Connect with us

Published

on

An interest rate rise by the Bank of England at midday is a nailed-on certainty – though opinions are split on the level of additional pain that could be imposed as efforts to curb the country’s inflation problem stumble.

At the start of this week, policymakers were widely tipped to raise the base rate by a quarter of a percentage point to 4.75% – a record 13th consecutive increase – maintaining a slower path for hikes since March.

But the latest inflation figures, published yesterday, prompted financial market participants to anticipate a greater, almost even, chance of a half percentage point hike to 5%.

While there were already concerns about the stubborn pace of price rises, the inflation data came as a shock.

It showed price growth was becoming more engrained in the economy while the main consumer prices index (CPI) also failed to budge lower as most experts had predicted.

The Bank had also previously expressed concerns about the pace of wage rises which, it argues, contributes to demand and further inflation ahead.

Inflation is proving more difficult to cool than had been anticipated, and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt told Sky News last month he would even be comfortable with a recession if it brought inflation to heel.

The only tool the Bank has to do that, rate rises, will mean more pain for borrowers whatever today’s rate decision brings.

Read more: PM and chancellor face conundrum as mortgages rise – and there’s no silver bullet to end the crisis

Growing interest rate expectations over recent weeks have forced up funding costs for lenders, with data from Moneyfacts this week showing average rates for two-year fixed mortgage deals rising above 6%.

They have continued to rise each day this week having stood just above 2.5% in March last year.

With the financial markets now seeing the Bank rate potentially rising to 6% by early next year, such a level, if realised, would mean mortgage rates have far further to rise.

Read more:
The solution to bringing down inflation is a political nightmare for the Tories
Mortgage misery: What is causing the crunch, will it get worse and what can you do if you are struggling?
‘Eyewatering’ hit to 1.4 million, mainly young, mortgage customers ahead, IFS warns

In making its rate decision today, the Monetary Policy Committee could face a big split in voting – though the majority of opinion among commentators is that a quarter-point rise will be the result.

After all, the Bank has consistently steered markets away from their peak rate scenarios this year and even signalled that a pause in the rate cycle was close.

But the core function of the MPC is to keep inflation around a target rate of 2% – and there are signs of frustration in Whitehall that the independent Bank of England is lagging behind the curve.

So at a sticky 8.7% – and with wage growth and so-called core inflation (which strips out volatile elements such as energy and food) ticking up last month – some might be forgiven for thinking there was every justification for a 0.5 percentage point rate hike.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Sticky’ inflation explained

The other side of the argument suggests a smaller rise would be sufficient as there is evidence that the 12 rate hikes to date, along with a natural easing in many costs, were starting to have an effect.

Samuel Tombs, chief UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said wider data suggested wage growth pressures would start to reduce and that energy-linked inflation would fall sharply, allowing an easing of price growth more widely.

He said of the MPC’s dilemma: “The headline rate of CPI inflation still looks set to fall sharply over the remainder of this year, probably to about 4.5% by December and to around 2% in the second half of 2024.”

He added: “We continue to think that the MPC will not raise Bank rate all the way to the near 6% level priced-in by markets before today’s data; for now, our base case remains Bank rate peaks at 5%.”

Continue Reading

UK

Prince Harry denies having ‘physical fight’ with Prince Andrew

Published

on

By

Prince Harry denies having 'physical fight' with Prince Andrew

Prince Harry has denied having a fight with Prince Andrew after it was claimed “punches were thrown” between the pair in 2013.

The allegations appeared in excerpts from a new book on the Duke of York being serialised in the Daily Mail.

It claims a row started after Prince Andrew said something behind Harry’s back, with Andrew “left with a bloody nose” and the pair needing to be broken up.

It also claimed the Duke of York once warned his nephew about marrying Meghan and suggested it wouldn’t last long.

However, a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex strongly denied the claims.

“I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry,” a statement said.

They said a legal letter had been sent to the Daily Mail due to “gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks” in its reporting.

The book – Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York – is billed as the first joint biography of Prince Andrew and ex-wife Sarah Ferguson.

It’s said to be based on interviews with “over a hundred people who have never spoken before”.

Prince Harry – in his own 2023 book Spare – made his own claims of an altercation with Prince William.

He said his brother once knocked him to the floor amid a confrontation over Meghan’s “rude” and “abrasive” behaviour.

“It all happened so fast. So very fast,” Harry wrote in the book.

“He grabbed me by the collar, ripping my necklace, and he knocked me to the floor. I landed on the dog’s bowl, which cracked under my back, the pieces cutting into me.”

“I lay there for a moment, dazed, then got to my feet and told him to get out,” the prince added.

Harry claimed his brother wanted him to hit him back “but I chose not to”, and that William later returned and apologised.

Read more from Sky News:
Search for British woman missing in Greece
Two-year-old girl found alive in suitcase

The Duke Of Sussex has described his relationship with his family as extremely strained after he quit as a working royal and took legal action against the media, and over the removal of his UK police protection.

He claimed earlier this year the King wouldn’t speak to him and there had “been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family”.

Continue Reading

UK

Search for British woman who disappeared from Greek beach

Published

on

By

Search for British woman who disappeared from Greek beach

A search is under way for a British woman who went missing from a beach in Kavala, northern Greece.

The Hellenic Coastguard said the port authority received reports that Michele Ann Joy Bourda, 59, was missing on the evening of 1 August.

The woman went missing from the Ofrynio beach area.

The coastguard is investigating reports that her belongings were left on the beach.

On Sunday, three recreational craft, five fishing boats and two patrol boats were involved in the search.

According to local media, she lived with her husband, who is reportedly of Greek origin, in the Macedonian city of Serres.

She had gone to the beach with him and reportedly vanished while he was sleeping on a sunbed.

More on Greece

The charity LifeLine Hellas, which put out an appeal to try and find Ms Bourda, said she went missing at noon on 1 August.

She has been described as having straight blonde hair up to her shoulders and being 1.73m tall.

Continue Reading

UK

Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation – and how much they’ll get

Published

on

By

Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation - and how much they'll get

Martin Lewis says motorists who were mis-sold car finance are likely to receive “hundreds, not thousands of pounds” – with regulators launching a consultation on a new compensation scheme.

The founder of MoneySavingExpert.com believes it is “very likely” that about 40% of Britons who entered personal contact purchase or hire purchase agreements between 2007 and 2021 will be eligible for payouts.

“Discretionary commission arrangements” saw brokers and dealers charge higher levels of interest so they could receive more commission, without telling consumers.

Pics: PA
Image:
Pics: PA

Speaking to Sky News Radio’s Faye Rowlands, Lewis said: “Very rarely will it be thousands of pounds unless you have more than one car finance deal.

“So up to about a maximum of £950 per car finance deal where you are due compensation.”

Lewis explained that consumers who believe they may have been affected should check whether they had a discretionary commission arrangement by writing to their car finance company.

However, the personal finance guru warned against using a claims firm.

More on Money

“They’re hardly going to do anything for you and you might get the money paid to you automatically anyway, in which case you’re giving them 30% for nothing,” he added.

Read more: How to tell if you’ve been mis-sold car finance

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Who’s eligible for payout after car finance scandal?

Yesterday, the Financial Conduct Authority said its review of the past use of motor finance “has shown that many firms were not complying with the law or our disclosure rules that were in force when they sold loans to consumers”.

The FCA’s statement added that those affected “should be appropriately compensated in an orderly, consistent and efficient way”.

Lewis told Sky News that the consultation will launch in October – and will take six weeks.

“We expect payouts to come in 2026, assuming this will happen and it’s very likely to happen,” he said.

“As for exactly how will work, it hasn’t decided yet. Firms will have to contact people, although there is an issue about them having destroyed some of the data for older claims.”

He believes claims will either be paid automatically – or affected consumers will need to opt in and apply to get compensation back.

Read more from Sky News:
Hamas ‘ready’ to deliver aid to hostages
Oasis ‘saddened’ after man dies at concert

What motorists should do next

The FCA says you may be affected if you bought a car under a finance scheme, including hire purchase agreements, before 28 January 2021.

Anyone who has already complained does not need to do anything.

The authority added: “Consumers concerned that they were not told about commission, and who think they may have paid too much for the finance, should complain now”.

Its website advises drivers to complain to their finance provider first.

If you’re unhappy with the response, you can then contact the Financial Ombudsman.

Any compensation scheme will be easy to participate in, without drivers needing to use a claims management company or law firm.

The FCA has warned motorists that doing so could end up costing you 30% of any compensation in fees.

The FCA estimates the cost of any scheme – including compensation and administrative costs – to be no lower than £9bn.

But in a video on X, Lewis said that millions of people are likely to be due a share of up to £18bn.

The regulator’s announcement comes after the Supreme Court ruled on a separate, but similar, case on Friday.

Continue Reading

Trending