It is difficult not to feel sorry for Prince Harry when he talks about the “devastating impact” he believes years of intense press coverage have had on him and Meghan.
As he acknowledges in his written statement to the court case he has brought against Mirror Group Newspapers, he was caught up in a vicious circle in which he became the flawed person the tabloids were writing about.
He itemises the “stereotypes that they wanted to pin” on him to sell “as many newspapers as possible”, especially as the “spare” to the heir.
He said he was either “playboy prince, the failure, the dropout, the thicko, the cheat, the underage drinker, the irresponsible drug taker” and blamed them for his misbehaviour: “I thought that if they are printing this rubbish about me and people are believing it, I may as well ‘do the crime’, so to speak. It was a downward spiral…”
There is something climactic about Harry‘s lawsuits against the tabloid press over old grudges and hurts. As well as the case against the Mirror group, he has also launched suits against Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers and Lord Rothermere’s Associated Newspapers, publishers of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday.
It is a turning point. He is now 38 years old, a father of two and based in California with his American wife, a former TV actress after severing ties with the Royal Family.
Harry must now decide what he wants to do with the rest of his life and how the couple plan to go on funding their lifestyle, especially as the prince is no longer in receipt of funds from the UK taxpayer or, automatically, from his father King Charles.
Much will depend on how the current court trials turn out. If the judge rules in Harry’s favour in the Mirror case, it will likely be a massive vindication for the prince. The Mirror have already paid out £100m in settlement of other hacking cases.
Advertisement
In not agreeing to a deal and taking the expensive risk of going to court, Harry is championing hundreds who believe they were victims of illegal intrusion by the papers. If victorious, he is likely to be awarded millions in damages and coverage of his considerable legal costs. He will feel emboldened to pursue the private actions against the other media groups.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:19
What was Harry asked on day two?
In nine hours of giving evidence, however, Prince Harry appeared to struggle in producing specific news stories which could only have been acquired by illegal activity.
Under cross-examination, he conceded as much to MGN’s barrister Andrew Green KC. Although he thinks hacking is the most obvious explanation for the reports, a verdict of “Not Proven” is not an option at the Old Bailey, making a prediction of the ruling difficult.
If the ruling goes against him, the environment at home is only likely to get more hostile for Harry in the land of his birth. The first senior royal to go to trial for 130 years, he pinned a fresh target on his back by telling the court: “Our country is judged globally by the state of our press and our government – both of which I believe are at rock bottom.”
Meanwhile, on its front page the Daily Mail blared: “If Harry carries on his facile assault on our elected government, Charles must banish him to private life.”
Such banishment is impossible – King Charles has no such power. Harry and Meghan have established themselves independently in the United States and are earning their own money by trading on who they are.
There is no chance that Meghan, Harry, Archie and Lilibet will come back together to live in the UK. The couple’s chances of returning to the royal fold, even if they wanted to, are zero. What they have to sell is themselves.
Sources close to Harry – precisely the sort of anonymous attribution he complains of in negative stories about him – have vouched that the couple now plan to move away from self-exposing media activity and turn towards producing material instead.
Harry has reportedly shelved plans for a second volume of his autobiography. He donated nearly £2m of his earnings to charity: Sentebale, the couple’s foundation for children in southern Africa, and Wellchild, the UK charity for sick children. The film and television rights to Spare have not yet been sold. If there are dramatisations of Harry’s account of his life, they would be bound to reopen wounds.
Harry and Meghan have registered Archewell, as what Americans call “their content creation label”. They have multimillion-dollar deals with Spotify for podcasts and Netflix for TV content. Their documentary about themselves garnered 81.5 million views. Content not featuring them has so far been scant.
Much of Harry and Meghan’s future public activities are set to be around Archewell’s charitable arm. The Archewell Foundation, which raised $13m (£10m) last year from donors, has so far dispensed only £3m to causes such as COVID vaccines and Ukrainian and Afghan refugees.
Other donations include £10,000 to get a novel, A Colourful View From The Top, into the library of every secondary school in Britain. The book features inspirational stories about successful people from ethnic minority backgrounds.
The “key pillars” for the foundation’s activity are “building a better online world, restoring trust in information, and uplifting communities”. Given the aims of that second pillar, there must be a question whether the Foundation will end up bearing some of the costs of Harry’s crusade against the British tabloids.
It appears that it grates with Harry that he cannot escape how he was born. It is also what defines him, whether in or out of the working Royal Family. It may be a partnership forged in Hell for him, but media attention maintains his high profile, which is how he makes a living.
Harry has already said it will be an “injustice” if he loses his attacks on the tabloids. That would only fire up his sense of grievance. Whether we feel sorry for them or not, we are doomed to go on hearing more about Harry and Meghan for years to come.
A grief-stricken family has told Sky News they want “someone to take accountability” for the death of Lewis Stone, a retired butcher who was killed by a secure psychiatric unit patient released 10 days earlier.
In her first TV interview, Mr Stone’s step-daughter Vicki Lindsay said they were calling for an internal NHS Trust report to be made public so that lessons can be learned.
“The thought of anybody going through what we’ve gone through for the last six years… We’re living a life sentence,” she said.
On 28 February 2019, Lewis Stone was where he loved being most – the remote town of Borth on the west coast of Wales near Aberystwyth. It’s where he and his wife, Elizabeth, had a holiday home and planned to retire.
Image: Lewis’s step-daughter, Vicki Lindsay, says the family wants an apology and accountability
That morning, Lewis left for his daily pre-breakfast walk with his beloved dog Jock along the River Leri and never came home.
He had been stabbed multiple times, and despite repeated attempts to save his life, he died in hospital three months later.
Lewis’s killer, David Fleet, was sectioned under the Mental Health Act after admitting manslaughter with diminished responsibility.
More on Mental Health
Related Topics:
Sentencing, Judge Paul Thomas QC said Lewis had been in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Lewis’s family disagrees: “I just want somebody to say, ‘Yes, we messed up, we’re sorry. It doesn’t change things but we’re sorry’.
“We’ve had none of that. Mum’s had nothing, no support, she’s had nothing. That’s all we want, an admission.”
Image: Elizabeth and Lewis Stone, with their step-daughter Vicki Lindsay (centre), in happier times
Image: Lewis Stone and his grand-daughter Sammy
Fleet was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia at the time of the attack and told psychiatrists if he had not stabbed Mr Stone, the voices in his head “were going to kill him”.
Four months earlier, he had been detained under the Mental Health Act, but despite concerns raised by his own family, it was decided he should be treated at home.
The Hywel Dda health board told Sky News they don’t intend to release the internal report into Fleet’s care.
Sharon Daniel, the Interim Executive Director for Nursing, Quality and Patient Experience, said: “The Duty of Candour for patients came into force in Wales in April 2023. At the time of this incident and concern, we fulfilled our duties to be open.”
When asked if they would be willing to apologise to both affected families, Ms Daniel said: “In the event of serious incidents, we have robust processes in place for reviewing internally, identifying any issues, and where appropriate preparing an improvement plan to prevent such an occurrence in the future. We regret such incidents and always seek to learn from them.”
In February, victims’ families in Nottingham won their fight for an NHS review into the care of paranoid schizophrenic Valdo Calocane, who killed three people, to be made public. It exposed a catalogue of errors and systemic failings.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:03
In February, Sky’s Sarah-Jane Mee spoke to two mothers of two people killed by paranoid schizophrenic Valdo Calocane
The family’s adviser and former NHS lawyer Radd Seiger, who also advised the Nottingham families, told Sky News the two cases have striking similarities: “Sunlight is the best disinfectant when there are problems in the NHS.
“Let’s have these things out in the open. Yes, they’re uncomfortable, but that’s the only way the NHS is going to learn from its mistakes.
“It’s no good them marking their own homework in private where journalists, or lawyers, or families don’t get to scrutinise these things because we see that these things keep happening over and over and over.”
David Fleet’s family declined an opportunity to speak to Sky News for this report.
The Welsh government said: “We are fully committed to openness and transparency in line with the Duty of Candour to ensure lessons are learned. We have also invested in improving both the quality and safety of mental health care in Wales.”
A host of local and mayoral elections will be taking place across England on Thursday 1 May – the first voting day since the general election last year.
There will also be a new Member of Parliament.
Here is everything you need to know – from what’s at stake to how you can vote.
Local elections
There will be local elections in 23 of England’s 317 local authorities on 1 May.
Some are slightly different to others, depending on the type of authority.
A unitary authority is a one-tier local government, where the services of a county council and the other smaller councils listed above are combined.
