Dave Wilson is an editor for ESPN.com since 2010. He previously worked at The Dallas Morning News, San Diego Union-Tribune and Las Vegas Sun.
Jul 12, 2023, 07:00 AM ET
The Big 12 will kick off the start of media days on Wednesday, July 12, with no shortage of intriguing storylines.
Oklahoma and Texas, the conference’s most high-profile teams, will say goodbye after the 2023 season and head to the SEC. Whether the Sooners and Longhorns will be the focus of media days this week is up for debate.
Elsewhere in the conference, commissioner Brett Yormark has expressed interest in expansion and realignment, something that will likely be a big talking point this week.
And, of course, four new teams enter the fray as BYU, Cincinnati, Houston and UCF get set for life in a new conference.
With plenty to talk about, we dive into the five biggest questions ahead of Big 12 media days.
1. What can we expect from Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark’s address?
Dave Wilson: Yormark has been on the offensive since taking over as the Big 12 commissioner. He’s certainly shaken things up, whether it’s announcing a new league basketball presence at Rucker Park in Harlem or an expansion into Mexico for multiple sports. Last year, he said the league would be “younger, hipper, cooler,” so expect something along those lines, like when he announced a collaboration with streetwear company A Bathing Ape to sell $200 T-shirts with the Big 12 logo in camouflage. That certainly was a departure from the Bob Bowlsby era.
Bill Connelly: We haven’t seen a major conference commissioner this confident since Larry Scott tried to steal half the Big 12, invested in super expensive office real estate and decided not to stop with just a single Pac-12 Network. I doubt Yormark will get particularly specific in his media days address — just keep hitting those buzzwords — but I’m fascinated with how the next few years might play out for this conference. Aggression didn’t pay off for Scott and the Pac-12, but that doesn’t mean it’s guaranteed to fail for Yormark.
2. How much will realignment dominate the conversation?
Wilson: The league has reportedly flirted with Colorado and UConn, in addition to discussing the idea of adding Gonzaga for basketball only. Yormark will likely do his best impression of a politician, having to dance around the specific examples while also making it clear that the league is still “open for business,” as he’s said in the past.
Connelly: I’m sure he would love nothing more than to announce the addition of Colorado, UConn, Gonzaga, Arizona and the Monterrey Institute of Technology from the dais, but that’s probably not happening. Realignment will almost certainly come up many times, but these stories tend to break when we least expect it.
3. What will the send-off be like for Texas and Oklahoma?
Wilson: Last year, Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy made the most noise, saying the two schools shouldn’t be involved in league business meetings. Gundy has never been one to mince words, so if he’s not already bored with it, he might have a few choice lines. But the two schools also represent two of the best jobs in college football, and there aren’t too many coaches who want to burn those bridges.
Connelly: Gundy is never one to bite his tongue, and he probably won’t start now. (Houston coach Dana Holgorsen is probably still good for a zinger or two as well.) But I’m guessing the league and its coaches will attempt to steer questions about Oklahoma and Texas more toward remarks about the conference’s new schools and the fact that TCU — a school that’s staying — just earned the conference its first College Football Playoff win.
4. Which of the new guys is best positioned to make early noise?
Wilson: UCF has been waiting for this moment for years. Gus Malzahn has been at the top of the mountain before at Auburn and has new offensive coordinator Darin Hinshaw to allow him to see the big picture a little better. He’s got a returning starter at QB in John Rhys Plumlee, depth at RB and several big-program transfers to help jump-start their big leap. But my money’s on Dana Holgorsen to have the best soundbites of any of the newcomers.
Connelly: Yeah, if we’re looking for literal noise, Holgorsen’s the answer. But in terms of first-year success, Houston, Cincinnati and BYU all took steps backward last season and ranked 11th through 13th in the preseason poll. UCF ranked eighth, and in terms of recruiting rankings and athleticism, they seem to have the most Big 12-ready roster. They had a case to start out sixth or seventh.
5. What were the biggest surprises in the media poll released this week?
The preseason Big 12 media poll top 5 (first-place votes):
Wilson: First of all, last year’s Top 2 were Baylor and Oklahoma, with a combined 29 first-place votes. They combined to finish 12-14 and 7-11 in the conference. TCU, which finished seventh, played in the national championship game. So I’m surprised to see that Oklahoma still gets the benefit of the doubt over a team like Texas Tech, which returns nine offensive starters from a team that beat both Texas and Oklahoma and led TCU on the road in the fourth quarter. And while Texas got 41 first-place votes, there were 28 more spread across five other teams, including one for Oklahoma State, who underwent an offseason of huge change, losing 17 scholarship players in the transfer portal.
