Construction workers have one of the highest suicide rates compared to all other professions but a new international initiative hopes to combat the crisis devastating this segment of the blue-collar population.
Male construction workers are about four times more likely than the general population to end their own lives, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That accounts for 20% of suicides by occupation in the UK and in the US, the situation is just as bad.
It’s the second-highest rate of all industries, at 45 suicides per 100,000 workers, second only to the mining and oil-gas extraction industries.
“Construction workers cope with unique causes of stress,” said Doug Parker, assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health for the US Department of Labor, in a statement. These mounting stresses include “uncertain seasonal work; remote work and job travel that keeps workers away from home and support systems; long, hard days and the job-related risks of serious injuries, Parker said.
Construction employment in the New York City metro area which includes Long Island, lower Hudson Valley and Long Island totaled 373,800 jobs, per the latest state comptroller data. That’s amount represents 4.7% of all construction jobs in the US.
Previous CDC research analyzing 2017-2020 data from the National Violent Death Reporting System indicated “suicide risk is associated with low-skilled work, lower education, lower absolute and relative socioeconomic status, work-related access to lethal means and job stress, including poor supervisory and colleague support, low job control and job insecurity.”
However, hope is on the horizon: A just announced collaboration between the global electricity and gas company National Grid and the UK’s University of Warwick hopes to resolve some of the life-threatening mental health obstacles faced by construction workers.
A beta facility named “the Health Hub,” set up on a construction site in Kent, England, includes a gym, social spaces, one-to-one wellbeing coaching, health awareness events and a canteen with free healthy meals.
Several workers reported that the on-site facilities made life easier by helping them better balance their work and mental health without having to give up time spent with friends and families.
Workers also reported more chances to make healthy lifestyle choices and experiencing improved morale, a sense of appreciation from their employer and more awareness of mental health support systems.
Alongside the inaugural Health Hub, researchers at the University of Warwick Medical School conducted an analysis of the issues faced by construction workers, who described how long working hours taxed their physical and mental health and strained their family life, as well as the stigma surrounding mental health issues.
“It was eye-opening to learn about the extent of the challenges faced by workers in the construction industry and the spiraling consequences this can have on their livelihood and wellbeing,” research assistant Sophie Tyerman of the Warwick Medical School said in a statement.
“What stood out from the participant interviews was the camaraderie and peer support workers provided each other, given they often see their colleagues more than their own families,” Tyerman added.
“When it comes to construction facilities those on site tend to be contractors,” said Emma Ford, construction director for National Grid, which provides utilities to the UK and the northeastern US.
“This can mean that they dont receive the same kind of benefits that our people do. The Health Hub was designed to help change that.”
If you are struggling with suicidal thoughts or are experiencing a mental health crisis and live in New York City, you can call 1-888-NYC-WELL for free and confidential crisis counseling. If you live outside the five boroughs, you can dial the 24/7 National Suicide Prevention hotline at 1-800-273-8255 or go to SuicidePreventionLifeline.org.
Donald Trump declared a questionable “national energy emergency” when he entered the White House. Soon, he may have one for real.
The president promised his America would “drill, baby drill” to new levels of prosperity by making the most of its reserves of oil and gas.
Mr Trump has now axed hundreds of billions in tax breaks and grants for low-carbon power and clean energy research and given them instead to fossil fuel investments.
Image: Construction continues on Revolution Wind but the project is not yet connected to the grid. Pic: Reuters
There’s no better example than Revolution Wind, one of the largest offshore renewable energy projects in America.
Nearly 80% complete, the White House ordered an immediate halt.
When we visited, the massive 200m-wide turbines were going round – a temporary injunction has allowed construction to continue – but they’re not yet connected to the grid.
As long as Mr Trump is in power, it’s not certain they’ll ever be.
More on Climate Change
Related Topics:
The future of other major wind and solar developments is also in doubt, as is more than $100bn (£75bn) in clean energy investment.
There’s less doubt about the fossil fuel business however. The industry is getting what it asked for after backing Mr Trump’s re-election.
US energy secretary Chris Wright and many key White House staff and advisers are former fossil fuel industry insiders.
Analysis for Sky News, by Global Witness, reveals that since the Paris Agreement was signed in 2015, US oil and gas production has grown five times faster than the average of the world’s next largest producers.
An increase that really took off during Mr Trump’s first presidency.
The analysis of company data goes on to reveal how US oil and gas production is now forecast to continue growing – by 2035 to double that of its next closest rival, Russia.
“Instead of reducing investment in dirty oil and gas, the principal drivers of climate breakdown, the US has doubled down on fossil fuels, ramping up production,” said Patrick Galey, of Global Witness.
A fact that would probably be music to the president’s ears and to many conservative Americans who voted for him.
Image: US oil and gas production is forecast to grow to double that of Russia’s by 2035
Mr Trump’s “energy emergency” was perhaps a predictable response to the “climate emergency” invoked by his political rivals.
The only problem is, apart from accelerating global warming, his energy plan is on course to make America worse off.
‘US energy demand to grow 25%’
For the first time in years, US electricity demand has been going up. It is driven in part by a race to build power-hungry data centres – further encouraged by Mr Trump’s aim for American supremacy in AI.
Demand is rising and renewable energy is the quickest, cheapest way to meet it.
Image: Data centres require vast amounts of power. Pic: Reuters
President Trump has championed supremacy in AI – backing investments in and clearing red tape for massive energy-hungry data centres.
After declining, then remaining stable for years, US energy demand is now forecast to grow 25% by 2030, according to analysis by ICF International.
But where will all the electricity come from?
We went to Mitsubishi Power, which makes state-of- the-art gas turbines for power stations at its factory outside Savannah, Georgia.
Demand for new turbines has never been greater, according to Bill Newsom, the US CEO. Wait times for new turbines is now double what it was just two years ago.
Image: Mitsubishi makes gas turbines for power stations at its factory outside Savannah, Georgia
And while America will need gas to meet rising demand – it’s twice as clean as coal and provides “baseload” power that renewable energy grids can’t yet match – it can’t be built fast enough.
American businesses, including AI, will likely suffer because they can’t get the power they need.
US consumers – who Mr Trump promised lower bills – will end up paying more because he also made renewable energy more expensive.
And that’s to say nothing of the impact on carbon emissions.
The speed of transition being called for to meet the 1.5C Paris target was always going to be very expensive, as countries like the UK are finding out.
But by fighting one “emergency” with another, Mr Trump risks making Americans – and the climate – worse off.
A new theory suggests dark matter and dark energy may not exist. Physicist Rajendra Gupta’s model proposes that the universe’s forces weaken over time, naturally explaining cosmic expansion and galactic motion without unseen matter or energy.
A New York jury was unable to reach a verdict in the case of Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, the MIT-educated brothers accused of fraud and money laundering related to a 2023 exploit of the Ethereum blockchain that resulted in the removal of $25 million in digital assets.
In a Friday ruling, US District Judge Jessica Clarke declared a mistrial in the case after jurors failed to agree on whether to convict or acquit the brothers, Inner City Press reported.
The decision came after a three-week trial in Manhattan federal court, resulting in differing theories from prosecutors and the defense regarding the Peraire-Buenos’ alleged actions involving maximal extractable value (MEV) bots.
A MEV attack occurs when traders or validators exploit transaction ordering on a blockchain for profit. Using automated MEV bots, they front-run or sandwich other trades by paying higher fees for priority.
In the brothers’ case, they allegedly used MEV bots to “trick” users into trades. The exploit, though planned by the two for months, reportedly took just 12 seconds to net the pair $25 million.
In closing arguments to the jury this week, prosecutors argued that the brothers “tricked” and “defrauded” users by engaging in a “bait and switch” scheme, allowing them to extract about $25 million in crypto. They cited evidence suggesting that the two plotted their moves for months and researched potential consequences of their actions.
“Ladies and gentlemen, bait and switch is not a trading strategy,” said prosecutors on Tuesday, according to Inner City Press. “It is fraud. It is cheating. It is rigging the system. They pretended to be a legitimate MEV-Boost validator.”
In contrast, defense lawyers for the Peraire-Buenos pushed back against the US government’s theory of the two pretending to be “honest validators” to extract the funds, though the court ultimately allowed the argument to be presented to the jury.
“This is like stealing a base in baseball,” said the defense team on Tuesday. “If there’s no fraud, there’s no conspiracy, there’s no money laundering.”
What’s at stake for the crypto industry following the verdict?
Though the case ended without a verdict, the mistrial has left the crypto industry divided, with many observers debating the legal and technical implications of treating MEV-related activity as a potential criminal offense. Crypto advocacy organization Coin Center filed an amicus brief on Monday after opposition from prosecutors.
“I don’t think what’s in the indictment constitutes wire fraud,” said Carl Volz, a partner at law firm Gunnercooke, in a Monday op-ed for DLNews. “A jury could conclude differently, but if it does, it’ll be because the brothers googled stupidly and talked too much, for too long, with the wrong people.”