Nigel Farage’s bank accounts: What’s it all about, and what’s the Coutts threshold?
Nigel Farage has had his account with prestigious bank Coutts closed.
The Brexit campaigner has been told by his exclusive bank Coutts – a favourite of the Royal Family – that they no longer want him as a customer.
Mr Farage claimed in a video on Twitter this was due to him being a “politically exposed person” or PEP, and said closing his bank accounts was part of a plan to force him out of the UK.
According to a BBC report, the bank doesn’t want his custom because he does not have enough money in his accounts.
Here’s what you need to know about Mr Farage’s battle for a bank account, what a PEP is and what it means for banking.
What has Nigel Farage said about his bank accounts?
Mr Farage last week said a bank – now confirmed as Coutts – had decided to stop doing business with him.
He said a letter from the bank contained no explanation and he had then been told over the phone it was a “commercial decision”.
In the six-minute video posted on Twitter, he said losing his bank account was the equivalent of being a “non person” and that the decision may “fundamentally affect [his] future career and whether [he] can even go on staying living here in this country”.
“The establishment are trying to force me out of the UK by closing my bank accounts,” the caption read.
In a second Twitter video, he said he had been rejected from having bank accounts by nine different companies.
He said NatWest, the owner of Coutts, offered him an account after his announcement last week, but it was not suitable because it was a personal and not a business account.
Farage claimed banks did not want him as a customer due to him being a “politically exposed person”, or PEP.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Farage: Coutts are being ‘very dishonest’
What does being a PEP have to do with banking?
A PEP is someone who is in public office and is therefore more susceptible to corruption or bribery.
PEPs include MPs, ministers, members of the supreme court, and their family members.
Banks have to carry out extra checks on PEPs to prevent bribes or corruption being passed through their accounts.
They can refuse to take on PEPs as clients because of the extra work they create.
Is Nigel Farage a PEP?
Mr Farage claimed Coutts said they were not sure if he was still a PEP.
But after doing a subject access request with credit agencies, the ex-MEP said he was told he is a PEP for both personal and business accounts.
Is that why Nigel Farage had his bank account closed?
Not according to people familiar with Coutts.
A report in the BBC said sources close to the decision said it was a “commercial” move.
The prestigious private bank requires clients to have at least £1m in investments or borrowing – including a mortgage – or £3m in savings.
Mr Farage reportedly feel below their wealth threshold.
Asked by Sky News about the minimum limit, Mr Farage did not deny his funds did not reach the criteria, but said “no threshold has ever been mentioned to me”.
The bank, founded in the late 17th century, has links with the Royal Family dating back to George III.
Coutts has refused to comment, but it is understood the bank makes decisions about whether to end a relationship on commercial viability, reputational reasons or legal or regulatory requirements.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
‘You can bank at NatWest, Nigel’
What about claims Nigel Farage received money from Russia?
Mr Farage said in his Twitter video that claims he had received money from Russia could have resulted in the account closure.
He said the “only explanation I can think of” for the decision was a claim made by Labour MP Chris Bryant in the House of Commons that Mr Farage had received nearly £550,000 from Kremlin-backed TV channel RT.
Mr Farage has categorically denied the claims by Mr Bryant – which were made under the protection of parliamentary privilege and which he has not repeated outside the Commons.
“The truth is I’ve never received any money from any sources with any link to Russia,” Mr Farage said.
Read more:
‘You can bank at Natwest or HSBC like the rest of us, Nigel!’
Farage: ‘The Tories have betrayed Brexit’
What has the government response been?
MP Andrew Griffith, Economic Secretary to the Treasury and City Minister tweeted: “Banks should not be closing people’s accounts solely due to their status as a politically exposed person.”
He said he had written to the Financial Conduct Authority asking them to prioritise their review on this – although it has still not been established whether Mr Farage’s status as a PEP has anything to do with his account closure.
The Treasury said it was already looking into whether banks were being too rigorous in how they handle PEPs, and making sure UK-based politicians were treated as less risky than those in other countries.
A Treasury spokesman said: “It would be a serious concern if financial services were being denied to those exercising the right to lawful free speech.
“We are already looking into this issue and have passed a law that requires the FCA to review how banks treat PEPs – so we can strike the right balance between the customer’s right to free speech and the bank’s right to manage commercial risk.”
Shares in meal delivery platform Deliveroo have surged by 17% as investors react to news of a £2.7bn takeover proposal.
The company revealed after the market had closed on Friday that it had been in talks since 5 April with US rival DoorDash.
Deliveroo suggested then it was likely the 180p per share offer would be recommended, though full terms were yet to be agreed.
Money latest: Vet hits back at critics of prices
At that price, the company’s founder and chief executive, Will Shu, would be in line for a windfall of more than £170m.
Deliveroo further announced, before trading on Monday, that it had suspended its £100m share buyback programme.
The opening share price reaction took the value to 171p per share – still shy of the 180p on the table – and well under the 390p per share flotation price seen in 2021.
Deliveroo’s shares have weakened nearly 50% since their market debut.
The deal is not expected to face regulatory hurdles as it provides DoorDash access to 10 new markets where it currently has no presence.
But a takeover would likely represent a blow to the City of London given the anticipated loss of a tech-focused player.
Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “If the deal is done at that price, the company will fail to shake off the ‘Floperoo’ tag it was saddled with after its disastrous IPO debut in 2021.
“Even though Deliveroo has finally broken through into profitable territory, the prolonged bout of indigestion around its share price has continued.
“The surge in demand for home deliveries during the pandemic waned just as competition heated up. Deliveroo’s foray into grocery deliveries has helped it turn a profit but it’s still facing fierce rivals.”
She added: “The DoorDash Deliveroo deal will be unappetising for the government which has been trying to boost the number of tech companies listed in London.
“If Deliveroo is purchased it would join a stream of companies leaving the London Stock Exchange, with too few IPOs [initial public offerings] in the pipeline to make up the numbers.”
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway