A number of Club stocks that were unloved on Wall Street earlier in the year have seen their fortunes rebound in recent months, including oilfield-services firm Halliburton (HAL) and industrial Caterpillar (CAT) — creating potential opportunities to lock in gains. It’s been the year of technology on Wall Street. But, as Jim Cramer said Wednesday stocks in other parts of the market have started to come “back from the dead.” But how should investors navigate their positions in these resurrected stocks? In that vein, we screened our 35-stock portfolio to isolate the companies that have underperformed the S & P 500 so far in 2023 — meaning that, as of Wednesday’s close, they had gained less than 18.9% year-to-date. This allowed us to focus on a universe of stocks that haven’t necessarily been red hot like technology names such as Nvidia (NVDA), which has more than tripled in value this year. From there, we calculated each stocks’ lowest closing price since May 1 — roughly a month before this year’s rally started to broaden beyond tech — and how much each has climbed since that low to determine which have had the strongest momentum. We found eight stocks with double-digit percentage gains off their recent lows: Halliburton, Caterpillar, Wells Fargo (WFC), Constellation Brands (STZ), Emerson Electric (EMR), Coterra Energy (CTRA), Morgan Stanley (MS) and TJX Companies (TJX). Between May 1 and Wednesday’s close, the S & P 500 advanced 9.6%. Here’s a look at where we stand on these eight Club stocks, starting with the biggest gainer, Halliburton, and concluding with the eighth-best performer, TJX Companies. HAL 3M mountain Halliburton’s stock performance over the past three months. Recognizing Halliburton’s recent strength, we trimmed our position in the oilfield-services firm last week , locking in a small profit. Its second-quarter earnings report Wednesday underscored the company’s cash-generation abilities, and drilling activity may pickup further if oil prices climb. Plus, the stock remains cheap on a historical basis. Taken together, we’re comfortable holding onto our Halliburton position. CAT 3M mountain Caterpillar’s stock performance over the past three months. Similar to Halliburton, we made a disciplined, 30-share Caterpillar sale on July 10 because the stock’s strong momentum allowed it to break above our cost basis. We wanted to make sure we didn’t give back any of that move higher in what’s proven to be a battleground stock. Still, our multiyear thesis around CAT as an infrastructure spending winner remains intact, and we’re willing to let the position ride here. WFC 3M mountain Wells Fargo’s stock performance over the past three months. Wells Fargo is finally getting the respect it deserves, after issuing better-than-expected second-quarter results and raising its 2023 net-interest income guidance. The stock remains attractively valued — trading at 9.6 times forward earnings versus its five-year average of 11.4, per FactSet — and carries a respectable dividend yield around 2.5%. Those are reasons to feel comfortable owning it. But from a portfolio management perspective, Wells Fargo now carries a nearly 5% weighting, making it our second-largest holding behind only Apple (AAPL). For that reason, we may look to trim some WFC if its rally continues. STZ 3M mountain Constellation Brand’s stock performance over the past 3 months. Our outlook on Constellation Brands is even brighter knowing activist investor Elliott Management is involved and sees “meaningful growth potential” for the Corona and Modelo beer maker. We booked some profits Monday in Constellation, taking advantage of its recent momentum, and now feel comfortable to let the position run as we wait for Elliott’s influence to lead to improved financial discipline at the company. “If you get frustrated, you end up selling too low,” Jim said earlier this week. On Thursday, he suggested STZ shares could reach $300 per share . EMR 3M mountain Emerson Electric’s stock performance over the past three months. Following the bounce off its May 31 low, Emerson Electric has broken above our cost basis — a very welcome development for this hot-and-cold position. If Emerson is able to mount another run higher, we may look to sell some stock because of our uncertainties around management’s execution. It’s no secret that the way Emerson’s National Instruments acquisition played out left us frustrated. CTRA 3M mountain Coterra Energy’s stock performance over the past three months. Coterra Energy is another stock on this list that we’re willing to just hold here. If its recent momentum fades and a meaningful pullback ensues, we may look to add to our fairly small position, at a roughly 1% weighting. Energy prices have increased, and we know that the oil-and-gas