Rivian shares first undercover look at upcoming smaller R2 SUV
Rivian has been working on its cheaper, smaller R2 platform for some time now, expected to be the “high volume” counterpart to its flagship R1T and R1S. And we just saw our first look at the R2S – albeit undercover.
R2-based vehicles are expected to be more accessible to buyers and enable higher volume production, getting more EVs on the road and helping Rivian with its current primary goal of upping its production capacity. But currently, the R2 isn’t slated to release until 2026, so we’ve got some time to go until we see it.
We hadn’t seen anything yet of the vehicle, but Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe just revealed a small look at the R2S SUV, alongside chief designer Jeff Hammoud. The short video was posted on the company’s Instagram story, in response to customer questions as part of an “Ask Rivian” segment.
Well, sort of anyway. It’s under cover, and it’s just a clay model, but it gives us a sense of the size and shape of the vehicle nonetheless:
It’s not much to go on, but this is the first we’ve seen of the upcoming model, and we can get a sense of a few things from what we see here.
First, it’s smaller. Which was expected, but it’s nice to see confirmation of. In forum posts about the “reveal,” Rivian community members seemed surprised by just how much smaller it is, given that the R1T and R1S are quite large vehicles. But that’s what we were told would happen, and here it is.
Second, it does seem to maintain a pretty similar shape to the R1S. It’s quite boxy, in contrast to the typical egg-shaped small SUVs common across the rest of the segment. It does look like the roof line tapers in from the sides of the vehicles, perhaps moreso than on the R1S, so its front profile may look a little different. But we’re only seeing one angle, so we can’t be as certain of that.
In the background of the video, we saw some Rivian marketing material which seems to show that the R2 will maintain the R1’s striking headlight design. This design was originally controversial on the truck’s reveal but has become a bit of an icon for the company. We’ve seen a brief glimpse of the clay model’s fender in a previous Rivian video (see this article’s featured photo for that), which also confirmed that the R2 headlight design is similar to the R1.
It looks like the R2 will also come with a built-in portable flashlight which stows and charges in a secret pocket in the front door, another feature carried over from the R1.
Finally, Scaringe also answered a question about “tank turn,” a prototype mode which spins the quad-motor powertrain in opposite directions to allow a vehicle to turn in place on soft surfaces. Rivian showed this off as a cool marketing stunt a few years ago and had been planning to release it to the public.
But Scaringe said that Rivian has apparently now decided to shelve those plans. Rivian decided that the mode would be too destructive to trails and doesn’t fit with the company’s ethos to be better stewards of the environment. Though Scaringe didn’t say anything about “front dig mode,” another simpler version of tank turn which Rivian has patented.
Electrek’s Take
The R2 platform could be thought of as the “Model Y” compared to the R1’s “Model X.” A smaller and less expensive model designed for higher production numbers, in what is currently the most popular vehicle segment.
And we’ve recently gotten some news about how well that is going, with the Model Y becoming the world’s top-selling vehicle. This isn’t to say that Rivian will achieve the same feat – and they’re years behind Tesla in that respect anyway – but it does show the difference in potential volumes between these segments.
As for what we’ve seen of the R2 today, readers may know that I’m a fan of smaller vehicles (I drive a 2,800lb, two-seat Roadster after all), so this seems like an improvement to me. As much as I love Rivian and think the company is doing a great job (and we at Electrek love their vehicles), I do think we need to turn towards smaller vehicles as a society. The R2 doesn’t quite get us there, but it’s headed in the right direction at least.
So when people are surprised at how much smaller the R2 looks than the R1, well, that’s just a bonus for me.
And while I understand the egg shape (it’s about efficiency, which is important), it does get a little old sometimes to see almost every SUV – and indeed, almost every car, since SUV sales are (unfortunately) through the roof these days – with the exact same profile. As long as Rivian can keep the R2 from being too inefficient compared to competing vehicles, I’m glad it’s sticking with bolder lines to differentiate itself from basically everything else in the segment.
What do you think about what we’ve seen of the R2 today? Let us know in the comments.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
The latest hybrid telehandler from New Holland packs a range-extending combustion engine to boost its battery power during longer shifts – but it doesn’t run on gas or diesel. Instead, this farm-friendly machine is built to run on METHANE.
By collecting pig, cow, or poultry waste (poop), silage waste (corn husks and grass clippings), and food waste from composting and putting into a manure digester, farmers can generate valuable biogas – a renewable, low-carbon fuel that can be burned for heat, electricity, or used as fuel. And because large farming operations can produce huge amounts of biogas at an incredibly low cost compared to conventional grid and fuel costs, any machine that can run on biogas is going to have a real total cost of ownership (TCO) advantage.
Biogas generator
CASE and New Holland (collectively, CNH) understands its customers’ desire to put that biogas to good use. They also understand that nothing is quite as efficient as battery-electric power, though; but big farms have weird duty cycles: 4-6 hour shifts most of the year, then critical, un-skippable, non-negotiable round-the-clock running during harvest.
That need to run 24 hour shifts limits the appeal of pure electric machines, and has led to companies like ZQUIP developing power-agnostic modules that swap-out, power tool-style, to keep the machines going. With its new methane hybrid, New Holland is going a more recognizable EREV and hybrid route.
“With this prototype, New Holland shows its continuous commitment to the ‘Clean Energy Leader‘ strategy, building on our leadership in alternative fuel machines,” says Marco Gerbi, New Holland T4 and T5 tractor, loader and telehandler product management. “Our aim is to help our customers boost farm productivity and profitability by broadening our range of alternative fuel machines that do not compromise efficiency or productivity yet help to minimize agriculture’s carbon footprint.”
Primarily driven by a 70 kWh lithium-ion battery, the telehandler uses a methane-fueled version of Fiat Powertrain’s four-cylinder F28 engine as a range-extending backup whenever jobs demand more uptime. On the energy stored in the battery alone, New Holland says the machine can handle a full day’s worth of typical farm work — roughly a “350-day duty cycle,” and it can recharge from the grid, a biogas generator, or even rooftop (barntop?) solar.
It’s still just a prototype, but New Holland claims the hybrid setup cuts fuel use by up to 70% compared to a conventional diesel telehandler while delivering 30% better performance and uptime for its operators.
No word yet on availability and pricing.
New Holland methane hybrid gallery
SOURCE | IMAGES: CNH, via Equipment World.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Elon Musk’s Boring Company has work crew in Nashville walk off job over unpaid bills and safety
The Boring Company, Elon Musk’s tunneling startup, is reportedly facing significant issues with its new project in Nashville, Tennessee. A key subcontractor has walked off the job, alleging that the company has failed to pay for work completed on the “Music City Loop,” claiming they have received only 5% of what they are owed.
We have been following The Boring Company’s expansion efforts closely.
After the relative success of the Las Vegas Loop and several projects that failed to materialize, it looked like the company was winding down until a new proposal in Nashville gained some momentum.
However, a new report from the Nashville Banner indicates that the project is hitting a major wall.
Shane Trucking and Excavating, a local contractor hired to handle preliminary work for the tunnel project, pulled its workers off the site this Monday. William Shane, the owner of the company, told the Banner that The Boring Company has “ghosted” them and failed to pay invoices totaling in the six figures.
According to Shane, the payment terms were initially set for every 15 days, then unilaterally switched to 60 days. Now, he claims it has been over 120 days since they broke ground, and his company has received only a fraction of the payment due.
“We were really skeptical from the beginning, and then since then, things pretty much just went downhill,” Shane said.
The contractor was reportedly responsible for preparing the launch pad for “Prufrock,” The Boring Company’s proprietary tunnel boring machine (TBM). We previously reported on Prufrock’s capabilities, with the company claiming it can dig tunnels significantly faster than conventional machines, supposedly porpoising directly from the surface to avoid digging expensive launch pits.
If the launch pad isn’t finished because the excavator wasn’t paid, Prufrock isn’t digging anywhere.
This isn’t the first time we’ve heard of payment issues involving Musk-led companies. Tesla has been known to not pay its bills, leading to small companies going bankrupt.
As The Boring Company was stiffing Shane on the bills, the company tried to poach workers from its own contractor and lied about it:
“One of their head guys texts two of my welders, offering them a job for $45 an hour from his work phone,” Shane described, noting that the same TBC employee denied sending the texts when confronted with screenshots. “That’s actually a breach of contract.”
On top of the missed payments, Shane alleges serious safety concerns. They made several official complaints to OSHA:
“Where we’re digging, we’re so far down, there should be concrete and different structures like that to hold the slope back from falling on you while you’re working. Where most people use concrete, they currently have — I’m not even kidding — they currently have wood. They had us install wood 2x12s.”
The Boring Company Vice President David Buss blamed missed payments on “invoicing errors” in a statement to the Banner:
“It does look like we had some invoicing errors on that. It was, you know, unfortunately, too common of a thing, but I assured them that we are going to make sure that invoices are wired tomorrow.”
He also said that he would look into the poaching allegations, but added that he is not aware of any OSHA complaints.
The “Music City Loop” was pitched as a solution to connect downtown Nashville to the airport, a route that is notoriously congested.
The Boring Company claims it can complete the project without public money, but there are some obvious issues with its financing.
Electrek’s Take
I’ve been willing to give them the benefit of the doubt on the “Loop” concept. While it falls short of the original “autonomous pods” vision or the “Hyperloop” speed dreams, the system in Las Vegas does work to move people, even if it is just Teslas in tunnels driven by humans.
There’s just no evidence that it would be more efficient than any other public transit system.
When Musk launched The Boring Company’s first test tunnel in LA, I asked him if he had any simulations showing his “loop” system to be more efficient. He said that they were working on that. That was 7 years ago.
Therefore, while The Boring Company appears to have achieved marginal improvements in tunnel boring, mainly when it comes to smaller tunnels; it has yet to show clear evidence that its Loop system is a better solution than any other public transit system.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment3 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024