United States Sen. Jack Reed sponsored a bipartisan bill introduced into the Senate on July 18 that would tighten Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations and sanctions requirements for decentralized finance (DeFi). According to a news release on Reed’s website, the bill is titled the Crypto-Asset National Security Enhancement and Enforcement (CANSEE) Act.
The bill would subject DeFi operations to the same requirements as “other financial companies, including centralized crypto trading platforms, casinos, and even pawn shops.” The bill would make “anyone who controls that project” liable for the use of the DeFi service by sanctioned persons. Furthermore:
“If nobody controls a DeFi service, then — as a backstop — anyone who invests more than $25 million in developing the project will be responsible for these obligations.”
The bill would also “modernize” Treasury Department AML powers by extending them beyond the traditional financial system. According to the statement:
“As new technologies like cryptocurrency increasingly enable new ways to conduct financial transactions, it is critical to extend Treasury’s authority to crack down on illicit financial activity that may occur outside the banking sector.”
The bill also set new requirements for operators of crypto kiosks (or ATMs) to prevent their use in money laundering. Kiosk operators would be required to verify the identities of both counterparties in a transaction.
The bill has not been published at the time of writing. A member of Reed’s staff contacted by Cointelegraph could not say when the bill would be published. A text purporting to be the draft bill has been posted on GitHub.
Case in point:
The definition of “control” is so broadly worded that it’s meaningless. No thresholds, no specifics, just “control,” as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury. Completely and utterly unworkable.https://t.co/rVk26MJwfA
Crypto Twitter has wasted no time in condemning the bill. One commenter called it “an existential threat to DeFi” and a “nonstarter.” Another said that “imposing control responsibility for a $25mm investment is going to chill VC investment into DeFi b/c passive tokenholding does NOT equal control.”
The Crypto Council for Innovation said in a statement, “The proposal fails to offer actual guidance on technical ways for decentralized protocols to comply with BSA [Bank Secrecy Act] reporting requirements.” That organization favors an approach that “requires distinguishing various elements within the DeFi technology stack. It also involves leveraging the transparency and programmability inherent in blockchain systems to derive appropriate compliance measures unique to the crypto ecosystem.”
Amy James, founder of industry advocate Web3 Working Group, told Cointelegraph, “Sadly, the US is becoming less and less supportive of web3 innovation. […] Although some argue any amount of regulatory clarity is a win, it needs to be right or it’s not a long-term win. We commend these legislators on making an attempt to provide regulatory clarity, and we hope to see them adjust aspects of this bill based on industry feedback to make the US a long-term competitive market in web3.”
Sens. Mike Rounds, Mark Warner and Mitt Romney are cosponsors of the bill. Reed and Warner were cosponsors of a bill introduced by Sen. Elizabeth Warren — the Digital Asset Sanctions Compliance Enhancement Act — in March 2022.
Left-wing Labour MPs are split on whether they would welcome an Angela Rayner leadership bid, as speculation continues over whether Sir Keir Starmer can survive.
Senior MPs on the left have told Sky News that the former deputy prime minister “only needs to push the button” and she would have the support to take out her old boss.
But others said it “won’t wash with the public”, given it was only a few months ago that she resigned in scandal over her tax affairs. She has also been accused of not doing enough for the left while she was in government.
Sir Keir has insisted he would face down any threat to his leadership, while Ms Rayner’s allies say she has no plan to oust him.
But many MPs have said privately – if not publicly – that a challenge to his position appears increasingly inevitable given the state of the polls.
One MP in the socialist campaign group (SCG) said “all Angela needs to do is push the button” and MPs would get behind her – citing her popularity with the Labour membership.
Another MP said: “I think she would have a healthy number of people who would back her.”
More on Angela Rayner
Related Topics:
Ms Rayner, a former trade union rep, was elected by members to be deputy Labour leader in 2020. She was a longstanding member of Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet and is revered by many of her colleagueson the left for her rise from a working-class background to the top of British politics, having left school at 16, pregnant, and with no qualifications.
However one MP said while they personally “rate her a lot” she “could have done more” for the left while in government.
“Ange was the deputy leader for a long time. I have to say she went to ground for a long time and didn’t speak up. Whether she has the support of MPs or the country I don’t know.”
This view was echoed by another colleague, who said she is “complicit” in the government’s failures.
This MP, in a traditional red wall seat, said the “visceral dislike of Starmer is baked in” and they have never experienced anything like the anti-Labour sentiment they are hearing on the doorstep.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:46
Is Andy Burnham coming for Starmer?
They said any change of leader would have to be an outsider with a radical vision “like 1945”. “It would have to be Andy”, they said, referring to the Greater Manchester metro mayor Andy Burnham.
‘Burnham is a no-brainer’
Many MPs on both the left and the so-called “soft-left” told Sky News he would be their preferred candidate, given he is not associated with the current government, he has a different vision for the country and is popular with the public.
Mr Burnham is not currently an MP but he has not ruled out standing if a seat became available.
“In a hypothetical universe where all the barriers are overcome then Burnham is a no-brainer,” said one MP from the 2024 intake.
Another MP supportive of a Burnham takeover said a Rayner return “won’t wash with the public” given she had to resign from the second most senior position in government for underpaying stamp duty in September. They said it also wouldn’t be credible for her to “suddenly” start criticising the direction of the Starmer government given she was so closely tied to it.
As another MP put it: “I’d be backing a candidate from the left of the party. Angela Rayner is not from the left of the party.”
Other runners and riders
Any challenger would need the public backing of 80 colleagues to trigger a leadership contest. May is seen as crunch date if the local elections go as badly as predicted.
Image: Wes Streeting. Pic: PA
Other names that have come up include Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood. Mr Streeting is seen as a charismatic communicator who could take on Nigel Farage and Zack Polanski, while MPs within the “blue Labour” caucus are impressed with Ms Mahmood’s hard line on immigration.
But MPs on the left feel this would only offer a temporary boost in the polls as the pair are both seen as being on the centre-right, and a change of leader would be pointless without a change of direction.
Another name that has come up is the former Labour leader Ed Miliband, but while he is more to the left he has been rejected by the public once – having lost the 2015 election.
‘No active plot’
The MPs who spoke to Sky News stressed there was no active plot, but rather a general consensus that it is looking increasingly likely Sir Keir won’t be able to turn things around.
MPs who disagree with the prime minister’s politics said they are surprised at how personally disliked he is on the doorstep as he is ultimately a “nice man”.
They fear he has lost the trust of the public by saying one thing and doing another, with the winter fuel fiasco still coming up in areas where Reform UK is making gains.
As one MP put it: “We want him [Sir Keir] to do well and do better… but you can’t go on forever if things look terrible in the opinion polls.”
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
MPs have recently revived the soft-left tribune group with the aim of influencing the government to take more of a progressive direction.
Ms Rayner addressed this group on Tuesday night, along with new deputy leader Lucy Powell and cabinet ministers Mr Miliband and Lisa Nandy.
One MP who spoke to Ms Rayner said she has “absolutely no plans” to launch a leadership bid “unless she is keeping it quiet”. They added that the subject of a leadership challenge didn’t come up in any of the speeches and there was an “upbeat atmosphere” following the lifting of the two-child benefit cap.
“The budget has landed well with the party,” they said. “[The meeting] felt like a sea change.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:42
Streeting: ‘We need Rayner back’
As deputy prime minister and housing secretary, Ms Rayner introduced the Employment Rights Bill within 100 days and pushed through reforms to renters rights, the leasehold system and further devolution. She is also said to have played a crucial role in persuading Sir Keir to water down welfare cuts in the face of a major backbench rebellion.
A source close to her defended her record, saying she is “not interested in pacts and plots” and wants the government to succeed. They said she is not finished in politics but “she’s no one’s pawn, she’s her own person”.
Ms Rayner resigned after an ethics investigation found she acted in good faith, but broke the ministerial code by failing to get the correct tax advice after purchasing a flat in Brighton. She referred herself to HMRC and an investigation is ongoing.
Dulwich College has said allegations that Nigel Farage made racist and antisemitic comments to fellow pupils at the school are “profoundly distressing” and “entirely at odds with the Dulwich College of today”.
In the first reported statement from the school about the accusations – which date from 1970s – current master Robert Milne wrote “such behaviour is wholly incompatible with the values the College holds”.
“What we can unequivocally state is that the behaviours described are entirely at odds with the Dulwich College of today,” he continued
The comments come in a letter to former Dulwich pupil Jean-Pierre Lihou.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:22
Nigel Farage has previously said he “never directly racially abused anybody”.
Mr Farage has said he “never directly racially abused anybody” at Dulwich and said there is a “strong political element” to the allegations coming out 49 years later.
Reform’s deputy leader Richard Tice has called the ex-classmates “liars”.
More on Nigel Farage
Related Topics:
Nigel Farage said: “I have not met or spoken to this master. So I am surprised by his uninformed comments in response to claims from nearly 50 years ago from politically motivated actors.
“If he is interested, I can show him the many messages that I have received from fellow pupils, including Jewish ones, that entirely contradict these allegations.”
A spokesperson for Reform UK said: “This witch hunt is merely an attempt to discredit Reform and Nigel Farage.
“Instead of debating Reform on the substance of our ideas and policies, the left-wing media and deeply unpopular Labour Party are now using 50-year-old smears in a last act of desperation.
“The British public see right through it.”
Image: Dulwich College, pictured in 2022, has responded for the first time to claims Nigel Farage made racist comments as a student. Pic: PA
The letter also says the college has avoided making any public statements “to protect the college’s reputation in the long term”.
“This should not be interpreted as indifference: safeguarding the college’s good name and upholding its values are of paramount importance to us,” it continues.
Mr Lihou told Sky News he cautiously welcomed the letter written to him from the master and said he understands why the college wasn’t willing to unequivocally condemn the allegations against the Reform leader directly.
“Dulwich College has been clear that such accusations are very much at odds with the values of the school,” he said.
He added: “Why can Mr Farage not accept that approaching 30 people [who] have lasting memories from him as a 13-year-old to an adult that he should unreservedly apologise for?”
Sky News has contacted Dulwich College for a comment.
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission Acting Chairman Caroline Pham has scrapped “outdated guidance” on the delivery of crypto, which has been applauded for offering exchanges more flexibility.
“Eliminating outdated and overly complex guidance that penalizes the crypto industry and stifles innovation is exactly what the Administration has set out to do this year,” Pham said on Thursday.
The guidance, originally finalized in March 2020, related to when the “actual delivery” of crypto happened in a commodity transaction, but the CFTC said in a notice that it had to “reevaluate such guidance in light of further developments during the past 5 years.”
The CFTC under Pham has worked on a more crypto-friendly approach, and Pham said the guidance was withdrawn on recommendations from the president’s crypto working group, which suggested the CFTC release guidance on how crypto may be considered commodities and expand on prior guidance regarding the actual delivery of virtual assets.
More flexibility for exchanges with guidance gone
StarkWare general counsel Katherine Kirkpatrick Bos applauded the move, saying the guidance was making it harder for exchanges to offer margin or leverage unless actual delivery occurred within 28 days.
“This offers way more flexibility for exchanges,” she said. “But PSA — this isn’t law! Just guidance. All of this can be changed again should leadership change.”
The CFTC can issue guidance to clarify its interpretation of legislation and give insight into how it may enforce rules in certain situations; however, it’s not generally legally binding in the same way as formal regulation.
Garry Krugljakow, the head of Bitcoin (BTC) strategy at the Berlin-based Bitcoin treasury company aifinyo AG, speculated in an X post on Thursday that it’s a “major tell” of what’s to come.
“This move signals two things: cleaner jurisdiction for the CFTC and a regulatory path designed for scale, not hesitation,” he said.
“Actual delivery made sense in 2020. It doesn’t in a world of real custody, collateralization, and Bitcoin-backed credit,” Krugljakow said.
No guidance leaves uncertainty
Meanwhile, Todd Phillips, a fellow at the American think tank the Roosevelt Institute, said the definition of actual delivery is important, “as it decides what exchanges need to register with the CFTC and which don’t.”
“The CFTC replaced the prior guidance with nothing,” he said. “Right now, we have no idea what the CFTC thinks actual delivery means, or who has to register.”