Connect with us

Published

on

close video Supreme Court blocks Biden’s student loan handout

The Supreme Court on Friday blocked the Biden administration’s student loan handout.

The Supreme Court ruled Friday that the Biden administration cannot go forward with its student loan debt handout program.

In a 6-3 decision, the court held that federal law does not allow the Secretary of Education to cancel more than $430 billion in student loan debt. 

"The Secretary’s plan canceled roughly $430 billion of federal student loan balances, completely erasing the debts of 20 million borrowers and lowering the median amount owed by the other 23 million from $29,400 to $13,600," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. "Six States sued, arguing that the HEROES Act does not authorize the loan cancellation plan. We agree."

President Biden strongly disagreed with the court's decision and will make an announcement later today detailing new actions to protect student loan borrowers, a White House source told Fox News Digital. 

BIDEN STUDENT LOAN ‘REDISTRIBUTION’ COULD BENEFIT FELONS, GOP OFFICIALS CLAIM IN LETTER DEMANDING DETAILS

President Biden’s DOE is planning “workarounds” if the Supreme Court rules against student loan forgiveness. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci / AP Newsroom)

The White House source said Biden intends to blame Republicans for denying student borrowers the relief he promised to deliver to them.   

Biden's student loan initiative, which had been on hold pending litigation, involved the federal government providing up to $10,000 in debt relief – and up to $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients – for people who make less than $125,000 a year. The program was expected to cost the government more than $400 billion.

Biden made the unprecedented push for debt cancelation in August 2022, and his administration accepted some 16 million applications before Republicans objected, and the program was put on hold.

SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF COLORADO GRAPHIC DESIGNER WHO REFUSED TO CREATE SAME-SEX WEDDING WEBSITES

A visitor with a sign regarding student loan payments outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, June 27, 2023. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Republicans argued Biden lacked the authority to unilaterally forgive student loans. Estimates from the Congressional Budget Office said Biden's plan would cost taxpayers roughly $400 billion. Republicans were outraged at the total, arguing the forgiveness would be unfair to those who either paid their way through college, repaid their loans or never attended college in the first place.

The justices heard two separate challenges to the law. In one case, Department of Education v. Brown, the court said a pair of private borrowers who sought to challenge the loan forgiveness plan lacked standing to sue. 

The second and more relevant case is Biden v. Nebraska, where six states sued challenging the loan forgiveness scheme. The court found that Missouri at least had standing to sue because the program would open a nonprofit government corporation set up by the state, called MOHELA, to face an estimated $44 million in annual fees. READ THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION BELOW. APP USERS: CLICK HERE

Biden's administration had relied on a federal statute, called the HEROES Act, to enact the plan, claiming the law gave the secretary of education power to "waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs … as the secretary deems necessary in connection with a war or other military national emergency." 

The court majority shot down that argument. "The authority to ‘modify’ statutes and regulations allows the Secretary to make modest adjustments and additions to existing regulations," Roberts wrote, "not transform them." 

Roberts went on to say the Department of Education's "modifications" to the law "created a novel and fundamentally different loan forgiveness program" than what Congress intended in the HEROES Act. This program effectively granted loan forgiveness "to nearly every borrower in the country," Roberts said. 

BIDEN VETOES CANCELING HIS $400 BILLION STUDENT LOAN HANDOUT, VOWS HE'S ‘NOT GOING TO BACK DOWN'

President Biden faced opposition to his student loan forgiveness program. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images / Getty Images)

"The Secretary's comprehensive debt cancelation plan cannot fairly be called a waiver — it not only nullifies existing provisions, but augments and expands them dramatically," the chief justice wrote. "It cannot be mere modification, because it constitutes ‘effectively the introduction of a whole new regime' … And it cannot be some combination of the two, because when the Secretary seeks to add to existing law, the fact that he has ‘waived’ certain provisions does not give him a free pass to avoid the limits inherent in the power to ‘modify.'"

"However broad the meaning of ‘waive or modify,’ that language cannot authorize the kind of exhaustive rewriting of the statute that has taken place here." 

The court's three liberal justices dissented. "The majority overrides the combined judgment of the Legislative and Executive Branches, with the consequence of eliminating loan forgiveness for 43 million Americans. I respectfully dissent from that decision," Justice Elena Kagan wrote. 

Biden's Education Department had already been exploring potential workarounds to offer handouts via other means in anticipation of a ruling against the administration.

Republicans unveiled their own plan to address student loans and high college costs in June, introducing a series of five bills. The plan from Senate Republicans supports programs aimed at making sure students understand the real cost of college and also shuts off loans for programs that do not result in salaries that are high enough to justify those loans.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

"This would prevent some of the worst examples of students being exploited for profit. It would force schools to bring down cost and to compete for students. What an idea," Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., said of the bill. "It would also protect students from getting buried in debt they can never, ever pay."

Fox News' Mark Meredith contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

Overnight attacks in Russia and Ukraine as Zelenskyy eyes talks with Trump over peace plan

Published

on

By

Overnight attacks in Russia and Ukraine as Zelenskyy eyes talks with Trump over peace plan

Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy are set to hold talks over the Ukraine peace plan.

US and Ukrainian officials have held discussions in Geneva about a controversial 28-point proposal drawn up by America and Russia, which has since been countered by an amended deal drawn up by Kyiv’s European allies.

The White House said there were still a “couple of points of disagreement” as of Monday night, but spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said there was a “sense of urgency” to strike an agreement.

“The president wants to see this deal come together, and to see this war end,” she added.

Mr Zelenskyy echoed that message, saying “there is still work for all of us to do to finalise the document”.

“We must do everything with dignity,” he said in his nightly video address, adding: “The sensitive issues, the most delicate points, I will discuss with President Trump.”

Karoline Leavitt speaks with reporters at the White House. Pic: AP
Image:
Karoline Leavitt speaks with reporters at the White House. Pic: AP

It comes after Mr Trump, who had accused Ukraine of not being grateful enough for US military support while the Geneva talks were under way, suggested the process could be moving in the right direction.

He had earlier given Kyiv until Thursday to agree to the plan, but US Secretary of State Marco Rubio downplayed the deadline, saying officials could keep negotiating.

Moscow, however, has already signalled its opposition to the European version of the peace plan.

It would halt fighting at present front lines, leaving discussions of territory for later, and also include a NATO-style US security guarantee for Ukraine.

Read more:
Trump’s 28-point peace plan in full…
…and Europe’s 28-point counterproposal

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Russian drones devastate Kharkiv

The talks in Geneva, Switzerland, had begun with Mr Rubio denying the original plan was written by Russia.

It appeared to include a number of longstanding Kremlin demands that have proved impossible for Kyiv, including sacrificing territory Russian forces have not even seized since the war began.

Ms Leavitt has also insisted the US is not favouring the Russians.

Ukrainian troops fire near the frontline town of Pokrovsk. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Ukrainian troops fire near the frontline town of Pokrovsk. Pic: Reuters

Starmer to lead talks of Ukraine’s allies

Ukraine’s allies in the so-called “coalition of the willing” will hold a virtual meeting today, chaired by Sir Keir Starmer.

The British prime minister said the alliance was focused on achieving a “just and lasting peace”.

It “matters for all of us, because the conflict in Ukraine has had a direct impact here in the UK”, he added.

Russia and Ukraine report overnight attacks

The talks will begin hours after the governor of Russia’s Rostov region reported three people had been killed and 10 more injured in a Ukrainian attack overnight.

The Russian defence ministry said 249 Ukrainian drones were downed over Russian regions in total.

Meanwhile, Russian drone strikes in Kyiv left at least two dead and triggered fires on residential buildings – forcing evacuations, and leaving several people injured.

Drone strikes rocked Kyiv in the early hours of Tuesday. Pic: Ukrainian emergency services/Telegram
Image:
Drone strikes rocked Kyiv in the early hours of Tuesday. Pic: Ukrainian emergency services/Telegram

The war was also a topic of discussion in a call between Mr Trump and China’s Xi Jinping on Monday.

Mr Xi urged “all parties” in the conflict to “reduce differences”, according to Chinese state news agency Xinhua.

He reiterated that China supported all efforts conducive to peace.

China has remained a consistent ally of Russia throughout its invasion of Ukraine, and is the top buyer of Russian oil, along with India.

Continue Reading

World

Return to China ‘not an option’, Taiwan warns – as Xi mentions issue in phone call with Trump

Published

on

By

Return to China 'not an option', Taiwan warns - as Xi mentions issue in phone call with Trump

Taiwan’s prime minister has warned that a “return” to China is not an option.

Cho Jung-tai’s remarks came hours after President Xi Jinping mentioned the issue on a phone call with his US counterpart Donald Trump.

Mr Xi had described Taiwan’s return to mainland China as “an integral part of the post-war international order”.

But the island’s democratically elected government has rejected this – describing Taiwan as a “fully sovereign and independent country”.

“For the 23 million people of our nation, ‘return’ is not an option – this is very clear,” Mr Cho added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is Taiwan ready for a Chinese invasion?

China has offered Taiwan a “one country, two systems” model, but this position is not supported by any mainstream political party.

Meanwhile, relations between Beijing and Tokyo recently plunged to fresh lows after Japan’s prime minister suggested any attack on Taiwan would spark a military response.

Sanae Takaichi’s remarks were swiftly denounced by China’s foreign ministry, which said Japan had “crossed a red line that should not have been touched”.

Sun Yun from the Stimson Centre thinktank said: “My best guess is China is worried about the escalation with Japan.

“The reference to Taiwan and the post-World War II order directly points to the spat with Japan over Taiwan.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump scores Xi meeting out of 10

The US has not taken a side when it comes to Taiwan’s sovereignty but is opposed to any use of force to seize the territory.

Mr Trump’s administration has also been ambiguous over whether it would deploy US troops if war broke out in the Taiwan Strait.

Yesterday, Taiwan’s defence ministry spotted a single balloon from China flying over the strait and claims this is part of a campaign of harassment by Beijing.

Chinese officials have previously dismissed these complaints, arguing the balloons are for meteorological purposes.

In other developments, Mr Trump has confirmed that he will visit Beijing in April – with Mr Xi set to travel to Washington for a state visit later in 2026.

Read more from Sky News:
Why budget may evoke a blast from the past
Boy, 16, in life-threatening condition after shooting

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What did Xi and Trump’s meeting tell us?

Relations have improved in recent weeks after the pair met face to face in South Korea, with the US president moving to cut tariffs.

On Truth Social, he wrote: “Our relationship with China is extremely strong!”

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC issues ‘rare’ no-action letter for Solana DePIN project token FUSE

Published

on

By

SEC issues ‘rare’ no-action letter for Solana DePIN project token FUSE

The SEC has just issued its second “no-action letter” toward a decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) crypto project in recent months, giving its native token “regulatory cover” from enforcement.

The no-action letter was sent to the Solana DePIN project Fuse, which issues a network token, FUSE, as a reward to those actively maintaining the network.

Fuse initially submitted a letter to the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance on Nov. 19, asking for official confirmation that it would not recommend the SEC take enforcement action if the project continues to offer and sell FUSE tokens.

Fuse also outlined in its letter that FUSE is designed for network utility and consumptive purposes, not for speculation. They can only be redeemed for an average market price via third parties.   

“Based on the facts presented, the Division will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if, in reliance on your opinion as counsel, Fuse offers and sells the Tokens in the manner and under the circumstances described in your letter,” the Division of Corporation Finance’s deputy chief counsel, Jonathan Ingram, wrote on Monday. 

SEC’s no-action letter to Fuse Crypto. Source: SEC

The latest SEC no-action letter comes just a few months after the SEC issued a similar “highly coveted” letter to Double Zero, which was seen as a result of a new, more crypto-friendly leadership at the SEC. 

At the time, DoubleZero co-founder Austin Federa said such letters are common in TradFi but are “very rare” in the crypto space. 

“It was a months long process, but we found the SEC to be quite receptive, we found them to be quite professional, quite diligent, there was no crypto animosity.”

The SEC was put under new leadership in April, after Paul Atkins was sworn in as the 34th chairman, and the agency has since been seen taking a more balanced approach to crypto. As part of the leadership, crypto-friendly Hester Peirce also heads up the agency’s crypto task force. 

SEC no-action letters are a form of regulatory clarity

Adding to the discussion on X, Rebecca Rettig, a legal representative of Solana MEV infrastructure platform Jito Labs, said that no-action letters are sought after by many crypto projects.