Connect with us

Published

on

The chair of the COVID inquiry says it is up to her to decide what evidence is “relevant or potentially relevant” amid a legal row with the government over Boris Johnson’s WhatsApp messages.

Baroness Hallett said she refused to withdraw her order for the government to hand over unredacted material for her investigation as she formally opened the COVID inquiry on Tuesday.

It comes just days after the government launched a judicial review over her order to the Cabinet Office that it hand over Mr Johnson’s unredacted WhatsApp messages, diary entries and other documents.

‘We are not arsonists’: Minister defends her Brexit bill – politics latest

The former prime minister has already sent “all unredacted WhatsApps” directly to the inquiry.

Acknowledging the legal battle, Baroness Hallett said: “As has been widely reported in the media, an issue has arisen between the inquiry and the Cabinet Office as to who decides what is relevant or potentially relevant.

“I issued a notice under Section 21 of the Inquiries Act 2005 making it clear that, in my view, it is for the inquiry chair to decide what is relevant or potentially relevant.”

She continued: “The Cabinet Office disagrees, claiming they are not obliged to disclose what they consider to be unambiguously irrelevant material. They invited me to withdraw the Section 21 notice. I declined.

“They are now challenging my decision to decline to withdraw the notice in the High Court by way of judicial review.

“With litigation pending and as the decision-maker, I can make no further comment.”

In its reasoning for launching the judicial review, the government said it had done so with “regret” but that “important issues of principle” were at stake around privacy.

It also questioned whether Baroness Hallett had “the power to compel production of documents and messages which are unambiguously irrelevant to the inquiry’s work”, and argued that requesting such material “represents an unwarranted intrusion into other aspects of the work of government”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Never interview here!’ Johnson’s edict

Ministers have confirmed that they expect an expedited High Court hearing to take place on or shortly after 30 June.

But Mr Johnson decided to bypass the Cabinet Office last week by sending “all unredacted WhatsApps” directly to the COVID inquiry, saying he was “perfectly content” for the material to be inspected.

The former prime minister said he would “like to do the same” with texts that are on an old mobile phone he stopped using due to security concerns in May 2021 – more than a year after the pandemic began.

He said he had asked the government for its help to turn on the device securely to hand over the material.

Hugo Keith KC, a counsel for the inquiry, told Baroness Hallett that Mr Johnson’s unredacted WhatsApp messages and notebooks were going to be compared with redacted copies provided by the Cabinet Office and that the inspection would begin this week.

He said the inspection “will allow your team to make its own assessment as to the redactions applied by the Cabinet Office and to satisfy ourselves and ultimately you of their appropriateness or otherwise”.

Mr Johnson’s locked former phone has also been handed to the government with the hope of obtaining his messages before May 2021, Mr Keith said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

COVID Inquiry: Govt launch legal bid

“Neither Mr Johnson nor the inquiry has the technical expertise to ensure the contents of the phone can be downloaded safely and properly, particularly bearing in mind the overarching need to ensure no damage is done to national security.

“We have therefore agreed that this phone should be provided to the appropriate personnel in government for its contents to be downloaded.

“We have asked the Cabinet Office, in liaison with Mr Johnson and those government personnel, to obtain the phone without delay, to confirm in writing the process by which it will be examined and to give confirmation that it, like the diaries and the notebooks and the WhatsApps, will be accessed fully.

“That is to say, there will be no redactions made to the contents, other than in relation to national security, before we may view it.”

As well as receiving material from Mr Johnson, the inquiry has also received documents with redactions from two other individuals.

It said the Foreign Office had also supplied the inquiry with potentially relevant WhatsApps from two special advisers, with extensive redactions applied to parts that it deemed to be irrelevant.

Read more:
Government ‘too slow’ to recover taxpayer money lost to fraud
Baroness Hallett ‘may have to resign if ministers win WhatsApp battle’

By contrast, Mr Keith said the Department of Health and Social Care had provided a “much fuller disclosure”, including messages from Matt Hancock, who was health secretary during the pandemic.

“We would of course invite the Foreign Office the Cabinet Office to pay close regard to the position adopted by the DHSC,” he said.

So far the inquiry has issued 38 requests to government departments and other bodies, 11 to regional mayors and 12 to ministers including former prime minister Liz Truss, former deputy prime minister Dominic Raab, Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch and Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove.

Following this morning’s preliminary hearing, Rishi Sunak’s official spokesman said the government was “willing to agree another way forward” when asked whether it wanted to proceed with legal action.

“Obviously we have explored other possibilities for resolution previously. So obviously we continue to speak to the inquiry. And as I say, we are willing to agree another way forward.”

Continue Reading

World

Azerbaijan Airlines crash: Russian air defences may have shot down passenger jet after misidentifying it as drone, US intelligence suggests

Published

on

By

Azerbaijan Airlines crash: Russian air defences may have shot down passenger jet after misidentifying it as drone, US intelligence suggests

Russian air defences may have shot down an Azerbaijan Airlines flight after misidentifying it, according to US military sources.

Two unnamed officials who spoke to Sky News’ US partner NBC News said America had intelligence indicating Russia may have believed the flight was a drone and engaged its air defences.

It added that this was down, in part, due to the plane’s irregular flight pattern and altitude.

The report comes after US national security spokesperson John Kirby said on Friday that Washington had “seen some early indications that would certainly point to the possibility that this jet was brought down by Russian air defence systems”.

Map showing location of Azerbaijan Airlines airliner travelling from Baku to Grozny which was diverted to Aktau and crashed with 67 people onboard

He refused to elaborate, citing an ongoing investigation.

The plane had been flying from Azerbaijan’s capital Baku to Grozny, the regional capital of the Russian republic of Chechnya, on Christmas Day.

During its flight, it turned toward Kazakhstan and later crashed around two miles from Aktau while making an attempt to land after flying east across the Caspian Sea.

More on Azerbaijan

The crash killed 38 people and left all of the 29 survivors injured.

Azerbaijan observed a national day of mourning after the incident – as footage from inside the aircraft emerged.

Azerbaijan’s transport minister Rashad Nabiyev told the country’s media that “preliminary conclusions by experts point at external impact” and witness testimony did as well.

He added: “The type of weapon used in the impact will be determined during the probe.”

Azerbaijan Airlines has since suspended flights to a number of Russian cities.

Read more from Sky News:
Italian journalist detained by Iranian police
Two sailors die on separate yachts during race
South Korea’s parliament impeaches acting president

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Video shows inside plane before crash

A spokesperson for the Kremlin declined to comment on the crash, saying it would be up to investigators to determine the cause.

Dmitry Peskov said: “The air incident is being investigated, and we don’t believe we have the right to make any assessments until the conclusions are made as a result of the investigation.”

The crash was said to have taken place during a Ukrainian drone attack.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy blamed Russia in a post on social media.

‘As if someone hit me with an axe’

Passengers and crew who survived the crash told Azerbaijani media that they heard loud noises as the aircraft was circling over Grozny.

Aydan Rahimli, a flight attendant, said that after one noise oxygen masks were automatically released and she went to perform first aid on a colleague, Zulfugar Asadov, and then heard another bang.

Mr Asadov said the noises sounded like something hitting the plane from outside.

Shortly afterwards, he sustained a sudden injury like a “deep wound, the arm was lacerated as if someone hit me in the arm with an axe,” he said.

A drone view shows the crash site of an Azerbaijan Airlines passenger plane near the city of Aktau, Kazakhstan December 25, 2024. REUTERS/Azamat Sarsenbayev
Image:
The crash site near the city of Aktau.
Pic: Reuters/Azamat Sarsenbayev

Zulfugar Asadov, a flight attendant on the Azerbaijan Airlines plane that crashed in Kazakhstan, speaks during an interview with Reuters as he receives treatment at a hospital in Baku, Azerbaijan.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Zulfugar Asadov, a flight attendant on the Azerbaijan Airlines plane.
Pic: Reuters

Two other survivors described their experiences on the flight.

Jerova Salihat told Azerbaijani television that “something exploded” near her leg and Vafa Shabanova said there had been “two explosions in the sky, and an hour and a half later the plane crashed to the ground.”

If proven the plane crashed after being hit by Russian air defences, it would be the second deadly aviation incident linked to the Kremlin’s conflict with Ukraine.

Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was shot down by a Russian missile according to investigators, killing all 298 people aboard, in 2014.

Continue Reading

World

Why Russia has gone to war on ‘childfree propaganda’ and is promoting eight-children families

Published

on

By

Why Russia has gone to war on 'childfree propaganda' and is promoting eight-children families

In Russia, size matters when it comes to family.

