Mercedes-AMG has officially launched its third EV model and first all-electric performance SUV with the EQE. I previously tested out the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, so you know I had to take the AMG version out for a spin to see how it compares. Here are my thoughts.
The AMG EQE SUV was announced alongside the debut of its standard Mercedes-Benz version back in October of 2022. At the time, we learned the AMG version would arrive with less range compared to the EQE SUV (more on that later), but with higher performance.
This includes new air suspension, steering, and stabilization technology, as well as unique aesthetic design features inside and out. By March, we learned pricing of the American-made EQE SUV, which could qualify for federal tax credits at its most basic configuration.
That will not be the case for the AMG EQE SUV as it arrives with bolstered performance and advanced features. This past spring, I got the chance to be one of the first to drive the EQE SUV in Portugal and was a big fan, so it was a no-brainer when Mercedes asked me to visit Southern California and experience the AMG version. Here are some images from my drive.
The AMG EQE SUV looks and plays the sportier role
The Mercedes-AMG EQE SUV not only arrives as a profound demonstration in initialisms, but as the dual-motor, performance version of a mid-size SUV that has yet to make its own impact on the US market. The dynamic 4MATIC+ AWD experience synonymous with the AMG name stems from the EQE SUV’s synchronous motors, which combine for up to 677 hp and 738 Nm of torque (in RACE START mode).
Unique features implemented on the first electric performance SUV include front and rear AMG Ride Control+ air suspension, an adaptive damping system, and Active Ride Control roll stabilization. The AMG EQE SUV also features Mercedes’s unique MBUX curved Hyperscreen, where the passengers can control six different driving characteristics, via the following AMG Dynamic Select programs that control the suspension setup:
Drive Program
AMGEQE SUV Output Level
Slippery
50% (308 hp)
Comfort
80% (493 hp)
Sport
90% (555 hp)
Sport+
100% (617 hp)
RACE START without Boost function
100% (617 hp)
RACE START with Boost function (AMG DYNAMIC PLUS Package req.)
110% (677 hp)
The AMG SUV is slightly longer and taller than the standard Mercedes-Benz version, but not enough that that you’d even notice. As you can see in the images above, the exterior features AMG’s unique black panel radiator grille with vertical chrome struts to match the other two performance EQ models, as well as a brand-specific emblem on the hood instead of the three-point star.
When you open and close the vehicle, the SUV’s Digital Light headlamps feature an AMG-specific projection, but it was tough to see and film during the day. There are also plenty of unique details in the AMG EQE SUV’s interior, starting with the images I snapped below.
An AMG interior that is more sporty than luxurious
As you may have noticed, the MB-Tex microfiber textiles throughout the interior are a far cry from the bright white leathers I experienced in the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV earlier this year. The seat patterns, red seatbelts, and topstitching are all AMG-specific elements. I personally would have preferred the original leather as I found the microfiber a bit warm in the California weather, and the fabric does not allow for one of my favorite features while test driving – air-conditioned seats.
The steering wheel features of the only leather inside the SUV, complimenting a flattened wheel bottom, perforated grip areas, and silver aluminum paddles for adjusting regenerative braking levels. As you’ll see below, the AMG steering also features digital buttons that control the aforementioned drive programs.
Other unique interior features for the AMG version include unique displays in the instrument cluster and quick access to Dynamic Select in the center console (see display images above). The AMG EQE SUV also features Dolby Atmos sound, offering a 360-degree listening experience (as long as the song you’re listening to is compatible).
Aesthetics are one thing, but how does the AMG drive compare standard EQE SUV. Well, let me tell you.
AMG EQE SUV performs better, but is it worth the money?
Obviously the answer is subjective depending on your driving and performance preferences as well as the all-important factor of budget, but for me personally I’m not so sure. My drive day with the AMG EQE SUV was a fun one, but not a particularly memorable one.
Sure, the AMG definitely delivers better performance than the standard EQE SUV, but that’s a relatively low bar in terms of EV specs – and the gap isn’t as wide as I originally expected. The AMG-specific dual motors provide significantly more hp (617-677 vs. 288-402 hp), and the splitting of the roll bar from front to back allows the system to be connected and torsioned together for more sportiness, but this remains a heavy, lumbering EV in my opinion nonetheless.
Sport and Sport+ were absolutely dynamic and fun to experience, but I took a couple of turns a little too quickly and admittedly puckered up for a second – you definitely feel the weight of the Mercedes-Benz EVA platform, even with its “AMG treatment.”
The ride itself was smooth, although I found the regenerative braking in the AMG version jolty and annoying at times, depending upon which drive program I was in. It felt as if it wanted to be one pedal driving, but couldn’t make its mind up. This was a different sensation from the standard Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV.
ADAS system worked stupendously, seamlessly switching lanes on the highway while maintaining speeds and adjusting to the flow of traffic around me. I also love the head-up display (HUD), which is one of the more robust in the industry in my opinion. It compliments an MBUX complete with navigation that remains one of the very best. I never have to use Apple CarPlay in a Mercedes EV – that’s rare. Here’s the HUD in action:
All that said, there’s one huge hurdle in our way as we try to compare the AMG EQE SUV to its standard predecessor – Mercedes-AMG is not yet sharing pricing. Even so, it’s easy to wager that the AMG version will cost more than most trims of the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, and I’m personally not sure its worth it – especially since the latter is already such a well designed EV.
Electrek’s Take
Overall, I like the look of the Mercedes-AMG EQE SUV inside and out, but also felt like its sports car interior didn’t quite fit the level of performance (or lack thereof) this EV offers. I’d personally save my money and go for one of the Premium versions of the Mercedes-Benz EQE 350 SUV, depending on whether you want 2WD or 4WD – might be able to snag those tax credits, too.
Aside from the better motors and AMG Ride Control+, a lot of the same technology is present in the standard EQE SUV, including a heat pump and damping – it’s just slower off the starting line. Sure, the AMG version can go 0-60 mph in an estimated 3.4 seconds (using Race Start), but are you buying a mid-size luxury SUV to haul ass at every green light?
I’d take the 6.3 seconds with the EQE 350+ SUV for the 279 miles of range. Can AMG’s version beat that? It remains to be seen as the performance automaker has yet to divulge that information, which is interesting. The provisional range was expected to be between 233-292 miles (WLTP), another big reason why I’d probably lean toward the Premium 350+ or 350 4MATIC.
I think there will always be a place for AMG vehicles, especially as the growing lineup of EVs opens the door to better performance opportunities – we’ve already begun to see this potential in the AMG EQS and EQE sedans. When it comes to the EQE SUV however, I’d rather save my money on the Mercedes-Benz version and don’t think I’d miss anything in the AMG model.
We will have to see how pricing plans out and how the different models compare financially.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The Fiat Topolino Vilebrequin is a new beach town cruiser that captures the elegance, glamour, and relaxed vibe of the French Riviera. More significantly, the updated EV also heralds Stellantis’ plans to double EV production at its Kenitra Assembly Plant in Morocco.
Closer to a Mercury Villager Nautica or Ford F-150 Harley-Davidson than a new model on its own, the new Topolino Vilebrequin features colors and fabrics inspired by the French surfwear brand, and is based on the Dolcevita version of Stellantis’ electric microcar. With its open sides, a soft rollback roof, and turtle-tastic fabric prints, it’s ready to whisk you off on a carefree summer adventure in France or Italy – which are, coincidentally, the only two markets the “collector’s edition” Vilebrequin Topolino is currently available in.
“This encounter between the Fiat Topolino and our iconic sea turtle gave rise to a high-quality, lower-impact, and perfectly whimsical design,” says Roland Herlory, CEO of Vilebrequin. “(It is) the definitive summer toy, and the perfect witness to sun-soaked memories still to come.”
Like the standard Topolino, the new Vilebrequin model remains electronically limited to a top speed of 45 kph (just under 30 mph), and is equipped with a 5.5 kWh battery pack that ensures up to 75 km (about 45 miles) of electric range. Prices start at €13,490 ($15,810), and if you don’t want one you’re dead inside.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Fiat Topolino Vilebrequin
The Vilebrequin Topolino is just the latest version of Stellantis’ electric microcar platform that underpins the Citroën Ami, Opel Rocks-e, and Fiat Topolino. Annual production of the little EVs has grown from 20,000 units and is reportedly on track for 70,000 in 2025.
Now, Mopar Insiders is reporting that number is about to get even bigger. Stellantis’ Chief Operating Officer (COO) for the Middle East & Africa (MEA) region, Samir Cherfan, announced plans to more than double the production capacity at the company’s Kenitra Assembly Plant in Morocco, from some 230,000 vehicles per year to more than 530,000.
The factory was opened in 2019, and the planned €1.2 billion ($1.4B) expansion is expected to add around 3,100 new jobs to the factory’s employee roster.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Electric bikes are a menace. They go almost as fast as a car (if the car is parking), they’re whisper quiet (which makes them impossible to hear over the podcast playing in your headphones), and worst of all, they’re increasingly ridden by teenagers.
By now, we’ve all seen the headlines. Cities are cracking down. Lawmakers are holding emergency hearings. Parents are demanding bans. “Something must be done,” they cry at local city council meetings before driving back home in 5,000 lb SUVs.
And it’s true – some e-bike riders don’t follow the rules. Some ride too fast. Some are inexperienced. These are real problems that deserve real solutions. But if you think electric bikes are the biggest threat on our roads, just wait until you hear about the slightly more common, slightly more deadly vehicle we’ve been quietly tolerating for the last hundred years.
They’re called cars. And unlike e-bikes, they actually kill people. A lot of people. Over 40,000 people die in car crashes in the US every year. Thousands more are permanently injured. Entire neighborhoods are carved up by high-speed traffic. Kids can’t walk to school safely. But don’t worry – someone saw a teenager run a stop sign on an e-bike, so the real crisis must be those darn batteries on two wheels.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
It’s amazing how worked up people get over a few dozen e-bike crashes when many of us step over a sidewalk memorial for a car crash victim on the way to the grocery store. We’ve been so thoroughly conditioned to accept car violence as part of modern life that the idea of regulating them sounds unthinkable. But regulating e-bikes? Now that’s urgent.
To be clear, this isn’t about ignoring the risks that come with new technology. E-bikes are faster than regular bikes. They’re heavier, too. And they require education and enforcement like any other mode of transport capable of injuring someone, be it the rider or a pedestrian bystander. But the scale of the problem is what matters – and the scale here is completely lopsided. Let’s take New York City, for example. It’s got more e-bike usage than anywhere else in the US, and there are still only an average of two pedestrians per year killed by an e-bike accident. That number for cars? Around 100 per year in NYC. It’s not complicated math – cars are 50x more lethal in the city.
And yet, the person on the e-bike is the one getting the stink eye.
We’ve become so numb to the everyday destruction caused by automobiles that it barely registers anymore. Drunk driving? Distracted driving? Speeding through neighborhoods? It’s just background noise. But the moment someone on an e-bike blows through a stop sign at 16 mph, it’s front-page news and a city council emergency.
Here’s an idea: If we want safer streets, how about we start by addressing the machines that weigh two and a half tons and can hit 100 mph, not the ones that top out at 20 or 28 and are powered by a one-horsepower motor the size of an orange.
But we don’t. Because cars are familiar. Cars are “normal.” Cars are how we built our entire country. And so we turn our attention to the easy target – the new kid on the block. The same old playbook: panic, overreact, and legislate the hell out of it.
Sure, an e-bike might startle you on a sidewalk. But a car can climb that sidewalk and end your life. Which one do we really need to be afraid of?
This isn’t a strawman argument, either. Cars are literally used as mass casualty weapons. It happens all the time. It happened last night in Los Angeles when a disgruntled car driver deliberately plowed into a crowd outside a nightclub, injuring over 30 people. And that wasn’t the only car attack yesterday. Another car rammed into pedestrians on a sidewalk in NYC yesterday morning, leaving multiple pedestrians dead. These aren’t exceptions. This is the normal daily news in the US. It’s depressing, but it bears repeating. This is normal. These are everyday occurrences. Twice a day, yesterday.
While we’re busy debating throttle limits and helmet rules for e-bikes, maybe we should also talk about how tens of millions of drivers still routinely speed, blow stop signs, or scroll Instagram at 45 mph in a school zone. Or how car crashes are the number one killer of teenagers in America. Or we can continue to focus on the kid who forgot to put his foot down at a red light while riding an e-bike to school.
This isn’t satire anymore – it’s just sad. It’s a collective willingness to avoid a real, genuine threat to Americans while simultaneously scapegoating what is, by comparison, a non-threat.
The truth is, electric bikes aren’t the menace. They’re a solution. They’re one of the few glimmers of hope in a transportation system drowning in pollution, congestion, and daily tragedy. They make mobility cheaper, cleaner, and more accessible. And yet we treat them like an invasive species because they disrupt the dominance of the automobile.
It’s time to stop pretending we’re protecting the public from some great e-bike emergency. The real emergency is that we’ve accepted cars killing people as a fair trade for getting to Target five minutes faster.
So yes, let’s make e-biking safer. Let’s educate riders, build better bike infrastructure, and enforce traffic rules fairly. Those are all important things. We absolutely SHOULD invest in training programs to educate teens on safe riding. We absolutely SHOULD cite and fine dangerous riders who could threaten the lives of pedestrians. But let’s stop pretending that e-bikes are the problem when they’re clearly a symptom of a much bigger one.
If you’re really worried about the dangers on our streets, don’t look for the kid on the e-bike. Look for the driver behind them, sipping a latte and going 20 over the speed limit.
Now that’s the menace.
Image note: The first and last images in this article were both AI-generated, and represent everyday car/bike interactions
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The first all-new compact Mopar since the malaise-era K-Car, the Dodge Neon was a revelation. Its fun, approachable face, its “Hi.” marketing campaign, all of it was pitch-perfect for the uncertain times it was launched into. Now, a generation later, Stellantis faces similarly uncertain times – and a new Neon could go a long way towards helping the old Chrysler Co. do what it does best: come back from the brink.
If they wanted to, Stellantis could make it happen tomorrow.
Today, Stellantis is in trouble. Much like it was in the early 90s, the company is hemorrhaging cash, fighting with the unions, and struggling to sell higher-end cars. Today as then, what the company needs is an affordable, simple new car to get people in the showrooms – and in 1994, that new car was the Neon.
In the mid-late 1990s, the Dodge Neon was everywhere. It was affordable, fun to drive, and more or less reliable. It was also economical and fuel-efficient, but it wasn’t that way. It was sold as a fun, smiling face with funky round lights. In R/T and ACR spec, it was sold as an even more fun, smiling face, and offered serious performance chops that still get the grizzled Gen X guys at the SCCA/NASA track days excited.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Stellantis is selling a car right now, today, that meets all that criteria. It’s the right size, it’s reasonably affordable, and it’s got the right tech – available as both a PHEV and a pure EV – for its time.
Check out the original launch ad for the 1995 Plymouth Neon, below, and tell me they couldn’t do a shot-for-shot remake with a rebadged Ypsilon and make it immediately relevant to car buyers in 1995 in the comments.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.