Connect with us

Published

on

The Cabinet Office is seeking a judicial review of Baroness Hallett’s order to release Boris Johnson’s WhatsApp messages, diaries and notebooks, it confirmed in a letter to the COVID inquiry.

The government department said it was bringing a judicial review challenge “with regret” – but added that there were “important issues of principle at stake”.

Despite the development, it said it would “continue to co-operate fully with the inquiry before, during and after the jurisdictional issue in question”.

The legal action comes after days of wrangling in which the government hesitated over handing the tranche of documents to the public inquiry over fears it would compromise ministers’ and other individuals’ right to privacy.

Outlining its refusal to hand over the material in its letter, the Cabinet Office again questioned whether it had “the power to compel production of documents and messages which are unambiguously irrelevant to the inquiry’s work”.

COVID legal challenge ‘desperate attempt to withhold evidence – politics latest

Such materials include personal messages and “matters unconnected to the government’s handling of COVID”, it said.

More on Boris Johnson

It argued that requesting “irrelevant” material “represents an unwarranted intrusion into other aspects of the work of government” and that “important issues of principle are at stake here, affecting both the rights of individuals and the proper conduct of government”.

It said it had explored “a number of possible avenues for resolving this difference of opinion”, including offering redacted versions of the materials and “a more focused or sequential approach to the direction of the information requirements”.

“We remain hopeful and willing to agree together the best way forward.”

Inquiry chair Lady Hallett ordered the government to hand over the documents last week without any amendments, using a section 21 notice.

The tranche includes messages sent between former prime minister Mr Johnson and his fellow ministers and advisers during the pandemic, as well as diary entries.

But the Cabinet Office said today that Mr Johnson’s messages did not cover whole period the inquiry wants because he was using a new phone from May 2021.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rishi Sunak gives his response to speculation surrounding Boris Johnson’s messages being given to the COVID inquiry.

A government lawyer said the former prime minister had also swapped his own legal representation recently and gave “specified legal counsel permission to access an electronic record of certain WhatsApps” over the past two days.

Then on Wednesday night, Mr Johnson “invited Cabinet Office to share this information with the inquiry”.

“By working through the night, lawyers acting for Cabinet Office have now completed our review for national security and unambiguously irrelevant material and are in a separate communication providing the relevant material to the inquiry today,” it added/

What is the COVID inquiry asking for?

  • Unredacted messages sent and received by Boris Johnson between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022.
  • Unredacted diaries for Mr Johnson between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022
  • Copies of 24 unredacted notebooks filled in by Mr Johnson between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022
  • Unredacted messages sent and received by adviser Henry Cook between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022.
  • The inquiry wants messages – even from group chats – about the government response to COVID, as well as contact with a list of certain experts, ministers, civil servants and advisers

But the department wanted to note they had “not been able to verify the completeness of this material” given to them by Mr Johnson, saying it did not cover the “whole of the specified time period, but only the period from May 2021 when the former prime minister acquired a new phone”.

It added: “We have asked Boris Johnson if he will provide to us any further messages caught by the Section 21 notice.”

The inquiry confirmed on Thursday afternoon that it had received a response from the Cabinet Office.

In a short statement, it said: “At 4pm today the chair of the UK COVID public inquiry was served a copy of a claim form by the Cabinet Office seeking to commence judicial review proceedings against the chair’s ruling of 22 May 2023.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Cabinet Office has reiterated its refusal to hand over some of Boris Johnson’s WhatsApp messages to the COVID inquiry

Further information will be provided at a preliminary hearing at 10.30am on 6 June, it said.

On Wednesday afternoon, Mr Johnson’s team said all the information the inquiry wanted had been passed to the Cabinet Office.

His spokesman said the ex-prime minister wanted the Cabinet Office to “urgently” hand over the material, in a move that put pressure on Rishi Sunak and the government to hand over the documents.

Responding to the judicial review, Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner accused Mr Sunak of undermining the inquiry and said he was “hopelessly distracted with legal ploys to obstruct the Covid Inquiry in a desperate attempt to withhold evidence”.

Read more:
Boris Johnson hands COVID material to Cabinet Office in ‘full and in unredacted form’
How Boris Johnson was ‘doorstepped’ in US – and the key question he failed to answer

“Instead of digging himself further into a hole by pursuing doomed legal battles to conceal the truth, Rishi Sunak must comply with the Covid Inquiry’s requests for evidence in full. There can be no more excuses.”

Daily Cooper, the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, also criticised the government’s decision, calling it a “kick in the teeth” for bereaved families.