Just look at the Asachyovs. Vera and her husband Timofey have eight children – from 18-year-old Sofiya to 18-month-old Marusya – and they’ve just been crowned Moscow Family of the Year.

“It’s a great honour and joy,” Vera Asachyova told Sky News when asked how it felt to win.

“It brings pride to our family, not only my husband and I but for the children and their grandmothers and grandfathers.”

Vera and Timofey Asachyov have won medals and praise for having eight children
Image:
Vera and Timofey Asachyov have won medals and praise for having eight children

And that’s not their only award.

Having had so many children, they’ve also been honoured with the prestigious Order of Parental Glory, which Vera proudly wears pinned to her chest.

The family’s beaming faces are even on billboards around town.

They’re portrayed as the model family doing their patriotic duty.

The Asachyov's on a billboard promoting having children to families in Russia
Image:
The Asachyovs have been held up as an example by the state for others to follow

That’s because Russia’s birth rate is at a quarter-of-a-century low and the state wants others to follow the Asachyovs’ lead.

Official data shows 599,600 children were born in Russia in the first half of 2024, which is 16,000 fewer than in the same period in 2023 and the lowest since 1999.

The Kremlin called the figure “catastrophic” and is desperate to boost it.

The latest attempt is a ban on “childfree propaganda”, which was passed unanimously by Russia’s lower house of parliament last month.

It’s supposedly the promotion of life without children, and anyone caught spreading it can now be fined.

But does this propaganda really exist? Even if it does, surely there are more pressing reasons why a woman might not want to have children?

For example the costs involved, or perhaps because their partner is away fighting in Ukraine, or worse, has been killed there.

I put that to Tatiana Butskaya, an MP for Russia’s ruling party, United Russia, who sits on the parliamentary committee for Family Protection.

“This is an ideology against life on earth,” she replied, referring to the so-called propaganda.

“If [our parents] had adhered to this ideology, none of us would be at this press conference today. Perhaps it would’ve been other people here, and maybe even robots.”

Tatiana Butskaya, an MP for Russia's ruling party, United Russia
Image:
Tatiana Butskaya told Sky’s Ivor Bennett families with one child are ‘strange’

Vladimir Putin has previously encouraged women to have at least three children, to secure Russia’s future.

In the same vein, Ms Butskaya went on to criticise families with only one child, calling them “strange”.

“If this family has lived together for a long time, you think, ‘Well, maybe they have illnesses? Maybe something is wrong in the family’. Right?

“They’ve lived together for 30 years and only given birth to only one child. There’s something wrong there.”

According to the authorities, childfree propaganda is everywhere – in films, on the internet and throughout the media. But that’s not how it feels walking around Moscow.

Pretty much everywhere you look there are huge billboards promoting family and motherhood. The message on one reads “we have room to grow” in Russian.

Russia insists women still have the right not to have children, but feminist activists like Zalina Marshenkulova believe that’s no longer true.

Zalina Marshenkulova, a blogger who left Russia soon after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine
Image:
Zalina Marshenkulova called the ban ‘reproductive violence’

The prominent blogger left Russia soon after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and was charged in absentia with “justifying terrorism” by a Russian court earlier this year.

“It’s reproductive violence,” she told Sky News, referring to the ban on childfree propaganda. “It’s another repressive law they needed to turn all women into mechanisms for reproducing slaves.

“If you’re smart, if you love freedom, if you respect yourself, you can’t live in Russia. That’s what they try to say to us by this stupid law.”

Read more from Sky News:
Putin open to peace talks in Slovakia
‘NATO Santa’ shot down in apparent propaganda

A low birth rate isn’t Russia’s only demographic problem, of course. It also has a rising mortality rate, made worse by the war in Ukraine.

Stopping the war would help boost the population. But that’s not discussed.

Apparently, childfree propaganda is the bigger issue.

Continue Reading

World

Ireland’s weavers fight to save Donegal tweed from foreign imposters

Published

on

By

Ireland's weavers fight to save Donegal tweed from foreign imposters

Weavers of Ireland’s famous Donegal tweed have called for a special protected status for their product, as the craft industry battles a raft of cheaper imitations branding themselves as “Donegals”. 

Urgent efforts are under way to take advantage of a change in EU policy, which could see non-food and drink products receive the same protected designation as champagne or parma ham.

Currently, a textile manufacturer anywhere in the world can produce fabric and call it Donegal tweed, often vastly undercutting the genuine producers.

“It’s not great,” says Kieran Molloy, a sixth-generation weaver at Molloy & Sons.

Kieran Molloy, sixth-generation weaver and director of Molloy & Sons
Image:
Weaver Kieran Molloy says the unrestricted use of Donegal in tweed sales is a problem

He says the unrestricted use of the term Donegal “is making people think it’s a craft product, when in fact maybe it’s coming from an enormous mill in the UK or in China or Italy”.

“When people maybe think of Donegal, and they’re thinking of mountains and sheep and the craft, a lot of the time that’s not what they’re getting.”

Donegal tweed is a woollen fabric with neps – or flecks – of distinctive colours spun into the yarn as its main characteristic.

Samples of tweed at Molloy & Sons

The industry hopes to be awarded a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) following a 2022 decision by the European Commission to widen the categories of goods that could be protected. This would mean only fabric produced in Co Donegal could be described as a Donegal tweed.

Patrick Temple is CEO of Donegal’s largest tweed producer, Magee Weaving, and also chair of the Donegal Tweed Association.

He says the glut of foreign imposters “does detract from the business,” adding: “It also creates a mixed message for the consumer.

“The wonderful thing about a PGI, if we’re lucky enough to obtain it, is that it creates a pure message to the consumer and they know they’re buying a genuine fabric woven in Donegal.”

Patrick Temple, CEO Magee Weaving, at the Magee factory in Donegal town
Image:
Patrick Temple says a PGI would help Magee protect its business

Magee has celebrity fans like Sex And The City actor Sarah Jessica Parker, a regular visitor to Co Donegal.

In some ways, the tweed is a victim of its own popularity, which means larger international brands can put reproductions on the market for far lower prices than the Donegal producers.

Marks & Spencer has a range of men’s wool clothing marketed with the word “Donegal”, which features small flecks of colour.

A blazer, with the fabric woven in England and constructed in Cambodia, retails for €205 in Ireland, less than half the price of many of Magee’s authentic Donegal tweed blazers.

Mr Temple examined the M&S jacket for Sky News. “It’s a pleasant blazer, in a natural wool,” he says.

“It’s emulating, trying to be a Donegal. But unfortunately, it’s not woven in Donegal, there’s a small fleck there but we can’t call it a Donegal tweed.”

“It undercuts our position in the region of Donegal, as the genuine weavers of Donegal tweed,” he adds.

Read more on Ireland:
Ireland election results in maps and charts
Man found dead after questioned over schoolboy murder

Marks & Spencer stops short of describing its clothing as “Donegal tweed”, and does not claim the fabric is made in Ireland, but did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

The Donegal weavers have enlisted the expertise of colleagues in Scotland, where the famous Harris tweed has enjoyed protection from an act of parliament passed in 1993.

The legislation means that only wool handwoven on the Outer Hebrides can be described as Harris tweed within the UK.

An example of a Donegal tweed blazer, woven by Magee in Co Donegal. Pic: Magee
Image:
An example of a Donegal tweed blazer, woven by Magee in Co Donegal. Pic: Magee

Lorna Macaulay, the outgoing CEO of the Harris Tweed Authority, has held several meetings with the Donegal weavers, and says the geographic protection is vital.

Without the “absolutely pivotal” 1993 law, she says “we have no doubt that this [Harris tweed] industry would not have survived… it simply couldn’t have”.

“The protection it has brought has forever secured the definition of Harris tweed.”

Ms Macaulay says an appreciation of the shared culture has led to close cooperation between the weavers in Scotland and Ireland.

“When the Donegal people approached us, we didn’t consider ourselves as rivals or competitors, and in fact a really strong handwoven sector lifts all boats. There is a real will to work together,” she adds.

Read more from Sky News:
Most mispronounced words of 2024
Mosh pit nappy to avoid queues at gigs sells out

The Donegal weavers hope the Scottish input will strengthen their campaign. They want the incoming Irish government to help press Brussels for the coveted protected status.

It could take 12 to 18 months, admits Mr Temple, “but it’s really gaining momentum, and we hope it’ll be sooner rather than later”.

Continue Reading

Trending