A metropolitan district has a council that oversees all services, similar to a unitary authority – but has a mayor with a role similar to that of local councils.
The mayors for Doncaster and North Tyneside are single authority, making them the political leader of the council and leaving them responsible for delivering local council services.
Metro mayors chair combined authorities made up of several local councils.
Metro mayor election
There are six mayoral elections taking place on 1 May, two of which are the first ever in their areas.
One of them is for the West of England, where the current mayor is Dan Norris, who was elected as a Labour MP when he defeated Jacob Rees-Mogg to win the seat of North East Somerset and Hanham in last year’s general election.
Image: Labour MP Dan Norris. File pic: PA
Mr Norris, who has been mayor since 2021, has to vacate the role because the Labour Party introduced rules to prevent serving MPs from standing as mayoral candidates.
There is another mayoral election in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, while the first mayors for Hull and East Yorkshire and Greater Lincolnshire will be chosen after devolution deals were agreed in 2023, bringing together local councils in both areas to create larger authorities.
There will also be elections for the next mayor of Doncaster and North Tyneside.
New MP for Runcorn and Helsby
A by-election is also being held in Runcorn and Helsby after Labour’s Mike Amesbury agreed to stand down following his conviction for punching a man in the street.
Amesbury, who was suspended from the Labour Party, was jailed on 24 February for 10 weeks after he pleaded guilty to assault by beating of 45-year-old Paul Fellows in Main Street, Frodsham, Cheshire, in the early hours of 26 October.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:12
Amesbury steps down as MP
His resignation means Karen Shore, the deputy leader of Cheshire West and Chester Council, will run for Labour in the by-election, while the Conservatives are putting forward Sean Houlston, a membership services manager for the National Federation of Builders, and Sarah Pochin, a former Cheshire East councillor, is Reform’s candidate.
Amesbury came first in Runcorn and Helsby with 22,358 votes at the 2024 general election – equating to 52.9% of the electorate.
Reform UK came in second with 7,662 votes (18.1%) and the Tories in third with 6,756 votes (16%).
Outcomes could have significant national impact
The elections will be the first big test of all the parties since the general election, which fundamentally redrew the UK’s political landscape with a new world of multiparty politics.
The Tories have the most to lose as they hold 20 of the 23 local authorities up for grabs on 1 May.
And for the first time in a long time, Labour and the Conservatives are facing a genuine threat from other parties.
YouGov conducted exclusive polling for Sky News to get a sense of how the country was feeling ahead of the elections, surveying 2,178 adults in the UK on 6 and 7 April.
Here is the voting intention poll:
• Labour: 24% (no change) • Reform UK: 23% (no change) • Conservatives: 22% (+1) • Liberal Democrats: 17% (+3) • Green Party: 9% (-2)
It suggests that Nigel Farage’s Reform UK could be Labour’s closest competitor, with Kemi Badenoch trailing as she leads the Conservatives through elections for the first time, while the Lib Dems have closed the gap on the three top parties.
You have until 11.59pm on Friday to register to vote if you haven’t already.
You must be aged 16 or over (or 14 or over in Scotland and Wales) to register to vote – but to vote for a new MP you must be at least 18.
You can register if you are:
• A British citizen • An Irish or EU citizen living in the UK • A Commonwealth citizen who has permission to enter or stay in the UK, or who does not need permission • A citizen of another country living in Scotland or Wales who has permission to enter or stay in the UK, or who does not need permission • You can be an overseas voter if you previously lived in the UK and are a British citizen.
The easiest and quickest way to register is online.
Alternatively, you can use a paper form – though it may be too close to the deadline for you to complete this by the deadline.
You can do it by contacting your local Electoral Registration Office and asking them to post a form to you. Or you can print your own form off. You’ll then need to return the completed form to your local Electoral Registration Office.
How can I cast my vote?
There are three ways to vote:
In person at your local polling station
You’ll be sent a poll card just before an election or referendum telling you when to vote and at which polling station. It will usually be in a public building, such as a school or local hall, near your home.
You can only vote at the polling station allocated to your address. This will be shown on your poll card. You can also enter your postcode on this website to find out where your polling station is.
You will be able to cast your vote any time between 7am and 10pm
You must bring a form of photo ID with you in order to vote. There are 22 accepted types of ID.
At the polling station, you will need to give your name and address to staff and show them your photo ID.
