Amazon sellers say they were kicked off site after unknowingly hawking stolen goods
More Videos
Published
2 years agoon
By
admin
Amazon fulfillment center in Eastvale, California on Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2021.
MediaNews Group | The Riverside Press-Enterprise via Getty Images
Of the many acts that can get an Amazon merchant kicked off the site, few are as devastating as selling stolen goods. Amazon calls the behavior “illegal and strictly prohibited,” and those accused of such activity can be permanently suspended.
Dozens of small businesses have been booted from Amazon in recent months for purportedly hawking stolen goods from home appliance brands such as Breville, Keurig, Levoit and SharkNinja. But suspended sellers, who spent years building their businesses on Amazon, told CNBC they had no idea they were selling stolen products.
Amazon has provided limited evidence to back up its claims, sellers said, leaving them scrambling to find the problematic merchandise. To try to get reinstated and save their million-dollar business from potential collapse, they’ve taken it upon themselves to discover if they unsuspectingly bought stolen goods from one of the many wholesalers, closeout businesses and distributors that supply their Amazon inventory.
Amazon’s marketplace of independent sellers accounts for over 60% of goods sold on the platform. It’s such a dominant force in e-commerce that it’s often the primary or even sole source of revenue for third-party sellers. Over the past decade, the rapid growth of the marketplace has fueled a parallel boom in counterfeiters and spammers trying to game the system, pushing Amazon to ramp up enforcement.
Retailers, lawmakers and trade groups have repeatedly called attention to the growth of organized retail crime, saying that online marketplaces have contributed to the problem. Amazon’s recent crackdown serves as acknowledgment by the company that criminals are attempting to use the site as an outlet for illicitly obtained products.
While sellers can get suspended for any number of behaviors, from promoting unsafe or expired goods to providing bad customer experience and using inaccurate product descriptions, no allegation is harder to overcome than being labeled a seller of stolen items. Those merchants say Amazon has little interest in offering them second chances or much of an opportunity to defend themselves.
CNBC spoke with six sellers who were recently suspended. Each provided us with the names of their suppliers. A review of their invoices, communications with suppliers and other documentation revealed a convoluted web of wholesale and liquidation companies that frequently overlapped, and advertised similar products, including espresso machines from Breville, Keurig coffee makers, Levoit humidifiers, LG computer monitors, Shark mops and vacuums, and Ninja appliances.
In an email to CNBC, Amazon said it’s working with authorities and doesn’t comment “on matters that are the subject of active law enforcement investigations.”
“Amazon does not allow independent sellers to list stolen goods in our store, and we work closely with law enforcement, retailers, and brands to stop bad actors and hold them accountable, including withholding funds, terminating accounts, and making law enforcement referrals,” the company said.

Buying from the ‘youngest Amazon millionaire’
Two years ago, an Amazon seller — we’ll call him Frank — shifted from selling home goods under his own brand to running a wholesale business. With so much competition in the marketplace, he viewed it as safer to sell products consumers know and trust rather than promoting an unfamiliar brand.
On March 14, his thriving three-year-old Amazon business came to a screeching halt. Frank, who asked that we not use his real name out of fear of retribution from Amazon and his suppliers, said that’s the day Amazon told him his account had been suspended for selling stolen goods.
Frank said Amazon didn’t tell him which of his legions of products were allegedly stolen or offer any details that could help him track down the offenders. If he wanted any shot of appealing the suspension and saving his company, Frank would have to figure it all out himself.
Amazon wouldn’t comment on Frank’s case or any other specific sellers, but the company said in a statement that it regularly requests “invoices, purchase orders, or other proofs of sourcing” if it has concerns about a seller, and has an appeals process for merchants who believe enforcement decisions were erroneous.
One of Frank’s suppliers, according to documents he provided to CNBC, was KZ International, a large wholesale and distribution company owned by Kenzo Sobrie, a successful entrepreneur who has been described as “the youngest Amazon millionaire.”
When Frank contacted Amazon about his suspension, an account health representative told him that KZ had been placed on an internal list of “risky suppliers.” Amazon declined to say if such a list exists.
In December, KZ’s warehouse in Huntington Beach, California, was raided by the California Highway Patrol, which seized pallets of Dyson vacuums, TP-Link routers, Ninja blenders and Breville espresso machines. A few weeks later, law enforcement carried out a similar raid at the warehouse of one of KZ’s clients.
KZ sued two of it suppliers in March, claiming they provided the business with stolen goods. CHP ultimately recovered nearly $4 million worth of goods that it determined was “stolen cargo,” according to KZ’s complaint. Separately, Amazon said it shared information and intelligence with CHP in support of the investigation dubbed “Operation Overloaded.”
Frank still isn’t certain if his suspension was tied to products from KZ. His store has been offline for almost four months. Four other merchants suffered a similar fate right around the same time, according to information provided to CNBC. They all said they’d never been notified of selling stolen goods in their years on Amazon, and had no idea which of their products had been flagged or the suppliers who could be responsible.
Cutthroat competition
Millions of sellers from across the globe now make up Amazon’s third-party marketplace. Some go the private label route, selling household goods, clothing or exercise equipment under an independent brand. Others prefer to act as retailers, reselling hundreds or thousands of different products from well-known brands.
Either way, it’s a cutthroat, low-margin business that typically involves paying hefty fees to Amazon for warehousing and shipping products as well as for customer support and advertising. None of that shields a seller from getting duped by a wholesaler that may be providing them with stolen or counterfeit products, and being suddenly shut down.
While Amazon offers a free program called account health assurance, which is intended to protect merchants from getting summarily suspended, Amazon’s seller central site says accounts can be deactivated immediately “if we believe you have engaged in fraudulent, deceptive, illegal, or otherwise harmful activity.”
Joe Quinlivan, vice president of global robotics, fulfillment and information technology at Amazon.com Inc., speaks during the Delivering the Future event at the Amazon Robotics Innovation Hub in Westborough, Massachusetts, US, on Thursday, Nov. 10, 2022.
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Amazon uses technology to track products from the moment it enters a fulfillment center, scanning for fraud and counterfeits. When it identifies potential problems, the company refers products to investigators and refers cases to law enforcement. For organized retail crime, the company has an internal group called the ORC Engagement Team, consisting of law enforcement professionals.
Amazon’s aggressive recent actions coincide with calls from lawmakers and government agencies to root out stolen goods on the site after a rise in organized shoplifting, which allegedly led to more stolen items on e-commerce platforms. New legislation requires online marketplaces to verify the identity of high-volume sellers in order to prevent fraud.
Suspensions on Amazon are notoriously difficult to overcome. Sellers told CNBC that they’ve been given the chance to appeal their suspension in a judgment day-style video interview with an Amazon representative, where they can make their case for reinstatement. But it’s a longshot.
The interview typically lasts about 45 minutes, and sellers are required to provide copies of their driver’s license, tax ID number, invoices, and bank statements, among other documents. Amazon is supposed to notify sellers whether they cleared the interview within five business days. But some merchants say they’re still waiting for an answer weeks after their interview date.
“You start from a guilty-until-proven-innocent standpoint, and then if you can prove that it’s a mistake, it’s possible to get reinstated,” said Chris McCabe, a former Amazon employee who has spent the past nine years helping suspended sellers get back up and running. “These people can’t produce proof, because the items are stolen or the suppliers won’t cooperate and give them proof.”
‘It’s been devastating’
Amazon sellers are supposed to vet suppliers before they work with them. However, unraveling where the goods came from can be challenging, as it’s common for resold items to be bought and sold by several parties before being purchased by a merchant and listed on Amazon.
Beyond providing Amazon with receipts and documentation, the sellers say there’s little they can do to resolve the situation. In the meantime, their accounts remain locked, forcing some to lay off their employees or even file for bankruptcy.
“It’s been devastating to us, truthfully,” said Ricky Sala, who co-owns Oregon Prep Center, which launches and operates Amazon businesses for other companies. “We’re terrified to buy any wholesale products for customers right now because we don’t know what’s stolen, what’s not stolen, or what Amazon is going to say is stolen, even if it’s not stolen.”
Several of the accounts Sala oversees were suspended in recent months, which has cost his business some clients.
One of the main ways suspended sellers from across the country have gotten to know each other and swap stories is through chat groups. They found each other through forums, social media and mutual connections. In June, while sharing details of their suspensions with one another, several of them discovered that they had purchased goods from the same suppliers.
The Los Angeles area, home to two of the busiest trade ports in the country, has emerged as a hotbed for apparent organized retail criminal activity, based on the information provided by suspended sellers.
Several sellers told CNBC that the process of sourcing inventory changed during the Covid pandemic. Because of travel restrictions, they were unable to to meet prospective suppliers at trade shows or at their warehouses, so they would connect over social networks such as Instagram and Facebook, where they resorted to getting virtual tours of inventory.
Suppliers would nudge sellers to subscribe to their Telegram channel, where they advertise which products they have in stock, and how much they cost. The channels have names like “Amazon wholesales,” “Bulk sales” and “Amazon deals.”
Sala, 28, said a lot of the suppliers he knows who use Telegram’s messaging service are in his age bracket, and prefer blasting notes to their large groups rather than sending mass emails.
“They want to communicate fully on their phone,” Sala said.
Sellers are encouraged to act fast as the groups can have thousands of members and the offers typically get snapped up quickly.
A CNBC review of more than a half-dozen such Telegram groups showed consumer electronics and small kitchen appliances were some of the most popular products. Sellers told CNBC they would often order hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of products through these groups.
Even though travel reopened as the pandemic eased, much of the process remained virtual. Sellers who wanted to visit a supplier’s warehouse to check out inventory might find themselves unable to get hot products because competitors would snatch them up. They couldn’t afford to wait.
To manage costs, sellers rarely touch the merchandise. Instead, they rely on distributors to ship products into Amazon’s warehouses, where the e-retailer handles the sorting, packing and preparing of items for delivery through a popular program known as Fulfillment by Amazon, or FBA.

A seller in Miami said in an interview that in the back half of last year, he began working with a handful of new suppliers he’d found on Instagram, hoping to expand into the popular home appliances category.
The merchant, who asked to remain anonymous, paid over half a million dollars for pallets of air fryers, food processors, and espresso machines, according to invoices and bank statements reviewed by CNBC.
The documents showed that several of the suppliers claimed to have purchased the items directly from brands or liquidators. The Miami merchant said the suppliers offered the goods at “regular wholesale” prices.
On March 17, Amazon suspended his account for allegedly selling stolen items. In correspondence between the seller and Amazon, the company refused to say which products were in violation.
He contacted the FBI, hoping law enforcement might be able to help. Officials opened a report, but said there was little they could do without knowing which products were stolen.
One New York-based merchant said that on May 6, Amazon froze $17,000 worth of “unsuitable inventory,” which an account rep told him signified it was stolen goods. Amazon sent over a list of dozens of products that had violated its policies.
“We have taken this measure because we believe that your account is offering items that are unsuitable and may have been used to engage in deceptive or illegal activity that harms our customers, other selling partners, and our store,” according to a copy of the notice, which was viewed by CNBC.
The seller tracked down the products and provided as many invoices as he could to Amazon as part of his appeal interview on June 1. He was never suspended, but the inventory remains frozen more than a month later.
Several sellers said they reached out to the attorney general’s office in Amazon’s home state of Washington to raise awareness about what was happening. The attorney general’s office contacted the company in June about the suspensions, sources told CNBC.
Amazon confirmed that it’s in contact with the Washington State Office of the Attorney General on the topic of organized retail crime but didn’t provide details. The attorney general’s office didn’t respond to CNBC’s requests for comment.
Tracing the stolen goods supply chain
In tracing the supply chain for suspended sellers, some patterns started to emerge.
At least three sellers purchased computer monitors, air fryers and other goods from Ngo Wholesale Distributors, also known as Ngo Trading Co., which has addresses in Santa Fe Springs, part of Los Angeles County, and Garden Grove, just south in Orange County.
Tien Ngo, the company’s owner, told CNBC in an interview that he has purchased products from other southern California suppliers, including a company named Stride Trading, which is based outside of Los Angeles.
“They said they weren’t stolen goods, but I never looked into their supply chain,” Ngo said, regarding his conversations with the suppliers. “I didn’t want to jeopardize the existing relationship.”
Stride was listed as a supplier for other suspended sellers who spoke to CNBC. Because Amazon doesn’t provide details on the suppliers, CNBC couldn’t determine if its name has come up repeatedly by coincidence. Stride didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment.
A Keurig Green Mountain machine
Daniel Acker | Bloomberg | Getty Images
One seller said he was told by a Ngo employee that the suspensions were due to the recent CHP crackdown. The employee sent the seller a link to a news report about CHP’s “Operation Overloaded,” in which officers in May arrested more than 40 suspects, and recovered roughly $50 million in stolen merchandise, as well as 20 stolen cargo trailers, multiple firearms and 13 gold bars.
“Chances are stolen goods or similar ASINs/serial numbers are being bled in to every supply line,” the employee wrote. ASINs refers to the 10-digit code used to look up products on Amazon’s website.
Complaints filed by KZ, the wholesaler and distributor in Huntington Beach, provide the clearest picture of what happened in the lead-up to the suspensions.
In late March, KZ sued TV Wholesale Outlet, owned by Los Angeles resident Armen Babayan, alleging it sold the company $3.8 million worth of “illicitly obtained” goods. KZ said it learned the goods were stolen following raids by CHP of its facility. Now KZ is not only unable to sell the products but is also incurring “over $376,000 in shipping and storage fees, removal fees, and reserved inventory charges,” it said.
Additionally, KZ said it “has since become the subject of numerous claims by third-parties whose storefronts have been closed or frozen by Amazon because of the ‘stolen cargo.'”
Babayan filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on June 14 and disputed KZ’s claims.
KZ filed a separate lawsuit in May alleging another L.A.-area supplier, Juniper Holdings, sold the company over half a million dollars worth of stolen goods. A portion of those goods was seized by CHP when it raided KZ’s warehouse, the complaint said.
KZ learned some products were stolen months before the raid, according to the complaint, after a client received a letter from TP-Link warning that routers it had sourced from KZ had been stolen. Juniper told KZ it couldn’t return the merchandise, the complaint said.
Babayan didn’t respond to a request for comment. Juniper CEO Cameron Webb denied the allegations in KZ’s lawsuit.
CNBC reached out to Sobrie, the owner of KZ, numerous times by phone and text at numbers we found for him in California, Florida and New Jersey. He didn’t respond.
The owner of the Huntington Beach property that was raided by law enforcement declined to provide a comment but acknowledged that raids had occurred and said Sobrie’s company was no longer a tenant.
Kevin Cole, Sobrie’s attorney, didn’t provide answers to questions about his client’s business activities or relationship to Amazon, writing in an email that “the allegations in our lawsuits speak for themselves.”
Sobrie is well known in Amazon reseller circles. He’s been profiled for his success selling wholesale goods on the site and can be seen in Instagram posts posing in luxury vehicles and sharing e-commerce business advice.
Sobrie now runs a new wholesale company in New Jersey, KN Trading LLC, according to business records filed in the state. Its Telegram channel, which has over 1,100 subscribers, buzzes with new deals almost daily. A recent video posted on its Instagram page shows a warehouse stacked with boxes of goods, and employees loading packages onto UPS trucks. The caption reads, “Ready to boost your Amazon business? KN Trading is the partner you need!”
Meanwhile, the suspended sellers remain desperate for answers as they burn through cash. They’re almost certain to miss out on Prime Day, Amazon’s annual deal event, scheduled for next week, and can only hope they can get up and running in time to prepare for the holidays, the time of year when many retailers finally turn a profit.
In the group chat, they check in with each other almost daily, swapping tips for their appeal interviews, looking for any way to increase their chances of getting their accounts back.
One of them wrote in a recent message, “I’m praying we all get great news very soon and this will be a story that ended well.”

You may like
Technology
CNBC Daily Open: The flow of money in AI appears one-way at this point
Published
4 hours agoon
November 19, 2025By
admin
The Anthropic website on Friday, Aug. 22, 2025.
Gabby Jones | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Money keeps flowing into artificial intelligence companies but out of AI stocks.
In what looks like — once again — a scenario of the left hand scratching the right, Microsoft and Nvidia will be investing a combined $15 billion into Anthropic, while the OpenAI competitor has committed to buying compute power from its two newest stakeholders. At this point, it seems as if a big proportion of AI news can be summarized as: “Company X invests in Company Y, and Company Y will buy things from Company X.”
Okay, that’s unfair. There are a lot of developments in the AI world that are not about investments but, well, development. Google unveiled the third version of Gemini, its AI model, which Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google’s AI unit DeepMind, said “will be “trading cliché and flattery for genuine insight.” (But I still want an AI chatbot to compliment me on my curiosity when I ask how to cut a pear, so I’m not sure if that’s a pro for me.)
Investors, however, still appear skeptical about AI. Major names such as Nvidia, Amazon and Microsoft tumbled Tuesday stateside, giving the S&P 500 its fourth straight session in the red — the longest decline since August.
And if Nvidia — “the top company within the top industry within the top sector,” as CFRA’s chief investment strategist Sam Stovall puts it — fails to satisfy investors’ expectations when it reports earnings Wednesday, we might be seeing the S&P 500’s slide extend.
What you need to know today
The S&P 500 falls for a fourth consecutive day. Other major indexes also moved lower Tuesday stateside, while bitcoin prices dropped below $90,000 before recovering. Europe’s regional Stoxx 600 sank 1.72% and touched its lowest level in a month.
Anthropic signs deal with Microsoft and Nvidia. Microsoft announced Tuesday it will invest up to $5 billion in the startup, while Nvidia will put in up to $10 billion. That puts Anthropic’s valuation around $350 billion, according to a source.
Google announces its latest AI model Gemini 3. Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said Tuesday it will require “less prompting” for desired answers. The update comes eight months after Google introduced Gemini 2.5, and will be rolled out in the coming weeks.
U.S. Senators urge investigation into Trump-linked crypto firm. World Liberty Finance, heavily owned and run by the Trump family, sold tokens to a North Korean hacking organization, an Iranian crypto exchange and others, according to a corporate watchdog.
[PRO] Potentially resilient stocks amid AI slump. There are some global stocks and non-equity assets that could weather the turbulence in U.S. tech names happening recently, strategists told CNBC.
And finally…
Oleksii Liskonih | Istock | Getty Images
Diplomatic spat between Tokyo and Beijing threatens Japan’s already fragile economy
Miffed over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments related to Taiwan, China on Friday advised its citizens against travelling to the country. Japanese tourism-exposed stocks fell in the aftermath of that warning, while experts caution the impact could be more severe over a longer duration.
Takahide Kiuchi, executive economist at Nomura Research Institute, said tensions between the two Asian powers could result in a 1.79 trillion yen drop in Japan’s GDP over the course of one year — a 0.29% decline in the country’s GDP.
— Lim Hui Jie
Technology
Meta’s big antitrust win, Salesforce’s deal closure, and iPhone’s popularity in China
Published
9 hours agoon
November 18, 2025By
admin
Every weekday, the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer releases the Homestretch — an actionable afternoon update, just in time for the last hour of trading on Wall Street. Markets: Stocks continued their recent declines Tuesday as megacap tech lagged on worries about valuations within the artificial intelligence trade. The S & P 500 was on track for its worst losing streak since August as it closed in on its fourth consecutive session of losses. Club stocks Amazon and Microsoft weighed on the market, shedding 4% and 2.7%, respectively, in the afternoon. Club holding Nvidia ‘s 1.5% drop didn’t help sentiment either, going into its highly anticipated earnings report Wednesday evening. The Club also had a busy day of trades. We bought more Home Depot on its post-earnings decline , and sold half of our Disney stake following a disappointing quarter last week. Later in the session, we booked some big profits in Eli Lilly , while adding to our Nike position. The Club also initiated a position in Procter & Gamble , a consumer powerhouse behind household brands like Tide, Crest, and Gillette. Done deal : Salesforce closed its $8.3 billion acquisition of AI-powered data management company Informatica ahead of schedule. The companies had been targeting early next year for completion. “The market didn’t really care for this deal when it was announced in May,” Jeff Marks, director of portfolio analysis for the Club, said Tuesday afternoon, recalling Salesforce shares sinking on reports of the deal and the subsequent announcement a few days later. Marks added that the early completion of the purchase is a “good sign of confidence in the integration that Salesforce expects the deal to be accretive to non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP earnings per share one year faster than originally believed.” Despite these positive developments, Marks said Salesforce is still a “show me” story. Salesforce has yet to convince investors that AI doesn’t threaten the software giant’s core business, which operates using a seat-based model. The stock lost more than 1.5% in Tuesday’s trading. Big win: Meta Platforms got a big win Tuesday afternoon in an important antitrust case against the Federal Trade Commission. A federal judge ruled that the FTC did not prove its claims that Meta holds a monopoly in social networking or that the company should not have been allowed to acquire Instagram and WhatsApp back in 2012 and 2014, respectively. The agency, which wanted those two units to be divested, argued that there are no major apps like Facebook and Instagram. The judge, however, said that there are plenty of competitors, citing TikTok and YouTube, and contended that the social media landscape has changed radically since those Meta acquisitions were made over a decade ago. Shares of Club name Meta turned positive late Tuesday. The favorable Meta ruling came 10 weeks after Alphabet’s Google avoided the harshest penalties in the antitrust case it lost last year. Good news: iPhone sales in China surged in October, taking Apple’s dominance in the country’s smartphone market to one in every four phones sold, according to the latest data from Counterpoint Research . Apple last achieved this milestone in 2022. Overall, sales for Apple’s flagship device in China jumped 37% last month from the year prior. Analysts at Counterpoint pointed to solid demand for the iPhone 17, in particular, for the market share gains. All three iPhone 17 variants have outperformed iPhone 16 models in sales, according to Counterpoint, posting mid-to-high double-digit percentage growth from year-earlier levels. The base model of the iPhone 17 continued to grow at the fastest rate. Apple shares were up slightly on Tuesday. Jim Cramer has pounded the table on the new iPhones since the September launch. He previously described its debut as “gigantic” and argued that Apple’s newest devices are “more of a bargain” than past versions. The Club maintains its long-held “own it, don’t trade it” thesis on Apple stock. Up next: Club holding TJX will report quarterly earnings Wednesday morning, along with other retailers like Target and Lowe’s . Then, Nvidia and Palo Alto Networks , both Club names, will release their results after Wednesday’s market close. Investors will also get the minutes from the October Fed meeting at 2 p.m. ET on Wednesday. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Technology
Meta wins FTC antitrust trial that focused on WhatsApp, Instagram
Published
11 hours agoon
November 18, 2025By
admin

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg appears at the Meta Connect event in Menlo Park, California, on Sept. 25, 2024.
