During a Tuesday interview with CNN, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, was asked by anchor Jake Tapper to respond to the breaking news that former President Donald Trump could face a federal indictment for his role in instigating the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
DeSantis’ response was a revealing one.
“If [special prosecutor] Jack Smith has evidence of criminality,” asked Tapper, “should Donald Trump be held accountable?”
“Here’s the problem,” DeSantis replied. “This country is going down the road of criminalizing political differences, and I think that’s wrong.” A few moments later, DeSantis complained about the Department of Justice and the FBI being “weaponized against people they don’t like.” Eventually, he also got around to saying that he hopes Trump won’t be indicted because it “won’t be good for the country.”
Leave aside, for now, the bigger questions about whether another Trump indictment would be good for the countryor, for that matter, good for DeSantis’ own presidential aspirations.
Focus on the first part of DeSantis’ answerthe part about how criminalizing political differences is wrong. Tapper didn’t seize on that moment, but it would have been interesting to see him follow up by asking DeSantis how that position fits with the Florida governor’s extensive track record of wielding the power of the state against those with whom he has political disagreements.
Indeed, the weaponization of the state against those on the political left is thecentral theme of DeSantis’ entire campaign. He proudly boasts that Florida is “where woke goes to die,” and has banned schools in Florida from teaching anything that state education bureaucrats might deem to be “critical race theory.” Regardless of how he might define the terms “woke” and “critical race theory,” there’s no denying that his objections to them are purely political.
You could say the same thing about DeSantis’ decision during the pandemic to ban private businesses from requiring that workers and customers wear masks. And about his ongoing feud with The Walt Disney Company, Florida’s largest employer, which has accused DeSantis of orchestrating an unconstitutional “targeted campaign of government retaliation” after Disney’s then-CEO, Bob Chapek, spoke out against DeSantis’ so-called “Don’t Say Gay” law, which banned discussions of gender identity in public elementary school classrooms (the law was later broadened to include most classrooms up to grade 12).
That’s a political disagreement about another political disagreementand in both cases, DeSantis has aimed to limit the free speech rights of his opponents. While that may not quite rise to the level of “criminalizing political differences,” which is what DeSantis accused the Justice Department of doing, DeSantis clearly has no qualms about exercising state power in political fights.
In his recent book, DeSantis makes clear that he would continue to use state power against his political opponents if elected president. “An American revival,” DeSantis writes, “requires that corporations are treated as political actors when they use their economic power to advance an ideological agenda.” Later in the same chapter, DeSantis imagines various ways in which “the political branches [of government] can protect individual freedom from stridently ideological private actors” by limiting what those private actors can do or say.
The idea that government should intervene to protect some private individuals from the free speech being exercised by other private individualsis both nonsensical and probably unconstitutional. As The Atlantic’s Conor Friedersdorf has written about DeSantis’ misunderstanding of the value of freedom: “Neither my freedom nor yours requires the state to protect us from an entertainment company urging the state legislature to repeal a bill, or a beer company putting a trans influencer on a can, or whatever else DeSantis regards as a pathology. Indeed, we remain free in part because the First Amendment prevents the state from engaging in that sort of viewpoint discrimination.”
Much of what DeSantis has done in Florida and promised to do if elevated to the presidency is jarringly at odds with his criticism on Tuesday of Trump’s pending indictment. When you line that moment up against DeSantis’ campaign rhetoric, he seems to be saying that the problem with Trump’s possible indictment is merely that the state has been weaponized against the wrong person.
But that’s the root of the contradiction at the center of DeSantis’ campaign: Advocating for greater powers to be wielded against your political foes always creates the opportunity for your political foes to wield that same power against you and your allies.
The way out of that trap is not to double down on illiberalismeven though that’s what much of the populist right sees as necessarybut to do exactly what DeSantis said on Tuesday: oppose the criminalization of political differences.
Now let’s see if he can apply that same idea more broadly.
Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night talk show will return to ABC affiliates belonging to Sinclair and Nexstar after the two major network operators took his programme off-air over his comments in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Kimmel was accused of being “offensive and insensitive” after using his programme, Jimmy Kimmel Live, to accuse Donald Trump and his allies of capitalising on the killing.
Disney-owned ABC suspended the show last week following threats of potential repercussions from the Trump-appointed head of the Federal Communications Commission.
Sinclair, which controls 38 ABC affiliates from Seattle to Washington DC, called on Kimmel to apologise to Mr Kirk’s family over the comments and asked him to “make a meaningful personal donation” to Turning Point USA, the nonprofit that the conservative activist founded.
Image: Actor Gregg Donovan holds a sign that says “Welcome Back Jimmy”. Pic: AP
On Tuesday, Disney announced the return of the programme after backlash to its suspension, but both Sinclair and Nexstar, which own more than 20% of ABC affiliates, initially said they would not resume airing the show.
Kimmel criticised the ABC affiliates who preempted his show during his TV return, saying: “That’s not legal. That’s not American. It’s un-American.”
Three days later, the two major network operators announced that Jimmy Kimmel Live would return to their TV stations after the week-long boycott.
More on Jimmy Kimmel
Related Topics:
The move came after Sinclair received “thoughtful feedback from viewers, advertisers and community leaders”.
In its statement, the company pointed to its “responsibility as local broadcasters to provide programming that serves the interests of our communities, while also honouring our obligations to air national network programming.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:59
Protests held outside company buildings in support of Kimmel
Nexstar, which controls 28 ABC affiliates from Kansas to New Orleans, said in a similar statement that it was airing content that is “in the best interest of the communities we serve”.
Both companies said their decisions were not affected by influence from the Trump administration or anyone else.
The president had criticised the programme’s return on Tuesday, writing on Truth Social that he “can’t believe” ABC gave Kimmel his show back and hinted at further action.
“Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, who’s not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat GARBAGE,” Mr Trump wrote.
“He is yet another arm of the DNC (Democratic National Committee) and, to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major illegal Campaign Contribution. I think we’re going to test ABC out on this.”
Image: Donald Trump criticised the return of Kimmel’s show. Pic: Reuters
During Kimmel’s first show since being taken off-air, the presenter said it was “never my intention to make light of” Mr Kirk’s death.
“I don’t think there’s anything funny about it,” he said as he choked up.
“Nor was it my intention to blame any specific group for the actions of what was obviously a deeply disturbed individual. That was really the opposite of the point I was trying to make”.
Speaking on Tuesday night’s show, Kimmel said he understood why the remarks “felt either ill-timed or unclear, or maybe both”.
New episodes of Jimmy Kimmel Live air Monday to Thursday, and Friday night’s rerun will be of Tuesday’s show, meaning viewers of Sinclair stations will be able to watch Kimmel’s emotional return to the air.
The Prince of Wales has told Schitt’s Creek star Eugene Levy that 2024 was the “hardest year” of his life.
The future king told the Hollywood star about last year, which saw his wife, the Princess of Wales, and his father, the King, both undergoing treatment for cancer.
The pair were catching up over a pint in a pub as part of Apple TV+ series The Reluctant Traveler With Eugene Levy, which will air next month.
Image: The Prince of Wales and Eugene Levy in a pub in Windsor. Pic: PA
In the episode Living The Royal Life In The UK, William tells Levy: “I’d say 2024 was the hardest year I’ve ever had.
“Life is said to test us as well and being able to overcome that is what makes us who we are.”
Image: Eugene Levy and the Prince of Wales at Windsor Castle. Pic: PA
The preview of the episode also saw Levy invited to “pop down” to Windsor Castle for a private tour by the prince.
Levy, 78, can be seen reading out an invitation saying: “I heard that your travels have brought you to the UK and I wondered if you might like to see Windsor Castle?
More on Prince William
Related Topics:
“If you’re free at 10 tomorrow, why don’t you pop down to the Castle for a private tour.
After touring the castle, Levy asks William what he does when he is at home, and the prince laughs and replies: “Sleep. When you have three small children, sleep is an important part of my life.”
New episodes of The Reluctant Traveler With Eugene Levy will premiere weekly until the finale on 31 October 2025.
The special episode with William will air on 3 October.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — If there’s a recipe for a trap game, Florida State delivered nearly every ingredient required Friday.
After weeks of fawning praise following a Week 1 upset over Alabama, FSU quarterback Tommy Castellanos admitted his team might have read a few too many of its own headlines.
On the horizon in Week 6 is a showdown against rival Miami.
And on Friday, FSU got it first road test of the season against a pesky Virginia team wearing throwback uniforms in honor of another historic upset 30 years ago, when the Cavaliers delivered FSU its first loss as a member of the ACC.
When this game kicked off, it didn’t take long for the football gods to deliver some karma.
“I don’t think any part of it was looking further [ahead to Miami],” Florida State coach Mike Norvell said of a bevy of early miscues in his team’s 46-38 double-overtime loss. “We knew what their energy was going to be. We knew what our energy was going to be. It wasn’t a lack of preparation. But we did not execute like we needed to.”
Florida State fell into a 14-0 hole early in the second quarter, with the Cavaliers getting both touchdowns following Noles turnovers.
But that was just the beginning of a wild night at Scott Stadium that saw FSU battle back to take a 21-14 lead, Virginia respond to go up by seven with two minutes to play and Castellanos deliver a dagger in the end zone to tight end Randy Pittman on a fourth-and-goal with 36 seconds left to send the game to overtime.
All of that was just a prelude to Virginia quarterback Chandler Morris‘ fifth total touchdown of the game and a pitch-and-catch from Castellanos to star FSU receiver Duce Robinson that appeared to set the Seminoles up for a shot at a third overtime. Replay review, however, showed Robinson bobbling the catch as he exited the back of the end zone, and FSU’s last gasp on fourth down fell short.
Amid a 2-10 season a year ago, an outcome like this would have been another nail in Florida State’s coffin. After Friday’s defeat, however, Castellanos argued that it might have been exactly the experience this team required.
“I think we needed it,” said Castellanos, who threw for 254 yards, ran for 78 and accounted for two touchdowns to go with a pair of interceptions. “I think guys were riding high, kind of feeling ourselves a little bit. But I think we’ll respond and bounce back. We have to. This will push us and make us work harder.”
This offseason, Norvell lamented the 2024 team’s inability to respond to adversity, saying early losses doomed the season. He spent the entire offseason working to build a different mindset for 2025, and he said the resilience the Seminoles showed Friday offered ample evidence this won’t be a repeat of last year’s collapse.
“We didn’t finish with the outcome we wanted, but we responded,” Norvell said. “I believe in this team. I know how they work. And I believe in what they’ll do.”
Florida State refused to suggest Friday’s early struggles came as a result of looking ahead to Week 6’s rivalry game against No. 2 Miami, but there was clearly a lack of focus from the outset. Florida State’s first three drives resulted in a punt, a fumble and an interception.
Trap game? No. A bad mental approach? For sure, Pittman said.
“Just a lack of execution,” Pittman said. “It’s mental focus. We need to be locked in, be where your feet are, and execute.”
Regardless of how much Miami might have loomed over the Seminoles’ early struggles Friday, the Hurricanes will have their full attention now.
Castellanos said he already delivered a firm message to his teammates in the postgame locker room after the loss: “Be a man about it. Eat it, and on to the next. You can’t dwell on the past. It’s over.”
What lies ahead is a shot a redemption and a revival of FSU’s playoff hopes.
“We have a big opportunity here in front of us next week, a huge game for us, for our program and university,” Norvell said. “There are some big steps we need to take as a football team to be able to handle that environment and emotions and make sure our discipline and execution is what it needs to be.”