2020-2022 Chevy Bolt owners, starting yesterday evening, began receiving messages that their high voltage battery replacements would no longer be happening. Instead, a software diagnostics tool would be used to verify if the batteries had problems before a replacement would be performed. As anyone would expect, Bolt owners are up in arms.
GM initiated a recall in 2021 after a small number of Bolts high voltage batteries caught fire. The battery replacements were to take place on all pre-existing Bolts with the affected LG battery packs. Basically, every 2017-2020 Bolt. See our Bolt Recall Guide for all the details here.
I got a call today from the Chevrolet Concierge letting me know that GM has come up with a software fix instead of replacing the main battery on 2020-2022 Bolts. They will install software that puts the vehicle back to allowing 100% charging and it monitors the car to see if there are any defects in the battery pack. Once it passes these tests they will remove the safety recall on your vehicle.
I made an appointment with my dealer to get this software installed next week. They told me that GM tested the removed batteries on 2020-2020 Bolts and found that most were not found to be defective so they did not need to be replaced.
Once the safety recall is removed I should be able to buy my car at the end of the 36 month lease in August or earlier.
Or perhaps they started changing in May when GM updated its recall documentation. A commenter, Dave Salman, found out that GM sneakily updated its recall documentation to the HHTSA:
Another document GM submits to NHTSA is a 573 report. There are 3 of these reports on the NHTSA website for the battery recall for 2020-2022 Bolts. (Links to follow) The first two are from 2021 and say the remedy is battery replacement. The latest is from May 2023 and says the remedy is “In certain vehicles that GM has determined may contain defective battery modules, the remedy is the replacement of the vehicle’s high-voltage battery pack. In all other vehicles, the remedy is the installation of advanced diagnostic software that will monitor battery performance and identify defective battery modules that require replacement.” In typical GM weasel word (or lack thereof) style the May 2023 document doesn’t highlight the change or explain what made the change possible. The new document is here https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2021/RCLRPT-21V650-3740.PDF The older documents are here https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2021/RCLRPT-21V650-4541.PDF and here https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2021/RCLRPT-21V650-2919.PDF
Here are screen grabs from the old (left) – and new as of May 2023 – documents:
Old RemedyNew Remedy
Presented with the above, a GM spokesperson told us:
GM will provide owners of certain 2020-2022 Chevrolet Bolt EV and EUVs covered under a previously announced recall a new advanced diagnostics software. The software will continually monitor the battery to detect any potential anomalies and, if none are detected after approximately 6,200 miles (10,000 km) of use, the battery will automatically return to 100% state of charge without a return trip to the dealer.
If an anomaly is detected, the software will alert the owner via a message on the driver information center and the owner should then contact their dealer to schedule a battery or module replacement.
The software is free and will need to be installed by their dealer via a brief service appointment.
Owners of certain 2020-2022 model year Bolt EV and EUVs, can start to schedule installation at their Chevy EV dealer June 13, 2023.
General motors
GM also clarified that ’20-22 Bolt owners were never promised new batteries. Instead they were promised fixed defective modules. Until yesterday, that was taking the form of replaced batteries however.
It is important to note here that this only applies to 2020-2022 Bolt owners. 2017-2019 Bolt owners should still receive a replacement battery.
Electrek’s Take
So the obvious problem here is that GM was delivering new batteries to all 2020-2022 Bolt owners, and then slow-rolled the replacement. Some ’20-22 Bolts were resold with the promise of a new battery with new warranty en route; others got the battery if they were lucky.
’20-22 Bolt owners who didn’t get the new battery are pissed, even though this new software will allow Bolt owners that have been only charging to 80% for over a year to charge to 100% again. The software, if you believe GM at this point, will detect if there is a problem and if so, the battery replacement will again happen. If not, the 2020-2022 batteries will operate normally. These batteries have the increased 259 mile range on 65kWh over the 2017-2019 batteries which had 234 miles of range on 60kWh.
Another comms own goal from GM here. Getting ahead of this would have been advisable in my opinion rather than filling a Facebook and Reddit groups up with disoriented and angry Bolt owners.
Off the top of my head GM could have:
Told ’20-22 owners about the change so they don’t hear about it on Facebook(or Electrek!)
Offered to make the battery warranty the same time duration as getting a new battery with a “GM Verified” on battery so it doesn’t hurt the resale value.
Give owners free Onstar, lifetime premium app features for their trouble. Maybe some more EVGO miles.
So I bought my 2021 bolt 3 months ago, contingent that it didn’t have the battery replaced yet because I wanted the new battery and warranty. Bought at 9.7k miles and currently have 12.2k miles. Bought it at a BMW dealer.
I’m at a loss atm, literally the only reason I bought a used bolt was basically getting a brand new vehicle after the replacement. I had options to buy a new one (weirdly various dealers had new ones around Central florida so I had plenty to choose from at the time). I got a decent deal on the car but now my thoughts are the car will be devalued compared to replaced battery’s, I don’t have a new warranty, I don’t know how the previous owner took care of the battery’s, I “settled” on an lt instead of getting something more loaded or new model. And I’ve been running at 80% since I bought the car so it’s been slightly an inconvenience on range.
Basically what is my course of action for this? If they add the software with a new warranty I guess that’d be comparable, but as it stands I don’t want this vehicle, I feel like I got conned and gm is taking the east way out and not paying the millions it would cost to replace the rest of the batterys.
Obviously consult a lawyer is #1 but what kind of lawyer? What do I ask for? Any help is appreciated thank you for your time
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Pentagon-backed MP Materials warned investors this week to approach other rare earths projects with caution, pointing to the industry’s difficult economics.
Stocks of U.S. rare earth companies have had wild swings in recent months as investors have speculated that the Trump administration might strike more deals along the lines of its landmark agreement with MP. Smaller retail traders have gotten involved in the stocks with the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF up 60% this year.
The Defense Department in July took an equity stake in MP, set a price floor for the company, and inked an offtake agreement with the rare earth miner and magnet maker in an effort to roll back China’s dominance of the industry.
CEO James Litinsky said he didn’t want “people to get burned” amid the speculation. Litinsky cautioned investors “to just be very clear-eyed about what the actual structural economics are amidst all the excitement.”
“The vast majority of projects being promoted today simply will not work at virtually any price,” Litinksy said on the company’s third-quarter earnings call Thursday evening.
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, YTD
MP views itself as “America’s national champion,” Litinsky said. MP is the only active rare earth miner in the U.S. and has offtake agreements with Apple and General Motors in addition to the Pentagon.
“We have structural advantage because we’re fully vertically integrated,” the CEO said. “We’re years and billions ahead of others.”
It takes years for the best rare earth producers to ramp up and stabilize their output and economics “despite what some promoters might suggest,” Litinksy said. Australia’s Lynas took about a decade and MP will reach normalized production in about three years from the start of commissioning, he said.
The White House is “not ruling out other deals with equity stakes or price floors as we did with MP Materials, but that doesn’t mean every initiative we take would be in the shape of the MP deal,” a Trump administration official told CNBC in September.
Litinsky described the rare earth industry as close to a “structural oligopoly,” a system where there are just a few major players. The government investing in a dozens of sites and businesses wouldn’t necessarily set up a supply chain, he said.
The Trump administration should continue to encourage private capital to flow into the industry through loans, grants and other support, Litinsky said. There is room for “a lot of other players and supply” but the market will require “materially higher prices” for the industry’s structural challenges to change, he said.
“If X dollars of capital can stimulate two or three X in private capital, they should be doing that as much as possible,” Litinsky said.
The CEO indicated that he views MP as a forerunner that will help create the conditions for a broader market that is not dependent on China over time.
“In the very short term the administration has made sure that we have a successful national champion in MP,” Litinsky said. “We are going to sort of pave the path if you will to then figure out how there’s much broader supply coming online.”
Rare earths are crucial for making magnets that are key inputs in U.S. weapons platforms, semiconductor manufacturing, electric vehicles, clean energy technology and consumer electronics. Beijing dominates the global supply chain and the U.S. is dependent on China for imports.