“This cowardly attempt to obstruct a vital public inquiry is a kick in the teeth for bereaved families who’ve already waited far too long for answers.

“The government is delaying the inquiry even further and clogging up court time, all to prevent Sunak and his Conservative colleagues from having to release their messages.”

Continue Reading

World

Putin says ‘all of Ukraine is ours’ and threatens nuclear strike

Published

on

By

Putin says 'all of Ukraine is ours' and threatens nuclear strike

Vladimir Putin has doubled down on his insistence that Russia will not give up any occupied territory as part of peace negotiations with Ukraine.

In an exclusive interview with Sky News Arabia, the Russian president said negotiations need to recognise “the will of the people who live in certain territories”.

Mr Putin was referring to referendums held by Russian officials in 2022 in four annexed regions of Ukraine, and in Crimea.

Those referendums, which were described as “shams” by the UK’s foreign secretary at the time, saw all four regions vote to join Russia.

“The will of the people is what [we] call democracy,” said Mr Putin.

He said that he hopes Ukraine’s leadership will be “guided by national interests” in negotiations, rather than by the “interests of its sponsors”.

Those sponsors, he said, “are not interested in ending the conflict, but in using Ukraine for their own selfish political purposes”.

On Friday, the Russian president told business leaders in St Petersburg: “I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian people to be one nation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Putin pushes hard on Ukraine again

“In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours.”

He also threatened a nuclear strike on Ukraine for the first time in months, promising “catastrophic” consequences if Kyiv used a dirty bomb against Russian forces.

Read more from Sky News:
Regime change in Iran is ‘unacceptable’, says the Kremlin
Thousands watch summer solstice sunrise at Stonehenge
Here’s how to stay cool in the heat

“This would be a colossal mistake on the part of those whom we call neo-Nazis on the territory of today’s Ukraine,” he said.

“It could be their last mistake. We always respond and respond in kind. Therefore, our response will be very tough.

“Ukraine deserves a better fate than being an instrument in the geopolitical struggle of those who strive for confrontation with the Russian Federation.”

On Saturday morning, Russia claimed to have captured a small village named Zaporizhzhia in Ukraine’s Donetsk region.

Ivan Fedorov, head of the Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration, posted on Telegram saying that more than 200 Russian UAVs targeted the region on Friday.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv was now in talks with Denmark, Norway, Germany, Canada, the UK and Lithuania to start joint weapons production.

He urged Kyiv’s partners to provide 0.25% of their GDP to finance the production of Ukraine’s weapons.

Continue Reading

World

US warplanes transit through UK as Trump considers striking Iran

Published

on

By

US warplanes transit through UK as Trump considers striking Iran

Flight tracking data shows extensive movement of US military aircraft towards the Middle East in recent days, including via the UK.

Fifty-two US military planes were spotted flying over the eastern Mediterranean towards the Middle East between Monday and Thursday.

That includes at least 25 that passed through Chania airport, on the Greek island of Crete – an eight-fold increase in the rate of arrivals compared to the first half of June.

The movement of military equipment comes as the US considers whether to assist Israel in its conflict with Iran.

Of the 52 planes spotted over the eastern Mediterranean, 32 are used for transporting troops or cargo, 18 are used for mid-air refuelling and two are reconnaissance planes.

Forbes McKenzie, founder of McKenzie Intelligence, says that this indicates “the build-up of warfighting capability, which was not [in the region] before”.

Sky’s data does not include fighter jets, which typically fly without publicly revealing their location.

An air traffic control recording from Wednesday suggests that F-22 Raptors are among the planes being sent across the Atlantic, while 12 F-35 fighter jets were photographed travelling from the UK to the Middle East on Wednesday.

A US air tanker seen flying over England, accompanied by F-35 jets. Credit: Instagram/g.lockaviation
Image:
A US air tanker seen flying over Suffolk, accompanied by F-35 jets. Pic: Instagram/g.lockaviation

Many US military planes are passing through UK

A growing number of US Air Force planes have been passing through the UK in recent days.

Analysis of flight tracking data at three key air bases in the UK shows 63 US military flights landing between 16 and 19 June – more than double the rate of arrivals earlier in June.

On Thursday, Sky News filmed three US military C-17A Globemaster III transport aircraft and a C-130 Hercules military cargo plane arriving at Glasgow’s Prestwick Airport.

Flight tracking data shows that one of the planes arrived from an air base in Jordan, having earlier travelled there from Germany.

What does Israel need from US?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on 15 March that his country’s aim is to remove “two existential threats – the nuclear threat and the ballistic missile threat”.

