The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a set of sweeping changes to the rules governing the use of “optimization functions” by brokers in a committee vote on July 26.
We have an upcoming @SECGov Open Meeting on July 26 | 10am ET
We’ll be discussing: 1⃣Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, & Incident Disclosure 2⃣Use of Predictive Data Analytics 3⃣Exemption for Certain Internet Advisers From the Prohibition Against Registration
During an internal meeting streamed on the SEC’s website, Chairman Gary Gensler invoked everything from his disdain for the color green to his feelings on romantic comedies while advocating for the changes that essentially seek to prohibit brokers from using “optimization functions,” or data analytics tools, to their benefit.
A fact sheet published on the SEC website on July 26 states that the “covered technology” includes “a firm’s use of analytical, technological, or computational functions, algorithms, models, correlation matrices, or similar methods or processes.”
The fact sheet states that the use of the covered technologies could constitute a conflict of interest through any investor interaction or communication, “including by exercising discretion with respect to an investor’s account, providing information to an investor, or soliciting an investor.”
SEC commissioners and Chairman Gary Gensler signaling their votes. Source: SEC website
Commissioner Mark Uyeda pointed out during the discussion that laws already existed covering the myriad potential conflicts of interest that could arise between brokers and the investors they represent. Uyeda ultimately declined to support the proposed rule changes.
Gensler acknowledged the existing rules but added that the shifting technological landscape called for an update.
In defending the need for change, Gensler related a story about his childhood:
“My mom used to dress my identical twin brother Rob in red and me in green. You say, ‘Rob Red, Gary Green.’ I might not act as favorably to green prompts. I love [my mother], but maybe a little too much green for me.”
Citing his personal disdain for green and disclosing to the panel that he’s “kind of a rom-com guy,” Gensler appeared to relate that his personal preferences — something ostensibly discoverable via predictive data analytics — were analogous to a broker using data to target and lure potential investors.
The proposal passed in a 3-2 vote along party lines, with Commissioner Hester Peirce dissenting alongside fellow Republican Uyeda.
As it stands, the rules updates would only apply to cryptocurrency and digital assets transactions made through a broker-dealer registered with the SEC.
According to the SEC, “no crypto asset entity is registered with the SEC as a national securities exchange (like, for example, the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market). And no existing national securities exchange currently trades crypto asset securities.”
Next, the updates will be published in the Federal Register. Citizens will have 60 days from the document’s publication to submit comments before the committee holds a final vote.
Canada’s equities regulator has excluded crypto funds from reduced margin eligibility, citing volatility, liquidity risks and regulatory concerns, making leveraged trading more expensive.
Grenfell campaigners have reacted to the “deeply sensitive decision” by the deputy prime minister to demolish the tower block.
Victims’ families and survivors were given the news in a meeting attended by Angela Rayner on Wednesday night.
Grenfell Next of Kin, which represents some of the bereaved families, described it as a “deeply sensitive decision… after a thorough engagement process in person” following an “uncomfortable conversation with uncomfortable truths”.
In a statement on X the group said: “The lack of closure, the continuous discussions and consultations, the retraumatisation of a divisive and painful debate brings nothing to the table except pain and further division.
“We want a discussion about what will go in the Tower’s place so it can be seen and remembered forever. We need to re-imagine a future and rebuild our broken shattered lives and our families.”
The government has previously said there will be no changes to the site before the eighth anniversary of the fire disaster, which claimed 72 lives on 14 June 2017.
It is expected more details will be set out by ministers by the end of the week.
More on Grenfell Tower
Related Topics:
Engineering experts have said that while the tower remains stable, and it is safe for people to live, work and study nearby, its condition will worsen over time and there is no realistic prospect of bringing it back into use.
The latest advice issued to the government in September was that the building, or the part of it that was significantly damaged, should be taken down.
Image: Grenfell Tower pictured days after the devastating fire. Pic: AP
Meanwhile, another campaign group, Grenfell United, claimed Ms Rayner had not given a reason behind her decision during the meeting and refused to say how many of the victims’ families and survivors had been consulted.
In a statement, it said: “But judging from the room alone – the vast majority of whom were bereaved – no one supported her decision. But she claims her decision is based on our views.
“Ignoring the voices of bereaved on the future of our loved ones’ gravesite is disgraceful and unforgivable.”
Image: Members of a support group for the next of kin and families of some the 72 people killed in the Grenfell Tower fire. Pic: PA
Grenfell Next of Kin expressed a different opinion, suggesting the decision by Ms Rayner “must have been difficult” and adding that “all the previous Secretaries of State [for Housing, Communities and Local Government] avoided making a decision despite the harm it did to us and the community.”
Local Labour MP Joe Powell also defended Ms Rayner posting on X that following “intensive engagement with our community… the decision to start planning for the Tower to come down has not been taken lightly”.
What is left of the tower has stood in place since the tragedy, with a covering on the building featuring a large green heart accompanied by the words “forever in our hearts”.
Views have varied on what should happen to the site.
Some of the bereaved and survivors feel the tower should remain in place until there are criminal prosecutions over the failings which led to the disaster.
The final report of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, published in September, concluded the fire was the result of “decades of failure” by government and the construction industry to act on the dangers of flammable materials on high-rise buildings.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:43
Key takeaways from the Grenfell Inquiry
The west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the “systematic dishonesty” of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said.
He said the “simple truth” is that all the deaths were avoidable and that those who lived in the tower were “badly failed” by authorities “in most cases through incompetence but, in some cases, through dishonesty and greed”.
It would mean a near 10-year wait for justice if anyone is ultimately charged – a period of time described by families as “unbearable”.
The disaster was Britain’s deadliest residential fire since the Second World War and began a national reckoning over the safety and conditions of social housing and tower blocks.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:45
September 2024: Grenfell community ‘brave and hopeful’
Separately, the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower.
A shortlist of five potential design teams was announced last month, with a winner expected to be selected this summer to enable a planning application to be submitted in late 2026.
A government spokesperson said: “The priority for the deputy prime minister is to meet with and write to the bereaved, survivors and the immediate community to let them know her decision on the future of the Grenfell Tower.
“This is a deeply personal matter for all those affected, and the deputy prime minister is committed to keeping their voice at the heart of this.”
The Conservative Party is pledging to tighten immigration rules after Reform topped a landmark poll for the first time earlier this week.
In her first major policy announcement as Tory Party leader,Kemi Badenochis pledging to double the amount of time an immigrant needs to have been in the UK before claiming indefinite leave to remain from five to 10 years.
In order to claim indefinite leave to remain after 10 years, the individual must also meet new, tightened conditions.
These include not having claimed benefits or used social housing during the entire qualification period, not having a criminal record and being able to demonstrate that their household would be a “net contributor”.
Ms Badenoch accused Labour of being “not serious about tackling immigration” and said there needs to be a “new approach”.
“Our country is not a dormitory, it’s our home,” she said.
“The right to citizenship and permanent residency should only go to those who have demonstrated a real commitment to the UK. That’s why we should double the length of time before people can qualify for indefinite leave to remain from five to 10 years.
More on Conservatives
Related Topics:
“The Conservative Party is under new leadership. We’re going to tell the hard truths about immigration.
“The pace of immigration has been too quick and the numbers coming too high for meaningful integration. We need to slow down the track for citizenship. A UK passport should be a privilege not an automatic right.
“Far from reducing the number of people coming into Britain, the Labour government are presiding over an incoming disaster.
“The Border Security Bill will actually make it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the UK, let alone legal migrants. No one can trust Labour on immigration.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:11
Reform UK tops landmark poll
The poll, taken on 2 February and 3 February, showed Nigel Farage’s party has edged in front on 25%, with Labour pushed into second on 24% and the Tories on 21%.
It also put the Lib Dems on 14% and Greens on 9%.
All the polling moves that push Reform UK to the top for the first time this week are within the margin of error and the overall picture remains unchanged – with Britain in a new period of three party politics in the polls.
According to the poll, one in five Tory voters at the last election would now vote for Reform.
The Sky News/YouGov poll also found Kemi Badenoch has slipped behind Nigel Farage when voters are asked whether they have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of the leaders.
Image: Kemi Badenoch has fallen behind Nigel Farage in terms of net favourability rating. Pic: PA
Last month, Badenoch had a net favourability rating of -25, but that has now dropped to -29 this month.
This puts her below Farage, who had a net favourability rating of -32 last month, which has now risen to -27 this month.
Labour’s border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: “While [the Conservatives] scramble around for relevance, this Labour government is getting on with clearing up the mess they left behind – raising deportations, returns and removals to the highest rate in six years, increasing the number of illegal working raids and cutting the costs of the asylum system.”