Connelly: It’s all about close games in the Big 12. Oklahoma, Baylor and OSU combined to go 16-4 in one-score finishes in 2021, then went 4-11 in 2022. Texas Tech and TCU went a combined 10-1 in such games last year, and that’s going to be difficult to match. TCU is expected to fall a few spots from last year’s standings, but Tech is expected to rise further (and even got four first-place votes), and that sounds like a red flag, no matter how much I love what Joey McGuire is doing in Lubbock.
SUNRISE, Fla. — It’s a formula the Florida Panthers keep using in the playoffs: take a lead after two periods, then let Sergei Bobrovsky and the defense do the rest. And it worked again.
Bobrovsky stopped 23 shots for his fifth career playoff shutout, Carter Verhaeghe and Sam Bennett scored and the Panthers defeated the Toronto Maple Leafs2-0 on Sunday night in Game 4 to even the Eastern Conference semifinal series.
Florida has won 25 consecutive playoff games when leading after two periods, a streak that goes back to May 5, 2022. And in helping to tie the series, Bobrovsky officially put a slow start to rest. In Games 1 and 2 last week in Toronto, he allowed nine goals en route to two losses. He returned to Amerant Bank Arena on Friday night for Game 3, and allowed four more.
“It’s a series,” Bobrovsky said. “The bigger games are ahead, so we’re excited about them. The series comes down to a best-of-three, so it’s a big game, next one.”
Home-ice advantage has held, and Toronto will hope that trend continues in Game 5 on Wednesday night. The Leafs won Games 1 and 2 at home, then dropped Games 3 and 4 in Sunrise.
“We had looks,” Toronto coach Craig Berube said. “They’re doing a good job of swarming us with numbers, obviously. … It’s a battle out there. This is what it is. They don’t give you a lot.”
Verhaeghe scored on a power play — Florida’s fourth of the game — in the first period, Bennett added the insurance score with 7:50 left and Bobrovsky did the rest for his second shutout of this postseason.
“He was great,” Berube said of his netminder. “He played an excellent game.”
Verhaeghe’s goal came after Matthew Tkachuk, along the left-wing boards, threaded a pass through the slot and past two defenders. It found Verhaeghe — who slammed a one-timer past Woll.
That was part of an early spree for Florida. The Panthers took 21 of the game’s first 26 shots on net, controlling play for long stretches and keeping all the action in front of Woll. He held firm, time and again, keeping Toronto in it.
Bennett said enough. He came in from Woll’s left, with Verhaeghe opposite him, looking for a passing lane. When none appeared, Bennett went to the front of the net, watched Woll commit, then pushed the puck into the net before punching the air.
“That was more like the type of Panthers playoff hockey that we’re used to,” Bennett said.
It got chippy late, as games this late in a series tend to do. Oliver Ekman-Larsson — part of the Florida team that won the Stanley Cup last season — delivered a shot to the head and neck area of Panthers forward Evan Rodrigues about five minutes into the third period. It was originally called a major, then downgraded to a minor after review.
Rodrigues will need further evaluation Monday, Panthers coach Paul Maurice said.
KANSAS CITY, Kan. — Denny Hamlin said Saturday that he remains “pretty confident” in the case brought by his 23XI Racing, co-owned by the veteran driver and retired NBA great Michael Jordan, and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR alleging antitrust violations.
Hamlin spoke one day after a three-judge federal appellate panel indicated it might overturn an injunction that allows 23XI and Front Row to race as chartered teams, even as their lawsuit against the stock car series plays out in court.
“You know, they’re telling me kind of what’s going on. I didn’t get to hear it live or anything like that,” Hamlin said after qualifying 14th for Sunday’s race at Kansas Speedway. “But we’re overall pretty confident in our case.”
The teams filed the antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR on Oct. 2 in the Western District of North Carolina, arguing that the series bullied teams into signing charter agreements — essentially franchise deals — that make it difficult to compete financially.
Those were the only two holdouts of 15 charter-holding teams that refused to sign the agreements in September.
The most recent extension of the charters lasts until 2031, matching the current media rights deal. Perhaps the biggest benefit of them is that they guarantee 36 of the 40 spots available in each NASCAR race to teams that own them.