Israel says that Iran is attempting to develop a nuclear bomb, though Iran says its nuclear facilities are only for civilian energy purposes.

A US intelligence assessment in March concluded that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. President Trump dismissed the assessment on Tuesday, saying: “I think they were very close to having one.”

Forbes McKenzie says the Americans have a “very similar inventory of weapons systems” to the Israelis, “but of course, they also have the much-talked-about GBU-57”.

A GBU-57, or the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb, at Whiteman Air Base in Missouri. in 2023. File pic: US Air Force via AP
Image:
A GBU-57, or the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb, at Whiteman Air Base in Missouri in 2023. File pic: US Air Force via AP

The GBU-57 is a 30,000lb bomb – the largest non-nuclear bomb in existence. Mr McKenzie explains that it is “specifically designed to destroy targets which are very deep underground”.

Experts say it is the only weapon with any chance of destroying Iran’s main enrichment site, which is located underneath a mountain at Fordow.

Map showing the Fordow enrichment plant
Image:
Map showing the Fordow enrichment plant

Air-to-air refuelling could allow Israel to carry larger bombs

Among the dozens of US aircraft that Sky News tracked over the eastern Mediterranean in recent days, more than a third (18 planes) were designed for air-to-air refuelling.

“These are crucial because Israel is the best part of a thousand miles away from Iran,” says Sky News military analyst Sean Bell.

“Most military fighter jets would struggle to do those 2,000-mile round trips and have enough combat fuel.”

The ability to refuel mid-flight would also allow Israeli planes to carry heavier munitions, including bunker-buster bombs necessary to destroy the tunnels and silos where Iran stores many of its missiles.

Satellite imagery captured on 15 June shows the aftermath of Israeli strikes on a missile facility near the western city of Kermanshah, which destroyed at least 12 buildings at the site.

Destroyed buildings at entrance to Kermanshah missile facility, Iran, 15 June 2025. Pic: Maxar
Image:
Seven of the 12 destroyed buildings at Kermanshah missile facility, Iran, 15 June 2025. Pic: Maxar

At least four tunnel entrances were also damaged in the strikes, two of which can be seen in the image below.

Damaged tunnel entrances at Kermanshah missile facility, Iran, 15 June 2025. Pic: Maxar
Image:
Damaged tunnel entrances at Kermanshah missile facility, Iran, 15 June 2025. Pic: Maxar

Writing for Jane’s Defence Weekly, military analyst Jeremy Binnie says it looked like the tunnels were “targeted using guided munitions coming in at angles, not destroyed from above using penetrator bombs, raising the possibility that the damage can be cleared, enabling any [missile launchers] trapped inside to deploy”.

“This might reflect the limited payloads that Israeli aircraft can carry to Iran,” he adds.

Penetrator bombs, also known as bunker-busters, are much heavier than other types of munitions and as a result require more fuel to transport.

Israel does not have the latest generation of refuelling aircraft, Mr Binnie says, meaning it is likely to struggle to deploy a significant number of penetrator bombs.

Israel has struck most of Iran’s western missile bases

Even without direct US assistance, the Israeli air force has managed to inflict significant damage on Iran’s missile launch capacity.

Sky News has confirmed Israeli strikes on at least five of Iran’s six known missile bases in the west of the country.

On Monday, the IDF said that its strategy of targeting western launch sites had forced Iran to rely on its bases in the centre of the country, such as Isfahan – around 1,500km (930 miles) from Israel.

Among Iran’s most advanced weapons are three types of solid-fuelled rockets fitted with highly manoeuvrable warheads: Fattah-1, Kheibar Shekan and Haj Qassam.

The use of solid fuel makes these missiles easy to transport and fast to launch, while their manoeuvrable warheads make them better at evading Israeli air defences. However, none of them are capable of striking Israel from such a distance.

Iran is known to possess five types of missile capable of travelling more than 1,500km, but only one of these uses solid fuel – the Sijjil-1.

On 18 June, Iran claimed to have used this missile against Israel for the first time.

Iran’s missiles have caused significant damage

Iran’s missile attacks have killed at least 24 people in Israel and wounded hundreds, according to the Israeli foreign ministry.

The number of air raid alerts in Israel has topped 1,000 every day since the start of hostilities, reaching a peak of 3,024 on 15 June.

Iran has managed to strike some government buildings, including one in the city of Haifa on Friday.

And on 13 June, in Iran’s most notable targeting success so far, an Iranian missile impacted on or near the headquarters of Israel’s defence ministry in Tel Aviv.

