Connect with us

Published

on

To avoid rising energy costs and benefit from increasing renewable energy incentives and tax breaks, more homeowners may be considering a home solar system. Last year, the growth of residential solar in the U.S. boomed. Even as overall growth of solar installations, including commercial and utility-scale projects, decreased year over year, residential solar projects grew by a “staggering” 40%, to just under six gigawatts, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. That growth came across a record 700,000 U.S. homeowners who installed solar in 2022. 

There are a host of complicated issues in the solar market, including some contentious politics. Battles remain over foreign sourcing of solar energy components and tariffs on imports from China — President Biden recently vetoed a bill that would have re-imposed tariffs and likely driven up costs throughout the solar supply chain. Net metering, a primary way homeowners can be repaid by the grid for generating their own energy, took a big hit in California — the nation’s biggest solar market — last year, and that is expected to lower overall growth of residential projects this year. And lending conditions throughout the credit market are tighter today due to Federal Reserve interest rate hikes, driving up loan rates for solar projects.

Financing may be necessary or at least well worth considering for most homeowners interested in upgraded their home energy with solar. The national average for a 10 kilowatt solar panel installation in 2023 is around $20,000 after taking into account a 30% federal solar tax credit, according to EnergySage, a marketplace that connects consumers with energy companies. Loans have boomed as a way to finance solar, and even as low and in some cases zero-interest rate offers disappear, higher retail utility bills continue to make lending rates reasonable. According to energy consulting firm Wood Mackenzie, the loan segment’s record share of the residential solar market reached roughly 70% of projects in 2022. It won’t repeat that in 2023, but will remain a large part of the solar market.

Starting with the basics is the best way for homeowners to start wrapping their heads around solar power financial decisions. Here are some key things to consider before making the decision to move ahead with a residential project.

Do your research on state-by-state solar costs

“Before you investigate how you are going to pay for it, it’s easy to find out what you might want to buy and what it might cost,” said Joel Rosenberg, a member of the special projects team at Rewiring America, a nonprofit focused on electrifying homes, businesses and communities.

He recommends using EnergySage to find competing solar quotes. This will give homeowners a better idea — beyond nationwide averages — based on real-life factors such as the size of the system. This is important to understand before they start considering how to pay for it, he said. 

Seek out local energy financing programs

Once homeowners are ready to dig more into financing options, their state’s energy office and a local electric utility can be good places to start because both may offer solar financing programs.

“They may not be directly involved, but often they can flag things that may be worth looking into,” said Madeline Fleisher, an Ohio-based environmental and energy lawyer who runs a clean-energy website.

Ohio, for example, has a state program that offers a reduced rate on a solar loan with certain lenders.

Get solar loan quotes from multiple lenders

Consumers should seek quotes from three to five sources, being sure to pay careful attention to terms and conditions, said EnergySage CEO Vikram Aggarwal.

Potential lenders can include a homeowner’s local bank, credit union, national bank or a specialized institution known as a green bank that focuses on loans for environmentally friendly projects.

Green banks may have even more robust offerings, Fleisher said. Using a simple Google search for “green bank” and your state may yield options. To find potential lenders, homeowners can also consult broader industry sources such as the Green Bank Network or the Coalition for Green Capital.

Consider solar installation company offers carefully

Solar installers, such as Sunrun and Sunnova, also offer loans.

Most installers offer loans for a duration of 15, 20 or 25 years, while banks may offer short-duration loans at lower interest rates and for lower fees, Aggarwal said. Interest rates can vary widely depending on factors such as the loan amount, duration and the strength of the borrower’s credit. Typical loan amounts are $1,000 to $100,000, and annual percentage rates for people with excellent credit can range from around 6% to about 36%, according to a recent analysis by Nerdwallet. 

“Installers are great at installing solar, but they may not be experts at finance or banking,” said Jason MacDuff, president of greenpenny, a virtual and carbon-neutral bank focused on financing sustainable projects.

He said any homeowner considering a loan through an installer should make sure to speak directly to the financer. Homeowners should seek to fully understand the financial arrangement they are entering into, he said. For instance, will it be a fixed or variable rate? What are the upfront financing costs? And what is the projected monthly payment?

