Connect with us

Published

on

Space is becoming increasingly filled with human-made things. Most of these objects you would expect to find in space, such as functioning spacecraft, astronaut gear or free-floating space junk. But there are also a few peculiar items that humans have put into space — and not always on purpose. 

From dinosaur bones and a giant disco ball, to musical instruments and a gorilla suit, here are 15 of the weirdest things humans have sent to space.A Tesla and its “astronaut” driver 

A camera shows SpaceX’s Starman mannequin and Elon Musk’s Tesla Roadster as they fly above Earth. (Image credit: SpaceX)

On Feb. 6, 2018, SpaceX launched company founder Elon Musk’s very own cherry-red Tesla Roadster into space after the billionaire opted to use the car and its spacesuit-clad dummy passenger, known as “Starman,” as the test payload on the maiden mission of the Falcon Heavy rocket.

The Starman-carrying Tesla was originally intended to be put into orbit around Mars, which sparked fears that the car could become a potential biothreat that might contaminate the planet if it ever fell to the surface. But the vehicle massively overshot the Red Planet and is now stuck in an orbit around the sun, which takes around 557 days to complete.

You can track the car and its passenger in real time on the website whereisroadster.com. As of May 2023, the Tesla had completed around 3.4 orbits around the sun and traveled more than 2.5 billion miles (4 billion kilometers). This means the car has exceeded its warranty by more than 73,000 times.

Starman has long stopped beaming images back to Earth, but astronomers predict that the passenger and car are likely to have sustained significant damage. Maintenance hole covers (via atomic blasts) 

The testing site in Navada used during Operation Plumbbob. (Image credit: NNSA)

Between May 28 and Oct. 7, 1957, the U.S. military carried out a series of nuclear tests in the Nevada desert in a project known as Operation Plumbbob. The tests included 29 nuclear detonations, two of which, known as Pascal-A and Pascal-B, were carried out underground, to test if nuclear fallout could be contained.

Pascal-A was carried out July 26, 1957, when an atomic bomb detonated at the bottom of a 500-foot-deep (152 meters) hole, which was covered by a 4-inch-thick (10 centimeters) iron cover. The force of the explosion “inevitably” blew the maintenance hole into the sky, Robert Brownlee, an astrophysicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and lead scientist of the Pascal tests, told Business Insider before his death in 2018. Brownlee had expected that the cover would land back on Earth, but it was never recovered.

To further test what happened to the maintenance hole, Brownlee repeated the experiment on Aug. 27, 1957. This time, for Pascal-B, Brownlee recorded the experiment with a camera that shot one frame per millisecond, which revealed the cover could have reached a top speed of 125,000 mph (201,000 km/h). That speed is around five times the escape velocity of Earth, suggesting that both maintenance holes likely made it into space. It also makes the steel circles a candidate for the fastest human-made objects ever created.Presidential hair (eventually) 

Celestis’ Goddard Flight rocket takes off on May 20, 2011. (Image credit: Celestis)

On President’s Day 2023 (Feb. 20), Celestis, a Texas-based company that specializes in space burials, announced that it would be putting locks of former presidents’ hair on board the upcoming “Enterprise” mission, which is scheduled to launch from Cape Canaveral, Florida. 

Genetically verified hair samples from George Washington, John F. Kennedy, Dwight D. Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan will be included on the Enterprise spacecraft, along with the remains of others, including some of the cremated remains of “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry, who already had some of his ashes transported into space aboard Celestis’ first flight in 1997.

The spacecraft will eventually end up beyond the outer reaches of the solar system.A giant disco ball 

The Humanity Star on display before being sent into space. (Image credit: Rocket Lab)

On Jan. 21, 2018, American aerospace manufacturer Rocket Lab secretly launched a massive multisided mirror into space aboard one of the company’s test flights.

The unusual object, which was dubbed the “Humanity Star,” was around 3 feet (1 m) wide and had 65 reflective panels on its surface. It rapidly rotated in orbit around Earth and reflected enough sunlight to Earth’s surface to be visible to the naked eye. The shiny satellite was designed to be “a bright symbol and reminder to all on Earth about our fragile place in the universe.”

However, the giant disco ball’s time in space was short-lived. It reentered Earth’s atmosphere on March 22, two months after it launched and around seven months earlier than expected, according to The Atlantic.

