Connect with us

Published

on

The government should subsidise safe e-bikes to combat the risks posed from unregulated batteries, an industry figure has said.

The call comes after the death of a family in a Cambridge flat fire which was most likely caused by an electric bike that was charging.

Gemma Germeney, 31, died at the scene in the early hours of Friday, along with her children Lilly Peden, 8, and Oliver Peden, 4.

A man in his 30s also remains in hospital in a critical condition after a related incident.

Gemma Germeney, 31, eight-year-old Lilly Peden, and Oliver Peden, aged four all died in the fire.  Man believed to be Scott Peden.
Image:
Gemma Germeney, 31, eight-year-old Lilly Peden, and Oliver Peden, aged four all died in the fire

Francesco Mazzella, the founder and chief executive of Talio, which manufactures and sells e-bikes in Britain and across Europe said: “Let’s be honest, if you’re in the gig economy and you want a bike to go to work, you’ll most likely buy a £1,000 bike on the internet.

“If I was 20 years old I’d most probably be the same, but it doesn’t mean it’s safe. Unfortunately people live in a situation where the cost of living has gone up.”

Industry experts are pushing for better import controls around batteries, with some bought online from countries with less stringent safety regulations.

A fire started by an e-bike battery destroyed a room in seconds. Pic: West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue
Image:
A fire started by an e-bike battery destroyed a room in seconds. Pic: West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue

It took seconds for a fire started by an e-bike battery to engulf an entire room. Pic: West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue
Image:
Pic: West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue

One person who knows about the damage a faulty battery can cause is Dell Williams.

He bought a used e-scooter online and it burst into flames at his home within weeks.

Mr Williams, who was forced to move, says he feels lucky to be alive.

“It sounded like an explosion had just happened,” he recalled. “When I went towards the door, I saw orange flames.

“Life is priceless, I couldn’t have had it on my conscience if anyone else in the building lost their life due to my scooter exploding.”

Fire chiefs are also warning about the dangers associated with overheating batteries.

Mark Thomas of the National Fire Chiefs Council said when the batteries fail, they can cause fires of a higher intensity than normal, because of the large amount of energy the packs store.

“What tends to happen is that there will be a more intense release from that particular battery, so we see the fire almost ejected,” he said.

“People really need to be aware about this type of incident, given the fact that they can be so ferocious, and we’ve seen the devastation that this can cause and the tragedy that comes along with it.”

Read more:
Spa complex engulfed by huge blaze which started near swimming pool
Drivers warned after sunglasses set car on fire

Some experts also have concerns that go beyond bikes and scooters. Paul Christensen is the founding director of Lithiumionsafety. He offers advice on all aspects of lithium-ion battery safety.

He told Sky News that “the penetration of lithium-ion batteries into all levels of society has far outstripped our knowledge of the risks and hazards”.

He added: “We’re seeing an increase [in incidents] because we’re seeing a lot more of these batteries in all sorts of devices. Not just bikes, but from radio-controlled aircraft, e-cigarettes and grid-scale battery storage systems.”

Mr Christensen also explained batteries can overheat for a range of reasons, including batteries being overcharged, overheated or crushed and also defects linked to issues like contamination during the manufacturing stage.

The rise in recent incidents has prompted The Bicycle Association to encourage people to buy e-bikes from reputable brands and retailers.

They also advise people to be especially wary of purchasing bikes and batteries from overseas sellers via online marketplaces.

Continue Reading

Business

Car manufacturers fined £461m for collusion

Published

on

By

Car manufacturers fined £461m for collusion

Major car manufacturers and two trade bodies are to pay a total of £461m for “colluding to restrict competition” over vehicle recycling, UK and European regulators have announced.

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said they illegally agreed not to compete against one another when advertising what percentage of their cars can be recycled.

They also colluded to avoid paying third parties to recycle their customers’ scrap cars, the watchdog said.

Money latest: The many household bills rising today

It explained that those involved were BMW, Ford, Jaguar Land Rover, Peugeot Citroen, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Renault, Toyota, Vauxhall and Volkswagen.

Mercedes-Benz, was also party to the agreements, the CMA said, but it escaped a financial penalty because the German company alerted it to its participation.

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (Acea) and the Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders (SMMT) were also involved in the illegal agreements.

More from Money

The CMA imposed a combined penalty of almost £78m while the European Commission handed out fines totalling €458m (£382.7m).

The penalties were announced at a time of wider turmoil for Europe’s car industry.

Manufacturers across the continent are bracing for the threatened impact of tariffs on all their exports to the United States as part of Donald Trump’s trade war.

Within the combined fine settlements of £77.7m issued by the CMA, Ford was to pay £18.5m, VW £14.8m, BMW £11.1m and Jaguar Land Rover £4.6m.

Lucilia Falsarella Pereira, senior director of competition enforcement at the CMA, said: “Agreeing with competitors the prices you’ll pay for a service or colluding to restrict competition is illegal and this can extend to how you advertise your products.

“This kind of collusion can limit consumers’ ability to make informed choices and lower the incentive for companies to invest in new initiatives.

“We recognise that competing businesses may want to work together to help the environment, in those cases our door is open to help them do so.”

Continue Reading

Business

Customers ‘protected’ as household energy supplier exits market

Published

on

By

Customers 'protected' as household energy supplier exits market

A household energy supplier has failed, weeks after it attracted attention from regulators.

Rebel Energy, which has around 80,000 domestic customers and 10,000 others, had been the subject of a provisional order last month related to compliance with rules around renewable energy obligations.

The company’s website said it was “ceasing to trade” but gave no reason.

Money latest: The many household bills rising today

Industry watchdog Ofgem said on Tuesday that those affected by Rebel’s demise did not need to take any action and would be “protected”.

Customers, Ofgem said, would soon be appointed a new provider under its supplier of last resort (SoLR) mechanism.

This was deployed widely in 2021 when dozens of energy suppliers collapsed while failing to get to grips with a spike in wholesale energy costs.

More from Money

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why is the energy price cap rising?

The last supplier to go under was in July 2022.

Ofgem said new rules governing supplier business practices since then had bolstered resilience.

These include minimum capital requirements and the ringfencing of customer credit balances.

The exit from the market by Bedford-based Rebel was announced on the same day that the energy price cap rose again to take account of soaring wholesale costs between December and January.

Try the Sky News cost of living calculator

Tim Jarvis, director general for markets at Ofgem, said: “Rebel Energy customers do not need to worry, and I want to reassure them that they will not see any disruption to their energy supply, and any credit they may have on their accounts remains protected under Ofgem’s rules.

“We are working quickly to appoint new suppliers for all impacted customers. We’d advise customers not to try to switch supplier in the meantime, and a new supplier will be in touch in the coming weeks with further information.

“We have worked hard to improve the financial resilience of suppliers in recent years, implementing a series of rules to make sure they can weather unexpected shocks. But like any competitive market, some companies will still fail from time to time, and our priority is making sure consumers are protected if that happens.”

Continue Reading

Business

Harrods challenges survivors’ law firm’s compensation cut

Published

on

By

Harrods challenges survivors' law firm's compensation cut

Harrods is urging lawyers acting for the largest group of survivors of abuse perpetrated by its former owner to reconsider plans to swallow a significant chunk of claimants’ compensation payouts in fees.

Sky News has learnt that KP Law, which is acting for hundreds of potential clients under the banner Justice for Harrods, is proposing to take up to 25% of compensation awards in exchange for handling their cases.

In many cases, that is likely to mean survivors foregoing sums worth of tens of thousands of pounds to KP Law, which says it is working for hundreds of people who suffered abuse committed by Mohamed al Fayed.

Mohamed al Fayed. File pic: PA
Image:
Mohamed al Fayed. File pic: PA

Money latest: Boost for holidaymakers amid ‘awful April’ bill hikes

Under a redress scheme outlined by the London-based department store on Monday, which confirmed earlier reports by Sky News, claimants will be eligible for general damages awards of up to £200,000, depending upon whether they agree to a psychiatric assessment arranged by Harrods.

In addition, other payments could take the maximum award to an individual under the scheme to £385,000.

A document published online names several law firms which have agreed to represent Mr al Fayed’s victims without absorbing any of their compensation payments.

More on Mohamed Al Fayed

KP Law is not among those firms.

Theoretically, if Justice for Harrods members are awarded compensation in excess of the sums proposed by the company, KP Law could stand to earn many millions of pounds from its share of the payouts.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Many more’ likely abused by Fayed

A Harrods spokesperson told Sky News on Tuesday: “The purpose of the Harrods Redress Scheme is to offer financial and psychological support to those who choose to enter the scheme, rather than as a route to criminal justice.

“With a survivor-first approach, it has been designed by personal injury experts with the input of several legal firms currently representing survivors.

“Although Harrods tabled the scheme, control of the claim is in the hands of the survivors who can determine at any point to continue, challenge, opt out or seek alternative routes such as mediation or litigation.

“Our hope is that everyone receives 100% of the compensation awarded to them but we understand there is one exception among these law firms currently representing survivors who is proposing to take up to 25% of survivors’ compensation.

“We hope they will reconsider given we have already committed to paying reasonable legal costs.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Further claims against al Fayed

Responding to the publication of the scheme on Monday, KP Law criticised it as inadequate, saying it “does not go far enough to deliver the justice and accountability demanded by our clients”.

“This is not solely a question of compensation but about justice and exposing the systematic abuse and the many people who helped to operate it for the benefit of Mohamed al Fayed and others.”

Seeking to rebut the questions raised by Harrods about its fee structure, KP Law told Sky News: “KP Law is committed to supporting our clients through the litigation process to obtain justice first and foremost as well as recovering the maximum possible damages for them.

“This will cover all potential outcomes for the case.

“Despite the Harrods scheme seeking to narrow the potential issues, we believe that there are numerous potential defendants in a number of jurisdictions that are liable for what our clients went through, and we are committed to securing justice for our client group.

“KP Law is confident that it will recover more for its clients than what could be achieved through the redress scheme established by Harrods, which in our view is inadequate and does not go far enough to compensate victims of Mr al Fayed.”

The verbal battle between Harrods and KP Law underlines the fact that the battle for compensation and wider justice for survivors of Mr al Fayed remains far from complete.

The billionaire, who died in 2023, is thought to have sexually abused hundreds of women during a 25-year reign of terror at Harrods.

He also owned Fulham Football Club and Paris’s Ritz Hotel.

Harrods is now owned by a Qatari sovereign wealth fund controlled by the Gulf state’s ruling family.

The redress scheme commissioned by the department store is being coordinated by MPL Legal, an Essex-based law firm.

Last October, lawyers acting for victims of Mr al Fayed said they had received more than 420 enquiries about potential claims, although it is unclear how many more have come forward in the six months since.

Continue Reading

Trending