David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Meta won its high-profile antitrust case against the Federal Trade Commission, which had accused the company of holding a monopoly in social networking.
In a memorandum opinion released Tuesday, Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., said the FTC failed to prove its argument. The case, initially filed by the FTC five years ago, centered on Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
“Whether or not Meta enjoyed monopoly power in the past, though, the agency must show that it continues to hold such power now,” Boasberg said in the filing. “The Court’s verdict today determines that the FTC has not done so. A judgment so stating shall issue this day.”
Boasberg dismissed the case in 2021, saying the agency didn’t have enough evidence to prove “Facebook holds market power.” In August of that year, the FTC filed an amended complaint with more details about the company’s user numbers and metrics relative to competitors like Snapchat, the now-defunct Google+ social network and Myspace.
After reviewing the amendments, Boasberg in 2022 ruled that the case could proceed, saying the FTC had presented more details than before.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, former operating chief Sheryl Sandberg, Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom and other current and former Meta executives all testified in the trial, which began in April.
Meta shares were little changed on Tuesday. The stock is up about 2% for the year, badly underperforming broader indexes and most of its megacap tech peers.
“The Court’s decision today recognizes that Meta faces fierce competition,” the company said in a statement. “Our products are beneficial for people and businesses and exemplify American innovation and economic growth. We look forward to continuing to partner with the Administration and to invest in America.”
The FTC didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The ruling comes a little over two months after Google avoided the harshest possible penalty from an antitrust case it lost last year. While Google was found to hold an illegal monopoly in its core market of internet search, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta decided the company would not be forced to sell its Chrome browser, bucking the Department of Justice’s request. Google was, however, ordered to loosen its hold on search data.

In the Meta case, the FTC claimed the company shouldn’t have been allowed to buy Instagram for $1 billion in 2012 and WhatsApp for $19 billion in 2014, and the agency called for those units to be divested. The commission also alleged that there were no major alternatives for apps like Facebook and Instagram that people use to communicate with friends and family in a online, social space.
However, a major challenge for the FTC, according to the judge, was in proving that Meta is breaking antitrust law today, not years ago when the primary use of social networks was very different and based on sharing other kinds of content.
“To win the permanent injunction that it seeks here, the FTC must prove a current or imminent legal violation,” he wrote.
Boasberg ultimately sided with Meta’s argument that the technology industry has evolved since the early days of Facebook, and the company now faces a wide variety of competitors like TikTok.
“While each of Meta’s empirical showings can be quibbled with, they all tell a consistent story: people treat TikTok and YouTube as substitutes for Facebook and Instagram, and the amount of competitive overlap is economically important,” Boasberg wrote. “Against that unmistakable pattern, the FTC offers no empirical evidence of substitution whatsoever.”
Big changes in social
Much of Judge Boasberg’s conclusion was built on the transformation that’s taken place in the social media market in recent years and Meta’s changing position within it. User trends have moved heavily in the direction of video, where TikTok and YouTube have massive user bases and huge network effects.
“The most-used part of Meta’s apps is thus indistinguishable from the offerings on TikTok and YouTube,” Boasberg wrote.

Boasberg explained that there was enough evidence to show “that consumers are reallocating massive amounts of time from Meta’s apps” to those services and others, which has “forced Meta to invest gobs of cash to keep up.”
“Meta is not a monopolist insulated from competition,” he wrote. “The Court finds the evidence favoring Meta on this issue both credible and convincing.”
Boasberg also cited various documents and testimony from “industry insiders” that show how other tech companies like TikTok and YouTube viewed Meta as serious competition.
“TikTok and YouTube tracked Meta’s products as competitive threats,” Boasberg wrote.
WATCH: FTC chair on independence

Trending
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024