The Humanity Star is not the first disco ball to be launched into space. The Starshine project, which was run by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, launched three similar objects into space between 1999 and 2001, each of which stayed in orbit for more than a year; Japan also launched a mirror-covered satellite, called Ajisai, in August 1986, which is still in Earth orbit today, according to Live Science’s sister site Space.com.A sketched penis (possibly) 

The “Moon Museum” plaque that supposedly ended up on the moon. (Image credit: MoMA/Various Artists)

The artist Andy Warhol drew a rather crude sketch that may or may not have ended up on the moon.

The doodle was one of six included on a tiny ceramic tile known as “Moon Museum,” which was the brainchild of sculptor Forrest Myers, who petitioned NASA to place the tile on the moon. Myers’ request was denied, but the sculptor supposedly contacted scientists from Bell Laboratories, who secretly attached the tile to the Apollo 12 lunar lander, which currently sits on the moon, according to The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). However, this story has never been officially confirmed.

Warhol claimed that the sketch is actually just his initials, but we’ll let you decide for yourself. Various Lego pieces 

Japanese astronaut Satoshi Furukawa with his ISS model in 2012. (Image credit: NASA)

Lego has a long history with space. The building kits can help youngsters (and youngsters at heart) build replicas of real-life rockets. But the famous plastic pieces have also made their way into space and have even made their home in the spacecraft they are modeled on.

In 2012, Japanese astronaut Satoshi Furukawa built a to-scale version of the International Space Station (ISS) during his stay on the station. It took him more than two hours to build the model, which is quite impressive considering the lack of gravity. 

In 2019, the Lego company also sent a model of a conceptual future lunar base to the boundary of space by attaching it to a specialized balloon.

Additionally, there are three custom Lego figurines currently circling Jupiter on board NASA’s Juno probe, which was launched in 2011 to reveal insight into the gas giant and its moons. The figurines depict the Roman gods Juno and Jupiter, as well as Galileo Galilei, who discovered Jupiter’s four largest moons.Jeff Bezos (and other civilians) 

Jeff Bezos photographed in front of Blue Origin’s New Sheppard rocket. (Image credit: Blue Origin)

We’re not trying to call Jeff Bezos a weirdo by including him on this list; the strange thing about his journey into space is that the group he traveled with was the first all-civilian crew to complete a suborbital flight.

On July 20, 2021, Bezos — along with pioneering aviator Wally Funk, physics student Oliver Daemen and Bezos’ younger brother Mark — blasted off on Blue Origin’s New Shepard rocket from the company’s launch site in West Texas. The flight lasted only around 10 minutes, but the crew’s capsule did make it past the Kármán line — the boundary between Earth’s atmosphere and outer space, which lies around 62 miles (100 km) above sea level — before gently falling back to Earth.

However, there is some debate as to whether Bezos and the other civilian crewmembers can actually be considered astronauts. Some experts argue that the crew’s minimal flight training and lack of expertise exclude them from earning this title, which others must work much harder to achieve. Dinosaur bones 

A Dromaeosaurus skeleton dating to 75 million years ago. (Image credit: Canadian Museum of Nature)

Bezos and company are not the only oddities that Blue Origin has sent into space. On May 20, 2021, the company also launched nearly 200 individual dinosaur bone fragments on another New Shepard rocket.

The bones, which date to between 66 million and 70 million years ago, likely belonged to Dromaeosaurus, a bird-like raptor that was around 7 feet (2 m) long and 2 feet (0.6 m) high at the hip, Space.com reported. The bones were auctioned off upon their return to Earth to raise money for charity.

But these fragments were not the first dinosaur bones to be sent to space. In 1985, a piece of a vertebra and an eggshell from a baby Maiasaura were flown on NASA’s space shuttle Challenger. And in 1998, a 210-million-year-old Coelophysis skull flew on Challenger’s successor, space shuttle Endeavour. Parts of a Tyrannosaurus rex were also launched on the first test flight of NASA’s Orion spacecraft in 2014, according to Space.com.Tardigrades 

A tardigrade viewed under the microscope. (Image credit: Nature in Stock / Alamy Stock Photo)

Lots of different animals have been sent into space. Some of these you probably already know about, such as dogs, apes, monkeys and rodents. But lots of other creatures have made it into space, including cats, frogs, fruit flies, tortoises, fish and jellyfish.

However, the weirdest animals to be sent to space are arguably tardigrades, also known as water bears, which are renowned for being able to survive extreme conditions. In 2007, they also became the first animals to survive direct exposure to space when they were strapped to the outside of the Russian Foton-M3 spacecraft as it orbited Earth for 12 days, according to the European Space Agency. 

A follow-up paper, published 2008 in the journal Current Biology, revealed that 68% of the tardigrades managed to survive direct exposure to space, despite the extreme cold, dehydration and bombardment by cosmic radiation.A gorilla suit 

Astronaut Scott Kelly wearing a gorilla suit on the ISS. (Image credit: NASA)

Astronauts also seem to enjoy dressing up as animals in space.

In 2016, retired astronaut and current U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly smuggled a full-body gorilla suit to his identical twin Scott while he was staying on board the ISS. This resulted in a viral video, in which Scott surprised and chased British astronaut Tim Peake through the ISS modules (although Peake later admitted to being in on the joke).

Mark Kelly had originally tried to smuggle a gorilla suit to Scott in 2015, but the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket it was stashed on exploded in a ball of flames shortly after liftoff.Luke Skywalker’s lightsaber 

Astronaut Jim Reilly poses with Luke Skywalker’s lightsaber and R2D2 before taking the famous prop into space. (Image credit: NASA)

The original Star Wars trilogy, released between 1977 and 1983, is widely credited for inspiring an entire generation of astronauts and space scientists. So it is fitting that one of the movies’ most famous props — Luke Skywalker’s lightsaber — would eventually end up in space.

The lightsaber was launched into space in 2007 with a team of astronauts who delivered and assembled the Harmony module (aka Node 2) to the ISS. The launch coincided with the 30th anniversary of the first Star Wars film, “A New Hope,” but the lightsaber is actually Luke’s second laser sword (the green one), which featured in the third film, “Return of the Jedi.”

Luke’s lightsaber isn’t the only Star Wars memorabilia to have been sent into space. In 2017, as part of the marketing for “The Last Jedi” — the second film in the newest trilogy — Disney arranged for a replica of the spherical orange droid BB-8 to be sent to the ISS for the astronauts to play with, Space.com reported.Pizza delivery 

Pizza Hut also had its logo put on several Russian rockets in the early 2000s.  (Image credit: NASA)

In 2001, Pizza Hut became the first company to deliver food to space when it sent a pizza to the ISS on board a resupply rocket. The recipient of the pizza was Yuri Usachov, who was filmed eating the tasty treat along with other Russian cosmonauts.

The record-breaking delivery was a shameless marketing ploy, which cost the company more than $1 million ($1.7 million in today’s dollars). But the chefs who cooked the pizza still had to make some special considerations for its unusual journey: Extra seasoning was added to the food because astronauts can lose their sense of taste in space, and salami was used instead of pepperoni because it had a longer shelf life and the pizza had to be prepared well in advance of the launch, the BBC reported at the time.

Interestingly, NASA astronauts aboard the ISS at the time were forbidden from eating the pizza because of the agency’s strict rules on corporate sponsorships.

The pizza isn’t the only food that has been successfully delivered to the ISS. In December 2021, Uber Eats announced that it had delivered food to the ISS via Japanese entrepreneur and space tourist Yusaku Maezawa, who briefly visited the station, according to CNET. The meal included miso-coated mackerel and chicken with bamboo shoots.Amelia Earhart’s watch 

Amelia Earhart pictured in the cockpit of the Lockheed Electra in 1937. (Image credit: Shutterstock)

Amelia Earhart was a trailblazing aviator who in 1932 famously became the first woman to cross the Atlantic Ocean solo, as well as achieved other significant firsts and broke multiple aviation records. The pioneering pilot was presumed dead in 1937, when her plane was lost as she attempted to circumnavigate the globe. Her plane and body were never found.

Earhart’s story has been an inspiration for many young female aviators and astronauts, including NASA astronaut Shannon Walker, who took Earhart’s personal wristwatch — which Earhart wore on her famous trans-Atlantic flight — with her to the ISS in 2010, according to Experts Watches. (Earhart wore a different watch on her fatal final journey.)Parts of the Wright brothers’ plane 

The Wright flyer photographed on on Dec. 17, 1903. (Image credit: Public Domain)

Continuing with the aviation trend, parts of Orville and Wilbur Wright’s first plane, the Wright Flyer, have also made it into space — on two separate occasions. 

The biplane, which is also known as the Kitty Hawk, is famous for being the first airplane to make a sustained flight with humans aboard, after making four brief flights on Dec. 17, 1903, before being blown over and destroyed. Its longest flight lasted only 59 seconds, during which the plane traveled 852 feet (260 m).

In 1969, Neil Armstrong — the first person to walk on the moon — took parts of the Wright Flyer with him to the moon during NASA’s Apollo 11 mission, Time magazine reported. The fragments, which included four pieces of muslin fabric from the plane’s wing and two pieces of its propeller, were included in Armstrong’s personal preference kit, a small bag of personal belongings that each astronaut could bring onto the lunar module.

And in 2021, another swatch of fabric from the airplane landed on Mars along with NASA’s Perseverance rover and Ingenuity helicopter. The plane part is safely secured beneath the solar panels on Ingenuity, which has since made more than 50 flights on the Red Planet.Musical instruments 

Astronaut Jessica Meir playing the saxophone on the ISS. (Image credit: NASA)

For astronauts living on the ISS, there can be a psychological cost to spending so much time away from Earthly comforts. To overcome these obstacles, several astronauts have taken instruments — including keyboards, guitars, flutes, bells, bagpipes, a saxophone and even a didgeridoo — with them to space. 

For the most part, playing an instrument in space is very similar to playing it on Earth, but microgravity can pose issues. For example, if astronauts play a wind instrument, like the flute, on the ISS, they must keep their feet in loops to stop them from being propelled backward by the air they are blowing out of the instrument, according to NASA.

However, there is also a safety concern with taking instruments, such as guitars, on board the ISS because they are flammable and therefore must be safely stored when not in use. It is also expensive to put instruments into space; it costs around $10,000 per pound ($4,500 per kilogram) of cargo launched.Honorable mention — Zero-G indicators

Among astronauts, it has become a tradition for crews to select an unusual item as their “zero-G indicator,” an object that begins to float around them when gravity lessens. Examples of zero-G indicators include an Einstein doll, Snoopy the dog, Baby Yoda (or Grogu), toy dinosaurs, a planet Earth plushy, a stuffed penguin and a Buzz Lightyear figure, to name a few. 

Continue Reading

Politics

Whitehall officials tried to convince Lord Gove to cover up grooming scandal, he tells Sky News

Published

on

By

Whitehall officials tried to convince Lord Gove to cover up grooming scandal, he tells Sky News

Whitehall officials tried to convince Lord Michael Gove to go to court to cover up details of a report into the grooming scandal in 2011, he has said, confirming Sky News reporting earlier this week.

Speaking to Sky’s Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge, the former senior cabinet minister said it is “undoubtedly the case that more should have been done” to prevent the abuse of young girls in Britain, admitting that it weighs on him.

The allegations of an attempted cover-up were first made to Sky News by former Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings in an interview with Sky News, and the claims were substantiated by other sources as well. Mr Cummings was working for Lord Gove, who was then education secretary.

Politics latest: Badenoch says UK should ‘support Israel’

Lord Gove explained that in 2011, he learned that the late Times journalist Andrew Norfolk, who he described as “a heroic reporter who did more than anyone to initially uncover this scandal”, was seeking to publish details of a report from Rotherham Council about the abuse and grooming of young girls.

He said: “Rotherham Council wanted to stop that happening. They wanted to go to court to prevent him publishing some details, and we in the Department for Education were asked by the council, ‘would we join in, would we be a party to that court action to stop it?’

“And I had to look at the case, advised by Dominic [Cummings] and by others, and there were some within the department, some officials who said, ‘be cautious, don’t allow this to be published, there may be risks for relatives of the victims concerned.”

More on Grooming Gangs

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How Andrew Norfolk exposed grooming gangs

Rotherham Council also argued that publication may pose “risks” to the process of “improving in the way in which it handles” grooming cases, he continued.

The judicial review wanted by officials would have asked a judge to decide about the lawfulness of The Times’ publication plans and the consequences that would flow from this information entering the public domain.

But Lord Gove said: “My view at the time, advised by Dominic and by others within the department, was that it was definitely better for it to be published.”

“So we said to Rotherham, we will join the case, but we’re joining it on the side of the Times and Andrew Norfolk because we believe in transparency.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Attempted grooming scandal cover-up claim

‘Tough questions’ for Whitehall

Lord Gove went on to say that a national inquiry could see some “tough questions” asked of the Home Office about its culture and its interactions with the police.

But those questions will also be posed to two departments he led – the Department for Local Government and the Department of Education, and he said: “I think it’s right that there should be, because the nature and scale of what the victims have endured means that there’s an obligation on all of us who’ve been in any form of elected office to be honest and unsparing in looking at what went on.”

He said he “certainly didn’t have the knowledge at my command that we now do about the widespread nature of this activity”.

‘Not nearly enough’ progress made

Sophy Ridge put to Lord Gove that despite commissioning a report on what was happening to girls in care, and not seeking to block the publication of Andrew Norfolk’s reporting, he still failed to make change.

He replied: “Yes, so it is undoubtedly the case that more should have been done.”

Read more on grooming gangs:
What we do and don’t know from the data
A timeline of the scandal

He admitted that it “absolutely” weighs on him, and that “not nearly enough” progress was made on the protection of vulnerable girls.

“With the benefit of hindsight, I do wish that I had been more vehement in trying to persuade people to take appropriate action,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Key takeaways from the Casey review

Local government ‘sought to deny scale’ of scandal

The now Spectator editor went on to say that there was “pushback, particularly but not exclusively, from those in local government” to subsequent questions about cultural background, and he said “local councillors and others sought to deny the scale of what was happening and particularly, sought to deny questioning about the identity and the background of the perpetrators”.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

He continued: “I think the right thing to do is for everyone to acknowledge that sometimes there were people who were acting from noble motives, who did not want to increase ethnic and racial anxieties, who did not to fan far-right flames, and thought that it was better to step away from the really grim reality of what was going on.

“I can understand that. But ultimately, that didn’t serve anyone. It did not serve the victims.”

The Department for Education and Rotherham Council did not respond when approached for comment earlier this week on the claims first made by Dominic Cummings, revealed by Sky News.

Continue Reading

Politics

MP who introduced assisted dying bill ‘confident’ it will be voted through

Published

on

By

MP who introduced assisted dying bill 'confident' it will be voted through

The politician who introduced the assisted dying bill has said she is “confident” MPs will push it through to the next stage on Friday.

Speaking at a news conference ahead of a Commons vote, Kim Leadbeater said: “I do feel confident we can get through tomorrow successfully.”

If new amendments are voted through on Friday, the bill to give some terminally ill adults the right to end their lives will get closer to becoming law as it will go through to the next stage in the House of Lords.

Politics latest: PM should decide if MPs get vote on military action

Ms Leadbeater, who introduced the bill in October last year, said if MPs do not vote it through on Friday, “it could be another decade before this issue is brought back to parliament”.

But she said there was a “good majority” who voted for the bill at the last major vote, the second reading in November, when MPs voted it through by 330 to 275.

“There might be some small movement in the middle, some people might change their mind or will change their mind the other way,” she said.

More on Assisted Dying

“But fundamentally, I do not anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded.”

A new YouGov poll found 72% of Britons supported the bill as it stands, including 59% of those who say they support assisted dying in principle but oppose it in practice, and 67% were opposed to the principle of euthanasia but are willing to back it in practice.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How will the Assisted Dying Bill work?

Criticism by doctors

The Labour MP was joined by bereaved and terminally ill people at Thursday’s news conference as she made her case for a change in the law.

The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.

Recently, the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Pathologists and the Royal College of Physicians have raised concerns about the bill.

The Royal College of Psychiatrists said the bill, in its current form, did “not meet the needs of patients”.

It has also expressed concern over the shortage of qualified psychiatrists to take part in assisted dying panels.

Read more:
Assisted dying bill does not meet needs of patients, says Royal College of Psychiatrists
Why cancer patient is praying assisted dying bill passes major vote

People in favour of assisted dying demonstrate in Parliament Square. Pic: PA
Image:
People in favour of assisted dying demonstrate in Parliament Square. Pic: PA

But Ms Leadbeater said doctors and psychiatrists have their individual views on assisted dying and royal colleges have, over the years, been neutral because of that.

“My door is open, so if they have got concerns, they can come and speak to me about those concerns,” she said.

“But what I would say is they were very keen that there was psychiatric involvement in the process, and that’s why I included it. And I do think that’s important.”

It appears the country is ready for historic change

On the eve of one of the most important votes this current cohort of MPs will likely ever cast, it was a bold, daring claim to make.

Asked by a reporter at a news conference convened in a hot, crowded room deep inside the parliamentary estate if tomorrow’s assisted dying vote was likely to pass, Kim Leadbeater replied, confidently, yes, her controversial bill would be carried.

It would take a sizeable shift to swing it the other way, and opponents of the bill have been trying very hard to convince wavering MPs to do just that.

This week alone, there have been significant interventions from the Royal Colleges of Psychiatrists and Physicians – two professions that would be at the heart of delivering this end of life care and key in making the life or death decisions.

