Connect with us

Published

on

Since the news broke on Friday that a major BBC star had allegedly requested explicit pictures from a then-teenager in return for cash, many people have asked publicly, why his name has not been released.

The answer is complex, and invokes legal and editorial issues for news outlets in the UK.

One of the key considerations is that the allegations made in The Sun newspaper are just that – allegations.

It is not clear whether evidence has been seen by The Sun, and if it has, what that evidence is and who has supplied it.

Even then, other outlets, including Sky News, have not seen any evidence and would be relying on The Sun’s reporting.

It is also unclear if any laws have been broken, without knowing the content of the alleged photographs, and when exactly they were sent.

And for the BBC, bosses will obviously know who the man at the centre of this is, as they have suspended them, but even still, they will want to thoroughly investigate the allegations before releasing his name.

More on Bbc

In an email to staff, director-general Tim Davie said the BBC was taking the allegations “incredibly seriously”.

He added: “By law, individuals are entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy, which is making this situation more complex.

“I want to assure you that we are working rapidly to establish the facts.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

BBC suspends unnamed presenter

Read more:
Everything we know about the claims
BBC must ‘get a grip’ after new allegations

For other outlets, the UK has fairly strict defamation laws, which protect individuals against harm, reputational or otherwise, caused by things that have been said about them which turn out to be false.

Getting it wrong could ruin a person’s career, personal life and relationships – so there is significant risk to naming the man involved in this scandal, ethically, editorially and legally.

Even inference or innuendo, whether intentional or not, could also cause problems.

It is worth adding that laws around defamation do not just cover journalists, but everybody, so social media users posting online who they believe may or may not be involved, can still face legal action.

Nicky Campbell is among the presenters at the BBC who have already indicated they may involve the police, after people falsely named him as the person involved in this crisis on Twitter.

Usually in journalism with stories related to crimes or involving police, outlets would not name someone involved in a crime until they have been charged – though there are exceptions to this.

This is because if they are released and the case is dropped, the damage has already been done to the person named.

When a person is charged, it is an indication that the police are confident, or at least has evidence, of someone’s guilt.

Continue Reading

UK

Police appeal after man charged with murdering two women and raping third

Published

on

By

Police appeal after man charged with murdering two women and raping third

Police have appealed for information after a man was charged with murdering two women and raping a third.

Simon Levy has been charged with murdering 53-year-old Carmenza Valencia-Trujillo who died on the Aylesbury Estate, south-east London, on 17 March, the Metropolitan Police said.

In September, Levy, of Beaufoy Road, Tottenham, north London, was charged with murdering 39-year-old Sheryl Wilkins who was found unresponsive in High Road, Tottenham, on 24 August.

He is also accused of grievous bodily harm with intent, non-fatal strangulation and two counts of rape against a third woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, in Haringey, north London, on 21 January, police said.

The 40-year-old will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday charged with Ms Valencia-Trujillo’s murder.

Sheryl Wilkins was found unresponsive in High Road, Tottenham, on 24 August. Pic: Metropolitan Police
Image:
Sheryl Wilkins was found unresponsive in High Road, Tottenham, on 24 August. Pic: Metropolitan Police

He is also due to appear at the Old Bailey on Wednesday for a plea and trial preparation hearing for the murder of Ms Wilkins.

Detectives believe there may be individuals who have information relevant to this investigation – or who are yet to report incidents which have directly impacted them – and are asking for people to come forward.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the latest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Family of woman killed 56 years ago, in a case of mistaken identity, believe her remains are buried in a garden

Published

on

By

Family of woman killed 56 years ago, in a case of mistaken identity, believe her remains are buried in a garden

The family of murder victim Muriel McKay believe her remains are buried in a garden in east London, the High Court has heard.

Ms McKay was officially declared dead by a High Court judge earlier this month, 56 years after being kidnapped.

The 55-year-old was taken from her London home by Nizamodeen and his brother Arthur Hosein in December 1969.

They mistook her for Anna, the wife of media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

Ms McKay’s husband was newspaper executive Alick McKay, the deputy to newspaper mogul Rupert Murdoch.

The kidnappers realised their mistake, but still demanded a £1m ransom for her safe return.

Read more:
Muriel McKay’s family want Met chief to intervene
Murder victim family’s concerns over farm search

More from UK

The two Hosein brothers were convicted and jailed for life in one of the first murder trials without a body. Arthur Hosein died in prison.

On Monday, barristers for two of Ms McKay’s children, Ian McKay and Dianne Levinson, asked a judge to order that the homeowners of two neighbouring properties on Bethnal Green Road allow the family to conduct a “ground-penetrating radar survey” of a shared back garden.

One of the homeowners, Madeleine Higson, opposes the injunction bid, which would also stop her from disturbing the garden.

Mr Justice Richard Smith said he will hand down his judgment at 2pm on Tuesday, stating the case involved “not uncomplicated legal sensitivities”.

Speaking following the hearing, Ms McKay’s grandson Mark Dyer said the bid to discover her remains was “important to the whole family”.

He said: “We do not want to be felt sorry for, we just actually want to get on and … scan the place, check for my grandmother.

“We’ve been told she’s there, most probably there, so we need to pick her up.

“She would like to come home for Christmas this year and what is left of her is purely some remains, some bones.

“They should find a place where the family can go and visit, where whoever’s interested in what happened to her should go and visit, and that’s the right thing to do.”

Continue Reading

UK

UK to launch new ‘national day’ to remember victims and survivors of terrorism

Published

on

By

UK to launch new 'national day' to remember victims and survivors of terrorism

A new “national day” to honour victims and survivors of terrorism will be added to the calendar from next year, it has been revealed.

The annual commemoration will fall on 21 August, and will be marked in a different place each year to recognise the widespread impact of terrorism around the country.

It comes after a 12-week public consultation showed 91% supported the plan for a national day, and 84% strongly supported the proposal.

Flowers left in St Ann's Square, Manchester, to remember the Manchester Arena terror attack. Pic: PA
Image:
Flowers left in St Ann’s Square, Manchester, to remember the Manchester Arena terror attack. Pic: PA

How the day will look, including a final name and symbol, will be worked out collaboratively between survivors and ministers, according to the Home Office.

But it will “honour and remember victims and survivors of terrorism”, encouraging survivors to access specialist support, spotlighting their stories, and educating the public.

A spokesperson for the Home Office confirmed that it would not be a bank holiday.

Jo Berry, whose father Sir Anthony Berry was killed in the IRA Brighton hotel bombing in 1984, said victims of terrorism would no longer be “a footnote of history”.

Jo Berry, whose father was killed in the Brighton bombing in 1984, with convicted bomber Patrick Magee in 2004. File pic: PA
Image:
Jo Berry, whose father was killed in the Brighton bombing in 1984, with convicted bomber Patrick Magee in 2004. File pic: PA

She said: “What we remember as a nation matters. It sends a signal about what we value.

“For too long, survivors of terror attacks, and those who have been killed in them, have been a footnote of history. Survivors have felt ignored and forgotten.

“That’s why Survivors Against Terror launched a campaign for a new national day of memorial three years ago.”

Read more:
Referrals to UK counter-terrorism programme reach new high
I was reporting in London during 7/7 – here’s what happened

Travis Frain, who survived the Westminster Bridge attack in 2017, also backed the campaign.

He said: “A national day would provide an opportunity to remember those we have lost, to pay tribute to the bravery and resilience of those who have survived these heinous acts, and for us to look forward to the future to educate the next generation.”

The date was chosen to coincide with the UN International Day of Remembrance and Tribute to the Victims of Terrorism.

Plans have also been announced for a new support hub to help victims in the aftermath of terror attacks.

Continue Reading

Trending