Connect with us

Published

on

Share on Pinterest People who drink an excessive number of drinks will be impaired, even if they are heavy drinkers. Narcisa Palici / 500px/Getty ImagesA new study found that when people with alcohol-use disorder consumed the equivalent of seven to eight drinks they showed impairment on fine motor and cognitive tasks.This impairment was more than double what they experienced after consuming the smaller intoxicating amount of alcohol. Heavy drinkers and people with AUD both reported feeling less impaired than the light drinkers. Tolerance also does not reduce the damage that can be caused by alcohol, experts say.

While under some conditions, heavy drinkers may be better at holding their liquor, this is only true up to a certain level of alcohol intake, say researchers from the University of Chicago.

In a study published June 18 in Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research, they tested the effects of alcohol consumption on young adults with different patterns of alcohol use light and heavy social drinkers, and those with alcohol use disorder (or AUD, previously known as alcoholism). Differences between heavy and light drinkers

Researchers found that heavy drinkers and those with AUD showed less overall impairment on fine motor and cognitive tasks after consuming the equivalent of four to five drinks, compared to light drinkers.

This amount of alcohol is sufficient to produce a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08-0.09%, the lower limit in the United States for drunk driving.

However, when people with AUD consumed the equivalent of seven to eight drinks which researchers say is more in line with their usual drinking habits, and produces a BAC of around 0.13% they showed impairment on both of those tasks.

In fact, this impairment was more than double what they experienced after consuming the smaller intoxicating amount of alcohol. Three hours after drinking, their performance on these tasks still hadnt returned to their baseline level.

In addition, people with AUD had greater impairment after consuming the larger amount of alcohol than what light drinkers experienced after drinking the lesser amount.

Theres a lot of thinking that when experienced drinkers (those with AUD) consume alcohol, they are tolerant to its impairing effects, study author Andrea King, PhD, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral neuroscience at the University of Chicago, said in a news release.

[Our study] supported that a bit, but with a lot of nuances, she added. When [young people with AUD] drank alcohol in our study at a dose similar to their usual drinking pattern, we saw significant impairments on both the fine motor and cognitive tests that was even more impairment than a light drinker gets at the intoxicating dose. Health effects of alcohol

Dr. Lawrence Weinstein, chief medical officer of American Addiction Centers, who was not involved in the new research, said the study highlights that technically, no one can handle their liquor.

There may be a marked difference in the amount of alcohol at which someone becomes intoxicated, which is a worrying issue in itself, but ethanol, acetaldehyde and other metabolites are toxicants that will affect anyone who consumes alcohol despite the tolerance theyve developed, he told Healthline.

Tolerance also does not reduce the damage that can be caused by alcohol, he said, adding: It is illogical to believe that one would remain unaffected by regular consumption [of alcohol].

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 140,000 people die from excessive alcohol use in the United States each year, making it the fourth-leading preventable cause of death in the country.

In addition, almost 30% of U.S. traffic fatalities in 2019 involved alcohol-impaired driving, reports the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Over the long term, excessive alcohol use can increase the risk of high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, liver disease, certain types of cancer and other health problems.

[Alcohol is] costly to our society for so many reasons, said King in the release. Im hoping we can educate people who are experienced high-intensity drinkers who think that theyre holding their liquor or that theyre tolerant and wont experience accidents or injury from drinking. Different drinking patterns

In the new study, researchers enrolled almost 400 young people, most in their 20s, with different drinking patterns:light drinkers: consumed six or fewer drinks per week, with few binge drinking episodesheavy drinkers: consumed at least 10 drinks per week, with one to five heavy drinking episodes during that timedrinkers with AUD: consumed 28 or more drinks per week (21 or more for women), with at least 11 heavy drinking episodes per month; they also had to meet two or more clinical criteria for AUD

Binge drinking means consuming five or more drinks within about two hours for men, and four or more drinks for women.

Participants underwent two rounds of testing, one after consuming a high alcohol dose (the equivalent of four to five drinks) and the other after consuming a placebo drink containing only 1% alcohol (to create a similar taste). Both contained a flavored drink mix.

Researchers told participants they would receive a drink containing alcohol, a stimulant, a sedative or a placebo. This was to reduce the effect that peoples expectations might have on the results.

Participants consumed each drink over a 15-minute period.

Before drinking the beverage, and 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes after drinking, participants took a breathalyzer and completed two performance tasks.

One task involved inserting a grooved metal peg into randomly slotted holes; this measured fine motor skills. The other was a pencil-and-paper task designed to test cognitive skills.

At the 30- and 180-minute intervals, participants also reported how impaired they felt. Impacts of higher alcohol intake

Heavy drinkers and people with AUD both reported feeling less impaired than the light drinkers.

In addition, these two groups showed less overall alcohol impairment on the fine motor and cognitive tests; although all groups had similar impairment on the fine motor test at the 30-minute interval.

The performance of heavy drinkers and people with AUD returned to baseline more quickly than that of light drinkers, suggesting they may have greater alcohol tolerance.

However, people with AUD often drink more than four or five drinks in a session. So researchers asked a subset of participants with AUD to repeat the tasks after consuming the equivalent of seven to eight drinks.

At this dose, they had more than double the impairment they experienced at the lower intoxicating dose. Their performance also did not return to baseline during the testing, even after three hours.

They also experienced greater impairment from that higher dose than light drinkers did after the lower intoxicating dose.

I was surprised at how much impairment that group had to that larger dose, because while its 50% more [alcohol] than the first dose, were seeing more than double the impairment, King said in the release.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

What did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk – and why was his show suspended?

Published

on

By

What did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk - and why was his show suspended?

Jimmy Kimmel’s talk show has been suspended after comments he made about Charlie Kirk’s death during an opening monologue.

The veteran late-night host used his show on Monday night to accuse Donald Trump and his allies of capitalising on the conservative influencer’s assassination last week, causing backlash from right-wing politicians and influencers.

Disney-owned ABC said on Wednesday it would be taken off-air indefinitely – and with immediate effect – sparking strong responses from both Republicans and Democrats.

But what did Kimmel say, what reasons have been given for the suspension – and what has the reaction been?

What did Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk’s death?

Delivering his opening monologue, the host said the “MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it”.

He also accused them of “working very hard to capitalise on the murder”.

More from US

He then played a clip of Mr Trump being asked about how he was “holding up” by a reporter two days after Kirk’s shooting, in which the president said he was doing “very good” before pivoting to the subject of construction being done nearby for the White House’s new ballroom.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Jimmy Kimmel’s Charlie Kirk monologue

Kimmel then quipped: “He’s at the fourth stage of grief: construction.

“This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he calls a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” he added.

He highlighted supposed hypocrisy in how Republicans have responded to Kirk’s death, suggesting Vice President JD Vance’s unfounded claims that “most of the lunatics in American politics today are proud members of the far left” were “complete bull****”.

Mr Kimmel drew attention to Capitol rioters who, on 6 January 2021, “wanted to hang” Mr Trump’s first term vice president, Mike Pence, for certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.

He said: “Was that the liberal left? Or the toothless army who stormed the Capitol on January 6?”

The MAGA movement, led by the president, has been critical of the left as a whole since Mr Kirk’s shooting – even before suspect Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged.

In his Oval Office address on the night of the shooting, Mr Trump said the “radical left” had “compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals” for years, and that “this kind of rhetoric is directly responsible” for the shooting.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s Oval Office address after the shooting

Show suspended after pressure mounted on Disney and ABC

On Wednesday, an ABC spokesperson said Jimmy Kimmel Live would “be pre-empted indefinitely”, without elaborating on the decision. It is not known when or if it will return.

Before the announcement, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Brendan Carr, an independent US government agency that regulates television and radio, threatened to “take action” against Disney and ABC.

Kimmel's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Pic: AP
Image:
Kimmel’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Pic: AP

Mr Carr, a fervent Trump backer, warned the companies during an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson on Wednesday: “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.”

Further pressure came from network operator NexStar, which operates more than 20 ABC affiliates, after it announced it would be pulling Mr Kimmel’s show from its channels over the comments, which it called “offensive and insensitive”.

Both Disney and NexStar have FCC business ahead of them. Disney is seeking regulatory approval for ESPN’s acquisition of the NFL Network and NexStar needs the Trump administration’s go-ahead to complete its $6.2billion purchase of broadcast rival Tegna.

Fellow ABC affiliate Sinclair, which owns a swathe of local media in the United States, also said it would stop airing Mr Kimmel’s show before ABC suspended it.

What has been the reaction to Kimmel’s ‘cancellation’?

People protesting outside the centre where Kimmel's show is filmed. Pic: Reuters
Image:
People protesting outside the centre where Kimmel’s show is filmed. Pic: Reuters

The president – who is in the UK for his state visit – celebrated the move on Truth Social, writing: “The ratings challenged Jimmy Kimmel Show is CANCELLED. Congratulations to ABC for finally having the courage to do what had to be done.”

His sentiments have been echoed widely on the right, while Democrats have shared their outrage at Mr Kimmel’s suspension.

California Governor Gavin Newsom said the Republicans did “not believe in free speech” and that they were “censoring you in real time,” while Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer called for people “across the political spectrum… to stop what’s happening to Jimmy Kimmel”.

Celebrities who have guested on the show joined Democrats in speaking out. Wanda Sykes accused Mr Trump of seeking to end freedom of speech, while Ben Stiller tweeted: “This isn’t right.”

Actress Jean Smart shared a picture of her with Kimmel on Instagram and said she was “horrified” by the show’s cancellation, and comedian Michael Kosta, a rotating host on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, urged TV networks to “push back”.

Read more:
Body found in Tesla registered to singer named as missing 15-year-old girl
Robert Redford’s grandchildren pay tribute as they share family photos

Similarly, unions representing writers and actors branded the move as an attack on free speech, and accused ABC of caving to pressure from the White House.

The Writers Guild of America West and Writers Guild of America East said in a joint statement: “Shame on those in government who forget this founding truth. As for our employers, our words have made you rich. Silencing us impoverishes the whole world.”

Kimmel has not commented.

The group Refuse Fascism organised a protest outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre in Hollywood for Thursday, where the show is usually filmed.

‘A really dangerous moment for democracy’

Fiona O’Brien, UK director of Reporters Without Borders, told Sky News that the show’s suspension represented a “really dangerous moment for democracy”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘The media is not there to serve politicians’

“The media is not there to serve politicians,” she said. “The media is there to hold those in power to account, to scrutinise them. The general public, which is who the media serve, have a right to know what those in power are doing.”

She suggested that the tactics the Trump administration is accused of using to “block” freedom of speech, such as threatening to sue media corporations, are used by authoritarian governments around the world.

“It’s a way to try and control the narrative… silence your critics and have have only one side of the story told,” she added. “So any of these kinds of attacks represent a move away from objectivity.”

Barack Obama on Jimmy Kimmel Live in 2016. Pic: Susan Walsh/AP
Image:
Barack Obama on Jimmy Kimmel Live in 2016. Pic: Susan Walsh/AP

Writing on social media, former president Barack Obama, once a guest on Kimmel’s show said: “After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like.”

Trump targets two remaining late show hosts

Talk show hosts Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers. Pic: AP
Image:
Talk show hosts Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers. Pic: AP

The president has taken issue with Kimmel – and other late-night hosts – throughout the years, as they often use their shows’ monologues to criticise Mr Trump and other Republicans.

Jimmy Kimmel Live’s demise comes just weeks after Stephen Colbert’s The Late Show was cancelled by CBS.

After 10 years with Mr Colbert at the helm, the show is set to end when its current season ends next May.

While CBS said the move was “purely a financial decision” and “not related in any way to the show’s performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,” his fans have speculated it was a result of Mr Trump, who he regularly criticises.

The president praised the move at the time, saying “his talent was even worse than his ratings”.

Now Mr Trump is pushing for the axing of the two remaining late night shows belonging to Jimmy Fallon and Seth Myers, who also regularly make him and his aides the butt of their jokes.

“Kimmel has ZERO talent, and worse ratings than even Colbert, if that’s possible,” the president said on Truth Social after Mr Kimmel’s show was cancelled.

“That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!! President DJT.”

Continue Reading

Sports

NCAA removes spring transfer window for football

Published

on

By

NCAA removes spring transfer window for football

College football is officially moving to a single offseason transfer portal window, the NCAA announced Wednesday.

The Division I Administrative Committee voted to approve a legislative change that eliminates the spring transfer window but did not sign off on establishing Jan. 2-11 as the lone portal window for FBS and FCS players.

In response to feedback from student-athletes, the FBS and FCS oversight committees will discuss modifying the dates and length of the proposed January window. The Administrative Committee will consider those adjustments when it meets in October.

FBS head coaches advocated for a January portal window at the AFCA convention in January, and both oversight committees voted to support changing the transfer windows earlier this month. The reform will bring major changes to the timing and duration of the offseason transfer period in college football.

The initial proposal would require college football players to wait until Jan. 2 — the day after the completion of the College Football Playoff quarterfinals — to enter their names in the NCAA transfer portal database and be contacted by prospective schools. Graduate transfers were previously allowed to enter the portal early but now must also wait until the January window.

Players would have 10 days to enter the portal but are under no deadline to make a commitment to their next school once they enter.

Players on teams still competing in the College Football Playoff in January would have five days after their final postseason game to enter the portal. This season’s CFP semifinals — the Vrbo Fiesta Bowl and the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl — are scheduled for Jan. 8 and 9, respectively.

In previous years, the winter transfer portal window opened in early December on the Monday after bowl game selections. The change is aimed at alleviating some of the stress of the loaded December calendar, during which transfer recruiting, coaching changes, bowl practices, high school signing day, bowl games and the College Football Playoff all were going on simultaneously.

Last year’s winter portal window was Dec. 9-28 with the spring portal window on April 16-25. The total number of FBS scholarship transfers has increased yearly and surpassed 3,200 in 2024-25.

The elimination of the spring transfer period is a move the NCAA has considered in recent years. It was first established as a 15-day window in April 2023 and marked the final deadline for players to transfer and be immediately eligible at their next school. In 2024-25, the spring window was reduced to a 10-day period.

The spring window had become a source of frustration among coaches in recent years. Unexpected post-spring departures are difficult to replace, and the elimination of the one-time transfer rule has given players and agents the leverage to demand more money by threatening to transfer. Coaches have also taken advantage of the spring window to cut underperforming players and bring in additional transfers.

This year, more than 1,100 FBS scholarship players entered the transfer portal in the month of April.

Head coaching changes currently trigger a 30-day window for players who wish to enter the portal and explore a transfer. Football players at UCLA and Virginia Tech are already allowed to transfer early after their head coaches were fired Sunday.

Though many head coaches have expressed support for a January transfer window, Ohio State coach Ryan Day spoke out against it earlier this month, telling reporters it “doesn’t make any sense to me” that coaches must focus on recruiting transfers while their team is still competing for a national championship.

Continue Reading

Sports

S. Carolina’s Sellers questionable to face Mizzou

Published

on

By

S. Carolina's Sellers questionable to face Mizzou

South Carolina quarterback LaNorris Sellers is listed as questionable on the SEC availability report for Saturday’s game at No. 23 Missouri.

Sellers left the first half of the Gamecocks’ loss to Vanderbilt on Saturday after a hit to the head knocked him to the ground, and coach Shane Beamer said at halftime he wouldn’t return.

Sources told ESPN on Wednesday that Sellers has been in practice, and there’s optimism around his availability for Saturday.

Beamer made clear earlier in the week that there’s a “policy” at South Carolina that players who don’t practice on Tuesday and Wednesday aren’t going to play. Beamer has generally been mum on Sellers’ status this week, pointing to the injury report

Sellers, a redshirt sophomore, is one of the best players in the country and is considered a contender to be the top quarterback selected if he decides to enter the 2026 NFL draft. He accounted for 25 touchdowns last season — 18 passing and seven rushing. He threw for 2,534 yards and ran for an additional 674 in 2024.

Sellers was hit by Vanderbilt linebacker Langston Patterson with less than two minutes left in the second quarter of Saturday’s game. Patterson was ejected for targeting.

Sellers was replaced by sixth-year senior Luke Doty, who was 18-for-27 for 148 yards. He had an interception and didn’t lead the Gamecocks to a touchdown in the 31-7 home loss in Columbia. South Carolina didn’t score in the second half.

Continue Reading

Trending