It’s also worth noting that installers don’t always mention the fees, so be sure to ask about the installation cost if paying cash versus financing, Aggarwal said. Prepayment fees aren’t likely, but it’s worth asking and confirming in the loan documentation, just to make sure, he said.

Scrutinize fees, terms and conditions on solar debt

Consumers should always ask what fees are associated with the loans being offered, in addition to the interest rate, since fees could amount to thousands of dollars.

Homeowners should also be familiar with other terms, conditions and options that may be available. For example, some loans allow the borrower to amortize once to reduce the amount. To illustrate, if a homeowner takes a $10,000 loan and then receives a tax credit of $3,000, the money can be used to pay the lender and bring down the loan to $7,000. Generally, this option, when available, can be used once within the first 12 to 18 months of the loan, Aggarwal said.

Home equity loans and HELOCs could be a good option for homeowners who have built sufficient equity in their home. These options could also work well for homeowners whose credit doesn’t allow them to qualify for a personal loan with a favorable rate, according to Bankrate.

Be careful about lending risks that can lead to home foreclosure

The last thing any homeowner should do is let a green finance loan lead to foreclosure. That has been a concern for the Federal Trade Commission and the government’s consumer watchdog, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) loans, secured by a property tax lien on the borrower’s home, have been used over the past decade to finance renewable energy home improvements like solar power and were particularly popular several years ago. 

The CFPB has worried about lenders that aren’t operating on the level, and these loans leading borrowers to fall behind on mortgage payments, and to a deterioration in credit worthiness. A new proposal from the CFPB seeks to protect homeowners from “unscrupulous companies” offering “unaffordable loans with exaggerated promises of energy bill savings,” according to a recent statement from CFPB Director Rohit Chopra.

The solar finance market is dominated by a handful of players

While there are many options for loans in the residential solar market, the data shows that total lending volumes are dominated by five players that financed 71% of the entire residential market in 2022, according to Wood Mackenzie. That was similar to 2021’s lending market. GoodLeap (26% of the residential solar market) was No. 1 overall.

Sunrun and Sunnova together captured 79% of the third-party-owned market for home solar. This brings up another key decision for homeowners: should they finance and own the system themselves or lease the rights to their solar energy generation?

Solar leasing is poised to be more popular, but has downsides

Leasing options exist and may be attractive to some homeowners as a way to avoid the upfront costs of equipment and installation. Another benefit is that the homeowner isn’t responsible for maintenance. Leasing to homeowners is expected to become more popular this year, according to Wood Mackenzie, because of additional credits leasing companies can receive under the Inflation Reduction Act. These “adders” beyond the core 30% tax credit make the economics more attractive to companies that lease solar systems to homeowners.

But there are downsides for homeowners. 

Leasing is generally more expensive for homeowners and they won’t be eligible for the 30% tax credit, Aggarwal said. Leasing can also present several challenges when homeowners decide to sell their house, so it’s important to weigh the pros and cons carefully, Aggarwal added.

If considering this route, homeowners should be sure to understand the specifics about the lease process, MacDuff said. They should, for example, know how the lease payments compare with their existing utility payment and what the repair process will be if issues arise.

Solar prices continue to drop, so rushing isn’t the right decision

The tax credit that was extended and increased as a result of the Inflation Reduction Act makes the cost of solar installation more palatable for consumers, Rosenberg said. But if it’s still out of reach financially, even with a loan, check back from time to time because prices continue to drop and homeowners have 10 years to qualify for the IRA incentive.

“You can get a quote in 2023 and a quote in 2026 and it might be two-thirds of the cost and you can still get the tax credit,” he said.

Continue Reading

Environment

Why Iran won’t block the Hormuz Strait oil artery even as war with Israel looms

Published

on

By

Why Iran won't block the Hormuz Strait oil artery even as war with Israel looms

Tankers depicted in the Strait of Hormuz — a strategically important waterway which separates Iran, Oman and the United Arab Emirates.

ATTA KENARE | AFP | Getty Images

As tensions surge following Israeli strikes on Iran, fears have resurfaced that the Tehran could retaliate by targeting one of the world’s most vital oil arteries — the Strait of Hormuz. 

The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, sees roughly 20 million barrels per day of oil and oil products pass through, accounting for nearly one-fifth of global oil shipments. Any move to block it would ripple through energy markets.

