Connect with us

Published

on

13.2K

Stocking antibiotics for a catastrophe has been a topic of conversation among preppers for as long as Ive been writing about prepping (now 15 years). The challenge, of course, is trying to find over the counter antibiotics. Its impossible, right?

Not exactly. It can be done, but it requires unconventional approaches.

Ill explain, but lets back up for a second. Why Preppers Need to Stock Antibiotics

Ive found most new preppers tend to first dive into firearms and food. Theyll buy up whatever they think the best gun for SHTF is, then theyll stock canned goods and freeze-dried foods. Intermediate preppers begin calculating how much water they should store, start storing rice and beans, etc.

Stock beans, bullets, and bandages!
survivalist saying

Sprinkled between the food and firearms, newer preppers will begin adding some medical supplies. They may buy a first aid kit or make an IFAK kit. Theyll buy a copy of Where There is No Doctor, and usually thats about as far as theyll go for medical supplies. Sale Where There Is No Doctor: A Village Health Care Handbook Used Book in Good ConditionDavid Werner (Author) $24.26 Buy on Amazon

These are great steps to take, and without question, the prepper that takes these medical measures will be significantly better-suited to surviving a catastrophe than the average American. However, we can always do better, and during a crisis, odds are high that antibiotics will be needed by many. Theyre one of the main drugs I recommend people pack in a bug out bag, and theyre equally important at home for an extended crisis. We Take Access to Antibiotics for Granted

It is easy to take our collective dependence on antibiotics for granted. Were sick so we head to the doctors office, end up seeing the nurse practitioner instead, and then leave with a prescription called in to our local pharmacy.

Easy peasy.

However, this wasnt always the case. The first antibiotics were not prescribed until the late 1930s. After that, the rates of bacterial infection as a cause of death plummeted. Between 1944 and 1972, human life expectancy jumped by eight years as a result of it. Penicillin ushered in a whole new era in medicine.

If access to health care and antibiotics became a problem, simple diseases and infections that we think nothing of today could once again pose serious risk to our lives. Antibiotics are Critical After a Crisis

During a humanitarian crisis, whether its the result of war or natural disaster, communicable diseases pose a serious risk to the surviving population. Its the risks associated with population displacement that causes problems.

According to a study from the National Library of Medicine:

The availability of safe water and sanitation facilities, the degree of crowding, the underlying health status of the population, and the availability of healthcare services all interact within the context of the local disease ecology to influence the risk for communicable diseases and death in the affected population. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2725828/

So, the breakdown in infrastructure and cleanliness leads to a spread in infectious diseases. An earthquake, as an example, destroys infrastructure and displaces people, which then gives way to disease outbreaks because people are huddled together in an unsanitary environment.

Examples include an outbreak of norovirus in Texas after Hurricane Katrina in 2005and cutaneous leishmaniasis outbreaks during the Syrian conflict beginning in 2013.

In other parts of the world, cholera remains a serious problem. Its an acute diarrheal disease that can kill within hours if left untreated. Severe cases require you guessed it antibiotic treatment. What is considered a problem only in developing countries could quickly create problems in modern countries following a local or national catastrophe. How to Buy Over the Counter Antibiotics

Back in the early days of prepping, when prepping was still a largely hush hush topic lest you be viewed as an extremist, there was only my site and a handful of others dedicated to prepping. The biggest by far was Survival Blog. There people would often discuss how to convince their doctors to prescribe antibiotics even though they medically didnt need them at the time.

That puts the doctor in a precarious position, and they are not likely to just go prescribing unnecessary antibiotics because their patient fears the end of the world is coming. It is possible, more so today than yesteryear, to find a sympathetic doc who might help you out, but the odds are stacked against you.

If you want to stock antibiotics, youre going to have to find another way. Following are three ways Ive bought over the counter antibiotics. 1 Buying Antibiotics Online

This approach is a bit of a cheat, because technically it does involve a prescription (thats how theyre legally distributed), but you dont have to visit or talk with the doctor. While its not physically over the counter it is the same idea buying them online. Jase Medical

Jase Medical is an example of this service. They market themselves as a business that provides people who are preparing for a catastrophe, pandemic, foreign travel, etc. with a variety of different antibiotics.

Jase Medical is not a scam. I tried the service and received the medication. The antibiotics I received from Jase Medical. They came with a spiral-bound guide and case.

This service is great because you can just log on to your computer or phone, go through the online consultation (a series of questions), and then the doctor reviews your answers and you receive approval for the antibiotics which are then promptly mailed to you.

According to their website the consultation requires you to Fill out our simple online form for an evaluation from a board-certified physician.

See the screenshot below as an example of the types of questions asked: Sample question from Jase Medical.

Their service is available to everyone in the United States and Canada. Its fully legal because they contract with physicians who are licensed to prescribe medications in your area and they comply with all governing medical laws.

So, while it technically requires a prescription, its not the type of prescription that most people are accustomed to obtaining. Its easy.

There is a downside to this approach, however cost. You are unlikely to get your insurance to cover their services. You have to pay out of pocket, and thats where they make their money.

As of this writing, Jase Medical charges $259.95 USD for the following antibiotics: Metronidazole 30-500mg Tablets Azithromycin 6-250mg Tablets Amoxicillin-Clavulanate 28-875/125mg Tablets Ciprofloxacin 28-500mg Tablets Doxycycline 120-100mg Capsules

That price includes their booklet and case. Canadian orders for the same assortment costs $435.95 CAD.

Expensive? Yes. Worth it? That depends on the results of your SHTF plan, your medical conditions, and how much youre willing to spend. In Case

Another company offering a similar service is In Case, a play off just in case. They provide a kit of doctor-prescribed antibiotics for emergency use.Ive also used this company and the customer service was solid. I went through their online health questionnaire and the package of just in case medications came in the mail shortly thereafter.

The company describes their service as:

The IN CASE Kit is a box containing 6 doctor-prescribed medications which target treatment of severe infections and injuries for use in emergency situations. These medications treat natural and biological disaster pathogens causing infections throughout the body including thelungs, pelvic and urinary tract, skin wounds, gastrointestinal, eyes, ears, and central nervous system. IN CASE was co-founded by an ER physician who is also one of the countrys leading infectious disease researchers. IN CASEs doctor network covers all 50 states. In Case marketing statement I found the In Case Emergency Medication Usage Guide to be particularly informative. Its a simple explanation of which drugs to use under what circumstances.

My In Case package included: Cephalexin 500mg Ciprofloxacin HCL 500mg Doxycycline Hyclate 100mg Gentamicin 0.3% eye drops Metronidazole 500mg Mupirocin 2% ointment

As you can see, the In Case package has some similarities to the Jase Medical package, but also a few different medications. The similarities are the key antibiotics that most preppers will want to stock.

In an ideal world, you would be able to purchase a package from each, as I have. That way you have a greater variety of medications, but also a more robust supply of key antibiotics. 2 Buy Them in Another Country

Every time I travel to Mexico, Im surprised by what can be purchased over the counter. Antibiotics? Check. Prozac? No problem. Valium? Ritalin? Viagra? Steroids? All of that. Pictures I took of street signs advertising drugs for sale over the counter in Mexico.

To be sure, these are advertised in tourist destinations and what is available in one area of Mexico may not be available in another area. I have found drugs of this type available over the counter in Puerto Vallarta and Playa del Carmen. A trip to Oaxaca did not yield any drug stores that would sell these without a prescription (though many pharmacies have someone who can prescribe).

Is there a catch? Yes.

Its not that these drugs dont work (they do, Ive tried them). Its that bringing them back to the United States without a prescription could yield legal problems. According to an article from Very Well Health:

You are allowed to bring prescription medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from Mexico into the United States for your personal use. But there is a limit. In general, you may bring up to 50 dosage units into the U.S. without a prescription. https://www.verywellhealth.com/prescription-drugs-from-mexico-2966765

That prescription must be from a U.S.-based doctor.

It is not an uncommon practice for people living near the border with Mexico who have limited funds/insurance and need lower-cost prescription drugs to hop across the border for them and return home.

Another way to obtain antibiotics through travel is to speak with your physician in advance of travel and ask for antibiotics in case you encounter digestion problems (like travelers diarrhea). Azithromycin is often used to treat travelers diarrhea and many doctors will prescribe it as a just in case prescriptions when you travel.

My doctor has done it before for me. I didnt need the medication, so I stored it after the trip with my other medical preps. 3 Buy Fish Antibiotics

Anyone that has been in the prepping circles for any length of time is familiar with the idea of buying fish antibiotics for human use. This is the easiest approach, no? You go to your local pet supply store pick some off the shelf.

Does this also have a catch? Of course safety concerns. Are fish antibiotics safe for humans? Good luck finding an exact answer to that question.

The problem is that fish antibiotics are not regulated by the FDA, so theres no guarantee what youre taking is what the label says it is. For this reason, and because youre not first consulting a doctor on the need for antibiotics, most people advise against using fish antibiotics.

Is this just medical professionals being overly cautious? Perhaps. In other cases, like a Pharmacy Times article arguing against it, its logical to assume these groups have a vested interest in keeping people coming to the pharmacy counter and not the fish store.

However, based on another study from the National Library of Medicine, its clear that many humans are self-treating with fish antibiotics.

Im not going to dispense any medical advice here. You need to talk to your own doctor for that.

However, I can tell you that if there is a serious, catastrophic event that results in my needing to take antibiotics and the only ones I have on hand are fish antibiotics thats better than the alternative in my mind, which is leaving the condition untreated. Conclusion

Preppers would be wise to stock antibiotics once they have other essentials squared away (food, water, etc.). They should know what antibiotics treat which conditions and they should always start by trying to obtain a prescription from a prepper-friendly doctor.

Short of that, there are options to obtain antibiotics over the counter, but each comes with a potential drawback.

What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments section.

Continue Reading

UK

Grenfell Tower to be demolished, as campaigners react to ‘divisive and painful debate’ over decaying block

Published

on

By

Grenfell Tower to be demolished, as campaigners react to 'divisive and painful debate' over decaying block

Grenfell campaigners have reacted to the “deeply sensitive decision” by the deputy prime minister to demolish the tower block.

Victims’ families and survivors were given the news in a meeting attended by Angela Rayner on Wednesday night.

Grenfell Next of Kin, which represents some of the bereaved families, described it as a “deeply sensitive decision… after a thorough engagement process in person” following an “uncomfortable conversation with uncomfortable truths”.

In a statement on X the group said: “The lack of closure, the continuous discussions and consultations, the retraumatisation of a divisive and painful debate brings nothing to the table except pain and further division.

“We want a discussion about what will go in the Tower’s place so it can be seen and remembered forever. We need to re-imagine a future and rebuild our broken shattered lives and our families.”

The government has previously said there will be no changes to the site before the eighth anniversary of the fire disaster, which claimed 72 lives on 14 June 2017.

It is expected more details will be set out by ministers by the end of the week.

More on Grenfell Tower

Engineering experts have said that while the tower remains stable, and it is safe for people to live, work and study nearby, its condition will worsen over time and there is no realistic prospect of bringing it back into use.

The latest advice issued to the government in September was that the building, or the part of it that was significantly damaged, should be taken down.

Grenfell Tower pictured days after the devastating fire. Pic: AP
Image:
Grenfell Tower pictured days after the devastating fire. Pic: AP

Meanwhile, another campaign group, Grenfell United, claimed Ms Rayner had not given a reason behind her decision during the meeting and refused to say how many of the victims’ families and survivors had been consulted.

In a statement, it said: “But judging from the room alone – the vast majority of whom were bereaved – no one supported her decision. But she claims her decision is based on our views.

“Ignoring the voices of bereaved on the future of our loved ones’ gravesite is disgraceful and unforgivable.”

Members of a support group for the next of kin and families of some the 72 people killed in the Grenfell Tower Fire in 2017 ahead of a press conference.
Pic: PA
Image:
Members of a support group for the next of kin and families of some the 72 people killed in the Grenfell Tower fire. Pic: PA

Grenfell Next of Kin expressed a different opinion, suggesting the decision by Ms Rayner “must have been difficult” and adding that “all the previous Secretaries of State [for Housing, Communities and Local Government] avoided making a decision despite the harm it did to us and the community.”

Local Labour MP Joe Powell also defended Ms Rayner posting on X that following “intensive engagement with our community… the decision to start planning for the Tower to come down has not been taken lightly”.

What is left of the tower has stood in place since the tragedy, with a covering on the building featuring a large green heart accompanied by the words “forever in our hearts”.

Views have varied on what should happen to the site.

Some of the bereaved and survivors feel the tower should remain in place until there are criminal prosecutions over the failings which led to the disaster.

The final report of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, published in September, concluded the fire was the result of “decades of failure” by government and the construction industry to act on the dangers of flammable materials on high-rise buildings.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Key takeaways from the Grenfell Inquiry

The west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the “systematic dishonesty” of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said.

He said the “simple truth” is that all the deaths were avoidable and that those who lived in the tower were “badly failed” by authorities “in most cases through incompetence but, in some cases, through dishonesty and greed”.

However, the Metropolitan Police said last year that decisions on criminal charges for the Grenfell Tower blaze are not expected until the end of 2026.

Read more from Sky News:
Met crackdown on phone thieves
Trump ban on trans women athletes
Orebro survivor who escaped shooting

It would mean a near 10-year wait for justice if anyone is ultimately charged – a period of time described by families as “unbearable”.

The disaster was Britain’s deadliest residential fire since the Second World War and began a national reckoning over the safety and conditions of social housing and tower blocks.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

September 2024: Grenfell community ‘brave and hopeful’

Separately, the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower.

A shortlist of five potential design teams was announced last month, with a winner expected to be selected this summer to enable a planning application to be submitted in late 2026.

A government spokesperson said: “The priority for the deputy prime minister is to meet with and write to the bereaved, survivors and the immediate community to let them know her decision on the future of the Grenfell Tower.

“This is a deeply personal matter for all those affected, and the deputy prime minister is committed to keeping their voice at the heart of this.”

Continue Reading

UK

Met Police crackdown sees 1,000 stolen phones seized and 230 people arrested in one week

Published

on

By

Met Police crackdown sees 1,000 stolen phones seized and 230 people arrested in one week

The Met Police has stepped up its efforts to clamp down on phone thieves, seizing 1,000 stolen mobiles and arresting 230 people in one week.

During a week of co-ordinated action across London, the capital’s police force specifically targeted and clamped down on phone thieves.

This included action in hot spot areas, like the West End and Westminster where nearly 40% of thefts occur, it said.

One of two e-bike thieves arrested and convicted as part of the Met Police's crackdown on phone thieves.
Pic: Met Police
Image:
One of two e-bike thieves arrested and convicted as part of the Met Police’s crackdown on phone thieves.
Pic: Met Police

A man being arrested during the Met Police's week-long crackdown on phone thefts.
Pic: Met Police
Image:
A man being arrested during the Met Police’s week-long crackdown on phone thefts.
Pic: Met Police

The Met Police described it as a £50million-a-year trade that saw stolen phones resold abroad and in the UK.

Later on Thursday, the Home Secretary will chair a summit with law enforcement bodies to focus on tackling smartphone thefts.

One of the issues the Met Police wants to raise is with tech companies improving security on devices so stolen phones cannot be easily resold.

Increased patrols in Westminster saw 17 arrests for robbery and theft, following 42 stop and searches.

More on Metropolitan Police

Phone thief admits stealing 24 mobiles in one morning before police ram him off bike
‘Snatch thefts’ of bags and mobiles on streets of England and Wales more than double

In Hackney and Haringey, officers made 15 arrests connected to the operation, including a 15-year-old boy on an illegal electric bike who was found with a large knife and £1,000 cash.

Other operations included arresting two e-bike thieves, who were later sentenced to a combined five years, for phone thefts.

Alongside that, they executed a warrant at a second-hand phone shop where they suspected stolen mobiles were.

Read more from Sky News:
Teenagers died after car crashed into tree
‘Unauthorised, unqualified and uninformed’: Daniel Khalife jailed
Kay Burley announces she is leaving Sky News

Commander Owain Richards, who is leading the Met’s response to phone thefts, said: “We are seeing phone thefts on an industrial scale, fuelled by criminals making millions by being able to easily sell on stolen devices either here or abroad.

“By intensifying our efforts we’re catching more perpetrators and protecting people from having their phone stolen in the capital.

“But we need help from partners and industry to do more.

“That is why we’re working with other agencies and government to tackle the organised criminality driving this trade and calling on tech companies to make stolen phones unusable.”

Kaya Comer-Schwartz, London’s Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, said personal robbery was down 13% on the same period last year.

Continue Reading

UK

Starmer to slash red tape to build nuclear reactors

Published

on

By

Starmer to slash red tape to build nuclear reactors

Planning rules will be ripped up to make it easier to build new nuclear reactors and create thousands of highly skilled jobs, the government has announced.

The reforms are the latest in a series of proposals designed to “get Britain building” to help grow the economy, after powers for environmental quangos to delay infrastructure projects were removed.

The UK was the first country in the world to develop a nuclear reactor but the last time a power station was built was in 1995.

Ministers have blamed this on “suffocating” red tape, leaving the UK lagging behind in the global race for cleaner more affordable energy.

Under moves announced today, mini-nuclear power stations known as small modular reactors (SMRs) will be included in the national planning guidance, allowing them to be built in the UK for the first time.

SMRs are considered to be cheaper, quicker to manufacture and safer than conventional nuclear power plants, so industry experts see them as having an important role in efforts to decarbonise.

More on Nuclear

Other reforms include:

• Scrapping a list which currently limits nuclear development to eight specific sites

• Removing the expiry date on nuclear planning rules so projects don’t get timed out

• Establishing a new Nuclear Regulatory Taskforce to look at further ways to build nuclear plants quicker and cheaper, which will report directly to the prime minister

Unions and business groups have welcomed the announcement, but environmentalists were critical.

The changes come amid long-term struggles to get two existing nuclear projects over the line.

Only one nuclear power plant, Hinkley Point C in Somerset, is under construction in the UK – but its completion date has been delayed by years with the French company developing it blaming this on inflation, labour shortages and Brexit disruption.

The government also pointed to the need for a 30,000-page environmental assessment required to get planning permission, saying in its announcement today that Britain “has been suffocated by regulations”, which is harming investment.

A separate project, Sizewell C in Suffolk, has also been hit by delays and rising costs before a spade has even hit the ground.

By comparison China is constructing 29 reactors, and the EU has 12 at planning stage.

UK ‘let down and left behind’

Embargoed to 2230 Monday June 5..Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer during a visit to Hinkley Point nuclear power station in Somerset as part of his party's work on making Britain a clean energy superpower to create jobs, cut bills and boost energy security. Picture date: Monday June 5, 2023. PA Photo. See PA story POLITICS Nuclear. Photo credit should read: Ben Birchall/PA Wire
Image:
Starmer during a visit to Hinkley Point nuclear power station. Pic: PA

Sir Keir Starmer said: “This country hasn’t built a nuclear power station in decades. We’ve been let down and left behind.

“I’m putting an end to it – changing the rules to back the builders of this nation, and saying no to the blockers who have who have strangled our chances of cheaper energy, growth and jobs for far too long.”

The announcement builds on a Labour manifesto commitment to “end a decade of dithering” on nuclear power as part of broader plans to make Britain a clean energy superpower by 2030 – with cheaper bills and better energy security.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said that nuclear power will create “thousands of skilled jobs” and prevent the UK being vulnerable to global energy markets in the future.

“Build, build, build – that is what Britain’s clean energy mission is all about,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

’20 years’ to deliver GB Energy jobs

Some environmentalist groups dispute nuclear power’s green credentials though, saying that while it doesn’t produce carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases, it isn’t a plausible alternative to renewable energy sources – like wind and solar.

Dr Doug Parr, policy director for Greenpeace UK, said: “The Labour government has swallowed nuclear industry spin whole, seemingly without applying so much as a pinch of critical scrutiny or asking for a sprinkling of evidence.”

Unions were welcoming of the announcement’s potential to create jobs and deliver net zero, but said it should go alongside the complete go-ahead for Sizewall C.

And Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, said: “This is the prime minister’s strongest signal yet that new nuclear is critical to the growth and clean power mission.

“A more streamlined planning system will give certainty to investors, the supply chain and communities, and will enable us to get on with building new nuclear plants on more sites and at pace for a cleaner, more secure power system.”

Continue Reading

Trending