Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has said the UK “discourages” the use of cluster bombs after the US agreed to send them to Ukraine.

President Joe Biden has faced criticism for supplying the munitions, which are banned by many allies because of their track record of killing and maiming civilians.

The prime minister said the UK was one of 123 countries that signed a convention banning their use, and would continue focusing on supplying tanks and long-range weapons to help the fight against Russia.

Zelenskyy visits Ukraine’s ‘free island’ on war’s 500th day – War latest

He added: “We will continue to do our part to support Ukraine against Russia’s illegal and unprovoked invasion, but we’ve done that by providing heavy battle tanks and most recently long-range weapons, and hopefully all countries can continue to support Ukraine.

“Russia’s act of barbarism is causing untold suffering to millions of people.

“It’s right that we collectively stand up to it.”

Mr Sunak will meet Mr Biden in London on Monday ahead of a NATO summit.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What are cluster bombs?

Why cluster bombs decision is controversial

Cluster bombs detonate in the air and release “bomblets” that scatter over a large area.

Opponents say they kill indiscriminately and that some of the smaller munitions can fail to detonate, posing a long-term risk to civilians.

Mr Biden has called it a “difficult decision” but said he had to act as “the Ukrainians are running out of ammunition”.

The US says Kyiv has provided assurances it will not use cluster bombs in urban areas, but some NATO allies are likely to be uneasy over their supply.

Why US cluster bombs decision is already causing splits among allies


Alex Rossi - Middle East correspondent

Alex Rossi

International correspondent

@alexrossiSKY

The US decision to send cluster munitions to Ukraine is extremely controversial and is already causing splits in the alliance.

The problem is many of the allies – including the UK – are signatories to a convention banning their use.

And the reason for that is simple – as weapons they are absolutely horrific, hanging around long after the fighting has ceased with the potential to kill indiscriminately.

The US has got Kyiv to agree not to use the munitions in built-up areas but that’s hardly the point – and it’s why there is great unease about their supply.

Cluster munitions describe a method of dispersing large numbers of bomblets over a wide area – they can be delivered by missile, rocket or artillery shell.

They are meant to explode on impact but many don’t, meaning they remain where they fall and can be trodden on by civilians.

They are thought extremely effective as an area weapon, especially when used against heavily fortified positions.

And with Ukraine’s counteroffensive making slow progress the calculation in Washington seems to be that they could help advancing forces to break Russian lines.

Ukraine is also running low on artillery shells.

Neither Russia nor Ukraine are signatories to the treaty and both have used them since the start of the invasion.

The political dimension to all this is awkward but it’s unlikely to derail the alliance.

Downing Street has made its position clear and that will probably be the end of the matter.

There’s though, a real danger of the moral ground the West considers itself to stand on, on the issue of Ukraine, becoming eroded.

Russian war crimes are well documented but Washington is certainly opening itself up to accusations of hypocrisy and double standards.

Some human rights groups consider even the use of cluster munitions as a war crime.

The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits their use or stockpiling because of their indiscriminate effect on civilian populations, though the US, Ukraine, and Russia are not signatories.

Both Moscow and Kyiv have used cluster munitions so far in the war.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked the US for the “timely, broad and much-needed defence aid package” that will “bring Ukraine closer to victory over the enemy, and democracy to victory over dictatorship”.

Read more:
US cluster bombs deal is clear signal that war is not going well for Ukraine
Ukraine war is at a critical moment – and Zelenskyy needs some good news

File pic
Image:
Opponents say cluster bombs kill indiscriminately and pose a long-term risk to civilians. File pic

Biden’s made ‘wrong call’

Commons Defence Committee chairman Tobias Ellwood urged the US to “reconsider”.

The Tory MP tweeted: “This is the wrong call and will alienate international good will. Their use leaves deadly unexploded ordnance over the battlefield, killing & injuring civilians .”

But Dr Yuriy Sak, adviser to Ukraine’s defence minister, told Sky News: “It is an important move. It is a timely move.

“Russia has been using cluster munitions from day one of this aggressive, unprovoked war against Ukraine. They’ve been using cluster munitions against civilian cities.

“Now, we need these types of weapons as well as other types of weapons, in order for us to achieve one single sole purpose, which is to liberate our land.”

He added: “We will be using these weapons very responsibly.

“Our minister of defence has given written assurances that certain principles will be applied.

“We have a right to self-defence… but in exercising that right, we will always commit ourselves to abiding the international norms of war and humanitarian laws.

“We are dealing with an enemy who is killing our civilians every day.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Zelenskyy marks 500 days of conflict

‘The only target will be the enemy’

Insisting the weapons would not be used in urban areas, Dr Sak said: “They will be used only on the battlefield to allow the Ukrainian army to break through the defence lines of the enemy.

“The only target will be the enemy.”

Germany, which is signed up to the cluster bomb ban, has expressed understanding for the American position.

A spokesman for the Berlin government said: “We’re certain that our US friends didn’t take the decision about supplying such ammunition lightly.

“We need to remember once again that Russia has already used cluster ammunition at a large scale in its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine.”

But Spain, also a signatory to the convention, said it opposed the decision.

Spanish defence minister Margarita Robles said: “Spain, based on the firm commitment it has with Ukraine,
also has a firm commitment that certain weapons and bombs cannot be delivered under any circumstances.”

Continue Reading

World

Brazil ‘surprised’ UK not investing in new rainforest fund it helped design

Published

on

By

Brazil 'surprised' UK not investing in new rainforest fund it helped design

Brazil was “a bit surprised” Britain hasn’t contributed to a new investment fund to protect tropical forests, despite having helped to design it, a senior official has told Sky News. 

The Amazon nation has used its role as host of the COP30 climate talks to tout its new scheme, which it drew up with the help of countries including the UK and Indonesia.

With Britain’s budget day looming, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer decided against chipping in when he visited the Amazonian city of Belem this month.

The news came out the day before Brazil was about to launch it.

“The Brazilians were livid” about the timing, one source told Sky News.

Lush rainforest and waterways in the Brazilian Amazon
Image:
Lush rainforest and waterways in the Brazilian Amazon

A waterfall in Kayapo territory in Brazil
Image:
A waterfall in Kayapo territory in Brazil

Garo Batmanian, director-general of the Brazilian Forestry Service and coordinator of the new scheme, said: “We were expecting [Britain to pay in] because the UK was the very first one to support us.”

The so-called Tropical Forests Forever Facility (TFFF) was drawn up with the help of “very bright people from the UK”, according to Mr Batmanian.

More on Deforestation

“So we are a bit surprised, but we expect that once internal situations get better, hopefully they will come through,” he added.

The UK’s climate envoy, Rachel Kyte, told Sky News: “The PM agreed the decision was about not doing it now, as opposed to not ever.

“We will look at the TFFF after the budget and are carefully tracking how others are investing.”

Forest growing back from a fire (bottom left) and deforestation alongside healthy sections of Amazon rainforest
Image:
Forest growing back from a fire (bottom left) and deforestation alongside healthy sections of Amazon rainforest

The fund has been hailed as a breakthrough – if Brazil can get if off the ground.

Paul Polman, former Unilever boss and now co-vice chair of Planetary Guardians, said it could be the “first forest-finance plan big enough to change the game”.

Why do tropical forests need help?

At their best, tropical forests like the Amazon and the Congo Basin provide food, rainfall and clean air for millions of people around the world.

They soak up carbon dioxide – the main driver of climate change – providing a cooling effect on a heating planet.

But they are being nibbled away at by extractive industries like oil, logging, soy and gold.

Parts of the Amazon rainforest already emit more carbon dioxide than they store.

Other pockets are expected to collapse in the next few decades, meaning they’d no longer be rainforests at all.

Read more from COP30:
Climate protest in Brazilian city aims to hold governments’ feet to the fire
Are climate summits saving the world – or just hot air?

COP30 – why is it so controversial?

Greenpeace says deforested land could be better used, which would save the need for more land to be cleared
Image:
Greenpeace says deforested land could be better used, which would save the need for more land to be cleared

Cristiane Mazzetti, senior forest campaigner at Greenpeace Brazil, said: “Science is saying we need to immediately stop deforestation and start restoring what was once lost.

“And in Brazil, we already have enough open land that could be better used for agricultural expansion… There is no need [to open up] new areas.”

Can Brazil’s new investment fund save the world’s rainforests?

For decades, forests have been worth more dead than alive.

Successive attempts to save them have fallen flat because they’ve not been able to flip the economics in favour of conservation, or ensure a long-term stream of cash.

Brazil hopes the TFFF, if it launches, would make forests worth more standing than cut down, and pay out to countries and communities making that happen.

Mining is a lucrative industry in the Amazon. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Mining is a lucrative industry in the Amazon. Pic: Reuters

“We don’t pay only for carbon, we are paying for a hectare of standing forest. The more forests you have, the more you are paid,” said Mr Batmanian.

The other “innovation” is to stop relying on aid donations, he said.

“There is a lot of demand for overseas development assistance. It’s normal to have that. We have a lot of crisis, pandemics, epidemics out there.”

Instead, the TFFF is an investment fund that would compete with other commercial propositions.

Mr Polman said: “This isn’t charity, it’s smart economic infrastructure to protect the Amazon and keep our planet safe.”

How does the TFFF raise money?

The idea is to raise a first tranche of cash from governments that can de-risk the fund for private investors.

Every $1 invested by governments could attract a further $4 of private cash.

The TFFF would then be able to take a higher amount of risk to raise above-market returns, Brazil hopes.

That means it could generate enough cash to pay competitive returns to investors and payments to the eligible countries and communities keeping their tropical trees upright.

At least 20% of the payments has been earmarked for indigenous communities, widely regarded as the best stewards of the land. Many, but not all, have welcomed the idea.

Will the TFFF work?

The proposal needs at least $10-25bn of government money to get off the ground.

So far it has raised $5.5bn from the likes of Norway, France, and Indonesia. And the World Bank has agreed to host it, signalling strong credibility.

But it’s a hard task to generate enough money to compete with lucrative industries like gold and oil, many of which governments already invest in.

Dr Andreza Aruska de Souza Santos, director, Brazil Institute, King's College London
Image:
Dr Andreza Aruska de Souza Santos, director, Brazil Institute, King’s College London

Dr Andreza Aruska de Souza Santos, director of King’s College London’s Brazil Institute, said TFFF has the potential to make it “very financially viable to have a forest as a forest”.

“But the problem is that TFFF would need to compete with these very profitable industries… because you need to capture as much money from governments, from investors.

“And so far it’s not quite balancing the competitiveness of other sectors that are potentially harmful for forests.”

Continue Reading

World

COP30: Climate protest in Brazil’s city of Belem aims to hold governments’ feet to the fire

Published

on

By

COP30: Climate protest in Brazil's city of Belem aims to hold governments' feet to the fire

Hot, humid, loud and proud: the climate protest in the city of Belem was the embodiment of the Amazonian rainforest that surrounds it.

Hawkers brought carts selling bananas, mangoes and coconuts – while demonstrators bore umbrellas, hats and fans to shelter from the scorching tropical sun.

After a week of dreary negotiations at the COP30 climate talks, the streets were alive with the drumming of maracatu music and dancing to local carimbo rhythms on Saturday.

It was a carnival atmosphere designed to elevate sober issues.

The climate protest in the city of Belem
Image:
The climate protest in the city of Belem

Among those out on the streets were Kayapo people, an indigenous community living across the states of Para and Mato Grosso – the latter at the frontier of soy expansion in the Brazilian Amazon.

They are fighting local infrastructure projects like the new Ferrograo railway that will transport soy through their homeland.

The soy industry raises much-needed cash for Brazil’s economy – its second biggest export – but the kayapo say they do not get a slice of the benefit.

More on Cop30

The climate protest
Image:
The climate protest

Read more:
Cop out: Is net zero dead?

COP30: Are climate summits saving the world – or just hot air?

Uti, a Kayapo community leader, said: “We do not accept the construction of the Ferrograo and some other projects.

“We Kayapo do not accept any of this being built on indigenous land.”

Many Brazilian indigenous and community groups here want legal recognition of the rights to their land – and on Friday, the Brazilian government agreed to designate two more territories to the Mundurucu people.

It’s a Brazilian lens on global issues – indigenous peoples are widely regarded as the best stewards of the land, but rarely rewarded for their efforts.

In fact, it is often a terrible opposite: grandmother Julia Chunil Catricura had been fighting to stay on Mapuche land in southern Chile, but disappeared earlier this year when she went out for a walk.

Lefimilla Catalina, also Mapuche, said she’s travelled two days to be here in Belem to raise the case of Julia, and to forge alliances with other groups.

The protest in the city of Belem
Image:
The protest in the city of Belem

“At least [COP30] makes it visible” to the world that people are “facing conflicts” on their land, she said.

She added: “COP offers a tiny space [for indigenous people], and we want to be more involved.

“We want to have more influence, and that’s why we believe we have to take ownership of these spaces, we can’t stay out of it.”

They are joined by climate protesters from around the world in an effort to hold governments’ feet to the fire.

Louise Hutchins, convener of Make Polluters Pay Coalition International, said: “We’re here to say to governments they need to make the oil and gas companies pay up for the climate destruction – they’ve made billions in profits every day for the last 50 years.”

After three years of COPs with no protests – the UAE, Egypt, and Azerbaijan do not look kindly on people taking to the streets – this year demonstrators have defined the look, the tone and the soundtrack of the COP30 climate talks – and Saturday was no different.

Whether that will translate into anything more ambitious to come out of COP30 remains to be seen, with another week of negotiations still to go.

For now, the protests in Belem reflect the chaos, the mess and the beauty of Brazil, the COP process, and the rest of the world beyond.

Continue Reading

World

Video shows Storm Claudia’s impact in Portugal as ‘tornado’ devastates Algarve

Published

on

By

Video shows Storm Claudia's impact in Portugal as 'tornado' devastates Algarve

Video has shown the devastating impact Storm Claudia has had on Portugal, where “tornado-like” winds battered the country, local media said.

Footage from a holiday campsite in Albufeira, where an 85-year-old British woman was killed, shows the extent of the damage caused by the extreme winds, which reached up to 114kmph in Portugal’s southern region of the Algarve.

Regional commander of the Algarve, Vitor Vaz Pinto, said dozens of people were injured in the area after Storm Claudia hit, two of whom were seriously injured.

A destroyed campsite in the aftermath of Storm Claudia in Albufeira, in southern Portugal's Algarve region. Pic: AP
Image:
A destroyed campsite in the aftermath of Storm Claudia in Albufeira, in southern Portugal’s Algarve region. Pic: AP

The injured were of Portuguese, Spanish and British nationalities and ranged in age from six to 85 years old.

Follow the latest updates on Storm Claudia

According to media reports, the woman was initially reported missing at a campsite and later found dead.

SIC, which is Sky News’ Portuguese partner network, said an “extreme wind phenomenon” occurred around 10am on Saturday at the holiday site.

More on Extreme Weather

Flooding in Portugal due to Storm Claudia. Pic: S.I.C. TV
Image:
Flooding in Portugal due to Storm Claudia. Pic: S.I.C. TV

Portuguese Prime Minister Luis Montenegro expressed his “heartfelt condolences” to the family of the British woman and wished a “speedy recovery” to those who have been injured after the strong winds hit.

Portuguese media described the extreme weather in the Algarve as a tornado.

The storm, which was named by the Spanish meteorological service, affected Portugal and parts of Spain, Britain and Ireland.

Sky News’ weather presenter Jo Wheeler said the IPMA, or Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, had issued red rain warnings and severe wind warnings “well ahead of the storm’s arrival”.

She said there have been more than 2,434 weather-related incidents reported in the Algarve, including a downburst – a strong downward rush of air from a thunderstorm, causing similar damage to a tornado but linear rather than rotational -at Praia da Carvoeiro, with wind gusts of 114 km/hour.

Read more from Sky News:
Trump confirms he will sue the BBC over Panorama edit
Former chancellor Osborne is shock contender to head HSBC

Pics: AP
Image:
Pics: AP

Wheeler added that the presence of a tornado in Albufeira was yet to be confirmed, but it would account for the extent of the damage seen.

On Thursday, rescue workers found the bodies of an elderly couple inside their flooded home in Fernao Ferro, across the River Tagus from Lisbon.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Heartbreaking scenes’ – as floods devastate South Wales

Storm Claudia in the UK

In the UK, Storm Claudia caused severe flooding in the town of Monmouth and surrounding areas in southeastern Wales on Saturday.

Senedd Member Peter Fox described the impact as being “devastating”.

Rescues, evacuations, and welfare checks were being carried out by the South Wales Fire and Rescue Service, the force said.

“Storm Claudia has caused significant flooding in parts of Wales overnight, which continues to affect homes, businesses, transport and energy infrastructure,” a spokesperson for the Welsh government said.

Natural Resources Wales has issued 11 flood warnings, four of which are severe, as well as 17 flood alerts.

In England, according to the Environment Agency’s latest update, there were 49 active flood warnings and 134 flood alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending