The 2023 MLB draft is just around the corner, so we asked three of our own MLB experts to try their hand at selecting a first round consisting of this year’s top prospects.
The rules were simple: Jeff Passan, Jesse Rogers and Alden Gonzalez snake drafted through 10 rounds (30 total picks) to put together the best possible roster of 2023 draft prospects.
Each roster included a full lineup: Two pitchers, catcher, first baseman, second baseman, third baseman, shortstop and three outfielders. They were allowed to draft positions in any order, and their strategies show which positions are deepest — and most shallow — in this year’s class.
After making their 30 selections — with a healthy dose of trash talk mixed in — ESPN MLB draft analyst Kiley McDaniel broke down all three teams and declared which was the champion.
Rogers: This is like the Astros taking Mark Appel, with the Cubs then getting Kris Bryant. Yes, please.
Passan: If you think Paul Skenes is Mark Appel, this is going to be much easier than I figured. Skenes was the most dominant player in college baseball, and he is the most big-league-ready draft pick in years.
McDaniel: The top three is a true toss-up here, but the depth of the outfield means Skenes gets the slight edge. Everyone made the right pick here, even if I slightly prefer Langford to Crews.
4. Kyle Teel, C, Virginia (Gonzalez)
5. Rhett Lowder, SP, Wake Forest(Rogers)
6. Max Clark, OF, Franklin Community (Indiana) High School(Passan)
Gonzalez: Kiley might think I reached with Teel, but I don’t love the catching in this draft, and I feel really good about getting the best player at the position — especially one who will surely stick behind the plate — before everybody else.
Rogers: I scrambled after Alden took my pick. I don’t think Teel is a stretch; he’s the real deal. I’ll have to take advantage of other mistakes he and Jeff are bound to make.
McDaniel: WHAT? I thought this group understood that the first five guys have to be the first five picks. How does Passan get three of the crystal clear top five picking first, sixth, and seventh?!
7. Walker Jenkins, OF, South Brunswick (North Carolina) HS(Passan)
Passan: Here I am, thinking I’m in trouble because this is a five-player draft and I’m only going to get one of those players. Then Alden and Jesse decided to get cute. Thank you, boys. Thank you for acting like scouting directors who are bound to get fired.
Rogers: While you two were hitting the salad bar at Ruby Tuesday during spring training, I actually went to the campus of Grand Canyon in Phoenix and saw Wilson play. It is safe to say I have something in common with the scout who found Mike Trout: a keen eye for talent!
Passan: If you had as keen an eye for roster building, you’d know that shortstop is the deepest position in this draft and wouldn’t have wasted an early pick on one.
McDaniel: Alden, I like the thought of taking Teel to lock up the top catcher in a weak group, but Blake Mitchell isn’t wildly behind Teel, and the gap between Bradfield and Clark/Jenkins is huge. Real misstep there. Jesse: I like Wilson, but there are tons of similar shortstops this year, so I might have jumped at the other decent catcher in Mitchell to block Passan.
10. Chase Dollander, SP, Tennessee (Gonzalez)
11. Blake Mitchell, C, Sinton (Texas) HS (Rogers)
12. Brayden Taylor, 3B, TCU(Passan)
Gonzalez: Since Jesse summoned Ruby Tuesday out of nowhere, I’ll provide another Rolling Stones nod with my Enrique Bradfield Jr. pick, because he’s going to be a “Star Star.” (I’m really, really sorry.) Also, I have to scoop up Dollander, up-and-down year aside, because the pitching drop-off thereafter seems quite steep. Tiiiime is not on my side. (Again: Really sorry.)
Passan: Well, that’s a double snipe. I was going Dollander or Mitchell there. I’m glad you two decided to wake up.
McDaniel: OK, Jesse made the right pick here just in time getting Mitchell. I have Hurston Waldrep and Noble Meyer over Dollander, but it’s close, so I might have held off on taking a pitcher here, Alden.
13. Matt Shaw, 2B, Maryland(Passan)
14. Noble Meyer, RHP, Jesuit (Oregon) HS(Rogers)
15. Hurston Waldrep, RHP, Florida(Gonzalez)
Rogers: I was hoping to land a left-handed batting, right-handed throwing power third baseman, but I missed out on Brayden Taylor. So I went with pitching — some young, raw prep pitching in Noble Meyer.
McDaniel: Uh, wait, is that Taylor and Shaw ahead of Jacob Gonzalez among college infielders? That’s a tough sell. There are six pitcher slots to be filled, and now my clear top five arms have been taken, so Passan will get the last pick.
