Connect with us

Published

on

More than 100,000 students are attempting to sue their universities over disruption to their studies because of the pandemic and strike action.

When COVID hit in 2020 much of students’ learning went online, classrooms were shut, and social events cancelled.

Shannon Barnes, who is finishing her final exams at UCL where she studies physiology and is seeking compensation, said: “We were given a kit of weighing scales and an origami microscope and various simplified versions of equipment that you’d have in a lab, week on week we were told to do these simplified experiments from home, one of them was making a cake.

“Having had one year of fully in-person, seeing lecturers, completing practicals, going to tutorials, yet I’m going to come out of with a debt of more than £40,000 or £50,000, it just doesn’t seem right.”

Students who are unhappy with their teaching can complain directly to their university and then the Office for the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIAHE), who received a record number of complaints in 2022, and awarded more than £1 million in compensation.

Now students from over 100 universities are taking part in this “no win no fee” dispute and have joined group cases via StudentGroupClaim.co.uk to seek compensation of up to £5,000.

Shannon Barnes
Image:
Shannon Barnes, UCL student

For international students it could be more due to the higher fees which they paid.

More on Universities

This legal action focuses on students enrolled during the pandemic, along with others who had learning affected by strike action by lecturers from 2018-2022.

The first case to reach court is against University College London (UCL), who say they followed UK government guidance and “ensured that a high-quality academic experience was provided to students”.

They say going to court is premature and want students to go through their internal complaints’ procedure and then the OIAHE.

But lawyers for the students disagree.

Ryan Dunleavy
Image:
Ryan Dunleavy, lawyer representing students

Ryan Dunleavy, a partner from Harcus Parker said: “We’re arguing, like any other consumer and like any other person in this country, that they have article six rights which gives you the right to a fair trial, and we believe that fair trial should be heard in court.”

At the hearing at the High Court, a judge will decide whether the students at UCL are allowed to pursue their claims in court.

If the claim against UCL is allowed to proceed, similar claims will be brought against other universities, therefore the outcome of Wednesday will set a precedent.

Home Office to stop overseas students bringing family to UK in bid to curb migration

‘We are proud of how universities adapted’

It comes amid ongoing industrial action by the University and College Union, who are continuing a marking and assessment boycott over pay and working conditions, leaving many students across the country unclear if they will even graduate this summer.

Universities UK said: “The COVID-19 pandemic threw two years of unprecedented challenge at the higher education sector and our students, and we are proud of how universities adapted and managed in adverse circumstances.

“During some periods of lockdown, universities were not permitted to offer teaching and learning as usual, and instead universities adjusted quickly and creatively to ensure students could learn and graduate.”

Professor Kathleen Armour, Vice-President (Education & Student Experience) at UCL said: “We recognise that for many students, the last few years have been a disruptive and unsettling time.

“During the COVID-19 pandemic, we followed UK government guidance and prioritised the health and safety of our community.

“Our lecturers and support staff worked tirelessly to make our campus and all UCL premises as safe as possible and ensured that a high-quality academic experience was provided to students.

“We have also been fully committed to minimising the impact of industrial action, to ensure students are not academically disadvantaged.”

Continue Reading

UK

‘Loving father’ shot dead in suspected case of mistaken identity prompts appeal for information

Published

on

By

'Loving father' shot dead in suspected case of mistaken identity prompts appeal for information

The family of a father shot dead in a suspected case of mistaken identity in north London have said he “deserves justice” as they appealed for information.

Mahad Abdi Mohamed, 27, died from a gunshot wound to the head in hospital after he was hit with bullets fired from a stolen Mitsubishi Outlander, which was later found burnt out.

Detectives believe those responsible for his murder had set out to hurt someone else in a “pre-meditated and targeted attack” in Waverley Road, Tottenham, at 8.45pm on Thursday 20 March.

Mr Abdi Mohamed’s younger sister, Amal Abdi Mohamed, 23, said he was a “loving father” to his five-year-old son, who “looked up to him like a superhero”, and was planning to get married in the summer.

Mahad Abdi Mohamed with his sister. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Mahad Abdi Mohamed with his sister, Amal Abdi Mohamed. Pic: Met Police

“He was taken away from us through gun violence,” she said.

“A bullet didn’t just take his life, it tore through our family, through our heart, and it’s truly shocking, it’s devastating, and it’s so senseless, because this type of violence should never be normal.

“It should never be something a family ever has to expect, prepare for, or live with.”

More on Crime

Mr Abdi’s 26-year-old friend, with whom he had been breaking his Ramadan fast, was also shot in the leg and was treated in hospital for a wound police said was not life-changing.

The Metropolitan Police arrested four men on suspicion of murder, who have been released on bail pending further investigations.

Detectives are appealing for witnesses who saw a silver Mitsubishi Outlander in the area, which was found burnt out in Runcorn Close, the following morning.

A Mitsubishi was found burnt out. Pic: Met Police
A Mitsubishi was found burnt out the following day. Pic: Met Police
Image:
A Mitsubishi was found burnt out the following day. Pic: Met Police

“This tragic event and Mahad’s death, has had a profound impact on the community and all those who loved him. Someone out there knows what happened. And that person, or people, must come forward,” said Detective Chief Inspector Rebecca Woodsford.

“Regardless of how small you think your information is, please share it with us. It could be the missing link we need to secure justice for Mahad and his family.”

Read more from Sky News:
Government whip quits over Starmer’s welfare cuts
Patrols to protect women and girls from violence at concerts

Compensation scheme for Capture victims announced

‘To stay silent is to be complicit’

Many of Mr Abdi Mohamed’s family members were in tears as they visited the scene of his murder as part of the appeal for information.

“My sweet Mahad was the kind of person who could light up a room without even trying,” said his sister.

“His laugh was so loud, and it still echoes in our memories.”

Ms Abdi Mohamed said her brother “was funny, he was honest, and overall he was just a good man” but “wasn’t perfect”.

She said he had “made mistakes but turned his life around” working at Waterloo Station, and part-time at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and Royal Ascot as a security guard.

Mr Abdi Mohamed with his mother Zahra Ali Seef. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Mr Abdi Mohamed with his mother, Zahra Ali Seef. Pic: Met Police

“How do you look at a child who adored him day and night, and tell them that he’s gone and you don’t have the answers why? That boy will have to grow up with no dad,” she said.

“If you think you may know anything or have seen anything – you may think it doesn’t matter, but it might be the key to giving us an answer, and it might be the thing that finally lets our family take a breath.

“To stay silent is to be complicit.

“To stay silent is to let a grieving mother suffer in confusion. To stay silent is to let a little boy grow up not knowing what happened to his father.

“If you know something and you haven’t come forward, please think about that. Think about a family that cannot begin to heal because the truth is still hiding in the shadows. My brother deserves better. He deserves justice.”

Continue Reading

UK

Post Office Capture scandal: Sir Alan Bates calls for those responsible for wrongful convictions to be ‘brought to account’

Published

on

By

Post Office Capture scandal: Sir Alan Bates calls for those responsible for wrongful convictions to be 'brought to account'

Sir Alan Bates has called for those responsible for the wrongful convictions of sub postmasters in the Capture IT scandal to be “brought to account”.

It comes after Sky News unearthed a report showing Post Office lawyers knew of faults in the software nearly three decades ago.

The documents, found in a garage by a retired computer expert, describe the Capture system as “an accident waiting to happen”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Post Office: The lost ‘Capture’ files

Sir Alan said the Sky News investigation showed “yet another failure of government oversight; another failure of the Post Office board to ensure [the] Post Office recruited senior people competent of bringing in IT systems” and management that was “out of touch with what was going on within its organisation”.

The unearthed Capture report was commissioned by the defence team for sub postmistress Patricia Owen and served on the Post Office in 1998 at her trial.

It described the software as “quite capable of producing absurd gibberish” and concluded “reasonable doubt” existed as to “whether any criminal offence” had taken place.

Ms Owen was found guilty of stealing from her branch and given a suspended prison sentence.

She died in 2003 and her family had always believed the computer expert, who was due to give evidence on the report, “never turned up”.

Pat Owen and husband David
Screengrabs from Adele Robinson i/vs with case study. Family of Pat Owen from Kent who was convicted of 1998 from stealing from her post office branch. Now the Capture IT system is suspected of adding errors to the accounts. 
Source P 175500FR POST OFFICE CAPTURE CASES ROBINSON 0600 VT V2 JJ1
Image:
Patricia Owen (right) was convicted in 1998 of stealing from her post office branch. She died in 2003


Adrian Montagu reached out after seeing a Sky News report earlier this year and said he was actually stood down by the defending barrister with “no reason given”.

The barrister said he had no recollection of the case.

Victims and their lawyers hope the newly found “damning” expert report, which may never have been seen by a jury, could help overturn Capture convictions.

Read more: Post Office scandal redress must not only be fair – it must be fast

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is the Capture scandal?

‘These people have to be brought to account’

Sir Alan, the leading campaigner for victims of the Horizon Post Office scandal, said while “no programme is bug free, why [was the] Post Office allowed to transfer the financial risk from these bugs on to a third party ie the sub postmaster, and why did its lawyers continue with prosecutions seemingly knowing of these system bugs?”

He continued: “Whether it was incompetence or corporate malice, these people have to be brought to account for their actions, be it for Capture or Horizon.”

More than 100 victims have come forward

More than 100 victims, including those who were not convicted but who were affected by the faulty software, have so far come forward.

Capture was used in 2,500 branches between 1992 and 1999, just before Horizon was introduced – which saw hundreds wrongfully convicted.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the body responsible for investigating potential miscarriages of justice, is currently looking at a number of Capture convictions.

A CCRC spokesperson told Sky News: “We have received applications regarding 29 convictions which pre-date Horizon.
25 of these applications are being actively investigated by case review managers, and two more recent applications are in the preparatory stage and will be assigned to case review managers before the end of June.

“We have issued notices under s.17 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995 to Post Office Ltd requiring them to produce all material relating to the applications received.

“To date, POL have provided some material in relation to 17 of the cases and confirmed that they hold no material in relation to another 5. The CCRC is awaiting a response from POL in relation to 6 cases.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade said: “Postmasters negatively affected by Capture endured immeasurable suffering. We continue to listen to those who have been sharing their stories on the Capture system, and have taken their thoughts on board when designing the Capture Redress Scheme.”

Continue Reading

UK

Starmer could allow Trump use of British bases to attack Iran, says Harriet Harman

Published

on

By

Starmer could allow Trump use of British bases to attack Iran, says Harriet Harman

Sir Keir Starmer could end up allowing Donald Trump to use British bases to launch strikes on Iran, Harriet Harman has said.

Speaking to Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Baroness Harman said this was despite the prime minister being part of a generation “shaped” by opposition to the Iraq War.

👉Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app👈

Baroness Harman was solicitor general when Sir Tony Blair decided to take Britain to war in Iraq alongside the United States in 2003.

She said the decisions made by Sir Tony would be “burning bright” in Sir Keir‘s mind.

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair (left) and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer discuss politics during the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change's Future of Britain Conference in central London. Picture date: Tuesday July 18, 2023.
Image:
Tony Blair’s decision to go to war in Iraq will be ‘burning bright’ in the PM’s mind, Baroness Harman said. Pic: PA

“He’s part of the political generation of the Labour Party that grew up, which was shaped by its opposition to what Tony Blair was doing in relation to Iraq,” Baroness Harman said.

“So it would be a massive change for him.”

More on Donald Trump

Asked if the UK could end up giving permission for US aircraft to use British military bases on Cyprus and Diego Garcia, but not go any further than that, Baroness Harman said: “Exactly”.

Soldiers guard the security gate of RAF Akrotiri, a British military base in Cyprus, September 30, 2024. REUTERS/Elias Marcou
Image:
Soldiers guard the security gate of RAF Akrotiri, a British military base in Cyprus. File pic: Reuters

Read more:
‘Questions’ on legality of Israel’s actions in Iran
Donald Trump ‘may or may not’ strike Iran

Sky News reported on Thursday that Attorney General Richard Hermer has raised questions over whether Israel’s actions in Iran are lawful, potentially limiting what support he believes the UK could offer the US.

Baroness Harman said that for Sir Keir, the “rules-based international order is the most important thing”.

“If the attorney general says that the government can’t do something because it’s illegal, it can’t do it. So he’s in a very crucial position,” she added.

Harriet Harman (R) told Beth Rigby she thought Sir Keir Starmer's reaction to Liz Saville Roberts was not the way to go
Image:
Harriet Harman (R) with Beth Rigby

But Baroness Harman said it would be difficult for Sir Keir to say “thank you for the trade deal” to Mr Trump and then deny the president use of the airbases.

👉Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app👈

Remember, you can also watch us on YouTube!

Continue Reading

Trending