Connect with us

Published

on

Imagine youre the head of Mattel, and youre hoping the new Barbie movie sends your toy sales skyrocketing.

And then you hear this line of dialogue about the iconic doll:

You represent everything wrong with our culture. You destroyed the planet with your glorification of rampant consumerism you fascist!

Suddenly, the Barbie tie-ins got a little more complicated. And thats before the movie skewers both Mattel, Inc. and its fictional CEO (Will Ferrell).

This is hardly new from La La Land, a business where income inequality isnt a bug. Its the feature every ingenue craves. Youd think industry executives might avoid that awkward anti-capitalist messaging at all costs (much like how climate change activists fear their private jet addictions will be exposed).

And youd be flat-out wrong.

Modern films go out of their way to smite the rich and decry income inequality. The stars inhabiting those films just so happen to be among the richest stars in the Hollywood galaxy.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

The Barbie film goes out of its way to not only trash consumerism, but the titular toy. And a vital character even suggests we stop buying these fascist dolls of flawless white women. Yes, thats another word taken directly from the script to describe the plastic doll.

This summer features another big-budget comedy with the wealthy in its crosshairs.

The Jennifer Lawrence comedy No Hard Feelings finds the Oscar-winner smiting the rich early and often. She plays a bitter, broke woman named Maggie who decides to sleep with a younger man for a quick payday, courtesy of a wealthy couple who can buy just about anything.

Gross, right?

Not to Maggie. Shed rather do that than be part of the capitalist system. Lawrences character spends serious screen time trashing the rich. Shes drowning in debt and resents the wealthy Long Island residents keeping the local economy humming.

Her moral compass is pure, or at least she thinks it is.

Maggie all but spits in a wealthy bar customers face early in the film. His crime? Hes rich, and he asked for a drink minutes before the bar officially opened.

None of this was an accident. Director Gene Stupnitsky says he embraced the anti-wealthy angle to add gravitas to the story, hoping it wouldnt overwhelm the narrative.

The ultimate irony? The aggressively liberal Lawrence fought hard to snag a multi-million dollar paycheck to star in the film. Did she fight just as hard to make sure her co-stars got an equally large paycheck, or at least one larger than the studio initially offered? Talk about income inequality! So much privilege.

Last year saw two celebrated films similarly assault the rich.

The superior film The Menu featured Ralph Fiennes as a chef who invites wealthy diners to savor his revolutionary cuisine. The assorted guests, including far-left actor John Leguizamo, are portrayed as mostly shallow souls eager to climb the societal ladder.

The chef has more on his mind than keeping the dishes fresh and warm, and the story soon takes a horrific turn.

The mockery is relentless, although the film proved one of the sturdier awards season entries and didnt get lost in its agenda.

The same cant be said for Triangle of Sadness, the Best Picture nominee that scorches the elite early and often. The films first half is brilliant, and even Donald Trump might chuckle at its social X-ray of the fatuous elites.

A group of ultra-wealthy souls gather for an extravagant cruise, but theyre left to fend for themselves when a storm overwhelms the boat.

The moment Woody Harrelson enters the frame as the ships combative captain, sadly, the films agenda overwhelms the story. The satires second half is a dud with income inequality notes and a storytelling detour that sinks the initially impressive tale.

Conservatives rallied around Harrelson for defying COVID-19 groupthink , but hearing the ultra-wealthy star praise socialism in the film may be tough to swallow.

HBOs The White Lotus series similarly deconstructs how the rich and famous spend their leisure time. Show creator Mike White does so with a gimlet eye for hypocrisy and a greater sense of cultural balance. Hes willing to torch the rich while mocking those who attack them without earning their slice of the financial pie.

The shows first season showcases embittered Gen Z types Olivia Mossbacher (Sydney Sweeney) and her pal Paula (Brittany OGrady) as they smirk their way through paradise.

Do they appreciate the sacrifices the Mossbachers made to get them to Maui or the endless work that gave them the chance for a once-in-a-lifetime trip like this? Of course not.

The two have little empathy for anyone other than themselves. Later in the season, Paula cracks the parents safe to help a resort worker, but it hardly feels like a charitable move.

The best eat the rich satire in recent memory may be HBOs just-wrapped Succession. The celebrated drama showed the rich and famous brawling over power, fame, and family dynamics. The show drew near-universal acclaim despite its not-so-veiled attack on families like the conservative-leaning Murdoch clan.

Hollywood understandably loves to tweak the rich. Heck, many elites bring it on themselves, and great writers have famously toyed with excess in profound ways. F. Scott Fitzgeralds The Great Gatsby rushes to mind.

Its far less agreeable when an industry renowned for excess not only mocks it, but does so sans irony.

Sometimes, though, screenwriters still get it right.

Christian Toto is an award-winning journalist, movie critic and editor ofHollywoodInToto.com.He previously served as associate editor with Breitbart News Big Hollywood. Follow him at@HollywoodInToto.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Continue Reading

Sports

Franklin ‘can’t wait’ to coach again after PSU exit

Published

on

By

Franklin 'can't wait' to coach again after PSU exit

James Franklin says he “can’t wait” to coach again on the heels of Penn State firing him last weekend.

“I don’t know anything else,” Franklin said Saturday during ESPN’s “College GameDay.” “I’ve been doing this for 30 years. I don’t have hobbies. I don’t golf. I don’t fish. This has been such a big part of my identity, such a big part of my family. We love it.”

On Sunday, Penn State let Franklin go after the Nittany Lions’ 0-3 start in Big Ten play.

Off last year’s appearance in the College Football Playoff semifinals, the team began the year ranked No. 2 in the AP Top 25 preseason poll. But it lost in double overtime at home to Oregon on Sept. 27, dropping Franklin to 4-21 at Penn State against AP top-10 opponents, including 1-18 against top-10 Big Ten teams in conference games.

Then, with losses to UCLA and Northwestern, Penn State became the first team since the FBS and FCS split in 1978 to lose consecutive games while favored by 20 or more points in each game, according to ESPN Research.

Before a team meeting Sunday afternoon, Penn State athletic director Pat Kraft told Franklin he was being fired.

“I was in shock,” Franklin admitted. “I’m still working through it myself. It feels surreal.”

Franklin won 104 games and reached double-digit wins six times in 11 seasons at Penn State, including the previous three.

“I had a great run there,” he said. “Penn State was good to me and my family.”

Franklin noted that Penn State’s expectations skyrocketed during his tenure, especially this past offseason. That, in turn, led to his firing when it became clear the Nittany Lions wouldn’t meet them this season.

“We created that pressure,” he said. “That’s the thing that I’m most proud of.”

Franklin, 53, is still owed $49 million from his buyout, the second largest in college football history. He said now that he is looking forward to achieving what he couldn’t at Penn State.

“I thought we were going to win a national championship there,” he said. “We were close. That goal hasn’t changed. We’re just going to go win a national championship somewhere else now.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Louisville’s ‘great plan’ rattles Beck, No. 2 Miami

Published

on

By

Louisville's 'great plan' rattles Beck, No. 2 Miami

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. — Carson Beck‘s last throw — his fourth interception of the night — came on a hot route after Louisville brought the blitz. The play should have worked, Beck said, but there was “a miscommunication” and his receiver ran the wrong route. Instead, the pass found Louisville’s T.J. Capers with 32 seconds to play, and Miami‘s undefeated season came to an end.

That was the story of Miami’s night — one mistake on top of another, until it was finally too much for the No. 2 team in the country to overcome.

“That’s a really poor job of execution and discipline,” Miami coach Mario Cristobal said after the Hurricanes fell 24-21 to the unranked Cardinals. “That’s all of us — every player and every coach. After having some really good performances and working really hard in practice, that’s really disappointing. We’re all disappointed. We’re all pissed.”

Louisville schemed a nearly flawless game to torment the Hurricanes.

The Cardinals scored on their first two drives, showing Miami’s defense looks it hadn’t seen all season, safety Zechariah Poyser said.

“They had a great plan,” Poyser said. “They came up with stuff we hadn’t seen and we had to adjust to. We weren’t prepared for it.”

The early 14-0 deficit combined with a Louisville defensive game plan aimed at stuffing the run and forcing Beck to make quick throws frustrated the Miami offense too.

Beck’s first pick came on a deep shot over the middle in which Antonio Watts made a nifty catch for the interception. Beck went deep again on the next drive and was again picked off. He threw his third interception on a fourth-down heave in the fourth quarter that appeared to be a dagger for the Hurricanes, but Keionte Scott‘s forced fumble on the Cardinals’ ensuing drive set up a touchdown that gave Miami life.

Trailing by three with all three timeouts left, Miami drove to the Louisville 31, but coming off a timeout, Beck dodged pressure and tossed toward the sideline, where tight end Elija Lofton was out of position and the ball was intercepted, sealing the Louisville win.

It has become a familiar theme for Miami, which lost for the 10th time as a favorite under Cristobal.

Despite the ugly performance, however, Beck insisted this loss wasn’t going to define Miami.

