Connect with us

Published

on

Simon Davis is the co-founder and CEO of Mighty Bear Games, a multiplatform game developer in Southeast Asia creating accessible multiplayer experiences in Web3.

Davis has spent almost two decades working in the gaming industry, but he never planned to actually work in this field.

Before crypto, he was a professional guitarist who made ends meet by playing in metal bands and cover bands and by teaching guitar. But after his money dried up one summer, he scored a six-week gig as a professional game tester — and he’s never looked back.

Mighty Bear Games' Simon Davis' guitar collection
Davis’ ever-growing guitar collection. (Simon Davis)

During his time in the gaming industry, Davis has held management and product lead positions at gaming companies including King Digital Entertainment, Ubisoft, Bigpoint, AKQA, Empire Interactive, and Laughing Jackal. 

In 2017, Davis teamed up with some friends and fellow industry veterans to launch Mighty Bear Games in Singapore, where they intended to focus on creating traditional games — before pivoting to blockchain in 2022. And in 2023, the firm launched an open beta for Mighty Action Heroes, its first Web3 gaming title.

Davis, who also goes by “Papa Bear,” said every Mighty Bear employee receives a “bear title.” Some of Papa Bear’s employees include “Arty Bear,” “Bear-Abel,” “Excel Bear,” and “Bear McNumbers.”

Why the pivot to blockchain gaming?

I was lucky enough to kind of get into Bitcoin by accident in 2015, so I’ve been in the space for a few years. In 2021, I started playing with NFTs, and I’m lucky enough to be also based in Southeast Asia, so I could see firsthand what was happening with Axie [Infinity]. I think, for me, as someone who lived through the transition to free-to-play, it felt very much like a moment, kind of like when Farmville came out on Facebook. 

I think that for live service titles [games like Fortnite, League of Legends and Apex Legends], a dominant business model is going to emerge to revolve around player-owned and operated economies. Because I don’t believe you can have virtual worlds without digital property rights, essentially.

And I think that does enable a lot of new things that we’re really starting to scratch the surface on. So, I think that really was the pull factor.

What format do you think serves as the best way to attract users to blockchain gaming?

The Mighty Bear Games team
The Mighty Bear Games team. (Simon Davis)

I think mobile gaming is going to be the dominant platform because of geography. You see this if you look at the charts for the countries that have a great slope of interest in crypto or Web3. They tend to be countries where existing payment rails are not super developed.

People are largely unbanked in places like Indonesia and Brazil. These markets are mobile-first. Like, people in the Philippines and India are not necessarily using high-end PCs. 

So, you need to go where the users are. And this is a bit of a spicy take, but this is why I’m very bearish on people making super HD high-end Web3 games because it’s just not where the markets are today. So, you see a lot of these teams raising, like, mega bucks to make console-quality titles, but if no one can play them, then they aren’t going to do very much.

What do you think the current hurdles are for large-scale blockchain gaming adoption?

A lot of people talk about it in terms of silver bullets, right? Like, “Oh, we need one good game,” or like, “We need to solve the wallet problem.” I don’t think it’s any one of those things. I actually think it is just a lot of lead bullets, a lot of small things that need to happen. 

What I’ve experienced today is still pretty terrible, and scary, like social recovery. And it’s starting to become a thing, but that needs to become a lot easier.

Read also


Features

Gen Z and the NFT: Redefining Ownership for Digital Natives


Features

What it’s actually like to use Bitcoin in El Salvador

 

I just think, in general, it needs to be as easy and as brainless to use as a Web2 experience. And so I think there is an inherent conflict today with how people think about Web3, you know. They say things like, “Oh, you need to educate the users,” or, “Train people to hold their private keys.”

But you know, my mom doesn’t want to hold her own private keys. She does all her trading on Crypto.com. We need to make it essentially idiot-proof so anyone can do it.

I think we’re still quite a long way away, but I am seeing meaningful improvements, actually. I’m seeing products that are going to go to market next year which are going to help a lot. 

I don’t know how old you are, but I’ve just turned 40 this year. I remember in the 90s setting up a home internet connection on dial-up. It took me two days of calling technical support and someone telling me like configs. I was having to go in and change manually and stuff. And now, you know, we solved that, right? And then, the internet became a mass market, and then people could just put a CD in their computer, and it just worked. I think we need to get to that stage.

Mighty Action Heroes. (Game website)

Do you think the bad rap blockchain/NFT gaming gets is a big issue? 

It’s funny because gaming got a pretty bad rap in the 90s. You know, everyone was talking about how games were making children violent. There was a big moral panic, just like there was in music a few years before.

But I think that when you start to get these things in people’s hands and experience them, perceptions change. I do think a lot of the reputation that we have in crypto and Web3 is deserved. There are a lot of bad actors exploiting the lack of regulation, but the things that excite me: I’ve seen some games, for example, that allow players to earn small amounts of Bitcoin, And this sort of thing’s retention numbers are very strong, like the initial metrics are very promising. And I think that’s a really nice use case.

Reddit is also a great example, right? They put NFTs in the hands of huge numbers of people. A lot of people didn’t even realize they were interacting with NFTs. So then they had their first taste, and yeah — there are some stats that have come up, and not a huge amount of them have transacted on-chain.

But I actually don’t think that’s such a bad thing. If people are not dumping the assets on day one, I don’t see that as a negative. So, I think onboarding through stealth is pretty good.

What kind of adoption metrics are you looking for with your games?

So, people talk about installs and sign-ups — it’s just a vanity metric. For me, I’m interested in how many people are coming in every day, how regularly they’re coming back, and what the growth curve of that looks like initially.

And then once we do the mobile launch [of Mighty Action Heroes], which will be around August/September, how well are we doing on attracting non-crypto-native people into the game as well? That will be very interesting, and to see how they play together. It’s a different angle, but it’s one that I’m pretty bullish on.

What are some ideas or tech upgrades that could help blockchain gaming?

ERC-6551 tokens. 

Essentially, they give a smart contract account or a smart contract wallet to a 721 [token]. So, you know, a traditional NFT would be a JPG with some metadata attached. But essentially, the JPG or the asset, whatever that is, is then bound to a smart contract. 

And this is pretty cool because it means that assets can communicate directly with each other. So NFT to NFT, without using MetaMask. And it could also be compatible with other smart contract wallets. 

I think the really cool thing is that, essentially, your asset becomes a wallet and can have its own logic as well. So you could have a base character in a game as the 6551 token, and then all the clothes or the items or everything that that character has, the kind of sub-assets, can change within, each with its own logic.

As a game developer, you start thinking of how your characters could evolve and how you can attach new assets without updating the core.

Then as a dev, I think it’s really good for reputation management as well. Like, if you did a soulbound version, you could have achievements, proof-of-work, proof-of-play, social identity. I think it’s pretty cool. […] It’s more secure because it’s not just an asset within a wallet like it is on smart contracts with its own private key.

Brian Quarmby

Brian Quarmby discovered crypto in 2013 and instantly fell in love with the idea of decentralization. Brian has since lived and worked Asia and returned to Melbourne in late 2019. Brian is a lover of sport and art and is bullish on the potential for NFTs to transform artists lives in the near future.

Continue Reading

Politics

Cboe seeks to add staking to Fidelity’s Ether ETF

Published

on

By

Cboe seeks to add staking to Fidelity’s Ether ETF

Cboe seeks to add staking to Fidelity’s Ether ETF

Securities exchange Cboe BZX is seeking permission from US regulators to incorporate staking into Fidelity’s Ether exchange-traded fund (ETF), according to a March 11 filing. 

The filing marks Cboe’s latest attempt to support staking for the Ether (ETH) funds traded on its US exchange. 

Cboe’s proposed rule change would allow Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) to “stake, or cause to be staked, all or a portion of the Trust’s ether through one or more trusted staking providers,” the filing said.

The Fidelity Ethereum Fund is among the most popular Ether ETFs, with nearly $1 billion in assets under management, according to data from VettaFi. 

In February, Cboe asked permission to add staking to another Ether ETF, the 21Shares Core Ethereum ETF.

Staking Ether enhances returns and involves posting ETH as collateral with a validator in exchange for rewards.

As of March 11, staking Ether yields approximately 3.3% APR, denominated in ETH, according to Staking Rewards.

Other popular cryptocurrencies, including Solana (SOL), also feature staking mechanisms. 

Cboe seeks to add staking to Fidelity’s Ether ETF

Staking rewards by asset type. Source: Staking Rewards

Related: SEC seeks comment on in-kind redemptions for Bitcoin, Ether ETFs

Proposed rule changes

The US Securities and Exchange Commission must still approve Cboe’s proposed rule changes before staking can commence.

In February, the SEC acknowledged more than a dozen exchange filings related to cryptocurrency ETFs, according to records.

The SEC’s acknowledgments highlight how the agency has softened its stance on crypto since US President Donald Trump started his second term on Jan. 20. 

In addition to staking, the filings, submitted by Cboe and other exchanges, addressed proposed rule changes concerning options, in-kind redemptions and new types of altcoin funds.

Cboe has also asked permission to list Canary and WisdomTree’s proposed XRP (XRP) ETFs and support in-kind creations and redemptions for Fidelity’s Bitcoin (BTC) and ETH ETFs, among other proposed changes.

Magazine: MegaETH launch could save Ethereum… but at what cost?

Continue Reading

Politics

Texas lawmaker seeks to cap state’s proposed BTC purchases at $250M

Published

on

By

Texas lawmaker seeks to cap state’s proposed BTC purchases at 0M

Texas lawmaker seeks to cap state’s proposed BTC purchases at 0M

A member of the Texas legislature has proposed a bill that could limit the amount local and state authorities invest in cryptocurrency as a reserve asset.

In a bill filed on March 10, Texas Representative Ron Reynolds proposed the state’s comptroller not be allowed to invest more than $250 million of its Economic Stabilization Fund — otherwise known as a “rainy day” fund — in Bitcoin (BTC) or other cryptocurrencies. The legislation also suggested that Texas municipalities or counties could not invest more than $10 million in crypto.

Law, Texas, Bitcoin Reserve

HB 4258, filed by Texas Representative Ron Reynolds. Source: Texas legislature

The proposed bill followed the Texas Senate passing legislation on March 6 to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the state. The SB 21 bill seemingly could allow the Texas comptroller to have no limit on purchasing BTC for a reserve, based on the most recent draft. 

Related: Bitcoin reserve backlash signals unrealistic industry expectations

The plan for a strategic Bitcoin reserve in Texas was one of many separate bills proposed in US state governments following the inauguration of President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers winning control of the US House of Representatives and Senate. Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick said in January that the state’s legislative priorities for 2025 would include a proposal to establish a Texas Bitcoin Reserve.

Is there a partisan divide on state and federal crypto plans?

It’s unclear if Rep. Reynolds, a Democrat, intended to support the BTC reserve bill introduced by State Senator Charles Schwertner, a Republican, or propose restrictions in the event the legislation becomes law. If passed and signed by Governor Greg Abbott, the bill would take effect on Sept. 1. Cointelegraph reached out to Rep. Reynolds’ office for comment but did not receive a response at the time of publication. 

Though Trump signed an executive order on March 7 to create a federal “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve” and “Digital Asset Stockpile,” many legal experts have questioned the US president’s authority to enact specific policies through EOs. Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis reintroduced legislation on March 11 to codify the proposed BTC reserve into law in the Senate.

Magazine: Elon Musk’s plan to run government on blockchain faces uphill battle

Continue Reading

Politics

Rupert Lowe ‘keeping options open’ after ousting by Reform UK

Published

on

By

Rupert Lowe 'keeping options open' after ousting by Reform UK

Ousted Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe has told Sky News he has not ruled out joining the Conservatives or a new political party, declaring: “I’m keeping my options open.”

Mr Lowe answered a series of questions from Sky News after the latest twist in his feud with Nigel Farage, with a police investigation launched into claims he threatened party chairman Zia Yusuf.

The Metropolitan Police announced it had launched an investigation “into an allegation of a series of verbal threats made by a 67-year-old man” between December 2024 and February 2025.

Politics latest: UK set to be hit by Trump’s steel tariffs

Responding to the police statement, Mr Lowe said he had instructed lawyers, who had made contact with the Met and made them aware of his willingness to co-operate in any necessary investigation.

“My lawyers have not yet received any contact from the police,” he said.

“It is highly unusual for the police to disclose anything to the media at this stage of an investigation.

More on Nigel Farage

“I remain unaware of the specific allegations, but in any event, I deny any wrongdoing. The allegations are entirely untrue.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reform UK row explained

Could Lowe join Tories?

Later, Sky News asked the Great Yarmouth MP if he thought there was a way back into Reform UK for him or was this the end – and if he might join the Tories or a new political party.

“This has all happened over a few days,” Mr Lowe replied.

“I have been focused on debunking these false and damaging allegations. Who knows what will happen? I’m keeping my options open.”

In an interview on Monday, Mr Lowe said: “I was a Tory years ago. I think the Tories have got a lot of work to do. I think there’s some extremely good Tory MPs. I get on with a lot of them.”

For the Conservatives, the shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: “He hasn’t applied but obviously we’re a broad and welcoming political party.”

He told Times Radio: “People have been joining the Conservatives from across the political spectrum and we always welcome new joiners.”

Read more:
Reform reports Rupert Lowe to police

The Reform row: What has happened and what has been said?

Rupert Lowe. File pic: PA
Image:
Mr Lowe is a former chair of Southampton Football Club. File pic: PA

New splinter group?

And in a move seen as a hint of a new splinter group, another ousted Reform UK politician, former deputy leader Ben Habib, told The Daily Telegraph that Mr Lowe was a “good friend” and he was “constantly in touch with” him.

Sky News also asked Mr Lowe who he blamed for the party’s treatment of him, including throwing him out of the party after he criticised Mr Farage. