Connect with us

Published

on

The following is a transcript excerpt from the Sunday Extra edition of Morning Wire. The full episode can he heard here.

After months of speculation, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis entered the 2024 presidential race late last month and currently finds himself closer to former President Trump in the polls than the rest of the Republican field. Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief John Bickley caught up with Governor DeSantis on the streets of San Francisco earlier this week to witness firsthand the twin crises of homelessness and the fentanyl epidemic. Along the way, they also encountered a group of police officers attempting to move some of the homeless people out of the area. Those officers approached the governor to thank him for his work. They then sat down in a nearby cafe afterwards for the rest of the interview.

BICKLEY: Governor, were here in the heart of San Francisco, behind enemy lines, if you will. Weve got a very progressive California and a very conservative Florida under your leadership. What are you hoping to see here in California? What are you trying to experience firsthand here?

DESANTIS: I think what were seeing is the failure of leftist policies. When we pulled in, I saw somebody defecating on the street. I think this is the urban defecation capital of America. Youve seen a city that used to be one of the best in the country in terms of vibrancy and prosperity. Youve seen it become hollowed out, as a direct result of leftist policy and ideology. Its sad. But, I can tell you I never saw a California license plate growing up in Florida. Then, I became governor, and especially in the aftermath of COVID, and we have Californians leaving San Francisco to go to Miami and other places. We like what were doing. People appreciate it partly because it was intolerable to live in this area. They dont care about crime or homelessness. No one wants to live under those circumstances.

BICKLEY: What are some different things youve done in Florida, as opposed to California, thats keeping this kind of situation from happening?

DESANTIS: Whatever they do, we try to do the opposite on a lot of this stuff. They really facilitate increasing homelessness. Theyre very tolerant about illegal drug use, particularly in public. We will not countenance that. And their approach to criminal justice has been a total disaster. You cannot have somebody get into office and say, We are not gonna prosecute criminals. That just doesnt work. And Ive talked to people that have moved to Florida from here and other parts of the country, and they say, Someone mugged me, or They robbed my car, or They even broke into my home. No prosecution. Can you imagine that? Of course youre going to get more crime as a result. When you dont do those basics, the whole quality of life can collapse. The fact that thats happened here in what wouldve been one of the wealthiest areas in the entire world and probably was 10 years ago shows you that the ideas we fight over matter. When we put our ideas into place in Florida, we thrived. When the Left wing ideas are put in here, the whole place crumbles.

BICKLEY: We have one of the hubs here of the homeless crisis, and we also have right here the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. And here, we have the Nancy Pelosi Federal Building on their front lawn. Weve seen a lot of really young drug addicts here.

DESANTIS: Its a little ironic. I mean, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has done a lot of damage in this country with left-wing rulings over the years. Its gotten a little bit better, but its still very far out there. And then of course, Pelosis policies. In some respects, this is the logical culmination of the Pelosi liberalism that has been growing in San Francisco for many decades.

(Police officers approaches Governor DeSantis)

DESANTIS: Hey, how are you doing?

OFFICER: Its a pleasure meeting you.

DESANTIS: So, hey, good to see you, man. Youre city police?

OFFICER: Yes.

DESANTIS: How long have you been doing it?

OFFICER: 17 years.

DESANTIS: God bless you man. You got your work cut out for you here. How are you doing buddy? Thanks so much for your service.

OFFICER: Good luck, sir.

DESANTIS: We appreciate you guys. We appreciate you wearing the uniform,

OFFICER: Youve got a fight coming up next year.

DESANTIS: Well if people arent going to want a change in approach after seeing some of this, I mean, its just sad. You guys deserve better support. Its unacceptable that youre going out there, risking your life and like you can apprehend someone and they just let them go. Its absurd.

OFFICER: We appreciate it, sir. Have a great day.

DESANTIS: Thank you. Great to see you guys.

(After our walk and talk on the streets of San Francisco, we sat down in a nearby cafe to resume our conversation.)

BICKLEY: Governor, I have to bring up the fact that police officers spontaneously came up and shook your hand. I just want to process that for a second. What do you think is going on there? Were in San Francisco why are they enthusiastic about a Republican governor? What are they excited about?

DESANTIS: Well, theyve personally lived through the BLM riots, which the local officials effectively facilitated and urged on. Theyve seen weak-on-crime policies where theyll apprehend some criminal, and then [local officials] just wont prosecute them for really serious crimes. In Florida, weve stood for law and order across the board. If a cop in San Francisco isnt being treated well, we recruit them to Florida, and they get a $5,000 signing bonus if they come to our state. Were proud of that. Our crime rate in Floridas at a 50 year low. Obviously thats not whats happening here in San Francisco. In the heart of the BLM riots, I was one of the few guys willing to say, We stand with the people that wear the uniform. Were not gonna tolerate rioting; were not gonna do this. At that time, it was more fashionable to act like the police were the problem, and we never bought into that In Florida.

BICKLEY: On a federal level, how do you think you could make the environment for law enforcement more positive?

DESANTIS: Theres probably a few levers you can pull, but basically to target these Soros funded prosecutors who get elected like they did here in San Francisco on a platform to not enforce laws they dislike. So Ive met people who lived in San Francisco. They had their homes broken into, they went to the cops, and cops apprehended the guy. Do you want to press charges? Of course we do, they responded. Well, theyre not gonna prosecute, you know that. How would they not prosecute someone who breaks into your home? And so thats what ends up happening. And thats really a civil rights crisis for average people here because if the law is not enforced, you basically have anarchy reigning supreme. Theres a lot of reasons why San Franciscos gone downhill. Covid lockdowns were devastating here. They overdid it for so long; it was draconian. You obviously have bad tax and regulatory policies, but I think criminal justice not having public safety is is really the root. If people dont feel safe, theyre not going to want to be here. Thats why so many people have fled San Francisco because thats just the threshold that if you dont reach, people are gonna get out of Dodge. LISTEN: Catch the full interview with Governor Ron DeSantis on theSunday Extra edition of Morning Wire.

BICKLEY: You know, we heard the same kind of sentiment from the activists we talked to that are on the ground trying to work with the homeless crisis and the drug crisis. One of the things they brought up is actually the intersection of illegal immigration and crime issues here, and that the fentanyl crisis is driven a lot by the illegal immigration problem. Youve taken a lot of aggressive action on illegal immigration and actually had some public spats with Governor Newsom over that. Can you talk about that some?

DESANTIS: Theres no question that what Bidens allowed to happen at the border is killing Americans with fentanyl. In fact, Ive been on the streets here n San Francisco for like 10 minutes, and Ive seen defecation on the streets. Weve seen crack cocaine used openly on the streets, and weve seen fentanyl use openly on the streets. This has really got a vice grip around this community. Part of its because the government facilitates it, and they think its good to let people do this. But, yes, the borders been a huge problem for a lot of reasons, but fentanyl is probably the most deadly. Our view in Florida is that we will help at the border. Were doing that. Were not a sanctuary state. Weve banned sanctuary cities. If you bring in illegals from the border and smuggle them into Florida, were going to hold you accountable. Weve even authorized funds to transport illegal aliens to sanctuary jurisdictions, whether its Marthas Vineyard or whether its California. And Ill tell you that part of the reason they want to go to California is because they know theyre going to get benefits in California. And so California has made themselves a sanctuary state, and theyre basically incentivizing people to come illegally. As president, well crack down on sanctuary cities nationwide and sanctuary states, and well pull every lever we have because I think what theyre doing is flouting the law. The border, though, well do on day one, and well marshal all the assets: military, a civilian, you name it. Weve been talking about this in conservative circles for decades, and yet its never been fixed. Well bring it to a conclusion.

BICKLEY: Speaking of sanctuary states, California also defines itself as now a transgender sanctuary state. Florida has taken a very different sort of approach to this, through a lot of new policies. What would you do differently federally speaking, in terms of handling the transgender policies?

DESANTIS: In Florida, we said no sex change operations, sterilization, or puberty blockers for minors. They are sterilizing these kids and taking off their private parts and theyre minors. And what we found is as some of these kids get older, they have huge problems as a result of this. Many of them have huge regrets. And so were saying, Were not doing it in Florida. What does California do? Not only do they welcome that type of mutilation, they encourage kids, behind their parents backs, to go from other jurisdictions where they dont have the ability to get this type of gender surgery and come to California to do it as minors. I think its totally outrageous that thats happening. What theyre also doing in California, is they want to tell a parent, If you have a kid and the kid says, I know I was born a boy. Im 12, maybe I think Im a girl now. If you dont accept that, you could lose custody of your kid. Thats what theyre debating right now. I think its probably gonna end up passing just knowing the politics here, but how outrageous is that? So thats a massive attack on parental rights, and I think the modern Left thinks parents have a small role in the upbringing of their kid. And if theres a clash between leftist ideology and parental rights, they want the leftist ideology to trump the rights of the parents. In Florida, we completely reject that.

BICKLEY: Now youve gotten some pushback for your policies, specifically about parental rights. Some people have accused you of being kind of authoritarian in a sort of a strong government approach. How would you defend your policies?

DESANTIS: Well, if you look over the last three or four years, we took more action to limit government involvement in peoples lives by eliminating COVID lockdowns. We would go into local communities, and I would overrule them. And I would say, You cant force masks. You cant force kids to be locked out of school. You cant force businesses to close. To me, I think those are actions that promote freedom. I dont think those are authoritarian at all. I think what some people on the Left get frustrated with is the fact that we are successful in enacting policies. But Im getting this stuff through the legislature. Thats the way the constitutional system works. We say, We want a parents bill of rights. We work with the legislature, they deliver it and put it on my desk, and I sign it. We say, Parents Rights in Education, and we fought Disney to say, No gender ideology in the schools. Legislature passes it, I sign it, and it goes into law. Thats the way it should be done. Weve taken very strong action to protect and expand peoples freedom, and ultimately, thats the name of the game.

BICKLEY: As president, could you carry over some of those policies, on a federal level?

DESANTIS: I think so. First of all, Washingtons different from a state; theres no question about that. The swamp and the bureaucracy are way more entrenched. But, you know that going in. One of the things I did as governor before I got in, I had a compendium of all the powers of the governor: statutory, constitutional, and customary. So, I knew which levers to push. Same things gonna happen as president. Well know Article II, well know all the statutory powers every little piece of leverage we have. And what you say is, Okay, Ive got this agenda, but Ive got to get it through a constitutional system. So what levers can you pull to be able to advance it? Well be very active. On day one, spitting nails, well be on offense. And were not going to just sit like a potted plant, like some of these Republicans, hoping that good things happen; were gonna make these things happen. The good news is while the problems are more severe than what we deal with at the state level, I think your power to counteract them is greater as president. You have the powers and the bully pulpit, and you can really put issues on the agenda in a big way. We did that in Florida to great effect, but a governor is more limited in terms of the reach that he has. So, well be using all tools at our disposal.

BICKLEY: Final question: What wins the 2024 election? What argument or quality wins it? Democrat or Republican, whats the deciding factor?

DESANTIS: If the election is a referendum on Bidens failures, and we frame it that way with a candidate like me offering a better path for America, we will win the election. If it becomes a referendum on side issues or other things, and Bidens allowed to stay in his basement all campaign like he did last time, then I fear that the Democrats will be able to win. So focusing on his failures, how hes made America worse, and how were gonna do it better, not only will you get Republicans, youre going to get these independents. Thats what we did in Florida, and we won independents by 18 percentage points. We won over 60% of Hispanics because we were identifying the issues that mattered to them. We were fighting the fringe left on all the things theyre trying to do. And I think theres a huge majority coalition for that. People want a restoration of sanity in this country, and we can deliver that.

BICKLEY: Governor, thank you so much.

DESANTIS: Thank you.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

Continue Reading

UK

Budget 2025 income tax U-turn: What the hell just happened?

Published

on

By

Budget 2025 income tax U-turn: What the hell just happened?

What the hell’s just happened? 

On Thursday night I was told that Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer were now not going to raise income tax, having had anonymous briefings for weeks that a manifesto-breaking tax rise was coming, culminating in the speech in Downing Street by the chancellor last week alluding to that.

Politics live: U-turn on budget income tax rise triggers ‘not normal’ market volatility

I had also heard the prime minister was going to make a speech next week to the same effect.

The U-turn – first broken in the Financial Times – was not something the government wanted to leak, and there is anger in Downing Street.

I was told late last night by a source that the decision had been taken to back off income tax rises.

There is obviously some consternation, to say the least, that ministers, the party, the public have been marched up the hill, only to be marched back down again. It all adds to a sense of chaos and a government out of control. So what on earth is going on?

Read more: How No 10 plunged itself into crisis

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Bombshell’ over income tax

Let’s first do the economics of it. I was told this morning by Treasury sources that the fiscal forecasts from the Office of Budget Responsibility are stronger than expected.

There had been expectations of a £30bn-£40bn black hole in the public finances.

But I’m told today that black hole is actually closer to £20bn: the chancellor also wants headroom of perhaps up to £15bn, but I’m told the change in forecasts has changed the calculation. I’m told wage growth has been stronger which has helped tax receipts and improved forecasts.

So, where does that leave the government? Treasury figures tell me that the change in forecasts mean the manifesto-busting income tax hike is now not necessary.

I don’t need to spell out the jeopardy for such a move: Rachel Reeves was poised to be the first chancellor in 50 years to raise the basic rate of income tax and break the core manifesto pledge that Labour made to voters last year.

It doesn’t mean taxes are not going up. The government is set to freeze tax thresholds for another two years from 2028. That will raise around £8bn as millions of workers are dragged into higher tax bands and end up paying more tax.

There will also be tax raising around pensions and salary sacrifice schemes and on electric vehicles, as well as other measures, as the chancellor casts around for £20bn.

But what about the politics? Well, one government figure today insists that the decision to drop the income tax plan is nothing to do with the self-inflicted leadership crisis at No 10 after anonymous briefings designed to see off any potential post-budget coup against the prime minister spectacularly backfired. The changed forecasts, I’m told, came in last week.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

But of course there’s tonnes of politics in this. The talk of higher wage growth perhaps offsetting some of the productivity downgrades was being flagged a couple of weeks back, before the chancellor made her speech.

It’s extremely unusual for a chancellor to pitch-roll their budget. But Reeves did it for a reason.

That was laying the ground for a massive budget that would bring manifesto-breaking tax rises.

She told us of the difficult environment, ruled out more borrowing or spending cuts before telling us “everyone must play their part”. She repeatedly refused to stick to manifesto promises on tax. It doesn’t get much more stark than that.

That the government has U-turned on that decision is about far more than just the fiscal framework.

Read more: What taxes could go up now?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Wes Streeting: Faithful or traitor? Beth Rigby’s take

With trust so low in the government, there were serious worries – and warnings – from the party that such a big manifesto break might be something from which the PM and the chancellor wouldn’t recover.

One senior party figure that thinks there could be a leadership challenge after the May elections told me this week that manifesto-breaking tax rises would only make that more likely because Labour would “need a clean skin” to try and rebuild with the public if Starmer broke his promises in that way.

Read more: Is Starmer ‘in office but not in power’?

Lucy Powell, the deputy Labour leader, fired a warning shot last week when she said the party should stick to the manifesto and not raise tax: “We should be following through on our manifesto, of course. There’s no question about that,” she told Matt Chorley on BBC Radio 5 Live.

“Trust in politics is a key part of that because if we’re to take the country with us then they’ve got to trust us and that’s really important too.”

The party will no doubt feel relief today that the chancellor is not going to break the manifesto.

It would have only made things a whole lot worse for a government that is in real trouble.

But the shambles of this week is staggering. From the self-inflicted leadership crisis to leaks over a massive budget U-turn, it all lends to the sense that this is a No 10 out of control, lurching from one mess to another. Strap in.

Continue Reading

UK

Banksy painting theft lands burglar with 13-month prison sentence

Published

on

By

Banksy painting theft lands burglar with 13-month prison sentence

A man has been given a 13-month prison sentence for stealing Banksy’s famous Girl With Balloon painting from a London gallery.

Larry Fraser, 49, of Beckton, east London, was sentenced on Friday after pleading guilty to one count of non-residential burglary at Kingston Crown Court on 9 October.

The painting, one of the street artist‘s most famous, was stolen from a gallery in New Cavendish Street in London at around 11pm on 8 September last year.

The recovered painting back in the gallery. Pic: Metropolitan Police
Image:
The recovered painting back in the gallery. Pic: Metropolitan Police

Fraser used a hammer to smash his way through a glass entrance door at the Grove Gallery before stealing the artwork, which was valued at £270,000.

He concealed his identity with a mask, hooded jacket and gloves, but the Metropolitan Police’s Flying Squad was able to identify him and track him to a location streets away.

He was also caught on CCTV loading the artwork into a van before fleeing the scene.

A second man, 54-year-old James Love, was accused of being the getaway driver in the burglary, but cleared of stealing the print.

