Developers have accused the government of not doing enough to tackle falling levels of house building, as Michael Gove prepares to unveil plans that he says will boost construction – without spoiling the countryside.
In a speech expected on Monday, the levelling up and housing secretary will set out measures aimed at “unblocking the planning system” and increasing development in urban areas.
The prime minister has also announced that a manifesto promise to build one million new homes over this parliament will be met.
Government sources say a separate commitment to build 300,000 new homes per year by the mid-2020s still stands, despite a former Tory housing minister saying last May it would be missed “by a country mile”.
Mandatory housebuilding targets for local authorities were dropped by ministers last year after a rebellion from Conservative MPs concerned about the impact of developments.
Image: Michael Gove
Rishi Sunak said the solution to the UK’s housing shortage was not “concreting over the countryside”.
He added: “Our plan is to build the right homes where there is the most need and where there is local support, in the heart of Britain’s great cities… by regenerating disused brownfield land, streamlining planning process and helping homeowners to renovate and extend their houses outwards and upwards.”
But the Home Builders Federation said the plans “do little to address the major reasons why housing supply is falling” and questioned if there was enough brownfield land available to meet demand.
Stewart Baseley, executive chairman of the group, said: “The increasingly anti-development policy environment is driving down housing supply, taking access to decent housing out of the reach in particular of young people, costing jobs and reducing economic activity.
Advertisement
“Much more decisive action is needed if government is serious about boosting housing delivery.”
In a speech in central London tomorrow morning, Mr Gove is expected to lay out several proposals, including:
The creation of government-sponsored development corporations – modelled on a body set up by the Thatcher government in East London – with powers to buy up land using compulsory purchase orders and sell plots to developers.
A new ‘super-squad’ of planners and other experts to help unblock major developments. The team would initially be deployed to Cambridge to work on expansion plans.
The launch of a ‘Planning Skills Delivery Fund’ to clear backlogs and improve skills in the sector.
Higher fees levied on developers to help improve planning services.
New flexibilities to turn shops, takeaways and betting shops into homes and a cut in the administration required to convert barns and repurpose farm buildings.
A review of ‘permitted development rights’ to make it easier for the public to extend homes, convert lofts and renovate buildings.
The organisation representing local authorities criticised the government’s plans for increased flexibility in planning laws though – saying property conversions should be handled through formal planning applications.
“Further expanding permitted development rights risks creating poor quality residential environments that negatively impact people’s health and wellbeing, as well as a lack of affordable housing or suitable infrastructure,” said chair of the Local Government Association, councillor Shaun Davies.
A report by the cross-party Levelling Up Committee earlier this month concluded the government was on track to deliver one million new homes over the course of this parliament, but said the dropping of mandatory targets would make it difficult to meet the annual aim of 300,000 additional properties.
Government figures show 687,000 new homes have been delivered since early 2019, reaching a high of 242,700 in the 12 months to April 2020.
But in May last year, former housing minister Robert Jenrick – who now serves in the Home Office – predicted that housebuilding would fall in the immediate future and that the 300,000 target would be missed “by a country mile”.
Does the government’s rhetoric on homebuilding match up to reality?
Ballooning property prices have caused a big rise in the age of first-time buyers, with high deposit requirements stopping many getting on the housing ladder at all.
A lack of supply has also forced up rents, while rising mortgage rates are making the situation even more unaffordable.
Putting a figure on how much new housing is needed is tricky but most estimates range between 300,000 to 340,000 per year.
Ministers have previously said around this point, the increase in supply would start to have an impact on bringing down prices – although some query this logic.
Getting to this figure was dealt a blow when the government announced last year it would no longer be enforcing development targets.
This change was brought about by rebel Tory MPs and followed the loss of the Chesham and Amersham by-election to a Lib Dem campaign that centred on local anxieties over planning reform.
Housebuilders say the watering down of the targets has already led to 58 local authorities withdrawing or pausing their local housing plans.
Tomorrow’s push is designed to reassure the public on the issue of homebuilding without scaring traditional Tory voters (and their MPs) who are worried about buildings popping up in their leafy backyards.
While the government press release outlining the plans is adorned with positive quotes from developers like Persimmon and Keir, and bodies like RIBA and the Royal Town Planning Institute, you don’t have to look far to find deep scepticism as to whether the government’s rhetoric matches up to reality.
As well as the watering down of housing targets, criticism centres on the convoluted planning process, environmental regulations and whether there are enough brownfield urban sites to meet demand.
Much like tackling climate change, building new homes is something most people agree needs to happen – and yet, workable and scalable solutions everyone can agree with always seem thin on the ground.