However, market watchers believe a full-scale disruption of global oil flows by closing the waterway is unlikely, and might even be physically impossible.

There really is “no net benefit” that comes with impeding the passage of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, especially given how Iranian oil infrastructure has not been directly targeted, said Ellen Wald, President of Transversal Consulting. She added that any such action would likely trigger further retaliation.

She also warned that any major spike in oil prices caused by a closure could draw backlash from Iran’s largest oil customer: China.

Their friends will suffer more than their enemies… So it’s very hard to see that happening.

Anas Alhajji

Energy Outlook Advisors

“China does not want the flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf to be disrupted in any way, and China does not want the price of oil to rise. So they’re going to bring the full weight of their economic power to bear on Iran,” Wald explained.

China is the number one importer of Iranian oil, reportedly accounting for over three-quarters of its oil exports. The world’s second-largest economy is also Iran’s largest trade partner.

“Their friends will suffer more than their enemies … So it’s very hard to see that happening,” said Anas Alhajji, managing partner at Energy Outlook Advisors, adding that disrupting the channel could be more of a bane than a boon for Tehran, given how most of Iran’s daily consumption goods come via that route.

“It’s not in their interest to cause problems because they will suffer first.”

Iran in 2018 threatened to shut the Strait of Hormuz when tensions spiked following the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal and the reimposition of sanctions. Prior to that, another major threat reportedly came in 2011 and 2012, when Iranian officials, including then–Vice President Mohammad-Reza Rahimi, warned of a potential closure if the West slapped further sanctions on its oil exports over its nuclear program.

Impossible to close the strait?

The Strait of Hormuz, which is 35 to 60 miles (55 to 95 kilometers) wide, connects the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea.

The idea of shutting the Hormuz waterway has been a recurring rhetorical tool but never been acted upon, with analysts saying that it’s simply not possible.

“Let’s be real about the Strait of Hormuz. First of all, most of it is in Oman, not in Iran. Number two, it’s wide enough that the Iranians cannot close it,” said Alhajji.

Similarly, Transversal Consulting’s Wald noted that although many ships pass through Iranian waters, vessels can still traverse alternative routes via the United Arab Emirates and Oman.

“Any blockade of the Strait of Hormuz will be a ‘last resort’ option for Iran and likely contingent on a military engagement between U.S. and Iran,” said  Vivek Dhar, Commonwealth Bank of Australia’s director of mining and energy commodities research.

RBC Capital Markets’ Helima Croft suggested that while there could be some disruption, a full-scale blockade was unlikely.

“It is our understanding that it would be extremely difficult for Iran to close the strait for an extended period given the presence of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. Nevertheless, Iran could still launch attacks on tankers and mine the strait to disrupt maritime traffic,” said Croft, head of global commodity strategy and MENA research at RBC.

U.S. President Trump has warned of possible military action if negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program break down, but it is uncertain whether these threats are meant to raise the stakes of U.S.-Iran talks or simply to increase pressure at the negotiating table, said Dhar. 

Israel carried out a wave of airstrikes on Iran early Friday morning local time, claiming the attacks were aimed at facilities linked to Tehran’s nuclear program.

Despite Israel's airstrikes, Iran is unlikely to block the Strait of Hormuz for these reasons

According to Iranian state media, the strikes killed Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, chief of the Iranian Armed Forces, along with Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

While a closure of the strait remains highly unlikely, the escalating conflict has prompted some to consider even the faint possibility.

“[Closing the strait] is kind of an extreme scenario, although we are in an extreme situation,” said Amena Bakr, head of Middle East and OPEC+ insights at Kpler.

“So that’s why I’m not putting that option completely off the table. We need to consider it.”

Crude futures jumped as much as 13% after Israel launched airstrikes against Iran early Friday. Global benchmark Brent futures were up 6.5% at $73.88 per barrel as of 4.30 p.m. Singapore time, while the U.S. West Texas Intermediate was trading 6.7% higher at $72.57 per barrel.

Continue Reading

Environment

Iran launches 100 drones at Israel in response to missile attack as markets reel

Published

on

By

Iran launches 100 drones at Israel in response to missile attack as markets reel

Traffic flows on a highway in the Iranian capital Tehran on June 13, 2025 following reported Israeli strikes targeting Iran early in the morning.

AFP | Getty Images

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Iran launched more than 100 drones toward Israeli territory Friday morning after Israel’s overnight missile strike on the country killed at least three of its senior military leaders.

“We can now confirm that the Chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, Commander of the IRGC and the Commander of Iran’s Emergency Command were all eliminated in the Israeli strikes across Iran,” Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Effie Defrin said.

“Iran launched approximately 100 UAVs towards Israeli territory, which we are working to intercept.”

Rocket sirens sounded in northern Jordan as Jordan’s state media reported the country intercepted several Iranian drones in its airspace.

Israel’s attack on Iran, which it said was targeted at nuclear enrichment facilities, came just days before U.S. and Iranian officials were set to attend a sixth round of nuclear deal talks. It was the largest attack on the Islamic Republic since the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s.

News of the strikes sent oil prices surging as much as 13% before paring gains, with global benchmark Brent crude surpassing $78 a barrel at one point.

Asian and European stocks fell, as investors rushed into safe havens amid fear of a wider war in a region that accounts for one-third of the world’s oil supply. Dow futures were down over 500 points by 8:21 a.m. London time.

Brent crude is currently trading at $72.76 per barrel at 8:23 a.m. in London, up 5%, with U.S. WTI trading at $71.27 per barrel, up 4.6%.

All eyes are now on the next moves by Iran and the United States, particularly whether the U.S. will get involved in this conflict. The U.S. State Department has stated it was not involved in Israel’s overnight strikes on Iran, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling the actions unilateral and urging Iran not to target U.S. interests or personnel in the region.

Tehran does not see it that way. Iran’s foreign ministry warned it would hold Washington responsible for the consequences of Israel’s actions.

President Donald Trump is expected to attend a meeting of the National Security Council scheduled for 11 a.m. Eastern Time.

This is a developing story and will be updated shortly.

Continue Reading

Environment

Safe haven rush begins after Israel strikes Iran

Published

on

By

Safe haven rush begins after Israel strikes Iran

Investors fled to safe-haven assets Friday after a series of Israeli airstrikes on Iran marked a major escalation of conflict in the region.

The scale of the attack, which Israel said was targeting Iran’s nuclear program, took markets by surprise, pushing up prices of assets thought to offer protection in times of heightened volatility.

“The news has led to significant fears about an escalation and a wider regional conflict,” Deutsche Bank strategists said in a note early Friday. “The effects of the attack have cascaded across global markets, with a strong risk-off move for several asset classes.”

Gold hit an almost two-month high on the news, although pared some gains as the morning progressed. Spot prices of the metal were up 1.1% at $3,420.24 at 7:42 a.m. London time. Gold futures for August delivery were 1.3% higher at $3.446.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Gold

U.S. Treasury prices also rose, pushing yields lower. Yields on the 30-year, 10-year and 2-year Treasury notes were all down around 3 basis points.

European stocks are poised to open sharply lower, meanwhile, with U.S. stock futures also falling.

Investors flee to safe-haven assets during times of uncertainty to protect their money from volatility and find stability when risk assets tumble.

Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country had launched a “targeted military operation” against Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program. Iran said it launched around 100 drones targeting Israel in retaliation.

“This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat,” Netanyahu added.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the attack on Israel was “unilateral” and made without U.S. support. “We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,” Rubio said in a statement.

In currencies, the U.S. dollar, Swiss franc and Japanese yen — all considered safe havens — rose.

After a tricky few months following policy uncertainty sparked by the Trump administration, the U.S. dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of major peers, was 0.36% higher.

The Swiss franc and Japanese yen both climbed against the dollar earlier Friday, but were broadly unchanged by 6:50 a.m. London time.

Oil prices soar

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Brent crude

U.S. West Texas Intermediate was trading 7% higher at 7:48 a.m. London time at $72.76 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent surged 6.8% to $74.04 per barrel, both off earlier highs.

“Looking forward, the focus is now shifting to what form Iran’s retaliation might take. It’s also unclear whether talks between the US and Iran over their nuclear programme will continue,” the Deutsche Bank strategists added.

Continue Reading

Trending