Enel North America has officially named Oklahoma as its choice for its 3-gigawatt (GW) solar panel and cell factory – the largest economic development project in the state’s history.
The factory, which Enel first announced in November 2022, will be one of the largest in the US to produce solar cells through its affiliate 3Sun USA – and Enel says it eventually plans to double the factory’s capacity to 6 GW.
The solar factory is going to be in Inola, Oklahoma, about 25 miles east of Tulsa. Construction is planned to begin in fall 2023, and the first panel will be produced and available to the market by the end of 2024.
Our selection of Oklahoma is a testament to the strength of the Tulsa Port of Inola site, the state’s commitment to workforce development, and an attractive investment climate.
The more than two million-square-foot factory represents a planned investment in excess of $1 billion, and it will create more than 1,800 construction jobs and 1,000 new direct permanent jobs by 2025. Up to 900 more jobs would be created if the factory scales to 6 GW.
Enel North America already has an office in Oklahoma City and more than 2 GW of renewable energy generating capacity in Oklahoma, representing more than $3 billion in total investments over the last decade.
Meanwhile, Tesla’s primary battery cell supplier, Panasonic, is looking to build a third factory in the US. in July 2022, Panasonic snubbed snubbed Oklahoma and chose Kansas instead for the location of its second battery cell factory. (Its first factory is in Nevada.)
So officially landing Enel North America’s enormous solar factory is a huge official win for Oklahoma, and undoubtedly takes the sting out of losing out to Kansas.
Governor Kevin Stitt (R-OK) said:
Enel’s expansion is a huge win for Oklahoma, and I’m thrilled by their record investment in our state’s economy and workforce, that will have a lasting legacy and continue to impact Oklahomans for generations.
President Joe Biden said today about the Enel announcement:
Because of my Inflation Reduction Act, private capital is being invested in Oklahoma and all across the country, as communities step up to help build our clean energy economy.
…
While Republicans in Congress try to defund our Investing in America agenda, we will stand with working families to keep those jobs here in states like Oklahoma.
Enrico Viale, head of Enel North America, recently said that “policy tailwinds from the Inflation Reduction Act have served as a catalyst for our solar manufacturing ambitions in the US, ushering in a new era of made-in-America energy.”
But all five Oklahoma representatives – all Republicans – voted against the Inflation Reduction Act, and also voted for Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s proposal to defund the clean energy provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act that have mobilized these types of clean energy investments.
Representative Josh Brecheen (R-OK) is a cosponsor for legislation that “repeals the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.”
On April 17, Electrekreported that it Oklahoma is back in the running with Panasonic for its third factory. (Or, Panasonic could choose Kansas or Nevada again.)
Maybe the Sooner State will get lucky with Panasonic and Tesla in Round 2. Its Republican-majority state legislators successfully worked to incentivize Enel’s factory. Will its federal legislators publicly admit that the IRA is a catalyst for Oklahoma’s economic growth? I’m not holding my breath.
Photo: Enel North America
UnderstandSolar is a free service that links you to top-rated solar installers in your region for personalized solar estimates. Tesla now offers price matching, so it’s important to shop for the best quotes. Click here to learn more and get your quotes. — *ad.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Tankers depicted in the Strait of Hormuz — a strategically important waterway which separates Iran, Oman and the United Arab Emirates.
ATTA KENARE | AFP | Getty Images
As tensions surge following Israeli strikes on Iran, fears have resurfaced that the Tehran could retaliate by targeting one of the world’s most vital oil arteries — the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, sees roughly 20 million barrels per day of oil and oil products pass through, accounting for nearly one-fifth of global oil shipments. Any move to block it would ripple through energy markets.
However, market watchers believe a full-scale disruption of global oil flows by closing the waterway is unlikely, and might even be physically impossible.
There really is “no net benefit” that comes with impeding the passage of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, especially given how Iranian oil infrastructure has not been directly targeted, said Ellen Wald, President of Transversal Consulting. She added that any such action would likely trigger further retaliation.
She also warned that any major spike in oil prices caused by a closure could draw backlash from Iran’s largest oil customer: China.
Their friends will suffer more than their enemies… So it’s very hard to see that happening.
Anas Alhajji
Energy Outlook Advisors
“China does not want the flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf to be disrupted in any way, and China does not want the price of oil to rise. So they’re going to bring the full weight of their economic power to bear on Iran,” Wald explained.
“Their friends will suffer more than their enemies … So it’s very hard to see that happening,” said Anas Alhajji, managing partner at Energy Outlook Advisors, adding that disrupting the channel could be more of a bane than a boon for Tehran, given how most of Iran’s daily consumption goods come via that route.
“It’s not in their interest to cause problems because they will suffer first.”
The Strait of Hormuz, which is 35 to 60 miles (55 to 95 kilometers) wide, connects the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea.
The idea of shutting the Hormuz waterway has been a recurring rhetorical tool but never been acted upon, with analysts saying that it’s simply not possible.
“Let’s be real about the Strait of Hormuz. First of all, most of it is in Oman, not in Iran. Number two, it’s wide enough that the Iranians cannot close it,” said Alhajji.
Similarly, Transversal Consulting’s Wald noted that although many ships pass through Iranian waters, vessels can still traverse alternative routes via the United Arab Emirates and Oman.
“Any blockade of the Strait of Hormuz will be a ‘last resort’ option for Iran and likely contingent on a military engagement between U.S. and Iran,” said Vivek Dhar, Commonwealth Bank of Australia’s director of mining and energy commodities research.
RBC Capital Markets’ Helima Croft suggested that while there could be some disruption, a full-scale blockade was unlikely.
“It is our understanding that it would be extremely difficult for Iran to close the strait for an extended period given the presence of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. Nevertheless, Iran could still launch attacks on tankers and mine the strait to disrupt maritime traffic,” said Croft, head of global commodity strategy and MENA research at RBC.
U.S. President Trump has warned of possible military action if negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program break down, but it is uncertain whether these threats are meant to raise the stakes of U.S.-Iran talks or simply to increase pressure at the negotiating table, said Dhar.
Israel carried out a wave of airstrikes on Iran early Friday morning local time, claiming the attacks were aimed at facilities linked to Tehran’s nuclear program.
According to Iranian state media, the strikes killed Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, chief of the Iranian Armed Forces, along with Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
While a closure of the strait remains highly unlikely, the escalating conflict has prompted some to consider even the faint possibility.
“[Closing the strait] is kind of an extreme scenario, although we are in an extreme situation,” said Amena Bakr, head of Middle East and OPEC+ insights at Kpler.
“So that’s why I’m not putting that option completely off the table. We need to consider it.”
Crude futures jumped as much as 13% after Israel launched airstrikes against Iran early Friday. Global benchmark Brent futures were up 6.5% at $73.88 per barrel as of 4.30 p.m. Singapore time, while the U.S. West Texas Intermediate was trading 6.7% higher at $72.57 per barrel.
Traffic flows on a highway in the Iranian capital Tehran on June 13, 2025 following reported Israeli strikes targeting Iran early in the morning.
AFP | Getty Images
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Iran launched more than 100 drones toward Israeli territory Friday morning after Israel’s overnight missile strike on the country killed at least three of its senior military leaders.
“We can now confirm that the Chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, Commander of the IRGC and the Commander of Iran’s Emergency Command were all eliminated in the Israeli strikes across Iran,” Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Effie Defrin said.
“Iran launched approximately 100 UAVs towards Israeli territory, which we are working to intercept.”
Rocket sirens sounded in northern Jordan as Jordan’s state media reported the country intercepted several Iranian drones in its airspace.
Israel’s attack on Iran, which it said was targeted at nuclear enrichment facilities, came just days before U.S. and Iranian officials were set to attend a sixth round of nuclear deal talks. It was the largest attack on the Islamic Republic since the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s.
News of the strikes sent oil prices surging as much as 13% before paring gains, with global benchmark Brent crude surpassing $78 a barrel at one point.
Asian and European stocks fell, as investors rushed into safe havens amid fear of a wider war in a region that accounts for one-third of the world’s oil supply. Dow futures were down over 500 points by 8:21 a.m. London time.
Brent crude is currently trading at $72.76 per barrel at 8:23 a.m. in London, up 5%, with U.S. WTI trading at $71.27 per barrel, up 4.6%.
All eyes are now on the next moves by Iran and the United States, particularly whether the U.S. will get involved in this conflict. The U.S. State Department has stated it was not involved in Israel’s overnight strikes on Iran, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling the actions unilateral and urging Iran not to target U.S. interests or personnel in the region.
Tehran does not see it that way. Iran’s foreign ministry warned it would hold Washington responsible for the consequences of Israel’s actions.
President Donald Trump is expected to attend a meeting of the National Security Council scheduled for 11 a.m. Eastern Time.
This is a developing story and will be updated shortly.
Investors fled to safe-haven assets Friday after a series of Israeli airstrikes on Iran marked a major escalation of conflict in the region.
The scale of the attack, which Israel said was targeting Iran’s nuclear program, took markets by surprise, pushing up prices of assets thought to offer protection in times of heightened volatility.
“The news has led to significant fears about an escalation and a wider regional conflict,” Deutsche Bank strategists said in a note early Friday. “The effects of the attack have cascaded across global markets, with a strong risk-off move for several asset classes.”
Gold hit an almost two-month high on the news, although pared some gains as the morning progressed. Spot prices of the metal were up 1.1% at $3,420.24 at 7:42 a.m. London time. Gold futures for August delivery were 1.3% higher at $3.446.
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
Gold
U.S. Treasury prices also rose, pushing yields lower. Yields on the 30-year, 10-year and 2-year Treasury notes were all down around 3 basis points.
Investors flee to safe-haven assets during times of uncertainty to protect their money from volatility and find stability when risk assets tumble.
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country had launched a “targeted military operation” against Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program. Iran said it launched around 100 drones targeting Israel in retaliation.
“This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat,” Netanyahu added.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the attack on Israel was “unilateral” and made without U.S. support. “We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,” Rubio said in a statement.
In currencies, the U.S. dollar, Swiss franc and Japanese yen — all considered safe havens — rose.
After a tricky few months following policy uncertainty sparked by the Trump administration, the U.S. dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of major peers, was 0.36% higher.
The Swiss franc and Japanese yen both climbed against the dollar earlier Friday, but were broadly unchanged by 6:50 a.m. London time.
Oil prices soar
The most dramatic market reaction was seen in oil, as investors worried about retaliation from Iran and potential oil supply disruption.
Crude futures jumped as much as 13% following the airstrike, setting them on course for their largest single-day gains since 2020.
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
Brent crude
U.S. West Texas Intermediate was trading 7% higher at 7:48 a.m. London time at $72.76 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent surged 6.8% to $74.04 per barrel, both off earlier highs.
“Looking forward, the focus is now shifting to what form Iran’s retaliation might take. It’s also unclear whether talks between the US and Iran over their nuclear programme will continue,” the Deutsche Bank strategists added.