Connect with us

Published

on

The revelation that ministers are considering bringing Thames Water into temporary public ownership has reopened the fierce debate over the privatisation of the country’s water industry.

The sudden resignation of the company’s chief executive and Sky’s exclusive report into government contingency plans for the firm’s potential collapse comes amid growing calls for change following a string of controversies and scandals to hit the sector in recent years.

‘Vast improvement’

The current system of private monopolies dates back to 1989 when Conservative prime minister Margaret Thatcher sold off the publicly-owned water and sewage industry in England and Wales for £7.6bn.

She vowed it would lead to a new era of investment, improve water quality and help bring down bills. Her government also wrote off all debts and established Ofwat to regulate the industry.

Supporters argue that the water industry is now significantly better, while also acknowledging improvements are still needed.

Water UK, the industry body which represents firms, said on the 30th anniversary of privatisation in 2019 that the situation had “vastly improved” with a fall in supply problems, pollution, and leaks thanks to nearly £160bn worth of investment over the decades.

It also claimed that “average bills today are broadly the same as 20 years ago, once inflation is taken into account”.

However this is disputed.

Thames Water

‘The most egregious rip off’

Opponents say privatisation has led to soaring bills, poor performance and years of under-investment, and claim that the pay of executives and shareholders has been prioritised at the expense of long-suffering customers.

They also point to a National Audit Office study in 2015 which found that average household bills had risen 40% above inflation since 1989.

Water firms have also accrued £54bn in debt since privatisation – but paid out dividends to shareholders of £66bn, according to an analysis by The Guardian newspaper last year, with 20% of bills going towards servicing debt or paying out dividends on average.

Those calling for renationalisation include Labour’s former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who responded to Sky’s latest report on Thames Water by describing it on Twitter as “the most egregious rip off” of all the firms.

Regulator row

Meanwhile regulator Ofwat has also been accused of lacking the necessary teeth to take on water companies.

Critics include the Liberal Democrats, who have called for the body to be abolished and “replaced with a tough new independent regulator with real powers”.

The government has vowed to increase penalties, with Environment Secretary Therese Coffey proposing earlier his year measures including unlimited fines for firms caught polluting.

Public opinion

Most of the public support renationalisation of the water industry, according to opinion polls.

YouGov found in September 2022 that 63% of the public believed it should be run “entirely in the public sector”.

Even among Conservative voters the idea is popular, with 58% in favour, according to the same survey of more than 1,700 adults.

However there appears to be little appetite for such a move from the government, while Labour has backtracked on supporting the policy.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

A huge sewage spill caught on camera in Cornwall

Scandals

For or against privatisation, public dissatisfaction at water firms remains following a string of scandals and controversies.

Water UK confirmed earlier this year that bills would see the biggest increase in almost 20 years from April.

The 7.5% hike means average customers are now paying £31 more annually this year – taking the typical bill to £448.

The industry body then made an an unprecedent public apology following mounting fury over raw sewage being released into Britain’s waters.

Figures from the Environment Agency revealed it was pumped into England’s rivers and seas at least 301,091 times last year – an average of 824 a day.

Water UK said campaigners had been “right to be upset about the current quality of our rivers and beaches”.

But there was then further anger when firms admitted a planned £10bn investment in measures to tackle the issue would be funded by a “modest increase” in customers’ bills.

Water leaks have become another major issue – especially at a time of shortages and record high temperatures.

South East Water, which this week introduced a hosepipe ban for two million people in Kent and Sussex, has enraged customers over supply issues.

Residents in East Sussex said they had been left without water for 23 days despite the firm admitting that its reservoirs were topped up and said its infrastructure had struggled to cope with demand.

Meanwhile another firm, Welsh Water, admitted earlier this year that it been under-reporting the amount of leakages it was responsible for.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ruth Kelly apologises on behalf of Water UK for sewage in rivers

Multi-million pound profits and eye-watering pay packets for firms have further fuelled discontent.

Thames Water reported pre-tax profits of £493.5m in the six months to September 2022, despite the firm introducing a hosepipe ban for its 15 million customers during the year.

In 2021 the firm paid out £11m compensation after it was caught overcharging customers.

Read more:
Ministers weigh contingency plan for collapse of Thames Water
Thames Water boss resigns with immediate effect

The boss of the company who resigned, Sarah Bentley, was reportedly set to receive pay and perks worth £1.6m this year.

It came after Ms Bentley said earlier this year how she was “heartbroken” about the company’s historical failings – while admitting there had been “decades of underinvestment”.

Sky News understands that talks over the future of Thames Water remain at a preliminary stage and the contingency plans may not need to be activated.

Either way, the pressure and scrutiny on such firms is unlikely to go away any time soon.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump to sign US-UK tech partnership in drive for AI

Published

on

By

Trump to sign US-UK tech partnership in drive for AI

Some of the biggest US technology companies have pledged billions of pounds of investment to turbocharge Britain’s artificial intelligence (AI) industry, as the two countries announce a landmark technology deal.

Nvidia, Microsoft, Open AI and Google made a flurry of announcements to coincide with President Trump‘s state visit to the UK.

They include plans to build data centres and invest in AI research and engineering.

Money latest: Tax warning over state pension

Sir Keir Starmer described the agreement, which both leaders will sign over the coming days, as “a generational step change” in Britain’s relationship with the US.

The deal will see both countries cooperate on AI, quantum computing and nuclear energy, with investment in modular reactors revealed earlier this week.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Energy boss makes case for nuclear future

The prime minister said it was “shaping the futures of millions of people on both sides of the Atlantic, and delivering growth, security and opportunity up and down the country”.

More on Artificial Intelligence

The government said the deal would deliver thousands of jobs, with a new AI Growth Zone in the North East of England earmarked for 5,000 jobs.

The region will host a new data centre developed in partnership with ChatGPT developer OpenAI, the US chip giant Nvidia and the British data centre company Nscale. The UK government will supply energy for the project, which will be based in Blyth.

Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, who has previously drawn attention to Britain’s inadequate levels of digital infrastructure, said: “Today marks a historic chapter in US-United Kingdom technology collaboration.

“We are at the Big Bang of the AI era – and the United Kingdom stands in a Goldilocks position, where world-class talent, research and industry converge.”

Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang.  Pic: Reuters
Image:
Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang. Pic: Reuters

The Blyth data centre is part of Stargate, Open AI’s infrastructure project to build large data centres across the US.

The company has also developed sites in Norway and the UAE. Nvidia, which provides the graphic processing chips (GPUs), expects to generate $20bn (£14.6bn) by the end of this year from “sovereign” deals with national governments over the coming years.

Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, said: “The UK has been a longstanding pioneer of AI, and is now home to world-class researchers, millions of ChatGPT users and a government that quickly recognised the potential of this technology.

“Stargate UK builds on this foundation to help accelerate scientific breakthroughs, improve productivity, and drive economic growth.”

Read more from Sky News:
How most people are using ChatGPT
NHS medicines bill ‘should rise to preserve UK drug industry’

Microsoft also pledged £22bn, its largest ever investment in the UK, to expand data centres and construct the country’s largest AI supercomputer.

Meanwhile, Google owner Alphabet pledged £5bn to expand its data centres in Hertfordshire and fund its London-based subsidiary DeepMind, which uses AI to power cutting edge scientific research. The company was founded in Britain and acquired by Google in 2014.

Other investments include £1.5bn from AI cloud computing company CoreWeave and £1.4bn from Salesforce.

Continue Reading

Business

Jaguar Land Rover cyber attack: No discussions’ on taxpayer aid to suppliers

Published

on

By

Jaguar Land Rover cyber attack: No discussions' on taxpayer aid to suppliers

There are “no discussions around taxpayers’ money” to prop up Jaguar Land Rover’s (JLR) suppliers, according to the prime minister’s official spokesman, as the carmaker grapples a lengthening production shutdown following last month’s cyber attack.

JLR factories fell silent more than two weeks ago. While it is damaging for the company, it represents a perilous loss of business for the supply chain which has also been forced to send workers home.

Some have already lost their jobs.

Unions and the business and trade committee of MPs were among those to request the possibility of aid to prevent job losses and employers going bust as the disruption drags on.

Money latest: Tax warning over state pension

What happened?

It was revealed on 1 September that global production at JLR had been stopped following a cyber attack.

More from Money

IT systems were taken offline by the company under efforts to limit penetration and damage.

The company appeared confident initially that manufacturing could resume but restart dates have been consistently put back.

What damage was done?

Jaguar Land Rover has said very little about the extent of the attack.

But it admitted last week that some data had been accessed. It gave no further details.

Who is to blame?

A criminal investigation is continuing.

A group of English-speaking hackers claimed responsibility for the JLR attack via a Telegram platform called Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters, an amalgamation of the names of hacking groups Scattered Spider, Lapsus$ and ShinyHunters.

Scattered Spider, a loose group of relatively young hackers, were behind the Co-Op, Harrods and M&S attacks earlier in the year.

It is widely believed that M&S paid a sum to regain control of its systems after it was targeted with ransomware though it has refused to confirm if this was the case.

How is this affecting JLR as a business?

The business was highly profitable last year but 2025 has seen new trade war challenges in addition to the cyber attack: File pic: Reuters
Image:
The business was highly profitable last year but 2025 has seen new trade war challenges in addition to the cyber attack: File pic: Reuters

JLR typically produces about 1,000 vehicles a day.

Production staff are being paid but kept away from plants at Halewood on Merseyside, Solihull in the West Midlands, and its engine factory in Wolverhampton. It is the same story for workers at sites in Slovakia, China and India.

JLR revealed on Tuesday that production lines would now remain shut until at least 24 September.

David Bailey, professor of business economics at the Birmingham Business School, told the PA news agency: “The value of cars usually made at the sites means that around £1.7bn worth of vehicles will not have been produced, and I’d estimate that would have an initial impact of around £120m on profits.”

JLR achieved a pre-tax profit of £2.5bn for the financial year ending 31 March 2025, so should be able to absorb such a hit.

Sales and service operations continue as normal at its retail partners but the longer the disruption goes on, so do the risks to its inventories and bottom line.

Why does its supply chain need help?

JLR's supply chain includes everything from components to paint. Pic: Reuters
Image:
JLR’s supply chain includes everything from components to paint. Pic: Reuters

This is the part of the operation that was always bound to suffer most in the event of a global JLR production shutdown.

No manufacturing means no need for parts.

The company usually depends on a ‘just in time’ supply chain to feed its factories and keep production lines running smoothly.

The Unite union has appealed for a COVID-style furlough scheme to prevent job losses and the risk of affected companies, often small or medium-sized firms, being forced out of business.

JLR’s operations are understood to directly support more than 100,000 jobs in the UK though that sum doubles through indirect roles.

The loss of any major supplier would risk further production delays once JLR’s IT systems are back online.

It is currently understood that the vast majority of directly affected workers remain in their jobs but have either been sent home or are on restricted tasks.

JLR suppliers Evtec, WHS Plastics, SurTec and OPmobility have had to temporarily lay off roughly 6,000 staff while a growing number of other firms are cutting workers, with temporary or contracted workers most likely to be affected.

What has the government said?

In addition to the remarks by the PM’s official spokesman, minister for industry Chris McDonald told Sky News: “We know this is a worrying time for those affected by this incident and our cyber experts are supporting JLR to help them resolve this issue as quickly as possible.

“I met the company today to discuss their plans to resolve this issue and get production started again, and we continue to discuss the impact on the supply chain.”

Continue Reading

Business

NHS medicines bill should rise to preserve UK drug industry, minister says

Published

on

By

NHS medicines bill should rise to preserve UK drug industry, minister says

The NHS will increase the amount it spends on medicines in response to criticism from pharmaceutical companies that the UK is becoming uncompetitive, science minister Lord Vallance has told MPs.

Investments worth close to £2bn have been paused or cancelled this year by three of the world’s largest companies, Merck, AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly, amid a fraught negotiation between the industry and government over medicines pricing.

Addressing an emergency session of the science, technology and innovation select committee, Lord Vallance acknowledged that low prices historically paid by the NHS, and pressure from US President Donald Trump to cut prices for US consumers, had made the UK less attractive to industry.

Money latest: Tax warning over state pension

He said: “I’m deeply concerned that there’s been a 10-year decrease in the investment in support for a vital industry; vital for the economy, vital for patients and vital for the NHS at a time when medicines are making a bigger contribution than ever.

“I think the NHS will spend a larger percentage of its budget on medicines. These things are all about trade-offs, and the trade-off that has been made for the last decade has been [to spend] a lower percentage on medicines.

“We are now reaping the consequences of that in a very urgent way, and that is what we need now to address.”

More from Money

Lord Vallance’s comments came after industry executives warned MPs the UK’s commitment to the life sciences faces a “credibility challenge”, and was losing out on investment to competitors including Germany, Ireland and Singapore.

Science minister Lord Vallance
Image:
Science minister Lord Vallance

Ben Lucas, the UK managing director of drugs giant Merck, which last week cancelled a £1bn research investment in London, said the decision was made in part because of the “end-to-end” difficulty of doing business in the UK.

He said: “This is a credibility challenge. The reality is we have been having, with successive governments, this continued conversation about the potential of the UK. But from a US-based executive team looking in, I hear; ‘We have heard this plan before, but it hasn’t necessarily been delivered’.”

Tom Keith-Roach, the UK president of AstraZeneca, which has paused or cancelled $650m of investment in recent months, said: “The UK is an increasingly challenging place to bring forward that innovation, to get through the front door… of the NHS, to deliver to patients and improve patient lives.

“What we are seeing globally is that discretionary investment in R&D is flowing into countries that are seen to value innovation and pull that through to patients. It is increasingly challenging to bring that investment into an environment that is apparently not.”

Read more:
UK drugs industry’s challenges may prove costly

The industry wants the threshold for allowing new drugs into the NHS increased from the current £20,000-£30,000, unchanged since 1999, and to increase an overall medicines budget that has fallen in real terms by 11% in a decade.

It also wants a reduction in the complex “clawback” arrangements governing drug pricing, which this year will see the industry return 23% of total revenues to the NHS, around four times comparable schemes in Europe.

Lord Vallance said discussions with industry over reforming the clawback arrangements continued, despite formal negotiations ending without agreement earlier this year.

Continue Reading

Trending