“It’s a good thing we play 12 games and not just one,” Beck said. “That’s the biggest thing we have to realize is there’s more opportunities. We’ve been very successful this season, and shoot, we laid an egg tonight. I have to prepare better, I have to play better, and I’m going to do that and come back with fire.”

Cristobal lamented a bevy of missed opportunities, from costly penalties to the four turnovers, but insisted his team is built to withstand the loss.

“You better go out and do something about it,” Cristobal said. “That’s got to be the complete commitment of everybody. There’s no B.S., and there’s no excuse making. There’s no time to sit around and do anything but go back to work and go get better. That’s what it takes. That’s what real men do, and that’s what we have to do.”

Continue Reading

UK

Prince Andrew insisted on ‘gag order’ to stop allegations spoiling Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, memoir claims

Published

on

By

Prince Andrew insisted on 'gag order' to stop allegations spoiling Queen's Platinum Jubilee, memoir claims

Prince Andrew insisted his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, sign a one-year gag order – to prevent details of her allegations tarnishing the late Queen’s platinum jubilee, her memoirs have claimed.

Andrew relinquished his Duke of York title and remaining honours on Friday evening.

It came after discussions with King Charles, in consultation with the Prince of Wales, both of whom wanted to bring an end to the long-lasting scandal.

But, according to The Telegraph, Ms Giuffre’s book, which is due out on Tuesday, is focusing further attention on the sexual assault allegations and the prince’s friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, which led to the royal’s downfall.

She tells how Andrew’s “disastrous” Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis was like an “injection of jet fuel” for her legal team, and it raised the possibility of “subpoenaing” his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, and daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie and drawing them into the legal case.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Prince Andrew’s ’embarrassed’ Royals ‘for years’

The Telegraph also reports Ms Giuffre’s claims that she got “more out of” Andrew than a reported £12m payout and $2m (around £1.4m) donation to her charity because she had “an acknowledgement that I and many other women had been victimised and a tacit pledge to never deny it again”.

The former duke paid to settle a civil sexual assault case with Ms Giuffre in 2022, despite insisting he had never met her.

More on Prince Andrew

Ms Giuffre alleged she was forced to have sex with the prince when she was 17, after being trafficked by Epstein. Andrew continues to vehemently deny her allegations.

Read more:
Andrew giving up title is ‘Victory for Virginia’
Everything we know about Andrew losing titles
Prince Andrew: A timeline of events

Queen Elizabeth II was celebrating her platinum jubilee in 2022 – the first British monarch to reach the milestone – as the civil case against her son was gathering pace.

It was settled nine days after she reached the 70th anniversary of her accession.

According to the Telegraph, Ms Giuffre, who died in April, reveals in her book: “I agreed to a one-year gag order, which seemed important to the prince because it ensured that his mother’s platinum jubilee would not be tarnished any more than it already had been.”

Parades, processions, concerts and street parties were held across the UK in celebration of the Platinum Jubilee. Pic: PA
Image:
Parades, processions, concerts and street parties were held across the UK in celebration of the Platinum Jubilee. Pic: PA

In January 2022, a US judge ruled the civil case against Andrew could go ahead, and the Queen went on to strip him of his honorary military roles, with the prince also giving up his HRH style.

‘Devastating’ interview

His 2019 Newsnight interview, which he hoped would clear his name, backfired when he said he “did not regret” his friendship with convicted paedophile Epstein, who trafficked Ms Giuffre.

Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre (then Roberts) in 2001 - a picture the prince claimed had been doctored. Pic: Shutterstock
Image:
Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre (then Roberts) in 2001 – a picture the prince claimed had been doctored. Pic: Shutterstock


Andrew also said he had “no recollection” of ever meeting Ms Giuffre and added he could not have had sex with her in March 2001 because he was at Pizza Express with his daughter Beatrice on the day in question.

Ms Giuffre, whose book is called Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, wrote, according to The Telegraph: “As devastating as this interview was for Prince Andrew, for my legal team it was like an injection of jet fuel.

“Its contents would not only help us build an ironclad case against the prince but also open the door to potentially subpoenaing his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, and their daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.”

‘Amazed he was stupid enough’

She also told how Andrew had “stonewalled” her legal team for months before settlement discussions began moving very quickly when his deposition was scheduled for March 2022.

Ms Giuffre also wrote she was “amazed” that a member of the royal family would be “stupid enough” to appear in public with the convicted paedophile, after a photo of the pair walking in New York emerged.

Andrew, who remains a prince and continues to live in the Crown Estate property Royal Lodge, said on Friday the “continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the royal family”.

He insisted he was putting his “family and country first” and would stop using “my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me”.

Continue Reading

Trending