producer can break even with relatively low oil prices, which should bode well for free cash flow and capital returns to shareholders. MS 3M mountain Morgan Stanley’s stock performance over the past three months. Morgan Stanley’s stronger-than-expected quarterly results , released Tuesday, demonstrated that the bank’s once-struggling stock price didn’t reflect its underlying fundamentals. But, similar to Wells Fargo, portfolio management may eventually win the day. “Discipline always trumps conviction,” Jim said earlier this week . “My conviction is that Morgan Stanley’s stock goes higher. It doesn’t matter. My discipline says you already have too much of it.” As of Thursday, Morgan Stanley had the third-largest weighting in our portfolio, at approximately 4.5%. TJX 3M mountain TJX Companies’ stock performance over the past three months. The parent of TJ Maxx and Home Goods closed out Thursday just shy of Wednesday’s all-time high, validating our selective approach to the retail sector. While we’re always cautious about adding to a position near a peak, the story at TJX continues to look solid. Jim said last week he could see TJX ascending to $95 per share, representing more than 10% upside from Thursday’s close, at $85.44 apiece. The off-price retailer has an opportunity to gain market share not only due to Bed Bath & Beyond’s bankruptcy, but from consumers who are increasingly seeking out value. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long HAL, CAT, WFC, STZ, EMR, CTRA, MS and TJX. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Workers walk towards Halliburton Co. “sand castles” at an Anadarko Petroleum Corp. hydraulic fracturing (fracking) site north of Dacono, Colorado, U.S., on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2014.
Jamie Schwaberow | Bloomberg | Getty Images
A number of Club stocks that were unloved on Wall Street earlier in the year have seen their fortunes rebound in recent months, including oilfield-services firm Halliburton (HAL) and industrial Caterpillar (CAT) — creating potential opportunities to lock in gains.
On today’s fleet-focused episode of Quick Charge, we talk about a hot topic in today’s trucking industry called, “the messy middle,” explore some of the ways legacy truck brands are working to reduce fuel consumption and increase freight efficiency. PLUS: we’ve got ReVolt Motors’ CEO and founder Gus Gardner on-hand to tell us why he thinks his solution is better.
You know, for some people.
We’ve also got a look at the Kenworth Supertruck 2 concept truck, revisit the Revoy hybrid tandem trailer, and even plug a great article by CCJ’s Jeff Seger, who is asking some great questions over there. All this and more – enjoy!
New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (and sometimes Sunday). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.
Got news? Let us know! Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Thanks to Trump’s repeated executive order attacks on US clean energy policy, nearly $8 billion in investments and 16 new large-scale factories and other projects were cancelled, closed, or downsized in Q1 2025.
The $7.9 billion in investments withdrawn since January are more than three times the total investments cancelled over the previous 30 months, according to nonpartisan policy group E2’s latest Clean Economy Works monthly update.
However, companies continue to invest in the US renewable sector. Businesses in March announced 10 projects worth more than $1.6 billion for new solar, EV, and grid and transmission equipment factories across six states. That includes Tesla’s plan to invest $200 million in a battery factory near Houston that’s expected to create at least 1,500 new jobs. Combined, the projects are expected to create at least 5,000 new permanent jobs if completed.
Michael Timberlake of E2 said, “Clean energy companies still want to invest in America, but uncertainty over Trump administration policies and the future of critical clean energy tax credits are taking a clear toll. If this self-inflicted and unnecessary market uncertainty continues, we’ll almost certainly see more projects paused, more construction halted, and more job opportunities disappear.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
March’s 10 new projects bring the overall number of major clean energy projects tracked by E2 to 390 across 42 states and Puerto Rico. Companies have said they plan to invest more than $133 billion in these projects and hire 122,000 permanent workers.
Since Congress passed federal clean energy tax credits in August 2022, 34 clean energy projects have been cancelled, downsized, or shut down altogether, wiping out more than 15,000 jobs and scrapping $10 billion in planned investment, according to E2 and Atlas Public Policy.
However, in just the first three months of 2025, after Trump started rolling back clean energy policies, 13 projects were scrapped or scaled back, totaling more than $5 billion. That includes Bosch pulling the plug on its $200 million hydrogen fuel cell plant in South Carolina and Freyr Battery canceling its $2.5 billion battery factory in Georgia.
Republican-led districts have reaped the biggest rewards from Biden’s clean energy tax credits, but they’re also taking the biggest hits under Trump. So far, more than $6 billion in projects and over 10,000 jobs have been wiped out in GOP districts alone.
And the stakes are high. Through March, Republican districts have claimed 62% of all clean energy project announcements, 71% of the jobs, and a staggering 83% of the total investment.
A full map and list of announcements can be seen on E2’s website here. E2 says it will incorporate cancellation data in the coming weeks.
To limit power outages and make your home more resilient, consider going solar with a battery storage system. In order to find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check outEnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and you share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get startedhere. –trusted affiliate link*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Tesla has reportedly delayed the launch of its new “affordable EV,” which is believed to be a stripped-down Model Y, in the United States.
Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk made a pivotal decision that altered the automaker’s direction for the next few years.
The CEO canceled Tesla’s plan to build a cheaper new “$25,000 vehicle” on its next-generation “unboxed” vehicle platform to focus solely on the Robotaxi, utilizing the latest technology, and instead, Tesla plans to build more affordable EVs, though more expensive than previously announced, on its existing Model Y platform.
Musk has believed that Tesla is on the verge of solving self-driving technology for the last few years, and because of that, he believes that a $25,000 EV wouldn’t make sense, as self-driving ride-hailing fleets would take over the lower end of the car market.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
However, he has been consistently wrong about Tesla solving self-driving, which he first said would happen in 2019.
In the meantime, Tesla’s sales have been decreasing and the automaker had to throttle down production at all its manufacturing facilities.
That’s why, instead of building new, more affordable EVs on new production lines, Musk decided to greenlight new vehicles built on the same production lines as Model 3 and Model Y – increasing the utilization rate of its existing manufacturing lines.
Those vehicles have been described as “stripped-down Model Ys” with fewer features and cheaper materials, which Tesla said would launch in “the first half of 2025.”
Reuters is now reporting that Tesla is seeing a delay of “at least months” in launching the first new “lower-cost Model Y” in the US:
Tesla has promised affordable vehicles beginning in the first half of the year, offering a potential boost to flagging sales. Global production of the lower-cost Model Y, internally codenamed E41, is expected to begin in the United States, the sources said, but it would be at least months later than Tesla’s public plan, they added, offering a range of revised targets from the third quarter to early next year.
Along with the delay, the report also claims that Tesla aims to produce 250,000 units of the new model in the US by 2026. This would match Tesla’s currently reduced production capacity at Gigafactory Texas and Fremont factory.
The report follows other recent reports coming from China that also claimed Tesla’s new “affordable EVs” are “stripped-down Model Ys.”
The Chinese report references the new version of the Model 3 that Tesla launched in Mexico last year. It’s a regular Model 3, but Tesla removed some features, like the second-row screen, ambient lighting strip, and it uses fabric interior material rather than Tesla’s usual vegan leather.
The new Reuters report also said that Tesla planned to follow the stripped-down Model Y with a similar Model 3.
In China, the new vehicle was expected to come in the second half of 2025, and Tesla was waiting to see the impact of the updated Model Y, which launched earlier this year.
Electrek’s Take
These reports lend weight to what we have been saying for a year now: Tesla’s “more affordable EVs” will essentially be stripped-down versions of the Model Y and Model 3.
While they will enable Tesla to utilize its currently underutilized factories more efficiently, they will also cannibalize its existing Model 3 and Y lineup and significantly reduce its already dwindling gross margins.
I think Musk will sell the move as being good in the long term because it will allow Tesla to deploy more vehicles, which will later generate more revenue through the purchase of the “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) package.
However, that has been his argument for years, and it has yet to pan out as FSD still requires driver supervision and likely will for years to come, resulting in an extremely low take-rate for the $8,000 package.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.