Members of the United States House Financial Services Committee seem to be divided on the best legislative path forward dealing with regulatory clarity for crypto and blockchain technology.
In a July 26 markup hearing, the committee had several bills on its agenda, including the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, and Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023 — all directly related to addressing the regulation of cryptocurrencies. Many lawmakers supported the first bill, claiming it would help address another failure like the collapse of the FTX exchange, while others criticized the measure as favoring crypto firms over consumers.
Committee chair Patrick McHenry said the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act would help clarify the authority the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission had over payment stablecoins. However, ranking member Maxine Waters and others claimed the bill would still allow for the commingling of customer funds — as allegedly happened between FTX and Alameda Research — and required the development of an “entirely new regulatory structure” rather than relying on existing securities laws.
Key changes include:
✅ Revisions to pre-registration oversight of intermediaries ✅ Fine-tuned registration requirements ✅ Clarifies SEC & CFTC authority for payment stablecoins ✅ Increased CFTC funding
— Financial Services GOP (@FinancialCmte) July 25, 2023
The debate concerning the bill was not entirely split along party lines. Democratic Representative Jim Himes acknowledged that the legislation could have prevented the collapse of FTX, but also expressed ignorance about certain aspects of the crypto space, including the recent ruling in the SEC v. Ripple lawsuit on XRP (XRP) as a security. Massachusetts Representative Stephen Lynch referred to the bill as the “worst piece of legislation that has been presented for markup” in his roughly 20 years in government.
House Republicans said the bill would offer $120 million in funding to the CFTC to build up its resources addressing regulation of the crypto space, but some Democrats objected to how the funds would be redirected from the SEC, potentially limiting its capacity for enforcement. At the time of publication, lawmakers continued to debate the bills and proposed amendments, with a vote expected on July 26.
The bills are just a few of several proposed pieces of legislation aimed at addressing what many have called a regulatory gap in dealing with digital assets. The SEC has filed lawsuits against Coinbase, Binance and others in addition to enforcement cases against executives at FTX and Celsius.
Andy Burnham has hit out at allies of Sir Keir Starmer for “demanding simplistic statements of loyalty”, claiming they are underestimating the “peril” Labour is in.
The mayor of Greater Manchester insisted his recent interventions have not been about “personal ambition”, but starting an “open debate” about the direction of the party ahead of potentially catastrophic local and devolved elections next year.
In the lead up to Labour’s annual conference in Liverpool this week, the so-called “King of the North” has accused Sir Keir of having no vision for the country, while setting out his own policy proposals.
It has fuelled mounting speculation he could launch a future leadership challenge against the prime minister, who in turn has compared Mr Burnham to Liz Truss.
At a fringe event on the opening day of the conference, the Northern mayor said: “I was clear in the interviews I gave last week, I wanted to launch a debate about the direction of the party and getting a plan to beat Reform UK.
More from Politics
“Those out there making calls for simplistic statements of loyalty are underestimating the peril the party is in.”
Two polls this week have predicted Reform UK leader Nigel Farage will become the next prime minister, while a poll of Labour members found more than half of them don’t want Sir Keir to fight the next general election.
Mr Burnham later turned up to a rally about Proportional Representation (PR), in which he insisted he wanted “this government to work”.
He received a rapturous reception as he entered the room, flanked by over a dozen photographers.
Image: Andy Bunrham flanked by media at a fringe event
Mr Burnham made light of the attention, quipping that “there’s nothing more unstoppable than an idea whose time has come”, in reference to PR.
But this was not the focus of the punchy speech that followed, in which he criticised the Labour leadership’s handling of dissent, saying a “climate of fear” was preventing MPs from having an “open debate” about the direction of the party.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
A handful of Labour MPs have been suspended over the past year for criticising the government on issues like welfare reform and the two child benefit cap, but Mr Burnham has the freedom to be outspoken as he is not a member of parliament.
He said he had been accused of “all sorts of things” in the past week but had done “nothing more than launch a debate”.
Mr Burnham drew clear dividing lines in a recent interview with The New Statesman, as he said the country should be “less in hock to the bond markets”, called for a greater focus on council housing and said public utilities should be nationalised.
It fuelled speculation of an impending leadership challenge, given Mr Burnham fought twice to run the Labour Party while he was an MP, before stepping down in 2017 to run for the metro mayor position. He has not ruled out a return to Westminster and last week claimed Labour MPs have privately asked him to stand.
Sir Keir tried to shut down the narrative by suggesting Mr Burnham’s policies would unleash the economic chaos of Ms Truss, whose fatal mini budget sent the markets into meltdown, as he dismissed the “personal ambitions of the mayor”.
However, in a direct message to “those who say that I’m speaking out purely for my own ambition”, a defiant Mr Burnham said: “I can say to you tonight I am speaking out for the thousands of councillors here at this conference who are worried about going to those doorsteps next May, speaking for the members of the Senedd who, again, are working hard to keep Wales Labour… and, of course, members of the Scottish parliament as well, who want a stronger story about Labour to go to those doorsteps.
“I’m speaking out for the millions of good people around Britain who want a more hopeful direction for the country.
“I think we can do it. I honestly believe it can be done. We can make this government work, we can find that more hopeful direction and we can win again at the next general election.”
The speech was met with a big round of applause from members, while one Labour MP told Sky News it was a “great speech”.
And while cabinet ministers have called for the party to unite behind the prime minister to fight Reform UK – there appeared to a change in tone from Wes Streeting as the first day of conference drew to a close.
The health secretary told a fringe event that the government must be “open to challenge” from within.
He said: “We’ve got to be self-confident enough as ministers to be open to challenge, and openly debate different ideas, because it makes you stronger as a government.”
Reform’s immigration policy is “racist”, Sir Keir Starmer has said.
He was reacting after Nigel Farage‘s party said it would axe the right of migrants to apply for indefinite leave to remain (ILR), ban anyone who is not a UK citizen from claiming benefits, and force those applying for UK citizenship to renounce other citizenship.
This policy could impact hundreds of thousands of people, although Reform has exempted EU citizens with settled status from its plans to ban migrant access to benefits and its policies on ILR.
Indefinite leave to remain is the status which grants legal migrants the ability to settle in the UK without the need to renew a visa every few years.
Speaking to the BBC, the prime minister and Labour leader said: “Well, I do think that it is a racist policy. I do think it is immoral. It needs to be called out for what it is.”
But he did not condemn those supporting Reform UK.
More on Nigel Farage
Related Topics:
Sir Keir added: “No, I think there are plenty of people who either vote Reform or are thinking of voting Reform who are frustrated.
“They had 14 years of failure under the Conservatives, they want us to change things.
“They may have voted Labour a year ago, and they want the change to come more quickly. I actually do understand that.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:29
Can Reform scrap common migration path?
He had said previously: “It is one thing to say we’re going to remove illegal migrants, people who have no right to be here. I’m up for that.
“It is a completely different thing to say we are going to reach in to people who are lawfully here and start removing them. They are our neighbours.
“They’re people who work in our economy. They are part of who we are. It will rip this country apart.”
Labour has proposed its own changes to indefinite leave to remain, although it does not appear to be retrospective like Reform’s.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:09
‘I’m proud of the job Starmer’s doing’
Responding to the prime minister on social media, Reform’s head of policy Zia Yusuf said “Labour’s new message to the British electorate just dropped:
“‘Pay hundreds of billions for foreign nationals to live off the state forever, or we’ll call you racist!'”
Polling released at the start of the Labour conference by Survation shows that 65% of party members think Labour is going in the wrong direction, 64% think Sir Keir has done badly since taking office and 53% think the party should change leader before the next general election.
Image: A poll suggests over half of Labour members want Sir Keir to exit before the next election. Pic: Reuters
He claimed wages went up faster in 10 months under Labour compared to 10 years under the Conservatives.
But he claimed it “takes time” for improvements to really be felt by the public, “so we have to stay on course and not divert on the basis of one poll or another”.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Mr Reed said that the “revolving door” of Tory leaders was one of the reasons for Labour’s tricky inheritance – and he was “absolutely” sure Sir Keir should lead the party into the next general election.
The minister went on to brand Mr Farage a “plastic” patriot after the Reform UK leader “begged” the US Congress to put sanctions on British workers.