Connect with us

Published

on

This month, Foxconn pulled out of its joint venture with Vedanta. The two sides “mutually agreed to part ways,” Foxconn said in a statement at the time.

Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

Foxconn is best known as the main assembler of Apple’s iPhones. But in last couple of years, the Taiwanese firm has made a push into semiconductors, betting that the rise of technologies like artificial intelligence will boost demand for these chips.

But Foxconn’s semiconductor foray has had a tough start, highlighting the difficulty for new players to enter a market dominated by established firms with huge experience and a highly intricate supply chain.

“The industry presents newcomers with high barriers to entry, mainly high levels of capital intensity and access to coveted intellectual property,” Gabriel Perez, ICT analyst at BMI, a unit at Fitch Group, told CNBC via email.

“Established players such as TSMC, Samsung or Micron count with several decades of R&D (research and development), process engineering and trillions of dollars in investment to reach their current capabilities.”

Why is Foxconn getting into semiconductors?

Read more about tech and crypto from CNBC Pro

Neil Shah, vice president of research at Counterpoint Research, said Foxconn’s push into semiconductors is about diversifying its business, and the company’s decision to launch an electric car unit is part of that plan. Its aim is to become a “one stop shop” for electronics and automotive companies, Shah said.

If Foxconn could assemble electronics and manufacture chips, it would be a very unique and competitive business.

Why India?

Foxconn looked to India for its joint venture with Vedanta because the country’s government is looking to boost its domestic semiconductor industry and bring manufacturing on shore.

“Foxconn’s decision to establish a JV in India responds to two key trends – one of them being the market’s growing role as a consumer electronics manufacturing hub, the second one being India’s ambitions – mirroring other major markets such as the US, the EU and Mainland China – to develop its domestic semiconductor industry through public subsidies and regulatory incentives,” BMI’s Perez said.

What went wrong for Foxconn?

It’s hard to break into chipmaking

Foxconn’s hurdles point to a broader issue — it’s hard for newcomers to get into semiconductor manufacturing.

The manufacturing of chips is dominated by one player — Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, better known as TSMC — which has a 59% market share in the foundry segment, according to Counterpoint Research.

TSMC doesn’t design its own chips. Instead, it makes these components for other companies like Apple. TSMC has had more than two decades of experience and billions of dollars of investment to get to where it is.

TSMC also relies on a complex supply chain of companies that make critical tools to allow it to manufacture the most advanced chips in the world.

Foxconn and Vedanta’s effort appeared to rely heavily on STMicro, but once the European company bailed, the joint venture was without much expertise in semiconductors.

“Both companies … lacked the core competency of manufacturing a chip,” Counterpoint Research’s Shah said, adding that they were dependent on third-party technology and intellectual property.

Foxconn’s attempts to crack the semiconductor space highlight how difficult it is for a new entrant to do so — even for a $47.9 billion giant.

“The semiconductor market is highly concentrated with few players which have taken more than two decades to evolve to this point,” Shah said, adding that there are high barriers to entry, such as large amounts of investment and specialized labor.

“On an average, it takes more than two decades to be at the level of skill and scale to be a successful semiconductor manufacturing (fab) company.”

Continue Reading

Technology

U.S. firms scramble to secure rare-earth magnets — imports from China surge 660%

Published

on

By

U.S. firms scramble to secure rare-earth magnets — imports from China surge 660%

Annealed neodymium iron boron magnets sit in a barrel at a Neo Material Technologies Inc. factory in Tianjin, China on June 11, 2010.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

China’s exports of rare-earth magnets to the United States in June surged more than seven times from the prior month, as American firms clamor to get hold of the critical elements following a preliminary Sino-U.S. trade deal.

In April, Beijing placed restrictions on several critical magnets, used in advanced tech such as electric vehicles, wind turbines and MRI machines, requiring firms to receive licenses for export. The move was seen as retaliation against U.S. President Donald Trump’s steep tariffs on China. 

Beijing has a stranglehold on the production of rare-earth magnets, with an estimated 90% of the market, as well as a similar hold on the refining of rare-earth elements, which are used to make magnets. 

The U.S. received about 353 metric tons of rare-earth permanent magnets in June, up 660% from the previous month, data released by China’s General Administration of Customs showed, though the exports were about half that from June last year.

The U.S. was the second-largest destination for China’s rare-earth magnets, behind Germany, as it relies heavily on their imports for its large manufacturing sector, particularly automotive, electronics and renewable energy. 

In total, China exported 3,188 metric tons of rare earth permanent magnets globally last month, up nearly 160% from May, but 38% lower compared with the same period last year.

The growth in exports came after Washington and Beijing agreed last month on a trade framework that included easing controls on Chinese rare-earth exports as well as a rollback of some American tech restrictions for shipments to China. 

Pentagon invests in MP Materials, guarantees floor price for rare earth minerals

AI behemoth Nvidia said last week it was planning to resume shipments of its H20 AI chips to China, after the exports were restricted in April. Last month, controls on American AI chip software companies’ business in China had also been rolled back.

Chinese rare-earth magnet producers started announcing the approval of export licenses last month.

If exports continue to increase, it will be of great benefit to companies that have been suffering from shortages of magnets due to the lengthy time required to secure export licenses. For example, several European auto-parts suppliers were forced to halt production in recent months. 

The magnet shortages had also hit emerging industries such as humanoid robotics. In April, Elon Musk said production of Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robots had been disrupted

China’s controls on its rare-earths sector have prompted some global governments to reexamine their rare-earth supply chains and search for ways to support domestic mining of the minerals. 

However, experts say that setting up alternatives to China’s rare-earth magnet supply chain could take years, as it requires an intricate process of rare-earth element refining and separation. 

“The separation process is quite complex, and China has a lot of advantages in this after putting in decades of research into the processes,” Yue Wang, a senior consultant of rare earths at Wood Mackenzie, told CNBC last month. 

One way that the U.S. has been trying to compensate for lack of rare-earth magnets is through increased recycling. Apple and miner MP Materials announced a $500 million deal last week for the development of a recycling facility that will reinforce the iPhone maker’s U.S. magnet supply chain.

Peter Alexander from financial consultancy Z-ben Advisors said that Washington’s latest concessions on tech restrictions were a reflection of just how much leverage China has in its trade relationship with the United States, speaking on CNBC’s “China Connection” on Monday.

Continue Reading

Technology

How Huawei ascended from telecoms to become China’s ‘jack of all trades’ AI leader

Published

on

By

How Huawei ascended from telecoms to become China's 'jack of all trades' AI leader

The Huawei booth at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, 2025.

Arjun Kharpal | CNBC

Despite being beaten down by years of U.S. trade restrictions, China’s telecom giant Huawei has quietly emerged as one of the country’s fiercest competitors across the entire AI landscape.  

Not only does the Shenzhen-based firm appear to represent Beijing’s answer to American AI chip darling Nvidia, but it has also been an early adopter of monetizing artificial intelligence models in industrial applications. 

“Huawei has been forced to shift and expand its core business focus over the past decade… due to a variety of external pressures on the company,” said Paul Triolo, partner and senior vice president for China at advisory firm DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group.

This expansion has seen the company get involved in everything from smart cars and operating systems to the technologies needed for the AI boom, such as advanced semiconductors, data centers, chips and large language models. 

“No other technology company has been able to be competent in so many different sectors with high levels of complexity and barriers to entry,” Triolo said. 

This year, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has become increasingly vocal in calling Huawei “one of the most formidable technology companies in the world.” He has also warned that Huawei will replace Nvidia in China if Washington continues to restrict U.S. chip firms’ exports to the Asian country.

Nvidia surpassed $4 trillion in market capitalization last week to become the world’s most valuable company. Its cutting-edge processors and a related “CUDA” computing system remain the industry standard for training generative AI models and applications. 

But that moat may be narrowing, as Huawei proves that it not only does it all, it does it well. While challenging American AI stalwarts like Nvidia is a tall order, the company’s history shows why it can’t be counted out.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls Huawei a formidable competitor

Telephone switches to national champion

Huawei, which now employs more than 208,000 people across over 170 markets, came from humble beginnings. Founded by ambitious entrepreneur Ren Zhengfei in 1987 out of an apartment in Shenzhen, the firm started as a small telephone switch distributor.

As it grew into a telecoms player, it gained traction by targeting less developed markets such as Africa, the Middle East, Russia and South America, before eventually expanding to places like Europe.

By 2019, Huawei would be well-positioned to capitalize on the global 5G rollout, becoming a leader in the market. Around this time, it had also blossomed into one of the world’s largest smartphone manufacturers and was even designing smartphone chips through its chip design subsidiary, HiSilicon. 

But Huawei’s success also attracted increasing scrutiny from governments outside China, particularly the U.S., which has frequently accused Huawei’s technology of posing a national security threat. The Chinese company has refuted such risks

The export controls have ironically pushed Huawei into the arms of the Chinese government in a way that CEO Ren Zhengfei always resisted.

Paul Triolo

partner and senior vice president for China at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group

Huawei’s business suffered a major setback in 2019 when it was placed on a U.S. trade blacklist, preventing American companies from doing business with it. 

As the impact of the sanctions kicked in, Huawei’s consumer business – once the company’s largest by revenue – halved to about $34 billion in 2021 from the year before.

The company still managed a breakthrough on AI chips, and pressed ahead despite additional U.S. restrictions in 2020 that cut the company off from chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. A year earlier, Huawei officially launched its Ascend 910 AI processing chip as part of a strategy to build a “full-stack, all-scenario AI portfolio” and to become a provider of AI computing power.

But the U.S. targeting of Huawei also had the effect of turning the company into a martyr-like figure in China, building upon attention it received in 2018 when Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s CFO and daughter of Ren, was arrested in Canada for alleged violations of Iran sanctions.

As the U.S.-China tech war continued to expand and broad advanced chip restrictions were placed on China, Huawei was an obvious choice to become a national champion in the race, with more impetus and state backing for its AI plans. 

“The export controls have ironically pushed Huawei into the arms of the Chinese government in a way that CEO Ren Zhengfei always resisted,” Triolo said. In this way, the restrictions also became “the steroids” for Huawei’s AI hardware and software stack.

The comeback 

After another year of declining sales in the consumer segment, the unit started to turn around in 2023 with the release of a smartphone that analysts said contained an advanced chip made in China. 

The 5G chip came as a shock to many in the U.S., who didn’t expect Huawei to reach that level of advancement so quickly without TSMC. Instead, Huawei was reportedly working with Chinese chipmaker SMIC, a company that has also been blacklisted by the U.S.

While semiconductor analysts said the scale that Huawei and SMIC could produce these chips was severely limited, Huawei nonetheless had proved it was back in the advanced chip game. 

It was also around this time that reports began surfacing about Huawei’s new AI processor chip, the Ascend 910B, with the company looking to seize upon gaps left by export controls on Nvidia’s most advanced chips. Mass production of the next-generation 910C is reportedly already on the way. 

Weekly analysis and insights from Asia’s largest economy in your inbox
Subscribe now

To fill the void left by Nvidia, Huawei “has been making big strides in replicating the performance of high-end GPUs using combinations of lower chips,” said Jeffrey Towson, managing partner at TechMoat Consulting.

In April, Huawei unveiled its “AI CloudMatrix 384”, a system that links 384 Ascend 910C chips in a cluster within data centers. Analysts have said CloudMatrix is able to outperform Nvidia’s system, the GB200 NVL72, on some metrics.

Huawei isn’t just catching up, “it’s redefining how AI infrastructure works,” Forrester analysts said in a report last month about CloudMatrix.

Meanwhile, Huawei has also developed its own “CANN” software system that acts as an alternative to Nvidia’s CUDA

“Winning the AI race isn’t just about faster chips. It also includes delivering the tools developers need to build and deploy large-scale models,” Forrester’s report said, though authors noted that Huawei’s products are still not integrated enough with other commonly used tools for developers to switch over quickly from Nvidia.

The ‘Ascend Ecosystem Strategy’

Jensen Huang: China is not behind the U.S. in AI development

These data centers, in turn, have provided the training capabilities and computing power used by Huawei’s suite of AI models under its Pangu series. 

Unlike other general-purpose AI models like OpenAI’s GPT-4 or Google’s Gemini Ultra 1.0, Huawei’s Pangu model is designed to support more industry-specific applications across the medical, finance, government, industrial and automotive sectors. Pangu has already been applied in more than 20 industries over the last year, the company said last month

Rolling out such AI applications often involves having Huawei tech staff working for months at the project site, even if it’s in a remote coal mine, Jack Chen, vice president of the marketing department for Huawei’s oil, gas and mining business unit, which provides digital and intelligent solutions to transform these industries, told CNBC.

That research enabled the company in May to deploy more 100 electric-powered trucks that can autonomously transport dirt or coal using the telecom company’s 5G network, AI and cloud computing services.

And it’s not limited to China. The technology can “be replicated on a large scale in Central Asia, Latin America, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific,” Chen said.

Huawei has also open-sourced the Pangu models, in a move it said would help it expand overseas and further its “Ascend ecosystem strategy,” which refers to its AI products built around its Ascend chips.

Speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia” on Thursday, Patrick Moorhead of Moor Insights & Strategy said he expected Huawei to push Ascend in countries part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative — an investment and development project aimed at emerging markets. 

Over a period of five to 10 years, the company could begin to build serious market share in these countries, in the same way it once did with its telecommunications business, he added.

Continue Reading

Technology

Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay kiss-cam controversy

Published

on

By

Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay kiss-cam controversy

Chris Martin of Coldplay performs at the O2 Shepherd’s Bush Empire on October 12, 2021 in London, England.

Simone Joyner | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

Astronomer, the technology company that faced backlash after its CEO was allegedly caught in an affair at a Coldplay concert, said the CEO has resigned, the company announced Saturday.

“Andy Byron has tendered his resignation, and the Board of Directors has accepted,” the company said in a statement. “The Board will begin a search for our next Chief Executive as Cofounder and Chief Product Officer Pete DeJoy continues to serve as interim CEO.”

Byron was shown on a big screen at a Coldplay concert on Wednesday with his arms around the company’s chief people officer, Kristin Cabot. Byron, who is married with children, immediately hid when the couple was shown on screen. Lead singer Chris Martin said, “Either they’re having an affair or they’re just very shy.” A concert attendee’s video of the affair went viral.

In May, Astronomer announced a $93 million investment round led by Bain Ventures and other investors, including Salesforce Ventures.

Byron’s resignation comes after Astronomer said Friday that it had launched a “formal investigation” into the matter, and the CEO was placed on administrative leave.

“Before this week, we were known as a pioneer in the DataOps space, helping data teams power everything from modern analytics to production AI,” the company said in its Saturday statement. “Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met.”

Continue Reading

Trending