Overturning the injunction would leave 23XI and Front Row racing as “open teams,” meaning they would have to qualify at every Cup Series event. But there are only four open spots, and 23XI had four cars at Kansas this week – Bubba Wallace, Riley Herbst, Tyler Reddick and Corey Heim – and Front Row had three with Noah Gragson, Zane Smith and Todd Gilliland.
“You know, the judges haven’t made any kind of ruling,” Hamlin said, “so until they do, then we’re going to stay status quo.”
NASCAR attorney Chris Yates had argued the injunction, granted in December by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell, forced the series into an unwanted relationship with unwilling partners, and that it harms other teams because they earn less money. He also said that the teams should not have the benefits of the charter system they are suing to overturn.
“There’s no other place to compete,” countered Jeffrey Kessler, the attorney representing 23XI and Front Row, noting overturning the injunction will cause tremendous damage to the teams, potentially including the loss of drivers and sponsors.
“It will cause havoc to overturn this injunction in the middle of the season,” Kessler said.
There is a trial date set for December, and judge Steven Agee urged the sides to meet for mediation — previously ordered by a lower court — to attempt to resolve the dispute over the injunction. But that seems unlikely.
“We’re not going to rewrite the charter,” Yates told the judges.
RICHMOND, Va. — A three-judge federal appellate panel indicated Friday it might overturn an injunction that allows 23XI Racing, co-owned by retired NBA great Michael Jordan and veteran driver Denny Hamlin, and Front Row Motorsports to race as chartered teams in NASCAR this season while the two teams sue the stock car series over alleged antitrust violations.
NASCAR attorney Chris Yates argued the injunction, granted in December by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell of the Western District of North Carolina, forced the series into an unwanted relationship with unwilling partners, and that it harms other teams because they earn less money.
Yates said the district court broke precedent by granting the injunction, saying the “release” clause in the charter contracts forbidding the teams from suing is “common.” He argued, essentially, that the teams should not have the benefits of the charter system they are suing to overturn.
Overturning the injunction would leave the two organizations able to race but without any of the perks of being chartered, including guaranteed weekly revenue. They would also have to qualify at every Cup Series event to make the field, which currently has only four open spots each week; 23XI and Front Row are each running three cars in Cup this season.
Judges Steven Agee, Paul Niemeyer and Stephanie Thacker, at multiple points during the 50-minute hearing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth District, pushed back on the argument made by plaintiff’s attorney Jeffrey Kessler, who accused NASCAR of being a monopoly.
“There’s no other place to compete,” Kessler told the judges, later noting that overturning the injunction would cause tremendous damage to the two teams, which could lose drivers and sponsors. “It will cause havoc to overturn this injunction in the middle of the season.”
The teams filed the antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR on Oct. 2 in the Western District of North Carolina, arguing that the series bullied teams into signing new charters that make it difficult to compete financially. That came after two years of failed negotiations on new charter agreements, which is NASCAR’s equivalent of franchise deals.
23XI – co-owned by Jordan, Hamlin and Curtis Polk, a longtime Jordan business partner – and Front Row Motorsports, were the only two out of 15 charter-holding teams that refused to sign new agreements in September.
The charters, which teams originally signed before the 2016 season, have twice been extended. The most recent extension runs until 2031, matching the current media rights deal. It guarantees that 36 of the 40 available spots in weekly races will go to teams holding charters.
The judges expressed agreement with Yates’s argument that the district court had erred in issuing the injunction allowing the teams to race, because it mandated they sign the NASCAR charter but eliminated the contract’s release.
“It seems you want to have your cake and eat it, too,” Niemeyer told Kessler.
At another point, the judge pointedly told Kessler that if the teams want to race, they should sign the charter.
Yates contended that forcing an unwanted relationship between NASCAR and the two teams “harms NASCAR and other racing teams.” He said that more chartered teams would earn more money if not for the injunction and noted that the two teams are being “given the benefits of a contract they rejected.”
Kessler argued that even if the district court’s reasoning was flawed, other evidence should lead the circuit court to uphold the injunction. Niemayer disagreed.
“The court wanted you to be able to race but without a contract,” he said.
A trial date is set for December and Agee strongly urged the sides to meet for mediation – previously ordered by a lower court – to attempt to resolve the dispute over the injunction.
“It’ll be a very interesting trial,” Agee said with a wry smile.
The prospect of successful mediation seems unlikely. Yates told the judges: “We’re not going to rewrite the charter.”