Connect with us

Published

on

Can Ukraine’s counteroffensive prevail without combat air cover, and will the West come to regret not providing Ukraine with such battle-winning capability?

Although the West has provided a wealth of financial and military support to Ukraine to help combat the illegal invasion of Russian forces, it has been reluctant to provide the modern Western air power that President Zelenskyy clearly needs.

For much of the war in Ukraine, the Russian Air Force has been conspicuous by its absence.

Ukraine war latest: Hypersonic missiles ‘downed’ over Kyiv

Primarily used to launch long-range missiles at targets all over Ukraine, the Russian fighter jets have found the airspace over Ukraine particularly dangerous, and reports suggest they have lost 10% of their assets in the war to date.

The Russian Air Force has been constrained – to some degree – by the provision of modern Western air defence systems; however, since the start of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, the Russian Air Force has increased dramatically its sortie rate and effectiveness.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ukrainian village’s ’28 days in hell’

Air superiority is the degree of dominance that permits the conduct of operations by one side and its related land, sea and air forces at a given time and place without prohibitive interference by opposing air forces.

Successful land operations without local air superiority are very difficult; even in Afghanistan, just the sound of jet noise sparked panic in the Taliban fighters.

However, Ukraine does not have the air power capability to dominate the skies and is obliged to conduct its much-anticipated counteroffensive without effective air support.

As an interim measure, the West has provided a comprehensive suite of modern air defence systems – man-portable and mobile – which have taken their toll on the Russian Air Force.

However, the Russians can operate over southeast Ukraine with relative impunity and are supporting their land colleagues with a selection of glide munitions that enable the Russian fighters to remain a safe distance from the Ukrainian air defence systems.

It appears that the Russians have neither the training nor expertise to conduct effective close air support.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sean Bell on ‘sobering’ battles in Ukraine

Delivering explosive ordnance close to friendly forces is a challenging task, especially for fighters travelling at 1,000ft a second.

The difference between friendly and enemy is often a fraction of a second’s flying time, and thus the risk of fratricide is high.

If the Russian pilots were better trained, the results for Ukraine could be devastating.

Regardless, this is a very high-risk operation for Ukraine, sending inexperienced new recruits against robust Russian defences, where they will expect to suffer 3x the casualty rate on offence than they have on defence.

Read more:
Vladimir Putin’s speech analysed
Zelenskyy attacks Putin as shells kill three being rescued from floods

Ukraine ‘probing Russian defences’ looking for weak point to send in tanks

So, would the earlier provision of F-16s to Ukraine from the West have made a difference?

In short – no.

F-16 fighter jets. File pic
Image:
F-16 fighter jets. File pic

Ukraine needs modern air power, not a squadron or so of second-hand F-16 platforms that are neither supportable nor credible, against modern, stealthy Russian fighters.

Air power is a complex amalgam of technology, high-tech software, state-of-the-art precision weapons, and a wealth of supporting capabilities – such as airborne warning and control systems (AWACs), surface-to-air missiles and electronic warfare.

The Russian Air Force could decimate a small number of autonomous ageing F-16s, thus destroying Ukraine’s fledgling air power capability almost overnight and emboldening the Russian military.

The only credible way to provide Ukraine with the air capability required for this year’s offensive would be for the West to intervene and commit Western assets – and crews – to the conflict.

There is no sign of any international appetite for that level of escalation, despite the critical importance of this Ukrainian offensive.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

For now, the Ukrainian military has to take on established Russian defences and without the protective umbrella of air support. That is a tough challenge.

Ukraine appears confident that it can prevail – despite the limited resources at its disposal.

Meanwhile, the West will be hoping it does not come to regret the decision not to provide battle-winning combat air capability to Ukraine.

The stakes could not be higher.

Continue Reading

World

Friedrich Merz: German chancellor-in-waiting vows to ‘create unity’ in Europe

Published

on

By

Friedrich Merz: German chancellor-in-waiting vows to 'create unity' in Europe

Friedrich Merz, who is set to become the new German chancellor, has vowed to “create unity” in Europe as it adjusts to the new Trump administration and Russia’s war on Ukraine.

Mr Merz’s task will be complicated by the need to form a coalition with the centre-left Social Democrats of outgoing chancellor Olaf Scholz, who will remain in office for the immediate future.

He has repeatedly pledged not to work with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, despite its second-place finish but which is under observation by the country’s intelligence agency for suspected right-wing extremism.

Mr Merz’s conservative Christian Democrats and their Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union, which won with 28.5% of the votes, and the Social Democrats have a combined 328 seats in the 630-seat parliament.

The 69-year-old, who put toughening Germany’s immigration laws at the forefront of the election campaign, said he hopes to complete a deal by Easter.

Experts believe this could prove to be a challenging timescale as the rivals try to find common ground over key policies.

Co-leader of the Social Democrats, Lars Klingbeil, indicated a deal with Mr Merz is not a formality.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The path to power may not be smooth for Merz

He said: “The ball is in Friedrich Merz’s court. Only the course of any talks will show whether a government can be formed.”

With US President Donald Trump back in the White House and tensions rising over how to resolve the war in Ukraine, Mr Merz wants to unify Europe in the face of challenges from the US and Russia.

“I have no illusions at all about what is happening from America,” he told supporters.

“We are under such massive pressure… my absolute priority now is really to create unity in Europe.”

Read more:
Who is Friedrich Merz – the trained pilot?
The woman at the top of Germany’s far-right AfD party

At a media conference later, he added: “There are three topics we need to talk about. Of course, external and security policy – especially following the statements coming out of Washington.

“It is clear that we as Europeans need to be able to act swiftly. We need to be able to defend ourselves. That is a topic that is a top priority in the next few weeks.”

Mr Merz said he remains “hopeful” of maintaining the transatlantic relationship, but warned if it “is destroyed, it will not only be to the detriment of Europe, it will also be to the detriment of America”.

On the other key issues, he added: “Another important topic is the immigration – that is an area where we have proposals. I suppose the Social Democrats will be prepared to talk to us about this as well.

“The third topic is the economic situation. We have to protect work in the industrial sector in Germany.”

He also earlier used social media to say “Europe stands unwaveringly by Ukraine’s side” and how “we must put Ukraine in a position of strength”.

Continue Reading

World

Pope Francis ‘resumes some work’ after ‘slight improvement’ in health, Vatican says

Published

on

By

Pope Francis 'resumes some work' after 'slight improvement' in health, Vatican says

Pope Francis’s health has shown a “slight improvement” but he remains in a critical condition, the Vatican has said.

The Pope, 88, has been at Rome’s Gemelli Hospital since 14 February and is being treated for double pneumonia and chronic bronchitis.

In a statement on Monday evening, the Vatican said: “The clinical conditions of the Holy Father, in their critical state, show a slight improvement.

“Even today there were no episodes of asthmatic respiratory crises; some laboratory tests improved.

“Monitoring of mild renal failure is not a cause for concern. Oxygen therapy continues, although with slightly reduced flow and oxygen percentage

“The doctors, considering the complexity of the clinical picture, are prudently not releasing the prognosis yet. In the morning he received the Eucharist, while in the afternoon he resumed work activity.

“In the evening he called the Parish Priest of the Parish of Gaza to express his paternal closeness. Pope Francis thanks all the people of God who have gathered in these days to pray for his health.”

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

World

A gift any Russian leader could only dream of is in Putin’s grasp – a NATO without US military support

Published

on

By

A gift any Russian leader could only dream of is in Putin's grasp - a NATO without US military support

In a strictly military sense, the war in Ukraine is not going so badly for Kyiv. 

Russian territorial gains on the ground have slowed to a crawl since last November for which they are losing, on average, some 1,500 men every day.

They have almost – but still not quite – taken Toretsk. And after months of being on the verge of overwhelming the other key strategic towns of Chasiv Yar and Pokrovsk, Russian forces still remain outside them.

Russia’s massive air bombing campaign against the Ukrainian power grid, its critical infrastructure and civilian targets has not brought Kyiv to its knees, though this has been far and away the toughest winter of Russia’s air offensive against Ukraine.

Follow Ukraine war latest

And in the Black Sea, Ukraine has chased the Russian navy away from its western waters and thus kept its vital shipping routes open from the Odesa ports to the Mediterranean and the Danube Basin. This is a strategic battle Ukraine has unquestionably won.

But with so much material help from Iran, North Korea and China, Russia is obviously prepared to carry on the war, even though on current trends, its own economy will be pretty shaky by the end of this year.

If Western powers, particularly the United States, continued with their previous levels of support, then Ukraine could carry on as well, if it were minded to keep fighting, even with its more limited pool of manpower.

But the battlefield doesn’t matter much any more. The political ground has dramatically shifted under Kyiv and its principal backers in Europe.

The US seems to have suddenly reversed its position under President Trump, and it is driving Ukraine into a very rapid, so-called ‘peace deal’. Serious negotiations have not yet begun, but top US decision-makers seem to want to give Moscow more than it could ever have dreamed of when its “special military operation” in Ukraine went so spectacularly wrong three years ago.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Three years of war in Ukraine

Moscow now feels it has a very good chance of keeping all its military gains, getting even parts of the Ukrainian regions it hasn’t yet conquered, getting some relief from sanctions, US investment in its economy and re-entry into the G7, which would go back to being a G8.

It will also be making demands on what Kyiv will and will not be allowed to do and what NATO should do to “reassure” Moscow that it won’t have to invade anyone else in an act of self-defence.

Most of all, the US is holding out the tantalizing prospect to Russia that NATO’s “transatlantic dimension” may be militarily finished under the Trump administration. That implies that if the Europeans end up fighting Russia in the future, the US will stand aside.

That prospect is the greatest free gift Washington could ever give Moscow.

Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, even Gorbachev and Yeltsin, fervently wished for it but never even got close. Putin may feel it is now within his grasp, whatever happens next in Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Trending