This week on Electrek’s Wheel-E podcast, we discuss the most popular news stories from the world of electric bikes and other nontraditional electric vehicles. This time, that includes a new e-bike model from Tenways, California kills off its e-bike voucher program, a review of the new VMAX VX2 Hub e-scooter, Zero launches a scooter, NIU’s got a new micro-car, and more.
The Wheel-E podcast returns every two weeks on Electrek’s YouTube channel, Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter.
As a reminder, we’ll have an accompanying post, like this one, on the site with an embedded link to the live stream. Head to the YouTube channel to get your questions and comments in.
After the show ends, the video will be archived on YouTube and the audio on all your favorite podcast apps:
We also have a Patreon if you want to help us to avoid more ads and invest more in our content. We have some awesome gifts for our Patreons and more coming.
Here are a few of the articles that we will discuss during the Wheel-E podcast today:
Here’s the live stream for today’s episode starting at 9:00 a.m. ET (or the video after 10:00 a.m. ET):
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Nvidia has established itself as the undisputed leader in artificial intelligence chips, selling large quantities of silicon to most of the world’s biggest tech companies en route to a $4.5 trillion market cap.
One of Nvidia’s key clients is Google, which has been loading up on the chipmaker’s graphics processing units, or GPUs, to try and keep pace with soaring demand for AI compute power in the cloud.
While there’s no sign that Google will be slowing its purchases of Nvidia GPUs, the internet giant is increasingly showing that it’s not just a buyer of high-powered silicon. It’s also a developer.
On Thursday, Google announced that its most powerful chip yet, called Ironwood, is being made widely available in the coming weeks. It’s the seventh generation of Google’s Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU, the company’s custom silicon that’s been in the works for more than a decade.
TPUs are application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, which play a crucial role in AI by providing highly specialized and efficient hardware for particular tasks. Google says Ironwood is designed to handle the heaviest AI workloads, from training large models to powering real-time chatbots and AI agents, and is more than four times faster than its predecessor. AI startup Anthropic plans to use up to 1 million of them to run its Claude model.
For Google, TPUs offer a competitive edge at a time when all the hyperscalers are rushing to build mammoth data centers, and AI processors can’t get manufactured fast enough to meet demand. Other cloud companies are taking a similar approach, but are well behind in their efforts.
Amazon Web Services made its first cloud AI chip, Inferentia, available to customers in 2019, followed by Trainium three years later. Microsoft didn’t announce its first custom AI chip, Maia, until the end of 2023.
“Of the ASIC players, Google’s the only one that’s really deployed this stuff in huge volumes,” said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst covering semiconductors at Bernstein. “For other big players, it takes a long time and a lot of effort and a lot of money. They’re the furthest along among the other hyperscalers.”
Google didn’t provide a comment for this story.
Originally trained for internal workloads, Google’s TPUs have been available to cloud customers since 2018. Of late, Nvidia has shown some level of concern. When OpenAI signed its first cloud contract with Google earlier this year, the announcement spurred Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to initiate further talks with the AI startup and its CEO, Sam Altman, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.
Unlike Nvidia, Google isn’t selling its chips as hardware, but rather providing access to TPUs as a service through its cloud, which has emerged as one of the company’s big growth drivers. In its third-quarter earnings report last week, Google parent Alphabet said cloud revenue increased 34% from a year earlier to $15.15 billion, beating analyst estimates. The company ended the quarter with a business backlog of $155 billion.
“We are seeing substantial demand for our AI infrastructure products, including TPU-based and GPU-based solutions,” CEO Sundar Pichai said on the earnings call. “It is one of the key drivers of our growth over the past year, and I think on a going-forward basis, I think we continue to see very strong demand, and we are investing to meet that.”
Google doesn’t break out the size of its TPU business within its cloud segment. Analysts at D.A. Davidson estimated in September that a “standalone” business consisting of TPUs and Google’s DeepMind AI division could be valued at about $900 billion, up from an estimate of $717 billion in January. Alphabet’s current market cap is more than $3.4 trillion.
‘Tightly targeted’ chips
Customization is a major differentiator for Google. One critical advantage, analysts say, is the efficiency TPUs offer customers relative to competitive products and services.
“They’re really making chips that are very tightly targeted for their workloads that they expect to have,” said James Sanders, an analyst at Tech Insights.
Rasgon said that efficiency is going to become increasingly important because with all the infrastructure that’s being built, the “likely bottleneck probably isn’t chip supply, it’s probably power.”
On Tuesday, Google announced Project Suncatcher, which explores “how an interconnected network of solar-powered satellites, equipped with our Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) AI chips, could harness the full power of the Sun.”
As a part of the project, Google said it plans to launch two prototype solar-powered satellites carrying TPUs by early 2027.
“This approach would have tremendous potential for scale, and also minimizes impact on terrestrial resources,” the company said in the announcement. “That will test our hardware in orbit, laying the groundwork for a future era of massively-scaled computation in space.”
Dario Amodei, co-founder and chief executive officer of Anthropic, at the World Economic Forum in 2025.
Stefan Wermuth | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Google’s largest TPU deal on record landed late last month, when the company announced a massive expansion of its agreement with OpenAI rival Anthropic valued in the tens of billions of dollars. With the partnership, Google is expected to bring well over a gigawatt of AI compute capacity online in 2026.
“Anthropic’s choice to significantly expand its usage of TPUs reflects the strong price-performance and efficiency its teams have seen with TPUs for several years,” Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian said at the time of the announcement.
Google has invested $3 billion in Anthropic. And while Amazon remains Anthropic’s most deeply embedded cloud partner, Google is now providing the core infrastructure to support the next generation of Claude models.
“There is such demand for our models that I think the only way we would have been able to serve as much as we’ve been able to this year is this multi-chip strategy,” Anthropic Chief Product Officer Mike Krieger told CNBC.
That strategy spans TPUs, Amazon Trainium and Nvidia GPUs, allowing the company to optimize for cost, performance and redundancy. Krieger said Anthropic did a lot of up-front work to make sure its models can run equally well across the silicon providers.
“I’ve seen that investment pay off now that we’re able to come online with these massive data centers and meet customers where they are,” Krieger said.
Hefty spending is coming
Two months before the Anthropic deal, Google forged a six-year cloud agreement with Meta worth more than $10 billion, though it’s not clear how much of the arrangement includes use of TPUs. And while OpenAI said it will start using Google’s cloud as it diversifies away from Microsoft, the company told Reuters it’s not deploying GPUs.
Alphabet CFO Anat Ashkenazi attributed Google’s cloud momentum in the latest quarter to rising enterprise demand for Google’s full AI stack. The company said it signed more billion-dollar cloud deals in the first nine months of 2025 than in the previous two years combined.
“In GCP, we see strong demand for enterprise AI infrastructure, including TPUs and GPUs,” Ashkenazi said, adding that users are also flocking to the company’s latest Gemini offerings as well as services “such as cybersecurity and data analytics.”
Amazon, which reported 20% growth in its market-leading cloud infrastructure business last quarter, is expressing similar sentiment.
AWS CEO Matt Garman told CNBC in a recent interview that the company’s Trainium chip series is gaining momentum. He said “every Trainium 2 chip we land in our data centers today is getting sold and used,” and he promised further performance gains and efficiency improvements with Trainium 3.
Shareholders have shown a willingness to stomach hefty investments.
Google just raised the high end of its capital expenditures forecast for the year to $93 billion, up from prior guidance of $85 billion, with an even steeper ramp expected in 2026. The stock price soared 38% in the third quarter, its best performance for any period in 20 years, and is up another 17% in the fourth quarter.
Mizuho recently pointed to Google’s distinct cost and performance advantage with TPUs, noting that while the chips were originally built for internal use, Google is now winning external customers and bigger workloads.
Morgan Stanley analysts wrote in a report in June that while Nvidia’s GPUs will likely remain the dominant chip provider in AI, growing developer familiarity with TPUs could become a meaningful driver of Google Cloud growth.
And analysts at D.A. Davidson said in September that they see so much demand for TPUs that Google should consider selling the systems “externally to customers,” including frontier AI labs.
“We continue to believe that Google’s TPUs remain the best alternative to Nvidia, with the gap between the two closing significantly over the past 9-12 months,” they wrote. “During this time, we’ve seen growing positive sentiment around TPUs.”