Most of the Iranian strikes verified by Sky News, however, have hit civilian targets. These include residential buildings, a school and a university.

On Thursday, one missile hit the Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba, southern Israel’s main hospital. More than 70 people were injured, according to Israel’s health ministry.

Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said that Iran had struck a nearby technology park containing an IDF cyber defence training centre, and that the “blast wave caused superficial damage to a small section” of the hospital.

However, the technology park is in fact 1.2km away from where the missile struck.

Photos of the hospital show evidence of a direct hit, with a large section of one building’s roof completely destroyed.

A general view of Soroka  hospital following a missile strike from Iran on Israel.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
A general view of Soroka hospital following a missile strike from Iran on Israel.
Pic: Reuters

Iran successfully struck the technology park on Friday, though its missile fell in an open area, causing damage to a nearby residential building but no casualties.

Israel has killed much of Iran’s military leadership

It’s not clear exactly how many people Israel’s strikes in Iran have killed, or how many are civilians. Estimates by human rights groups of the total number of fatalities exceed 600.

What is clear is that among the military personnel killed are many key figures in the Iranian armed forces, including the military’s chief of staff, deputy head of intelligence and deputy head of operations.

Key figures in the powerful Revolutionary Guard have also been killed, including the militia’s commander-in-chief, its aerospace force commander and its air defences commander.

On Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that US assistance was not necessary for Israel to win the war.

“We will achieve all our objectives and hit all of their nuclear facilities,” he said. “We have the capability to do that.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How close is Iran to producing a nuclear weapon?

Forbes McKenzie says that while Israel has secured significant victories in the war so far, “they only have so much fuel, they only have so many munitions”.

“The Americans have an ability to keep up the pace of operations that the Israelis have started, and they’re able to do it for an indefinite period of time.”

Additional reporting by data journalist Joely Santa Cruz and OSINT producers Freya Gibson, Lina-Sirine Zitout and Sam Doak.


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Continue Reading

World

Putin says ‘Ukraine is ours’ and threatens nuclear strike – showing how he feels about Trump

Published

on

By

Putin says 'Ukraine is ours' and threatens nuclear strike - showing how he feels about Trump

He may have been speaking at an economic forum, but that didn’t stop Vladimir Putin from issuing his most hawkish comments on Ukraine in a very long time.

During a Q&A at Russia’s flagship investment event in St Petersburg, the Kremlin leader was asked what his end game was in the conflict.

He replied: “I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian people to be one nation. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours.”

The answer received rapturous applause from an auditorium full of fawning politicians and business figures.

And there was more.

“There is an old rule,” he said. “‘Where a Russian soldier sets foot, that is ours’.”

In short, he was saying that he wants the whole lot.

More on Russia

Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks at the St. Petersburg International Econimic Forum. Pic: AP
Image:
Putin’s comments were his most hawkish in a long time. Pic: AP

The comments came as a surprise because they are in sharp contrast to the Kremlin’s recent rhetoric.

Ever since Donald Trump began his push for a peace deal, Moscow has adopted a softer tone, more conciliatory – in an apparent attempt to show Washington that it is interested in a settlement.

But there was none of that kind of language here. Quite the opposite.

The Russian president even, for the first time in months, threatened a nuclear strike on Ukraine.

Asked how Moscow would respond if Kyiv used a dirty bomb against Russian forces, he promised “catastrophic” consequences for his enemy.

“This would be a colossal mistake on the part of those whom we call neo-Nazis on the territory of today’s Ukraine,” he said. “It could be their last mistake.

“We always respond and respond in kind. Therefore, our response will be very tough.”

Read more:
Iran regime change is ‘unacceptable’, says the Kremlin

Western brands on Russian shelves despite sanctions

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

The Kremlin’s nuclear sabre-rattling was an almost weekly feature during the last days of the Biden administration, but the sabres stilled when Mr Trump came to power.

But now, all of a sudden, he’s returned to it.

A firefighter works at the site of a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Odesa, Ukraine June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Nina Li
Image:
The aftermath of a Russian drone strike on Odesa, Ukraine. Pic: Reuters

It felt like a very deliberate message from Vladimir Putin that, despite peace talks, Russia has no intention of backing down, neither on the battlefield nor at the negotiating table.

I think it shows that Moscow is not too worried about upsetting Donald Trump.

The American leader appears to have distanced himself from trying to mediate the conflict, but still seems to be pursuing warmer ties with Moscow.

So I think these comments also show how confident Putin is that things are going his way.

Continue Reading

Trending