A Jeremy Clarkson column about Prince Harry and Meghan in The Sun newspaper was sexist, a press watchdog has ruled.
The column – headlined “One day, Harold the glove puppet will tell the truth about A Woman Talking B*******” – contained a “pejorative and prejudicial reference” to the sex of the Duchess of Sussex, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) said.
Clarkson, 63, wrote in December last year: “I hate her. Not like I hate Nicola Sturgeon or Rose West. I hate her on a cellular level.”
He told how he lies awake at night “dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while crowds chant, ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her” – claiming “everyone who’s my age thinks the same way”.
“But what makes me despair,” he added, “is that younger people, especially girls, think she’s pretty cool.”
The article, published on 16 December 2022, saw IPSO deluged by more than 25,000 complaints from the public – the highest number it has ever received.
It was a “serious breach” of Clause 12 (Discrimination) of the Editors’ Code of Practice – a set of rules newspaper and magazines who are members of IPSO have agreed to follow – the watchdog said on Friday.
More on Duchess Of Sussex
Related Topics:
However, separate complaints that the article was inaccurate, harassed the Duchess and discriminated against her on the grounds of her race were not upheld.
IPSO chairman, Lord Faulks, said of the ruling: “We found that the imagery employed by the columnist in this article was humiliating and degrading toward the Duchess.”
Advertisement
Image: Prince Harry and Meghan. Pic: AP
The Sun “failed to meet the high editorial standards” expected by IPSO, he added.
Further explaining why the column was sexist, the IPSO complaints committee ruled: “Specifically: the writer’s claim that the Duchess exercised power via her sexual hold over her husband which, in the view of the Committee, was a reference to stereotypes about women using their sexuality to gain power.
“[It] also implied that it was the Duchess’ sexuality – rather than any other attribute or accomplishment – which was the source of her power.
“To argue that a woman is in a position of influence due to ‘vivid bedroom promises’, to compare the hatred of an individual to other women only, and to reference a fictional scene of public humiliation given to a sexually manipulative woman, read as a whole, amounted to a breach of Clause 12 (i).”
The ruling added: “The Editors’ Code of Practice protects the right of commentators to challenge, to shock, be satirical and entertain, but it states that the press must avoid discriminatory references towards an individual.
“By holding publications to account, we promote the standards of journalism set out in the Editors’ Code of Practice.
“We will take action where these standards are not met, such as in this article which contained pejorative and prejudicial language in an article discussing a woman.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
He tweeted: “Oh dear. I’ve rather put my foot in it. In a column I wrote about Meghan, I made a clumsy reference to a scene in Game of Thrones and this has gone down badly with a great many people.
“I’m horrified to have caused so much hurt and I shall be more careful in future.”
Twitter
This content is provided by Twitter, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Twitter cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Twitter cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Twitter cookies for this session only.
Twitter
This content is provided by Twitter, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Twitter cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Twitter cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Twitter cookies for this session only.
The Sun also apologised after a huge backlash, saying it “regretted” publishing the column last December. It also removed it from its website and archives.
Now the tabloid has been ordered to inform its readers of the findings by publishing a summary written by IPSO on the same page where the column usually appears.
It must also be flagged on the front page of The Sun and on the homepage of its website.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
44:13
Special programme: Harry in Court
IPSO investigated two specific complaints made by the charity The Fawcett Society, which campaigns for gender equality and women’s rights, and the WILDE Foundation, a platform created to help women, girls, and victims and survivors of abuse.
Both organisations said they were affected by breaches of the code.
In a statement, The Sun said: “After Jeremy Clarkson’s column was published in December, both The Sun and Jeremy Clarkson apologised. We said we regretted publishing the article and removed it from our website.
“The Sun accepts that with free expression comes responsibility.
“Half of The Sun’s readers are women and we have a very long and proud history of campaigning for women, which has changed the lives of many.
“The Sun is committed to its work campaigning to strengthen legislation on domestic abuse, helping to provide beds in refuges and empowering survivors of abuse to seek help. Our most recent campaign, Baby Bank on Us, is raising money to help women struggling with the alarming costs of living and a newborn baby.
“Ipso has ruled that The Sun published a column about the Duchess of Sussex which contained a pejorative and prejudicial reference to the duchess’s sex. The committee did not uphold separate elements of the complaint that the article was inaccurate, harassed the Duchess of Sussex, and included discriminatory references to her on the ground of race.
“The Sun is today publishing the summary of Ipso’s findings.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
The head teacher of the Southport attacker’s former school has told a public inquiry she felt like he was “building up to something”.
Joanne Hodson, head of The Acorns School in Ormskirk, said she had a “visceral sense of dread” that he would do something.
“I felt like something was going to happen and there was a level of agitation with direct challenges to staff, the way he was with other pupils. I felt like every day it was building and building and building,” she told the inquiry at Liverpool Town Hall.
Axel Rudakubana, then aged 17, killed six-year-old Bebe King, seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, and nine-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar and attempted to murder 10 others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport on 29 July last year.
Image: Families of the victims with their legal team arrive at Liverpool Town Hall for the Southport Inquiry.
Pic: PA
Rudakubana, referred to during the public inquiry as AR, came to Ms Hodson’s school after he was permanently excluded from the Range High School, in Formby, due to taking knives to school in October 2019.
‘Devoid of any remorse’
Ms Hodson said she first met Rudakubana at his admissions meeting for the Acorns, when she asked him why he had taken a knife to his former school.
“He looked me in the eyes and said ‘to use it’. This is the only time in my career that a pupil has said this to me or behaved in a manner so devoid of any remorse,” she said.
“What also surprised me was that AR’s parents did not flinch at this comment.”
She said the parents saw Rudakubana “as the victim” and believed he had taken the knife to school as a response to being bullied.
His parents thought he was a “good boy” who never did anything wrong and that “any issues were someone else’s fault”, according to Ms Hodson.
Image: Members of the public leave flowers at a memorial site for the victims of the Southport stabbings. File pic
Ms Hodson said she had feared Rudakubana was going to “bring something” to the Acorns.
Instead, he returned to the Range in December 2019 to assault another student with a hockey stick while carrying a knife in his bag.
‘Sinister undertone’
Ms Hodson described Rudakubana as the “most unusual” pupil she had experienced during her career, adding in a statement: “There was a sinister undertone and it was difficult to build rapport.
“He had no respect for authority and generally a lack of respect of other pupils and staff. He was insistent that his views alone were correct and everyone else was wrong. There was never any sense of remorse or accountability for his actions.”
In his education, health and care plan, it was noted there were concerns that Rudakubana said or did things which had been described as “sinister”, the inquiry heard.
Image: A three-minute silence was held in Town Hall Gardens, Southport, marking one year since the attack. File pic: PA
Ms Hodson said she was asking other agencies for help, but the word “sinister” was crossed out in the report and changed to “inappropriate” after professional views were submitted by the child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS).
“I was challenged quite heavily and told no child should ever be described as sinister and as a professional I should not be using those words,” she said.
‘Let down’ by Prevent
Ms Hodson said school staff were concerned about Rudakubana attacking his peers and made three referrals about him to the government’s anti-terror programme Prevent.
The head teacher said staff felt “let down” after their third referral caused in the school’s relationship with Rudakubana and his father, but was not acted on by Prevent.
When Rudakubana made comments thought to be antisemitic in school in January 2022, teachers did not make another referral to Prevent, with Ms Hodson telling the inquiry: “On reflection, whilst I regret not submitting further Prevent referrals in 2022, I think by this point Acorns had lost faith that anything would be done.”
She said staff were concerned about Rudakubana being radicalised, but “he was so socially isolated that I could not conceive of the idea that he might attack a group of strangers, let alone young children”.
“The tragic events are so far removed from what I would have associated AR with in terms of risk,” Ms Hodson said.
A leaked letter, seen by Sky News, warns government that victims of the Post Office scandal find compensation schemes “worse than the original injustice”.
The letter was written by victims’ commissioner Baroness Newlove and sent to the Post Office minister Blair McDougall earlier this month.
“Far from offering catharsis,” she writes, “the compensation process was seen to be as bad as or even worse an experience than the initial investigation, prosecution and injustice itself.”
She adds that “hearing this from victims, time and again, shocked me”.
Victims told her that initial offers were “insultingly low” and that constant delays and requests for decades-old paperwork had left them offended and “distressed”.
Some described the process as “adversarial”, with Baroness Newlove comparing it to fighting an insurance company rather than receiving justice from the state.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:55
‘Unbearable’ wait to clear names for Post Office victims
The letter urges the government to abandon “commercial tactics” such as making low initial offers – approaches the Commissioner says are “not appropriate when dealing with traumatised victims”.
More on Post Office Scandal
Related Topics:
“It might be better to come back with a request for more information, rather than make an offer that is guaranteed to offend the victim,” she said.
It announced that it would accept most of the recommendations, including on redress, put forward by the chair of the inquiry Sir Wyn Williams.
In her four-page letter, Baroness Newlove also welcomes access to “free legal advice” to help victims with claims but calls for earlier cases to be reviewed.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:48
Minister: No deadline on Horizon scandal compensation
She explains that where advice had not been available, some victims “might have been disadvantaged as a result”.
“Is it possible these early cases can be reviewed to ensure everyone has been treated fairly and equally?” she asks.
The letter also raises concerns that some current serving sub postmasters feel “under pressure” from managers not to pursue claims, urging the department to ensure this “is not the case”.
Baroness Newlove also relays victims’ frustration that Fujitsu, the company behind the faulty Horizon system, continues to work with the government and asks whether this is “an issue the government is looking to address”.
Post Office Minister Blair McDougall said in response to the letter: “We pay tribute to all the postmasters who have suffered from the Horizon scandal, which is why we have increased the total amount paid to postmasters fivefold to over £1 billion as part of our ongoing commitment to deliver justice to victims as swiftly as possible.
“Since this letter was sent we set out our response to Sir Wyn Williams’ inquiry proposals, which will help us further speed up claims, and which offers legal advice to sub postmasters.
“I look forward to working with postmasters in making further improvements to the redress schemes so that they get the compensation they deserve.”
A Post Office spokesperson said: “We have and continue to actively support all Post Office colleagues, but particularly those with direct contact with Postmasters, to encourage them to submit a claim to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme if they believe they suffered losses in the past.
“Our Area Managers are playing a pivotal role in guiding Postmasters on how to submit a claim and signposting where there’s additional support to do so. We have a dedicated claimant support team available on the phone to discuss options, provide support, and answer any questions a Postmaster may have so that we can begin to process their claim right away.
“We would welcome contact with the Victim Commissioner directly so that we can understand more about what they have been told and to ensure all of us work together so that current and former postmasters get their claims in as soon as possible.
“To assist this, we will shortly be launching a national advertising campaign urging any current or former Postmaster who has not submitted a claim to do so as soon as possible and by 31 January 2026.”
A Fujitsu spokesperson said in a statement: “We continue to work with government to ensure we adhere to the voluntary restrictions we put in place regarding bidding for new contracts while the Post Office Inquiry is ongoing, and we are engaged with government regarding Fujitsu’s contribution to compensation.”
The ringleader behind an arson attack and plot to kidnap a billionaire Russian dissident had been “groomed” by a chatbot, operated by Wagner mercenaries, a court was told.
The Old Bailey heard the fire at an industrial estate in Leyton, East London, on 20 March 2024, caused an estimated £1m of damage, including to vital Starlink satellite equipment destined for Ukraine.
During his trial, the court heard he also tasked two people to burn down an exclusive restaurant and wine dealership in Mayfair and to kidnap Evgeny Chichvarkin, the billionaire owner.
Image: Two units in the Cromwell Industrial Estate were set on fire in March 2024. Pic: London Fire Brigade
Image: Damage to an east London warehouse that was shown to the jury at the Old Bailey.
Pic: PA
However, Paul Hynes KC, defending, told a sentencing hearing on Thursday that the Russians were “trash fishing” using a Russian language chatbot called PrivetBot on the encrypted Telegram platform and Earl was “easy meat”.
“Our prime submission is that he is, or was at the time, a sad individual who sat for lengthy periods alone in his bedroom at his parents’ house.
“His minimalist existence was taking drugs, particularly cannabis and involving himself in online gaming.
“We do not seek to characterise Dylan Earl as a victim in this case but there are vulnerable elements in him that were used by PrivetBot, acting on behalf of the Wagner Group, as a proxy for the Russian Federation.”
In April 2024, PrivetBot messaged Earl. His replies had been deleted, but the Wagner contact said: “I see that you know what you want. It’s a great happiness that you have realised so early that you are a WARRIOR. We need your connections and your capabilities.”
Mr Hynes told the judge, Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, Earl was “very much a sad individual” who “had a certain detachment from reality” and “sought praise, importance and significance”.
“The potent effect of the messaging is shown in his desperate, pathetic and delusional responses,” he added.
Earl messaged the contact, offering to recruit thousands more to join their operation and boasting of his underworld contacts.
“If you need connections with IRA, I can sort it. You want criminal connections with murderers, kidnappers, soldiers, drug dealers, fraudsters, car thieves, I can sort it all,” Earl wrote.
But the court heard Earl never left his bedroom and never met the people he recruited.
Earl and five other men are being sentenced for their part in the Russian-ordered arson attack on behalf of the Wagner Group, a Russian mercenary company, which is proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK.
The Kremlin denies accusations that it is involved in any such acts of sabotage.