Larry Fraser. Pic: Metropolitan Police
Image:
Larry Fraser. Pic: Metropolitan Police

Damage to the Grove Gallery after the theft. Pic: Metropolitan Police
Image:
Damage to the Grove Gallery after the theft. Pic: Metropolitan Police

Fraser was arrested at his home address on 10 September, within 48 hours of the burglary, and charged the next day.

Officers were able to recover the artwork after executing a warrant on the Isle of Dogs. It has now been returned to the gallery.

Fraser pleaded to the court that he was struggling with a historic drug debt and agreed to steal the work “under a degree of pressure and fear”.

He said he did not know what he would be stealing, nor its value, until the day of the offence.

Fraser was caught on CCTV taking the painting away from the gallery. Pic: Metropolitan Police
Image:
Fraser was caught on CCTV taking the painting away from the gallery. Pic: Metropolitan Police

Jeffrey Israel, defending, said Fraser lived with his mother as her principal carer, and had only managed to “break his cycle of drug addiction” after his last prison sentence.

He added that it “would take a bold advocate” to suggest that the value of the print had increased by the burglary, but insisted “that is probably the reality”.

Read more:
Banksy artwork ‘worth millions’ scrubbed off wall outside court
Blink-182 star to auction rare Banksy worth millions

Judge Anne Brown was unmoved, however, and said the offence was “simply too serious” for a suspended sentence.

“This is a brazen and serious non-domestic burglary,” she said.

“Whilst you did not know the precise value of the print, you obviously understood it to be very valuable.”

She added: “Whilst I am sure there was a high degree of planning, this was not your plan.”

However, Fraser may be eligible for immediate release due to time spent on electronic curfew.

Detective Chief Inspector Scott Mather, who led the Met’s investigation, said: “Banksy’s Girl With Balloon is known across the world – and we reacted immediately to not just bring Fraser to justice but also reunite the artwork with the gallery.

“The speed at which this took place is a testament to the tireless work of the flying squad officers – in total it took just four days for normality to be restored.”

The 2004 artwork was part of a £1.5m collection of 13 Banksy pieces at the gallery.

Gallery manager, Lindor Mehmetaj, said it was “remarkable” for the piece to have been recovered after the theft.

The 29-year-old said: “I was completely, completely shocked, but in a very, very positive way when the Flying Squad showed me the actual artwork.

“It’s very hard to put into words, the weight that comes off your shoulders.”

Continue Reading

UK

Summer camp leader pleads guilty to drugging and sexually assaulting two boys

Published

on

By

Summer camp leader pleads guilty to drugging and sexually assaulting two boys

A former vet has admitted drugging and sexually assaulting two boys at a summer camp and child cruelty towards six other victims.

Jon Ruben, 76, of Nottinghamshire, admitted sexual assault of a child under 13, assault of a child under 13 by penetration, eight counts of child cruelty, three counts of making indecent images of children and four drugs charges.

Leicester Crown Court was told Ruben, who prosecutors said had run a holiday camp for at least 27 years, laced sweets with tranquilising drugs and attacked two children after asking youngsters to play “a sweet game”.

Ruben denied a charge of assault by penetration which prosecutors have been given two weeks to consider if they will proceed with.

Prosecutor Mary Prior KC said the charges related to a summer camp held at rented premises near a village in Leicestershire last summer.

The prosecutor told the court: “The defendant, for at least 27 years, has run a holiday camp.

“There is a long history of children feeling sick at the camp over many years.”

The rented premises, Stathern Lodge, were not connected to the camp itself, the court heard, and Ruben was in charge of youngsters there, Ms Prior said.

“He made the rules,” she added. “For many years he has played what he calls a sweet game with the children in which he goes into the bedrooms.

“The game is that each has to eat really sticky sweets as quickly as they can but they must chew them.

“Children have always felt ill the next day but he explained it as they were overwrought.”

Ruben was remanded in custody until a further hearing at the same court on 28 November.

Temporary Detective Chief Inspector Neil Holden said: “This has been a horrific, complex and emotional investigation involving multiple young, innocent, vulnerable victims and a man who committed the vilest crimes.

“Our focus today must of course remain on the young victims and with the support of partners and dedicated family liaison officers, we have and continue to support their welfare and to ensure their safeguarding going forward.”

Continue Reading

Trending