Industry sources have also cast doubt on whether the government will hit its one million pledge, amid rising costs in the sector.
Housebuilders say the dropping of mandatory targets combined with the enforcement of pollution rules by Natural England has led to approved planning permissions falling to record lows.
The environmental watchdog has been accused by developers of blocking up to 145,000 homes because of so-called “nutrient neutrality rules” centred on the risk to waterways.
Image: A new housing estate under construction in Ashford, Kent
In an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Gove said ministers needed to work with Natural England to make sure the balance was right between building new homes and protecting the environment.
Ahead of his speech, Mr Gove said: “At the heart of this is making sure that we build beautiful and empower communities to have a say in the development in their area.”
But Labour’s shadow housing secretary Lisa Nandy said the Conservatives had failed to deliver enough new homes while in government.
She said: “It takes some serious brass neck for the Tories to make yet more promises when the housing crisis has gone from bad to worse on their watch, and when housebuilding is on course to hit its lowest rate since the Second World War because Rishi Sunak rolled over to his own MPs.”
A 92-year-old man has been found guilty of raping and murdering a woman born 133 years ago – in what’s thought to be the UK’s longest cold case to reach trial.
Ryland Headley was convicted at Bristol Crown Court of killing 75-year-old mother of two, Louisa Dunne, at her home back in June 1967.
Latest DNA technology – as well as matching palm prints taken at the scene more than 57 years ago – led a jury to find Headley guilty on both charges.
Image: Ryland Headley, now aged 92, has been found guilty of rape and murder. Pic Avon and Somerset Police
Image: The front of Louisa Dunne’s home. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Detective Inspector Dave Marchant from Avon and Somerset Police said forces across the country are investigating whether Headley could be linked to other unsolved crimes.
“This investigation was a blend of new and old forensic techniques – DNA being the latest and greatest…but we were able to utilise that original investigative material,” he said.
On the morning of 28 June 1967, neighbours noticed that Louisa Dunne, born in 1892, wasn’t standing on her doorstep as usual.
They found her lying dead inside her home in the Easton area of Bristol – bruised, blood coming from one ear, vomit in her mouth and her underwear around her ankles.
More on Crime
Related Topics:
The police investigation at the time found traces of semen on intimate swabs and on the skirt she was wearing, but it was around 20 years before DNA testing.
Image: Louisa Dunne’s skirt. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image: Map showing original house-to-house coverage. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
A palm print was also found on one of the rear windows inside the house.
“The original investigation was, by all accounts, massive,” DI Marchant told Sky News.
“Over 19,000 palm print eliminations were taken from men and boys in the Bristol area and beyond. Over 8,000 house-to-house records were completed and several thousand statements were taken,” he added.
But Headley – in his 30s at the time – lived just outside the ring of houses where palm prints were taken.
A post-mortem examination found she had “extensive abrasions” on her face and that the most likely explanation was that a hand had been pressed against her mouth.
Image: The back of Louisa Dunne’s house. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image: Palmprint images. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Around 20 crates of evidence were stored in Avon and Somerset Police HQ for nearly six decades alongside other cold cases.
The case was reviewed in 2024, with new DNA testing on the sperm found on the skirt Ms Dunne had been wearing.
Investigating officers were told the results showed a DNA match on the national database that was “a billion times” more likely to belong to Headley than anyone else.
“I had to read that email several times to fully digest the content of it and believe what I was reading. Then it was, okay, game on, let’s get this investigation going,” said DI Marchant.
Headley was arrested at his home in Ipswich in November 2024 – he did not give evidence during the trial.
Image: Headley during his arrest. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image: Louisa Dunne in 1933. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
The jury heard that forensic experts had matched Headley’s palm print, taken on arrest, to that of the one found on Ms Dunne’s window at the time.
The judge allowed the prosecution to raise the fact that Headley had already spent time in jail for committing two other rapes, around a decade after Ms Dunne’s murder.
Both those cases involved attacks against elderly women in similar circumstances.
Prosecutor Anna Vigars KC told the jury these offences demonstrate to all of us that Headley “has a tendency” to act in exactly the same way that we say that he did back in 1967.
“In other words, to break into people’s homes at night and, in some cases, to target an elderly woman living alone, to have sex with her despite her attempts to fend him off, and to threaten violence,” she said.
Image: Ryland Headley is on trial for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Pic: PA
Speaking before the verdict, Louisa Dunne’s granddaughter recalled the moment police told her of progress in the cold case, nearly six decades on: “She said, ‘this is about your grandmother’, and I said, ‘have they caught him?’ It came out, I never thought I’d say anything like that. Have you caught him? and she said, ‘we have a suspect’.”
She described the impact of the attack on her grandmother and that a conviction would bring relief:
“I accepted it. I accepted that some murders just never get solved. And some people just have to live with that emptiness and that sadness.
“I think it’s appalling, absolutely appalling. The poor woman – it must have been absolutely terrifying. And the reality of a rape, I don’t like thinking about, I don’t think anybody does,” she added.
The Crown Prosecution Service told Sky News that it was not aware of a cold case with a longer period between the offence and trial.
DI Marchant told Sky News it demonstrates the value of reviewing such cases: “I think this investigation shows you should never give up.
“You should never look at an investigation and say, ‘oh, it’s too old, it happened X number of years ago’ and have an arbitrary cut off point. At the time we re-instigated it in 2024… there was a chance a suspect could still be alive and as it turned out – he was.”
The BBC has said it regrets not pulling the live stream of Bob Vylan’s “unacceptable” Glastonbury set – as Ofcom said the broadcaster has “questions to answer”.
The corporation has faced mounting criticism over airing the performance on Glastonbury‘s West Holts Stage, during which the rap-punk duo’s frontman Bobby Vylan led chants of: “Free, free Palestine” and: “Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)”.
Sir Keir Starmer condemned the remarks as “appalling hate speech”, while festival organiser Emily Eavis said they “crossed a line” – and media watchdog Ofcom has now also released a statement raising concerns.
This morning, a spokesperson for the prime minister did not directly answer when asked if he still had confidence in BBC director-general Tim Davie.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:32
What is the Glastonbury controversy?
Footage from Bob Vylan’s set on Saturday showed some of the crowd joining in, as the group performed in front of a screen that said Israel’s actions in Gaza amount to “genocide”.
Afterwards, the BBC said there had been a warning on screen about potential “strong and discriminatory language”, but described the comments as “deeply offensive”.
On Monday, a spokesperson released an updated statement, saying the comments were antisemitic and the performance should have been taken off air.
“The BBC respects freedom of expression but stands firmly against incitement to violence,” the statement said. “The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves. We welcome Glastonbury’s condemnation of the performance.”
Image: Pic: PA
A judgement to issue a warning on screen while streaming online was in line with editorial guidelines, the spokesperson added, and the performance has not been made available to view on demand.
“The team were dealing with a live situation but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen.
“In light of this weekend, we will look at our guidance around live events so we can be sure teams are clear on when it is acceptable to keep output on air.”
An Ofcom spokesperson said: “We are very concerned about the live stream of this performance, and the BBC clearly has questions to answer.
“We have been speaking to the BBC over the weekend and we are obtaining further information as a matter of urgency, including what procedures were in place to ensure compliance with its own editorial guidelines.”
In a statement shared on Instagram on Sunday, Bobby Vylan said: “Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place.
“As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us.”
The latest developments follows severe condemnation from the prime minister, who said there was “no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech”.
Image: Mo Chara of Kneecap at Glastonbury. Pic: Reuters
Sir Keir also referenced a previous statement that Belfast rap group Kneecap, who were on stage after Bob Vylan, should have been removed from the line-up after one member was charged with a terrorism offence.
“I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence,” he said.
Ms Eavis, whose father Michael co-founded the festival, said in a statement that Bob Vylan had “very much crossed a line”.
She added: “Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.”
The Israeli embassy posted on X in the hours after the set, saying it was “deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric”.
It said the slogan used “advocates for the dismantling of the State of Israel”.
In a separate post on X on Sunday, Israel’s foreign ministry published graphic footage following the attack by Hamas on the Nova festival in Israel on 7 October 2023, and the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said it would be formally complaining to the BBC over its “outrageous decision” to broadcast the performance.
Speaking to Sky News’ Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillipson behalf of the government, Health Secretary Wes Streeting described the chant as “appalling”, especially at a music festival – “when there were Israelis at a similar music festival who were kidnapped, murdered, raped, and in some cases still held captive”.
He added that while “there’s no justification for inciting violence against Israelis… the way in which Israel’s conducting this war has made it extremely difficult for Israel’s allies around the world to stand by and justify”.
Lucy McMullin, who was in the crowd for Bob Vylan, told Sky News: “When there’s children and civilians being murdered and starved, then I think it’s important that people are speaking out on these issues.
“However, inciting more death and violence is not the way to do it.”
Police have said they are reviewing footage of both the Bob Vylan and Kneecap sets to assess whether any criminal offences were committed.
Speaking to Sky News earlier today, women and equalities minister Baroness Jacqui Smith said the comments “clearly” over-stepped the mark.
“I’m surprised that the BBC carried on broadcasting them live when it was obvious what was happening.”