There will be instructions in the polling booth telling you exactly how to cast your vote.
Postal vote
You can register to vote by post for any reason, including that you simply don’t want to go to a polling station on the day.
You need to apply for this by 5pm on 14 April and can do so by clicking here.
Postal votes now expire every three years, so if you registered to do so more than three years ago, you will need to re-apply.
By proxy
This is where you apply for someone to vote on your behalf if you cannot go to the polling station in person and do not want to or can’t vote by post.
You and your proxy must both be registered to vote in the UK before you can apply.
The deadline to apply for proxy voting in the May 1 elections is 5pm on 23 April, and you can apply here.
Which elections have been postponed – and why?
Elections for county councils in the following areas have been postponed until May 2026:
• Norfolk • Suffolk • Essex • Thurrock • Surrey • East and West Sussex • Hampshire • Isle of Wight
Most areas of the UK are now covered by one-tier systems such as unitary authorities, but there are still 21 county councils.
The government is pushing for a “devolution revolution”, meaning the remaining county councils are being encouraged to merge with other local authorities to become unitary authorities.
So in December last year, the government told county councils they could request to postpone their elections set for 1 May if they were trying to reorganise into one-tier systems.
While 16 county councils requested to postpone, only the eight listed above were successful.
A new spit test for prostate cancer which can be done at home may be better than current testing methods, a study suggests.
Experts have developed a simple saliva test which analyses genetic variants in a man’s DNA, which appears to perform better than the current method for assessing prostate cancer risk.
Currently, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test is used to check for prostate conditions, including prostate cancer or an enlarged prostate.
Routine testing is not currently available on the NHS, but patients may be offered a PSA test if a GP suspects they have prostate cancer. Men over 50 can ask their GP for a PSA test even if they do not have symptoms.
But experts have said the new saliva test could be used as an additional screening tool, as it reduced the number of false positive results and detected a higher proportion of aggressive cancers than the PSA test.
It could lead to fewer men being sent for unnecessary testing, according to researchers at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.
They tested the effectiveness of a new tool they had developed called a polygenic risk score, which uses spit to assess 130 genetic variants known to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer, which can then determine whether or not a person is at high risk of the disease.
Image: The new spit test for prostate cancer. Pic: PA
Test saved lives of two brothers
Taking part in the trial saved the lives of two brothers.
Dheeresh Turnbull said traditional methods to assess prostate cancer deemed he had a low risk of disease, but the new spit test helped the 71-year-old discover he actually had a life-threatening tumour in his prostate.
After finding out the news, his brother Joel Turnbull also took part in the study and discovered he had an aggressive prostate tumour.
“It’s incredible to think that because of this study two lives have now been saved in my family,” Dheeresh said.
The brothers were among 6,300 men aged 55 to 69 in the UK who were assessed by the tool as part of the study.
Of those, 745 (12%) were deemed to have a high risk score and were invited to have prostate cancer screening, including an MRI scan and a biopsy.
Prostate cancer was detected in 187 of the 468 who took up the offer, and of those, 103 had cancer that was deemed to be “higher risk”, so treatment was offered.
Of the 187 men, 118 had a PSA level below 3.0ug/L – which is considered “normal” and would typically indicate no further screening is required.
Test could ‘turn the tide on prostate cancer’
Writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, the researchers said cancer “would not have been detected” in 74 of the men using the “diagnostics pathway” currently in use in the UK – which includes a high PSA level and an MRI.
They concluded that for the men with the highest genetic risk, the test falsely identified fewer people with prostate cancer than the PSA test and picked up people with cancer who would have been missed by the PSA test alone.
It detected a higher proportion of aggressive cancers than the PSA test and also accurately identified men with prostate cancer who were missed by an MRI scan.
Professor Ros Eeles, from the Institute of Cancer Research, London, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, said: “With this test, it could be possible to turn the tide on prostate cancer.
“We have shown that a relatively simple, inexpensive spit test to identify men of European heritage at higher risk due to their genetic make-up is an effective tool to catch prostate cancer early.
Some 55,000 cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed each year in the UK, with around 12,000 men in the UK dying from the disease annually, according to Cancer Research UK.
It comes after Health Secretary Wes Streeting suggested he would support a national prostate cancer screening programme for men at higher risk of disease if it is backed by the evidence. The UK’s National Screening Committee is currently assessing whether or not such a programme should be rolled out.