Connect with us

Published

on

The 2023 MLB draft is just around the corner, so we asked three of our own MLB experts to try their hand at selecting a first round consisting of this year’s top prospects.

The rules were simple: Jeff Passan, Jesse Rogers and Alden Gonzalez snake drafted through 10 rounds (30 total picks) to put together the best possible roster of 2023 draft prospects.

Each roster included a full lineup: Two pitchers, catcher, first baseman, second baseman, third baseman, shortstop and three outfielders. They were allowed to draft positions in any order, and their strategies show which positions are deepest — and most shallow — in this year’s class.

After making their 30 selections — with a healthy dose of trash talk mixed in — ESPN MLB draft analyst Kiley McDaniel broke down all three teams and declared which was the champion.

Let the dueling mock draft begin!


Top 300 draft prospects | Watch: Sunday at 7 p.m. ET on ESPN

1. Paul Skenes, SP, LSU (Passan)

2. Dylan Crews, OF, LSU (Rogers)

3. Wyatt Langford, OF, Florida (Gonzalez)

Rogers: This is like the Astros taking Mark Appel, with the Cubs then getting Kris Bryant. Yes, please.

Passan: If you think Paul Skenes is Mark Appel, this is going to be much easier than I figured. Skenes was the most dominant player in college baseball, and he is the most big-league-ready draft pick in years.

McDaniel: The top three is a true toss-up here, but the depth of the outfield means Skenes gets the slight edge. Everyone made the right pick here, even if I slightly prefer Langford to Crews.

4. Kyle Teel, C, Virginia (Gonzalez)

5. Rhett Lowder, SP, Wake Forest (Rogers)

6. Max Clark, OF, Franklin Community (Indiana) High School (Passan)

Gonzalez: Kiley might think I reached with Teel, but I don’t love the catching in this draft, and I feel really good about getting the best player at the position — especially one who will surely stick behind the plate — before everybody else.

Rogers: I scrambled after Alden took my pick. I don’t think Teel is a stretch; he’s the real deal. I’ll have to take advantage of other mistakes he and Jeff are bound to make.

McDaniel: WHAT? I thought this group understood that the first five guys have to be the first five picks. How does Passan get three of the crystal clear top five picking first, sixth, and seventh?!

7. Walker Jenkins, OF, South Brunswick (North Carolina) HS (Passan)

8. Jacob Wilson, SS, Grand Canyon (Rogers)

9. Enrique Bradfield Jr., OF, Vanderbilt (Gonzalez)

Passan: Here I am, thinking I’m in trouble because this is a five-player draft and I’m only going to get one of those players. Then Alden and Jesse decided to get cute. Thank you, boys. Thank you for acting like scouting directors who are bound to get fired.

Rogers: While you two were hitting the salad bar at Ruby Tuesday during spring training, I actually went to the campus of Grand Canyon in Phoenix and saw Wilson play. It is safe to say I have something in common with the scout who found Mike Trout: a keen eye for talent!

Passan: If you had as keen an eye for roster building, you’d know that shortstop is the deepest position in this draft and wouldn’t have wasted an early pick on one.

McDaniel: Alden, I like the thought of taking Teel to lock up the top catcher in a weak group, but Blake Mitchell isn’t wildly behind Teel, and the gap between Bradfield and Clark/Jenkins is huge. Real misstep there. Jesse: I like Wilson, but there are tons of similar shortstops this year, so I might have jumped at the other decent catcher in Mitchell to block Passan.

10. Chase Dollander, SP, Tennessee (Gonzalez)

11. Blake Mitchell, C, Sinton (Texas) HS (Rogers)

12. Brayden Taylor, 3B, TCU (Passan)

Gonzalez: Since Jesse summoned Ruby Tuesday out of nowhere, I’ll provide another Rolling Stones nod with my Enrique Bradfield Jr. pick, because he’s going to be a “Star Star.” (I’m really, really sorry.) Also, I have to scoop up Dollander, up-and-down year aside, because the pitching drop-off thereafter seems quite steep. Tiiiime is not on my side. (Again: Really sorry.)

Passan: Well, that’s a double snipe. I was going Dollander or Mitchell there. I’m glad you two decided to wake up.

McDaniel: OK, Jesse made the right pick here just in time getting Mitchell. I have Hurston Waldrep and Noble Meyer over Dollander, but it’s close, so I might have held off on taking a pitcher here, Alden.

13. Matt Shaw, 2B, Maryland (Passan)

14. Noble Meyer, RHP, Jesuit (Oregon) HS (Rogers)

15. Hurston Waldrep, RHP, Florida (Gonzalez)

Rogers: I was hoping to land a left-handed batting, right-handed throwing power third baseman, but I missed out on Brayden Taylor. So I went with pitching — some young, raw prep pitching in Noble Meyer.

McDaniel: Uh, wait, is that Taylor and Shaw ahead of Jacob Gonzalez among college infielders? That’s a tough sell. There are six pitcher slots to be filled, and now my clear top five arms have been taken, so Passan will get the last pick.

16. Arjun Nimmala, SS, Strawberry Crest (Florida) HS (Gonzalez)

17. Colin Houck, 2B, Parkview (Georgia) HS (Rogers)

18. Jacob Gonzalez, SS, Ole Miss (Passan)

Gonzalez: Time to make what might be my first big upside play of this draft, and being able to get Nimmala here feels like a steal.

Passan: I agree, Alden. Nimmala here is a steal. I was planning on taking him. But I do appreciate you wiping the board of pitchers last round and allowing me to get a value pick later.

In the meantime, I’ll get a steal myself: Jacob Gonzalez, who I almost took last round and would’ve let slip if I weren’t worried Alden was going to nab him and stick him at second base. And I’ll grab Nolan Schanuel, because the first basemen in this class are mid, which means the rest will fit right in on Alden’s and Jesse’s teams

McDaniel: Ah, a breath of fresh air: My literal top three available go in this round. Gonzalez slipped way too far in another win for Passan.

19. Nolan Schanuel, 1B, Florida Atlantic (Passan)

20. Yohandy Morales, 3B, Miami (Rogers)

21. Tommy Troy, 2B, Stanford (Gonzalez)

Rogers: Tommy Troy sounds like a small, light-hitting middle infielder — which is exactly what he’ll be for you, Alden. His power surge at Stanford last season fooled you, while Morales is a star at 6-foot-4 and 225 pounds. Smaller guys — Troy might be the smallest in the first round — are fun, but they don’t pay the bills. Morales will.

Gonzalez: Jose Altuve and Mookie Betts would like a word. Troy might not have 70 power, but the dude makes a lot of hard, solid contact. You’ll wish you had it.

McDaniel: Two of my top three best available players go here, and Schanuel was my next best college bat. Good picks considering none of you knew my final rankings while doing this.

22. Bryce Eldridge, 1B/RHP, Madison (Virginia) HS (Gonzalez)

23. Chase Davis, OF, Arizona (Rogers)

24. Dillon Head, OF, Homewood-Flossmoor (Illinois) HS (Passan)

Rogers: Chase Davis is another player I personally scouted. Stardom awaits.

Gonzalez: I was going to save this as a potential value play late, but I couldn’t resist. Eldridge probably isn’t the next great two-way player, but he can be a standout right fielder. And if not, a first baseman. And if not, we’ll run the pickup basketball circuit together. The dude is 6-foot-7. That’s like one and a half Jeff Passans.

Passan: For the record, I’m 5-foot-9, which is exactly the same height as … Alden. Though if we’re talking about coming up short: Jesse, you need another outfielder. Dillon Head lives 30 miles from you. Not only a subpar scouting director but a sellout too. So I’ll pick Head.

McDaniel: Eldridge is the right pick here, and those could be the next best outfielders, though I might slightly prefer Jonny Farmelo to these two.

25. Ralphy Velazquez, C, Huntington Beach (California) HS (Passan)

26. Jack Hurley, OF, Virginia Tech (Rogers)

27. Aidan Miller, 3B, Mitchell (Florida) HS (Gonzalez)

Passan: Just to make sure you don’t use Velazquez as a first baseman, where he has played, I’ll grab him as my catcher, which is where he’ll play to start his minor league career.

McDaniel: That’s the correct pick for third catcher, with Cole Carrigg or a speculative Kemp Alderman conversion the other options. Infield is exceptionally deep in this area, so it would’ve been smart to rush to get outfielders, catcher and two pitchers quickly then take the infield leftovers.

28. Jake Gelof, OF, Virginia (Gonzalez)

29. Mike Boeve, 1B, Nebraska-Omaha (Rogers)

30. Thomas White, SP, Phillips Academy (Massachusetts) (Passan)

Gonzalez: I was scrambling a bit at the end here — you’re right, Jeff, first base is slim pickings at the top of this draft — but I feel good about getting 70-grade power in Gelof. He’ll play first base for me. All good.

Rogers: Are you trying to convince yourself of that pick, Alden? Sounds like it. Because you won’t convince us of it. My final one goes to Mike Boeve, from Nebraska-Omaha. I’m sure our esteemed, extremely handsome judge will allow me to move him to first base, right Kiley?

Passan: Let’s close this thing out the way it began, with a massive, hard-throwing pitcher — this time left-hander Thomas White, who will gladly join this team instead of honoring his Vanderbilt commitment.

Gonzalez: Wow, it’s pretty amazing how much better my team is. I’d like to thank the brilliant, tireless, illuminating research/analysis of the one and only Kiley McDaniel for all my success.

McDaniel: Boeve’s next best position after second is probably first, so I’ll allow it. No Brock Wilken love? He seems to be a slam-dunk choice here for first base, which also is his second-best position, behind third base.

Why is your team the best?

Passan: Let’s start with this: I got three of the five best players in the draft. The difference between Skenes and Lowder is the biggest single-position gap in the draft, and letting Clark and Jenkins slip was some amateur-hour stuff. We can continue with this: I got the best first baseman, second baseman and third baseman, and the shortstops are all more or less in the same strata. And let’s finish here: I have a 50-50 split between college and high school players, giving my team a perfect proportion of steady performance and excellent upside. My team has the highest floor and ceiling, which is no easy feat.

Gonzalez: No, let’s start here: My roster includes the best catcher in this draft (Teel), arguably the best true center fielder available (Bradfield), one of the three can’t-miss position players (Langford) and the second-best pitcher (Dollander) in a really shallow pitching draft. I feel really good about my upside gambles with Nimmala at No. 16 and Eldridge at 22. And I filled out the rest of the roster with safer, high-floor picks in Waldrep, Troy and Gelof. If Dollander bounces back, like I think he should, it’s a laugher.

Rogers: I have the best overall balance, especially at the most important positions, having taken the best outfielder, best shortstop, second-best starter and second-best catcher. At least, that’s what my scouting department has told me. I also believe I have the right balance in players who can contribute soonish and those with more upside down the line. For example, Wilson’s mature approach — he was the toughest to strike out in college baseball this season — makes me think he won’t be long for the minors, while Meyer’s raw ability at 18 years old is going to pay off in a few years. Balance is the key word for Team Rogers.

McDaniel’s final verdict

I think Jesse comes in third. Boeve was the worst player selected, and passing on Clark and Jenkins with his second pick did the most damage, while my rankings are on the lower end of consensus on Hurley, Davis and Mitchell.

So that leaves Alden heads up against Jeff now. Alden’s top-end talent is lacking a bit, with only two of my top 10 players, while Jeff has five. Alden ended up going heavy in the Nos. 11-20 area by focusing on scarcity. But I give the nod to Jeff here because the top of the draft is what empirically matters, and he won this exercise there.

Continue Reading

Sports

Hamlin: Team couldn’t survive under charter deal

Published

on

By

Hamlin: Team couldn't survive under charter deal

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin outlined the precarious situation facing NASCAR teams, testifying Tuesday in the federal antitrust trial against the stock car series that the race team he co-owns spent more than $700,000 to the series in 2022 alone and how agreeing to its charter proposal last fall would have been like signing his own “death certificate.”

Hamlin was the first witness called when testimony began Monday in the antitrust case brought by 23XI Racing, which is owned by Hamlin and Basketball Hall of Famer Michael Jordan, and Front Row Motorsports, owned by fast-food franchiser Bob Jenkins. The two teams contend that NASCAR is a monopoly that has handcuffed teams with a no-win revenue model.

Hamlin returned to the stand for more than three hours and was asked about line items in 23XI Racing’s budget. He noted how more than $703,000 three years ago was spent on costs to NASCAR ranging from entry fees, credentials for team members to enter the track and even access to Internet signals. He also said he and Jordan spent $100 million to build 23XI and “all it takes is one sponsor to go away and all our profit is gone.”

All 15 of NASCAR’s teams had been vocal for over two years that the last charter agreement made it impossible for them to turn a profit and they demanded four changes in prolonged negotiations. When the final offer came from NASCAR and lacked most of what the teams asked for, 23XI and Front Row refused to sign and instead sued.

23XI has turned a profit in all but one of its five seasons, but its financial success is largely a product of Jordan’s star power drawing top-dollar sponsors. Plaintiffs’ attorney Jeffery Kessler told the jury Monday that a NASCAR-commissioned study found that 75% of teams lost money in 2024.

Hamlin testified that the TV deal NASCAR signed ahead of the 2025 season has not been a boon to race teams because of a shift toward streaming services and big-ticket sponsors want to be on television. He also referred to a meeting with NASCAR chairman Jim France, who indicated teams are spending too much and it should only cost $10 million per car. Hamlin testified it costs $20 million.

“We cannot cut more. Tell me how to get my investment back? He had no answer,” Hamlin said.

As for refusing to sign the charter agreements last fall, Hamlin said the last-ditch proposal from NASCAR “had eight points minimum that needed to be changed. When we pointed that out we were told ‘Negotiations are closed.'”

“I didn’t sign because I knew this was my death certificate for the future,” he said, later adding: “I have spent 20 years trying to make this sport grow as a driver and for the last five years as a team owner. 23XI is doing our part. You can’t have someone treat you this unfairly and I knew It wasn’t right. They were wrong and someone needed to be held accountable.”

Under cross-examination, Hamlin was asked why he paints a rosier picture of NASCAR on podcast appearances. He replied that he is regurgitating NASCAR talking points because any negative comments can lead to retribution.

“You can take all my things out of context and paint a picture that everything is fine,” he said. “The reality is, (being) negative affects me in (technical inspection), getting called to the hauler, NASCAR not liking what I said.”

The trial is expected to last two weeks.

NASCAR is owned and operated by the Florida-based France family, which founded the series in 1948. Kessler said over a three-year period almost $400 million was paid to the France Family Trust and a 2023 evaluation by Goldman Sachs found NASCAR to be worth $5 billion. The pretrial discovery process revealed NASCAR made more than $100 million in 2024, while Jenkins testified in a deposition he has lost $60 million over the last decade and $100 million since starting his team in 2004.

NASCAR contends it is doing nothing wrong and has not restrained trade or commerce by its teams. The series says the original charters were given for free to teams when the system was created in 2016 and the demand for them created a market of $1.5 billion in equity for chartered organizations.

Hamlin countered that 11 of the original 19 chartered organizations are out of business; all three of 23XI’s charters came from teams that ceased operations. NASCAR also said each chartered car now receives a guaranteed $12.5 million in annual revenue, up from $9 million. Hamlin testified it costs $20 million to bring a single car to the track for all 38 races and that figure does not include any overhead, operating costs or a driver’s salary.

Continue Reading

Sports

Hamlin emotional, MJ present at antitrust trial

Published

on

By

Hamlin emotional, MJ present at antitrust trial

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — The landmark federal antitrust trial against NASCAR opened Monday with three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin breaking down in tears minutes into his testimony as the first witness in a case that could upend the venerable stock car series.

Hamlin’s 23XI Racing, which he co-owns with Michael Jordan, and Front Row Motorsports claim the series is a monopolistic bully that leaves its teams no option but to comply with rules and financing they don’t agree with.

As Jordan watched from the gallery, Hamlin began to cry and had to stop and compose himself when asked how he got into racing. He disclosed to The Associated Press last month that his father is dying, and he said on the stand he was emotional because his dad “is not in great health.”

“We got to when I was about 20 and a decision had to be made, I could keep racing or go out and work for my dad’s trailer business,” Hamlin testified, adding that he later was thinking about what retirement looked like and found a team going out of business. He needed a partner and turned to Jordan, who he had developed a friendship with when the Basketball Hall of Famer owned the Charlotte Hornets and Hamlin was a season-ticket holder.

“If I can’t be successful with Michael as a partner, I knew this was never going to work,” he said.

The references to his early days in auto racing and the sacrifices his family made were intended to show how difficult it is for both team owners and drivers to make it at the top level of the sport. He said he never would have been able to start 23XI in 2021 had he not partnered with Jordan.

Because of Jordan’s presence with the team, Hamlin testified, 23XI has turned a profit in all but one of its five seasons of operation. His attorney, Jeffrey Kessler, said in his opening statement that fast-food restaurant entrepreneur Bob Jenkins has never turned a profit since starting his Front Row team in 2004, a team that won the Daytona 500 in 2021.

Kessler said a NASCAR-commissioned study found that 75% of teams lost money in 2024 and added that over a three-year period almost $400 million was paid to the France Family Trust. He said a 2023 evaluation by Goldman Sachs found NASCAR to be worth $5 billion. NASCAR is currently run by Jim France, son of founder Bill France Sr.

“What the evidence is going to show is Mr. France ran this for the benefit of his family at the expense of the teams and sport,” Kessler said.

At the heart of the lawsuit is NASCAR’s revenue sharing model, which 23XI and Front Row argue is unfair to race teams that often operate at a loss. Hamlin testified it cost $20 million to simply bring a single car to the track over a 38-race season, not including overhead expenses such as driver salary and business operations.

“So, why would these people do this if you are just going to lose money because NASCAR isn’t giving you a fair deal?” asked Kessler, “Because you love stock car racing, and there’s nowhere else to do it.”

The charter agreements signed for this year that triggered the lawsuit guarantee the teams $12.5 million in annual revenue per chartered car. NASCAR argues the guaranteed payouts are an increase from $9 million from the previous agreement, but Hamlin noted that 11 of the first 19 chartered teams are no longer in business.

All three charters 23XI purchased came from teams that ceased operations, and Hamlin said 23XI paid $4.7 million for its first charter, $13.5 million for its second and $28 million for its third, acquired late last year. He acknowledged purchasing the third charter was a risk because of the pending litigation – and the price concerned him – but it was required if 23XI intends to build itself into a top team.

The charter system guarantees a car a spot in the field each race week as well as a percentage of the purse and gives team owners an asset to sell should they want to get out of the business.

NASCAR attorneys argued that the charter system has created $1.5 billion in equity for the 36 chartered teams. Prior to the charter system, teams raced “open,” with no guarantee they’d make the field or earn a payout.

“The France family built NASCAR from nothing. They are an American success story,” Johnny Stephenson said in the opening statement for NASCAR. Stephenson is a colleague of Christopher Yates, who had previously handled most of the courtroom arguments for the defendants.

“They’ve done it through hard work over 75 years. That’s the kind of effort that doesn’t deserve a lawsuit. That’s the kind of effort that deserves admiration.”

The case has churned through hearings and arguments for more than a year despite calls from other NASCAR teams to settle. U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell even helped mediate a failed two-day summit in October.

A NASCAR victory could put 23XI, Front Row and their six combined cars out of business. Their charters – now being held by NASCAR – would likely be sold. The last charter went for $45 million, and NASCAR has indicated there is interest from potential buyers including private equity firms.

A win for the teams could lead to monetary damages and the potential demolition of NASCAR as it is run today. The judge has the power to unravel a monopoly, and nothing is off the table, from ordering a sale of NASCAR to the dismantling of the charter system.

Jordan’s presence factors into the trial

Jordan’s presence in the courtroom gallery near Hamlin was a factor: Among those dismissed from serving on the jury was a man who said he can’t be impartial because “I like Mike” and another who said he had Michael Jordan posters on his walls growing up. A juror said they were a North Carolina fan but noted the football team at Jordan’s alma mater is not “doing too well right now” to which the star shook his head and laughed.

NASCAR executives in the courtroom included chairman Jim France and vice chair Lesa France Kennedy, two scions of the family that founded NASCAR in 1948 and still owns it.

Hamlin will resume testimony Tuesday morning. NASCAR Commissioner Steve Phelps, 23XI minority owner Curtis Polk, France Kennedy and other top executives had to leave the courtroom after opening arguments because they are all potential witnesses.

Continue Reading

Sports

What Mikko Rantanen learned from last season’s double-trade campaign

Published

on

By

What Mikko Rantanen learned from last season's double-trade campaign

NEW YORK — After 11 seasons as one of the NHL’s leading scorers, Mikko Rantanen has become accustomed to fame.

But infamy? Not so much, although he has experienced plenty of that this season.

Rantanen recently served the first suspension of his NHL career, having earned an automatic one-game ban for two game misconducts for physical infractions.

NHL rules state that players must go 41 games between ejections to avoid suspension. Rantanen’s second ejection, for boarding Calgary Flames forward Matt Coronato, came four days after his first ejection on a play that earned Rantanen widespread derision from fans — and one very angry coach.

On Nov. 18, Rantanen skated through a check by New York Islanders defenseman Scott Mayfield and shoved defenseman Alexander Romanov in the back, sending him violently into the end boards. As a result of that play, Romanov had shoulder surgery that will put him on the shelf for five months at a minimum.

Rantanen didn’t have a hearing with the NHL Department of Player Safety for either of these misconducts, but he heard plenty from Islanders coach Patrick Roy after the Romanov hit. It was a scene that instantly went viral: Rantanen leaving the ice after his major penalty and a red-faced Roy screaming at him from the New York bench.

play

0:38

Mikko Rantanen ejected for nasty hit on Alex Romanov

Alex Romanov is left flat out on the ice after this shove in the back from Mikko Rantanen with under a minute left in regulation.

“Usually if something happens, if somebody gets pissed off, the media picks it up,” Rantanen told ESPN on Tuesday. “So I’m not really surprised it got so big.”

Roy, who called the hit “disrespectful,” yelled at Rantanen, appearing to say, “You’re not going to f—ing finish that game” in reference to the teams’ rematch scheduled for March 26 on Long Island.

Is Rantanen worried about what might happen in that game?

“No, no, no,” he said. “I’m just going to play there, play hard, play hockey and see what comes at me. But I’m a grown man. So I can stand up for myself.”

But the notoriety wasn’t only on the ice for Rantanen in 2025. Earlier this year, thanks to two blockbuster trades, he became one of the NHL’s most debated players.


RANTANEN WAS PLAYING for the Colorado Avalanche in a contract year. His salary demands remained high — rumored at the time to be around $14 million annually for one of the league’s most dominant scoring wingers and a player who helped Colorado win the Stanley Cup in 2022.

Avalanche GM Chris MacFarland shocked the hockey world by trading him to the Carolina Hurricanes in a blockbuster deal on Jan. 24 that saw Canes leading scorer Martin Necas sent back to the Avalanche. MacFarland called it a “business decision” involving a player who “had the unrestricted free agent card” but lamented losing “a superstar human being.”

However, Rantanen’s time with the Hurricanes was incredibly short. Carolina hoped to convince him to sign an extension — meeting his salary demands — and to put roots down in Raleigh. But after 13 games, the player the Hurricanes hoped could lead them to the Stanley Cup was traded again, this time to Dallas, in a deal involving young forward Logan Stankoven.

“My sense of it was that this just didn’t feel like home for him, as far as I can tell. And that’s OK. He’s making an eight-year commitment,” Carolina GM Eric Tulsky said at the time.

It was a dizzying, at times humbling, experience for Rantanen. He wanted to remain in Colorado. He learned quickly how much was out of his control. It was no surprise that Rantanen’s contract with Dallas spanned eight seasons (for $96 million total) and carried a full no-movement clause.

“You learn always from those tough moments, whether it’s on the ice or wherever in life,” he said. “You always learn from those moments when you’re going through tough times.”

The double-trade season and the new monster contract sparked questions around the NHL about whether Rantanen was in fact worth coveting. Was he a superstar away from the Avalanche? Was he a franchise-level player?

“There’s been a lot written about him. There’s been a lot said about him,” then-Stars coach Peter DeBoer said last postseason. “There’s been a lot of doubters out there, based on the situations he’s been in and how it’s looked at different points.”

Rantanen began answering those questions in the Stanley Cup playoffs, leading the Stars back to the conference finals for the third straight season — including a seven-game, first-round elimination of his friends from Colorado. Rantanen had 22 points in 18 playoff games, including one torrid stretch in which he had nine goals and eight assists in the span of six games.


DALLAS IS HOME NOW. Rantanen and his girlfriend, Susanna Ranta, got engaged in the offseason. No contract talk leaks. No trade chaos. To his relief, just playing the game.

“We’re settled and know where we’re going to be,” he said. “You don’t have to think about off-ice stuff as much. You can just focus on hockey. It’s been more comfortable.”

Rantanen’s comfort has been to Dallas’ benefit. Through 25 games, he has 33 points, including 10 goals. That includes 18 points on the Stars’ torrid power play, which ranked second to Pittsburgh heading into Tuesday’s game against the New York Rangers.

Winger Jason Robertson said having Rantanen for a full training camp was a key to that unit’s success. “You really didn’t have time to develop that look, that chemistry after the trade deadline last year,” he said.

At 5-on-5, Rantanen has found a fit with center Wyatt Johnston, who was tied with Robertson at 16 goals to lead the Stars. Like Nathan MacKinnon, the Avalanche star with whom Rantanen had explosive chemistry, Johnston is a right-shot center.

“Obviously last year I had a lot of success with playing with [Roope] Hintz and [Mikael] Granlund. Those are two lefties, so it’s not end of the world,” Rantanen said. “But playing a lot with Nate in the past as a righty, it’s more common for me to make plays and stuff. [Johnston] is a really good player. He can score goals. We find each other pretty well. Obviously, it takes some time. We haven’t played that long together, so we can still get better, but it’s going in a good direction.”

play

0:45

Mikko Rantanen capitalizes on the power play

Mikko Rantanen scores on the power play for Dallas Stars

Rantanen has played with Johnston and Dallas captain Jamie Benn recently, which is to say the Finland native is not playing with his countryman Hintz. When he was traded to the Stars last season, Rantanen joined what was colloquially known as Dallas’ “Finnish Mafia,” along with Hintz, defensemen Miro Heiskanen and Esa Lindell, and Granlund, who left for Anaheim as a free agent last summer. He played on a line with Hintz and Granlund for much of the playoffs.

There are moments when the Finns flock together. Such as at the end of a recent morning skate, when they were speaking their native tongue during a Suomi-only shooting drill. But Dallas players say Rantanen also has subverted some expectations.

“Normally, most of our Finnish guys are relatively quiet and whatever. Mikko comes in here and he’s this big, loud and happy guy. Just a different dynamic,” Robertson said. “He fit in obviously very well, and everyone welcomed him in.”

Forward Tyler Seguin knew Rantanen only as an opponent before the trade. A rather large opponent, at 6-foot-4 and around 230 pounds. Seguin said having Rantanen as a teammate offered an up-close glimpse at “how thick he is and why his nickname is what it is” referring to “Moose,” Rantanen’s moniker in Colorado.

“He’s a big boy,” Seguin said.

But Seguin also appreciates what a charismatic teammate he is, too.

“I used to know him as a skilled big forward that put up a lot of offense and points with Colorado. Getting him here as a teammate, I’ve learned what a good person he is. How much he can affect our locker room with his leadership,” Seguin explained. “Sometimes, guys come in and won’t feel comfortable talking. He does. So it’s nice.”


RANTANEN BRINGS SIZE, skill and personality to Dallas. He also brings a superstar quality to the franchise as “one of the elite power forwards in the game,” as GM Jim Nill described him last March.

Dallas coach Glen Gulutzan, hired to replace DeBoer in the offseason, coached two other elite forwards on the Edmonton Oilers‘ bench as an assistant coach: Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl. Gulutzan said that Rantanen is “certainly there” as far as comparable star quality.

“The most interesting thing that I’ve found coaching Mikko and then coaching Leon and Connor: The similarity is their fire. Their competitiveness. And that’s what you need, right?” Gulutzan said. “They’re very hard on themselves, just to be great every night. That’s what I really noticed. I didn’t know that as much with Mikko, but now that I’ve gotten to coach him, you just see that drive and that intensity.”

Rantanen is trying to drive the Stars into the Stanley Cup Final after three straight conference finals losses, and push Dallas to its first Cup win since 1999. He has found the right fit with a team committed to him for the long term. But he learned a lesson the hard way during last season’s chaos: Take nothing for granted.

“Last year was nothing like I’ve experienced before. Hopefully it never happens again,” he said. “But if it does, I’m ready.”

Continue Reading

Trending