, social security and migration, Elma Saiz. Pic: AP

Read more from Sky News:
Anger in the Spanish town smashed by floods
Spain seizes 13 tonnes of cocaine worth £659m

The figure compares to the 30,000 people who have arrived in the UK via small boats across the Channel so far in 2024.

The UK, as well as other European nations, including Germany, France, and the Netherlands, have in recent years taken tougher stances on migration.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

However, Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has often described his government’s migration policies as a way to combat the country’s low birthrate.

The government’s new policy simplifies the administrative processes for short and long-term visas and provides migrants with additional workplace protections.

It also extends a visa offered previously to job-seekers for three months to one year.

Many migrants make a living in Spain’s underground economy as fruit pickers, caretakers, delivery drivers, or other low-paid jobs.

Migration minister Ms Saiz said the government’s new policy would help prevent abuse and “serve to combat mafias, fraud and the violation of rights”.

Continue Reading

Trending