The setting might have been political, but the message was much less so.

Ms Leadbeater was flanked by supporters with the most compelling, heart-wrenching testimonies.

Each told their own powerful story: of lonely, painful deaths, carefully planned journeys to Switzerland’s Dignitas clinic kept secret from loved ones, and the life limiting deterioration in health and dreading what new misery the next few weeks or months would bring.

It was a powerful reminder to MPs that away from the parliamentary process and bill scrutiny, ultimately, this is what the legislation is all about.

There was a (questionable) assurance from Lord Falconer that the House of Lords would respect the will of the people and the bill will pass through the upper chamber without difficulty.

The timetable is tight, but it appears the country is ready for change – a historic one.

On Friday, MPs will vote on a number of amendments proposed by Ms Leadbeater after months of discussions with the assisted dying committee, made up of MPs both for and against the bill.

At the start of the session they will vote on a person not being eligible for assisted dying if their wish to end their life was substantially motivated by factors such as not wanting to be a burden, a mental disorder, a disability, financial considerations, a lack of access to care, or suicidal ideation.

People opposed to assisted dying demonstrate in Parliament Square. Pic: PA
Image:
People opposed to assisted dying demonstrate in Parliament Square. Pic: PA

The Speaker has indicated he will also choose these amendments for MPs to vote on:

• Supported by Ms Leadbeater – Requiring the government to publish an assessment of palliative and end-of-life care within a year of the bill passing

• Supported by Ms Leadbeater – A person cannot be considered terminally ill solely because they voluntarily stopped eating or drinking

• Not supported by Ms Leadbeater – Disapply the presumption a person has capacity unless the opposite is established

• Not supported by Ms Leadbeater – Prevent section 1 of the NHS Act 2006, which sets out the NHS’ purpose, from being amended by regulations.

Continue Reading

Environment

E-quipment highlight: Cushman Hauler XL long bed LSV

Published

on

By

E-quipment highlight: Cushman Hauler XL long bed LSV

We’ve been big fans of highly capable LSVs for a while here on Electrek, and the newest Cushman Hauler XL ELiTE electric utility vehicle keeps that trend alive with an extra-long, 68.5″ aluminum bed for even more cargo-hauling capability.

The Cushman Hauler XL ELiTE’s truck-like layout, functional dash, and familiar, car-like controls make it easier to operate than an ATV with a trailer, while its 1,200 lb. bed load capacity and 1,600-pound payload capacity (plus 1,500 lb. towing capacity) beat the pants off the classic, 00’s-era Ford Ranger pickup’s 1,140 lb. payload capacity.

The Cushman’s flatbed can be upgraded to add steel drop sides, an aluminum box bed (shown, above) and other custom upfit solutions that enable fleet operators to perfectly tailor the Hauler’s capabilities to their specific needs.

You already know how to drive it


The Hauler XL features a “twin pack” of two 56.7V, 4.2 kWh ELiTE lithium-ion batteries (8.4 kWh total) developed by Samsung SDI. The batteries are expected to be good for between four to eight hours of operation, depending on load, and are backed by a 5-year battery warranty.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

What’s more, the newest Cushman features a technology that’s commonplace in cars and trucks, but still incredibly rare in the world of UTVs: regenerative braking.

“The Hauler XL … is an industry leader in bed size, vehicle rating and bed load capacity,” says Adam Harris, vice president and general manager of Cushman and E-Z-GO. “With our five-year battery warranty and patented E-brake technology, it’s built for the most difficult jobs.”

Cushman lists the Hauler XL’s manufacturer suggested retail price (MSRP) at $19,989, but dealers are advertising new ones for as low as $17,398. For that money you get a day’s worth of silent, emissions-free operation and the previously-mentioned 1,200 lb. bed capacity.

Electrek’s Take


Hauler XL ELiTE; via Cushman.
Hauler XL ELiTE; via Cushman.

Every smart fleet manager eventually asks themselves whether they need a pickup, or a payload. When they ask that question, they’re usually trying to decide between something like a Ford Maverick and an F-150, but with vehicles like the Hauler XL ELiTE, Club Car Urban UTV, or the latest weird thing Micah Toll dredged up on Alibaba, you get the bed and the payload capacity – and you get them both for $20-30,000 less than a conventional pickup.

SOURCE | IMAGES: Cushman, via Equipment World.


Your personalized home solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? You won’t get a single phone call until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending