Connect with us

Published

on

This image shows how the sun’s appearance changes between solar maximum (on the left) and solar minimum (on the right). (Image credit: NASA/Solar Dynamics Observatory)

From a distance, the sun may seem calm and steady. But zoom in, and our home star is actually in a perpetual state of flux, transforming over time from a uniform sea of fire to a chaotic jumble of warped plasma and back again in a recurring cycle. 

Every 11 years or so, the sun’s magnetic field gets tangled up like a ball of tightly wound rubber bands until it eventually snaps and completely flips — turning the north pole into the south pole and vice versa. In the lead-up to this gargantuan reversal, the sun amps up its activity: belching out fiery blobs of plasma, growing dark planet-size spots and emitting streams of powerful radiation.

This period of increased activity, known as solar maximum, is also a potentially perilous time for Earth, which gets bombarded by solar storms that can disrupt communications, damage power infrastructure, harm some living creatures (including astronauts) and send satellites plummeting toward the planet.

And some scientists think the next solar maximum may be coming sooner — and be much more powerful — than we thought. 

Originally, scientists predicted that the current solar cycle would peak in 2025. But a bumper crop of sunspots, solar storms and rare solar phenomena suggest solar maximum could arrive by the end of this year at the earliest — and several experts told Live Science we are poorly prepared. 

Related: 10 signs the sun is gearing up for its explosive peak — the solar maximum What causes the solar cycle? 

Approximately every 11 years, the sun goes from a low point in solar activity, known as solar minimum, to solar maximum and back again. It’s not clear exactly why the sun’s cycles last this long, but astronomers have noted the pattern ever since the first, aptly named Solar Cycle 1, which occurred between 1755 and 1766. The current cycle, Solar Cycle 25, officially began in December 2019, according to NASA.

So what causes our home star’s fluctuation? “It all comes down to the sun’s magnetic field,” Alex James, a solar physicist at University College London in the U.K., told Live Science.

At solar minimum, the sun’s magnetic field is strong and organized, with two clear poles like a normal dipole magnet, James said. The magnetic field acts as a “giant forcefield” that contains the sun’s superheated plasma, or ionized gas, close to the surface, suppressing solar activity, he added.

A butterfly-shaped coronal mass ejection explodes from the sun’s far side on March 10. (Image credit: NASA/Solar and Heliospheric Observatory)

But the magnetic field slowly gets tangled, with some regions becoming more magnetized than others, James said. As a result, the sun’s magnetic field gradually weakens, and solar activity begins to ramp up: Plasma rises from the star’s surface and forms massive magnetized horseshoes, known as coronal loops, that pepper the sun’s lower atmosphere. These fiery ribbons can then snap as the sun’s magnetic field realigns, releasing bright flashes of light and radiation, known as solar flares. Sometimes, flares also bring enormous, magnetized clouds of fast-moving particles, known as coronal mass ejections (CMEs).

A few years after the maximum, the sun’s magnetic field “snaps” and then completely flips. This ushers in the end of the cycle and the beginning of a new solar minimum, James said.

Related: Could a solar storm ever destroy Earth?

To determine where we are in the solar cycle, researchers monitor sunspots — darker, cooler, circular patches of our local star’s surface where coronal loops form. 

“Sunspots appear when strong magnetic fields poke through the surface of the sun,” James said. “By looking at those sunspots we can get an idea of how strong and complex the sun’s magnetic field is at that moment.”

A time-lapse image of two major sunspot groups moving across the surface of the sun between Dec. 2 and Dec. 27, 2022. (Image credit: Şenol Şanlı)

Sunspots are almost completely absent at solar minimum and increase in numbers until a peak at solar maximum, but there’s a lot of variation from cycle to cycle.

“Every cycle is different,” James said.Solar Cycle 25 

In April 2019, the Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel, which is made up of dozens of scientists from NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), released its forecast for Solar Cycle 25, suggesting that the solar maximum would likely begin sometime in 2025 and would be comparable in size to the maximum of Solar Cycle 24, which peaked unusually late between mid-2014 and early 2016 and was quite weak compared with past solar maximums.

But from the beginning, the forecast seemed off. For instance, the number of observed sunspots has been much higher than predicted. 

In December 2022, the sun reached an eight-year sunspot peak. And in January 2023, scientists observed more than twice as many sunspots as NASA had predicted (143 observed versus 63 estimated), with the numbers staying nearly as high over the following months. In total, the number of observed sunspots has exceeded the predicted number for 27 months in a row. 

While the bounty of sunspots is a major red flag, they are not the only evidence solar maximum could be here soon.

The ghostly lines of the sun’s corona, or upper atmosphere, were clearly visible during a “hybrid eclipse” on April 20. The red ring surrounds a CME that erupted the same day.  (Image credit: Petr Horálek, Josef Kujal, Milan Hlaváč)

Another key indicator of solar activity is the number and intensity of solar flares. In 2022, there were fivefold more C-class and M-class solar flares than there were in 2021, and year on year, the number of the most powerful, X-class solar flares is also increasing, according to SpaceWeatherLive.com. The first half of 2023 logged more X-class flares than in all of 2022, and at least one has directly hit Earth. (Solar flare classes include A, B, C, M and X, with each class being at least 10 times more powerful than the previous one.)

Related: 10 solar storms that blew us away in 2022

Solar flares can also bring geomagnetic storms — major disturbances of Earth’s magnetosphere caused by solar wind or CMEs. For instance, on March 24, a “stealth” CME hit Earth without warning and triggered the most powerful geomagnetic storm in more than six years, which created vast auroras, or northern lights, that were visible in more than 30 U.S. states. An overall increase in the number of geomagnetic storms this year has also caused the temperature in the thermosphere — the second-highest layer of Earth’s atmosphere ― to reach a 20-year peak.

Rare solar phenomena also become increasingly common near solar maximum — and several have happened in recent months. On March 9, a 60,000-mile-tall (96,560 kilometers) plasma waterfall rose above and then fell back towards the sun; on Feb. 2 an enormous polar vortex, or ring of fire, swirled around the sun’s north pole for more than 8 hours; and in March, a “solar tornado” raged for three days and stood taller than 14 Earths stacked on top of each other. 

All this evidence suggests that the solar maximum is “going to peak earlier and it’s going to peak higher than expected,” James told Live Science. This opinion is shared by many other solar physicists, experts told Live Science.Image 1 of 4A “plasma waterfall” rained down on the solar surface on March 9. (Image credit: Eduardo Schaberger Poupeau) A CME measuring around 1 million miles erupted from the sun in September 2022. (Image credit: Andrew McCarthy) A towering “solar tornado” raged on the sun’s surface for three days in March. (Image credit: NASA/SDO/composite by Steve Spaleta) A never-before-seen “polar vortex” appeared around the sun’s north pole on Feb. 2.in (Image credit: NASA/ Solar Dynamics Observatory)

The exact start to solar maximum will likely only be obvious once it has passed and solar activity decreases. However, one research group led by Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist and deputy director of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, has predicted  the solar maximum could peak later this year.

Past cycles suggest the solar maximum may last for somewhere between one and two years, though scientists don’t know for sure. Potential impacts on Earth 

So, the solar maximum may be coming on stronger and sooner than we anticipated. Why does that matter?

The answer primarily depends on whether solar storms barrel into Earth, Tzu-Wei Fang, a researcher at NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center who was not part of the Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel, told Live Science. To hit Earth, solar storms must be pointing in the right direction at the right time. Increases in solar activity make this more likely but don’t guarantee the planet will be slammed with more storms, she added. 

But if a solar storm does hit, it can ionize Earth’s upper atmosphere and fuel radio and satellite blackouts. Big storms that block the planet’s connections to satellites can temporarily wipe out long-range radio and GPS  systems for up to half the planet, Fang said. On its own, that is just a minor inconvenience, but if a lengthy blackout coincided with a major disaster, such as an earthquake or tsunami, the results could be catastrophic, she added.

Strong solar storms can also generate ground-based electrical currents that can damage metallic infrastructure, including older power grids and rail lines, Fang said.

Airplane passengers may also be walloped by higher levels of radiation during solar storms, although it’s not clear if the doses would be high enough to have any health impacts, Fang said. However, such spikes in radiation would be much more significant for astronauts onboard spacecraft, such as the International Space Station or the upcoming Artemis mission to the moon. As a result, “future missions should factor solar cycles into consideration,” she added.

Related: Could a powerful solar storm wipe out the internet?

Past research has also revealed that geomagnetic storms can disrupt the migrations of gray whales and other animals that rely on the Earth’s magnetic field lines to navigate, such as sea turtles and some birds, which can have disastrous consequences. 

This blurry image of auroras was taken from an airplane window during a major geomagentic storm on March 24. (Image credit: Dakota Snider)

An ionized upper atmosphere also becomes denser, which can create additional drag for Earth-orbiting satellites. This extra drag can push satellites into each other or force them out of orbit. For instance, In February 2022, 40 of SpaceX’s Starlink satellites burned up in Earth’s atmosphere when they plummeted to Earth during a geomagnetic storm the day after they were launched. 

And the number of satellites has exponentially increased compared with past solar cycles, Fang said. Most are operated by commercial companies that rarely factor space weather into satellite design or launch schedules, she added. 

“Companies want to launch satellites as soon as they can to make sure they don’t delay rocket launches,” Fang said. “Sometimes it’s better for them to launch a group and lose half than not launch at all.” This all raises the risks of major collisions or deorbiting satellites during the solar maximum, she added.

The chances of a once-in-a-century superstorm, such as the Carrington Event in 1859, also slightly increase during solar maximum, Fang said. While a long shot, such a storm could cause trillions of dollars’ worth of damage and majorly impact everyday life, she added.

Humans can do little to shield ourselves from a direct solar storm hit, but we can prepare for them by altering satellite trajectories, grounding planes and identifying vulnerable infrastructure, Fang said. As a result, more accurate solar weather forecasts are needed to help us prepare for the worst, she addedWhy were the forecasts wrong? 

If so many clues point to solar maximum being stronger and earlier than predicted, why didn’t scientists see it coming? Part of the problem is the way the prediction panels come up with their forecasts, Scott McIntosh told Live Science.

NASA and NOAA’s models have barely changed in the last 30 years, “but the science has,” McIntosh said. The models use data from past solar cycles such as sunspot number and cycle length, but do not fully account for each cycle’s individual progression, he added.

Related: When will the sun explode?

“It’s kind of like a big game of pin the tail on the donkey,” McIntosh said, where the “donkey” is the upcoming solar maximum and the prediction panel has blindfolded themselves by not using all available methods at their disposal.   

McIntosh and colleagues have proposed an alternative way to predict the strength of an upcoming solar maximum: so-called “solar terminators,” which occur right at the end of each solar minimum after the sun’s magnetic field has already flipped.

During solar minimum, a localized magnetic field, which is left behind from the sun’s magnetic-field flip, surrounds the sun’s equator. This localized field prevents the sun’s main magnetic field from growing stronger and getting tangled up, meaning the localized field essentially acts like a handbrake preventing solar activity from increasing.

But suddenly and without warning, this localized field disappears, releasing the brake and enabling solar activity to ramp up. This drastic change is what the team dubbed solar cycle termination events, or terminators. (Because solar terminators occur at the exact moment solar minimums end, they occur after each solar cycle has officially begun.)

Looking back over centuries of data, the team identified 14 individual solar terminators that preceded the start of solar maximums. The researchers noticed that the timing of these terminators correlates with the strength of the subsequent solar peaks. (The early years of data are sparse, so the team couldn’t identify solar terminators in every cycle.)

A graph showing the effects of solar terminators on solar cycle progression. The blurry sections represent solar minimum, and the dashed lines show terminator events. Solar activity sharply rises after solar terminators occur. (Image credit: McIntosh etl al. 2003)

For example, the terminator at the start of Solar Cycle 24 happened later than expected, which allowed for less magnetic field growth during Solar Cycle 24, resulting in a weaker solar maximum. But the terminator at the start of Solar Cycle 25, which occurred on Dec. 13, 2021, was earlier than expected, which the researchers took as a sign that the solar maximum would be stronger than the previous one. Ever since the 2021 terminator, solar activity has been ramping up faster than expected. RELATED STORIES—Puzzle of the sun’s mysterious ‘heartbeat’ signals finally solved

—Sun’s fiery surface revealed in amazing composite of 90,000 images

—Mini sun with simulated gravity could help prepare us for deadly solar storms

The way Solar Cycle 25 is progressing suggests that solar terminators could be the best way of predicting future solar cycles, McIntosh said. In July 2022, NASA  acknowledged the work done by McIntosh and colleagues and noted that solar activity seemed to be ramping up sooner than expected. 

Still, NASA hasn’t updated its 2025 forecast in light of McIntosh’s data and is probably not going to incorporate terminators into future forecasts, McIntosh predicted. “I think they will just stick with their models.”

Continue Reading

US

Leaks plunge success of ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’ into serious doubt

Published

on

By

Leaks plunge success of 'Operation Midnight Hammer' into serious doubt

There is a critical question hanging over the events of the past few days.

Behind the chest-thumping from Donald Trump, and the bewilderment beyond at his statecraft-by-social-media, doubts have now reached fever pitch about the success of the American bombing of Iran’s nuclear sites.

Leaks from the US Defence Department suggest the bunker busting bombs dropped on Iran’s three nuclear enrichment sites might only have set the country’s nuclear capabilities back by months.

U.S. President Donald Trump holds a meeting alongside Vice President J.D. Vance in the Situation Room at the White House

“We were assuming that the damage was going to be much more significant than this assessment is finding,” said one of three sources, speaking to NBC News.

“This assessment is already finding that these core pieces are still intact. That’s a bad sign for the overall programme.”

NBC News has spoken to three sources – all of whom say that the initial assessment by the Defence Intelligence Agency has concluded that the US airstrikes were not as effective as Mr Trump claimed.

Similar leaks were made to The New York Times, The Washington Post and CNN.

More on Donald Trump

Follow latest developments in our live blog

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why did Trump lash out at Iran and Israel?

Responding to the CNN leak, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: “This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as ‘top secret’ but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community.”

She continued: “The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear programme. Everyone knows what happens when you drop 14 30,000lb bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.”

In his address to the nation on Saturday night, Mr Trump had said: “I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: Iran strikes ‘spectacular success’

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has also dismissed the leaks, saying: “Based on everything we have seen – and I’ve seen it all – our bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s ability to create nuclear weapons.

“Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target – and worked perfectly.”

“The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran, so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the president and the successful mission.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Iran’s nuclear capabilities

Battle Damage Assessments (BDAs) take a long time to be close to conclusive and require extensive intelligence analysis.

Speaking to Sky News, former director of the CIA and top US General David Petraeus cautioned about drawing any conclusions at this stage.

“Well, the truth is, it is just too soon. And those who are leaking should know that it takes a long time to do the battle damage assessment. And those who have actually pushed back in very conclusive ways also probably should have wait for the full results,” Gen Petraeus said.

“This is a very painstaking process. It’s an effort by the overall intelligence community, not just Defence Intelligence Agency. In fact, the CIA would be the lead in this effort to mine all sources of intelligence, imagery, intelligence of all types, signals, cyber, even open-source intelligence.”

Read more analysis:
There’s one F word Trump fears most
Can Tehran regard Trump as trusted broker of peace?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s ‘ripping up the rule book’

Beyond the debate over the extent of the damage, questions remain over whether Iran might have managed to move equipment including centrifuges. Critically too, the whereabouts of about 400kg of highly enriched uranium is unknown.

The classified assessment of the military’s operation in Iran has been transmitted to Congress and has been viewed by some senators in a secure location, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the situation.

“I’ve reviewed the classified material,” Democratic Party Senator Tim Kaine, a member of the Armed Services Committee, said.

“I’m a little bit disappointed that my colleagues went and looked at it and mainly started talking about it publicly. That’s not we’re supposed to do with a classified report,” he added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Iran ‘not at all’ thankful for Trump

Speaking on Sunday to NBC’s Meet The Press, Israel’s ambassador to the UN Danny Danon insisted Iran’s nuclear capability had been dramatically set back.

“I think it’s still very early to jump into conclusions. We have to wait for the assessment. I can tell you one thing for sure. If you look where Iran was 12 days ago and where they are today, you understand that both Israel and the US were able to degrade the capabilities, push them back decades, and if we had an imminent threat, it doesn’t exist anymore.”

Continue Reading

UK

In dramatic move, UK to buy F-35 stealth jets that can carry US nuclear warheads

Published

on

By

In dramatic move, UK to buy F-35 stealth jets that can carry US nuclear warheads

The UK will buy at least 12 F-35 stealth jets that can carry nuclear warheads in the most significant strengthening of its nuclear capability in a generation, the government has said.

Today, Sir Keir Starmer will tell a summit of NATO allies in The Hague that the new squadron will join an alliance mission that can be armed with US nuclear weapons.

The dramatic move will doubtless draw condemnation and concern from Russia and China.

But it comes at a time of growing global insecurity – and as the prime minister and his European and Canadian counterparts scramble to convince Donald Trump they are serious about bolstering their ability to defend Europe, instead of overly relying on the United States.

The US president, a long-standing NATO sceptic, raised questions about whether he would uphold the alliance’s founding Article 5 principle – that an attack on one is an attack on all – before he even arrived in the Dutch city last night.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘There’s numerous definitions of Article 5’

An urgent need to keep Mr Trump on side has prompted NATO allies to agree to increase spending on defence and national resilience to a new target of 5% of GDP by 2035.

As part of this push to rearm, Sir Keir will give the Royal Air Force the ability to carry airborne nuclear warheads for the first time since the 1990s.

More on Defence

“In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted,” he said.

“These F-35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our allies.

“The UK’s commitment to NATO is unquestionable, as is the alliance’s contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure, but we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is NATO’s 5% defence spending goal?

It was not immediately clear when the F-35 jets would be bought or how much they will cost, but the new squadron will be part of a NATO-led nuclear deterrence mission.

That is in contrast to the UK’s national nuclear deterrence, based on a fleet of four nuclear-armed submarines, though they too are used to defend the whole of the alliance.

Mark Rutte, the head of NATO, applauded the plan – saying: “The UK has declared its nuclear deterrent to NATO for many decades, ​and I strongly welcome today’s announcement that the UK will now also join NATO’s nuclear mission and procure the F-35A.

“This is yet another robust British contribution to NATO.”

Keir Starmer watches a demonstration by troops as he visits the Netherlands marines training base.
Pic: AP
Image:
Sir Keir watches a demonstration by troops as he visits the Netherlands marines training base. Pic: AP

Aircraft operated by a small number of NATO countries, including Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, are cleared to carry US-provided nuclear weapons in a war.

The RAF and the Royal Navy already operate F-35B jets that can fly off Britain’s two aircraft carriers, but they are not equipped to drop nuclear warheads.

The new planes will be the F-35A variant, operated by the air force, that take off from land but can fly further and be armed with nuclear or conventional weapons.

The government said they would all be based together at RAF Marham in Norfolk.

The government has long planned to purchase a total of 138 F-35 aircraft, but has so far only acquired around three dozen – seven years since the first jets entered service.

The decision to purchase 12 of the A-variant does not mean extra aircraft.

It just means a diversification in the fleet – something the RAF has long been pushing for – though it’s a decision some in the Royal Navy have long pushed back against, believing it would reduce even further the number of the B-version that operate from their carriers.

Read more:
PM warns of ‘era of radical uncertainty’
Podcast – What is NATO without America?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is the UK preparing for war?

The government described the plan to purchase nuclear-capable aircraft as the “biggest strengthening of the UK’s nuclear posture in a generation”.

Defence Secretary John Healey said a major defence review published earlier in the month highlighted new nuclear risks.

“It recommended a new UK role in our collective defence and deterrence through a NATO-first approach,” he said.

However, the public version of the Strategic Defence Review stopped short of making any specific recommendation.

It merely said “the UK must explore how to support the US and its NATO allies in strengthening extended deterrence across the Euro-Atlantic”.

The F-35 aircraft is made by the US defence giant Lockheed Martin, but the British defence company BAE Systems is also a key contributor.

The order will support 20,000 jobs in the F-35 programme in the UK.

Continue Reading

Politics

Coinbase claims ‘key role’ in Secret Service’s biggest-ever crypto seizure

Published

on

By

Coinbase claims ‘key role’ in Secret Service’s biggest-ever crypto seizure

Coinbase claims ‘key role’ in Secret Service’s biggest-ever crypto seizure

Coinbase says it helped the US Secret Service seize $225 million in crypto allegedly stolen by scammers, the largest crypto seizure in the agency’s history.

Continue Reading

Trending