17. Colin Houck, 2B, Parkview (Georgia) HS(Rogers)
18. Jacob Gonzalez, SS, Ole Miss(Passan)
Gonzalez: Time to make what might be my first big upside play of this draft, and being able to get Nimmala here feels like a steal.
Passan: I agree, Alden. Nimmala here is a steal. I was planning on taking him. But I do appreciate you wiping the board of pitchers last round and allowing me to get a value pick later.
In the meantime, I’ll get a steal myself: Jacob Gonzalez, who I almost took last round and would’ve let slip if I weren’t worried Alden was going to nab him and stick him at second base. And I’ll grab Nolan Schanuel, because the first basemen in this class are mid, which means the rest will fit right in on Alden’s and Jesse’s teams
McDaniel: Ah, a breath of fresh air: My literal top three available go in this round. Gonzalez slipped way too far in another win for Passan.
19. Nolan Schanuel, 1B, Florida Atlantic(Passan)
20. Yohandy Morales, 3B, Miami(Rogers)
21. Tommy Troy, 2B, Stanford(Gonzalez)
Rogers: Tommy Troy sounds like a small, light-hitting middle infielder — which is exactly what he’ll be for you, Alden. His power surge at Stanford last season fooled you, while Morales is a star at 6-foot-4 and 225 pounds. Smaller guys — Troy might be the smallest in the first round — are fun, but they don’t pay the bills. Morales will.
Gonzalez: Jose Altuve and Mookie Betts would like a word. Troy might not have 70 power, but the dude makes a lot of hard, solid contact. You’ll wish you had it.
McDaniel: Two of my top three best available players go here, and Schanuel was my next best college bat. Good picks considering none of you knew my final rankings while doing this.
22. Bryce Eldridge, 1B/RHP, Madison (Virginia) HS(Gonzalez)
Rogers: Chase Davis is another player I personally scouted. Stardom awaits.
Gonzalez: I was going to save this as a potential value play late, but I couldn’t resist. Eldridge probably isn’t the next great two-way player, but he can be a standout right fielder. And if not, a first baseman. And if not, we’ll run the pickup basketball circuit together. The dude is 6-foot-7. That’s like one and a half Jeff Passans.
Passan: For the record, I’m 5-foot-9, which is exactly the same height as … Alden. Though if we’re talking about coming up short: Jesse, you need another outfielder. Dillon Head lives 30 miles from you. Not only a subpar scouting director but a sellout too. So I’ll pick Head.
McDaniel: Eldridge is the right pick here, and those could be the next best outfielders, though I might slightly prefer Jonny Farmelo to these two.
Passan: Just to make sure you don’t use Velazquez as a first baseman, where he has played, I’ll grab him as my catcher, which is where he’ll play to start his minor league career.
McDaniel: That’s the correct pick for third catcher, with Cole Carrigg or a speculative Kemp Alderman conversion the other options. Infield is exceptionally deep in this area, so it would’ve been smart to rush to get outfielders, catcher and two pitchers quickly then take the infield leftovers.
28. Jake Gelof, OF, Virginia (Gonzalez)
29. Mike Boeve, 1B, Nebraska-Omaha (Rogers)
30. Thomas White, SP, Phillips Academy (Massachusetts) (Passan)
Gonzalez: I was scrambling a bit at the end here — you’re right, Jeff, first base is slim pickings at the top of this draft — but I feel good about getting 70-grade power in Gelof. He’ll play first base for me. All good.
Rogers: Are you trying to convince yourself of that pick, Alden? Sounds like it. Because you won’t convince us of it. My final one goes to Mike Boeve, from Nebraska-Omaha. I’m sure our esteemed, extremely handsome judge will allow me to move him to first base, right Kiley?
Passan: Let’s close this thing out the way it began, with a massive, hard-throwing pitcher — this time left-hander Thomas White, who will gladly join this team instead of honoring his Vanderbilt commitment.
Gonzalez: Wow, it’s pretty amazing how much better my team is. I’d like to thank the brilliant, tireless, illuminating research/analysis of the one and only Kiley McDaniel for all my success.
McDaniel: Boeve’s next best position after second is probably first, so I’ll allow it. No Brock Wilken love? He seems to be a slam-dunk choice here for first base, which also is his second-best position, behind third base.
Why is your team the best?
Passan: Let’s start with this: I got three of the five best players in the draft. The difference between Skenes and Lowder is the biggest single-position gap in the draft, and letting Clark and Jenkins slip was some amateur-hour stuff. We can continue with this: I got the best first baseman, second baseman and third baseman, and the shortstops are all more or less in the same strata. And let’s finish here: I have a 50-50 split between college and high school players, giving my team a perfect proportion of steady performance and excellent upside. My team has the highest floor and ceiling, which is no easy feat.
Gonzalez: No, let’s start here: My roster includes the best catcher in this draft (Teel), arguably the best true center fielder available (Bradfield), one of the three can’t-miss position players (Langford) and the second-best pitcher (Dollander) in a really shallow pitching draft. I feel really good about my upside gambles with Nimmala at No. 16 and Eldridge at 22. And I filled out the rest of the roster with safer, high-floor picks in Waldrep, Troy and Gelof. If Dollander bounces back, like I think he should, it’s a laugher.
Rogers: I have the best overall balance, especially at the most important positions, having taken the best outfielder, best shortstop, second-best starter and second-best catcher. At least, that’s what my scouting department has told me. I also believe I have the right balance in players who can contribute soonish and those with more upside down the line. For example, Wilson’s mature approach — he was the toughest to strike out in college baseball this season — makes me think he won’t be long for the minors, while Meyer’s raw ability at 18 years old is going to pay off in a few years. Balance is the key word for Team Rogers.
McDaniel’s final verdict
I think Jesse comes in third. Boeve was the worst player selected, and passing on Clark and Jenkins with his second pick did the most damage, while my rankings are on the lower end of consensus on Hurley, Davis and Mitchell.
So that leaves Alden heads up against Jeff now. Alden’s top-end talent is lacking a bit, with only two of my top 10 players, while Jeff has five. Alden ended up going heavy in the Nos. 11-20 area by focusing on scarcity. But I give the nod to Jeff here because the top of the draft is what empirically matters, and he won this exercise there.
ARLINGTON, Texas — Two-time Cy Young Award winner Jacob deGrom already has thrown off the mound this offseason and said everything felt normal after missing most of his first two seasons with the Texas Rangers because of elbow surgery.
The three starts deGrom got to make in September were significant for him.
“That way I could treat it like a normal offseason and not feel like I was in rehab mode the whole time,” he said Saturday during the team’s annual Fan Fest. “So that’s what this offseason has been, you know, normal throwing. Been off the mound already and everything feels good.”
The right-hander said he would usually wait until Feb. 1 before throwing, but he started earlier this week so he could ramp up a bit slower going into spring training.
DeGrom, 36, has started only nine games for the Rangers since signing a $185 million, five-year contract in free agency two winters ago. They won all six starts he made before the end of April during his 2023 debut with the team before the surgery. After rehabbing most of last year, he was 3-0 with a 1.69 ERA and 14 strikeouts over 10⅔ innings in those three September starts.
“One of the things I’m most excited about is a healthy season from Jacob, and for our fans to see what that looks like, and how good he is,” Rangers president of baseball operations Chris Young said. “It’s just electric, and coming to the ballpark every day that he’s pitching, knowing that we’ve got a great chance to win the game, it’s an exciting feeling. Our fans truly haven’t experienced that over the course of a season. We’re excited and hopeful that this is the year they get to see that.”
Since his back-to-back Cy Young Awards with the New York Mets in 2018 and 2019, deGrom hasn’t made more than 15 starts in a season. He started 12 times during the COVID-19-shortened 60-game season in 2020.
DeGrom had a career-low 1.08 ERA over 92 innings in 2021 before missing the final three months with right forearm tightness and a sprained elbow, then was shut down late during spring training in 2022 because of a stress reaction in his right scapula. He went 5-4 with a 3.08 ERA in 11 starts over the last two months of that season before becoming a free agent.
His fastball touched 98 mph in the last of his three starts last season, when he pitched four innings of one-run ball against the Los Angeles Angels.
“In those games, you know, it’s still a thought in the back of your mind, you just came back from a major surgery and you probably don’t get another one at my age,” he said. “So it was, hey, is everything good? And then like I said, was able to check those boxes off in this offseason, treat it normal.”
Now deGrom feels like he can start pitching again without worrying about being injured.
“Just throw the ball to the target and not think about anything,” he said. “So, yeah, I think I can get back to where I was.”
More than a week after its season ended in the College Football Playoff, Texas has agreed to a new contract with coach Steve Sarkisian, a source told ESPN’s Pete Thamel on Saturday, confirming a report. The sides came to an agreement Friday night in a deal that includes an extension.
A source told ESPN that it’s a seven-year contract for Sarkisian, 50, that adds a year to his deal and makes him one of the highest-paid coaches in college football.
News of the agreement was first reported by The Action Network, which noted that the deal came after Sarkisian declined interviews with two NFL franchises for coaching positions.
The Longhorns, in their first season in the SEC, advanced to the title game and won two CFP playoff games against Clemson and Arizona State before being eliminated by Ohio State on Jan. 10 in the Cotton Bowl.
Texas played Ohio State tight before a late fumble return stretched the Buckeyes’ lead to 14 points. Sarkisian said being the last remaining SEC team in the playoff in their first year in the league is something the Longhorns take pride in.
“I really believe this is a premier football conference in America because of the week-in, week-out task that it requires physically and mentally,” Sarkisian said. “I know unfortunately for Georgia, they lost their starting quarterback in the SEC championship game, and I’m sure other teams in our conference had to endure things that can take their toll on your team, and that’s no excuse. At the end of the day, we have to find a way to navigate our ways through it, but to be here on this stage to be back in the final four wearing that SEC patch on our jersey, we’re going to do our best to represent it because this is a heck of a conference.”
Sarkisian arrived at Texas in 2021 after serving as Nick Saban’s offensive coordinator at Alabama in his previous stop. As head coach previously at Washington and USC, combined with his run at Texas, he is 84-52 overall. With the Longhorns, he is 38-17 and won the Big 12 title last season.
Texas will open next season with a rematch against Ohio State on Aug. 30 in Columbus, Ohio. In that game vs. the Buckeyes, the likely starter under center for Sarkisian will be Arch Manning, who backed up Quinn Ewers for two seasons and will soon get his chance to headline what will be one of the most anticipated quarterback situations in recent memory. The nephew of Peyton and Eli Manning and grandson of Archie Manning came to Texas as ESPN’s No. 5 recruit in the 2023 class.
Arch Manning saw more playing time this season as Ewers dealt with injury, and he completed 61 of 90 passes for 939 yards and nine touchdowns. He also showcased big-play ability as a runner, breaking off a 67-yard scamper against UTSA and averaging 4.2 yards per carry.
ATLANTA — Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua said the independent Irish are comfortable continuing to give up access to a first-round bye in the College Football Playoff — something currently granted to only the four highest-ranked conference champions — as long as the fate of conference championship games remains the same.
“We’re comfortable that if conference championship games continue as they’re currently configured, part of the deal we made is that we wouldn’t get a bye, and that’s understandable,” Bevacqua said Saturday, speaking to a small group of reporters at the national championship game media availability at the Georgia World Congress Center. “And quite frankly, I wouldn’t trade that [first-round] Indiana game at Notre Dame Stadium for anything in the world, but you also have to be smart and strategic, and your odds of making a national championship game are increased if you get to play one less game.
“So I think a lot is going to depend on the fate of the conference championship games,” he said. “Should they go away? And that’s obviously not my decision. Should they be altered in some sort of material way where it’s not the top two teams playing for a championship, but something else? Then I think we absolutely have to re-look at Notre Dame’s ability to get a bye if we end up being one of the top four teams.”
Bevacqua’s comments come as he and the FBS commissioners prepare to meet Sunday to begin their review of the inaugural 12-team field, which will produce a national champion on Monday with the winner of Ohio State vs. Notre Dame.
Bevacqua is part of the CFP’s management committee, which is also comprised of the 10 FBS commissioners tasked with determining the format and rules of the playoff to eventually send to the 11 presidents and chancellors on the CFP board for their approval. The commissioners and Bevacqua will have a 90-minute business meeting to start to discuss possible changes for the 2025 season, which would require unanimity, leaving many CFP sources skeptical that next season will look much different.
Bevacqua said he thinks “there’s a chance” the group could agree on a change to the seeding, but one option that has been floated by sources with knowledge of the discussions is having the committee’s top four teams earn the top four seeds — which opens the door for Notre Dame to earn a first-round bye without playing in a conference championship game.
“I think everybody wants what’s best for the overall system,” he said. “It was interesting, when you think about those four teams that got a bye, they didn’t advance. Now I don’t think that has anything to do with the fact that they got a bye, I think that was mostly competition and happenstance. But I think there’ll be a good, honest conversation that will start tomorrow. Are there any changes that we ought to make from this year to next year and make something that’s worked really well work even better? Will there be changes? I’m just one person. I’m not sure.”
CFP executive director Rich Clark, who also spoke to a small group of reporters at the media day event, said some changes for 2025 would require “more lead time than a few months to implement,” so no major structural changes like the size of the bracket are expected for 2025.
Clark said the commissioners will talk about every aspect from “cradle to the grave,” including seeding and re-seeding possibilities.”
Clark said whatever changes are made for 2026 and beyond — the start of a new, six-year contract with ESPN — need to be determined by the end of the calendar year. That could include increasing the bracket size, possibly to 14 or 16 teams.
“We’re trying to beat that timeline,” Clark said. “We don’t want to obviously wait until the limits of it. So we want to move smartly on these things, but we don’t want to make bad decisions, either.”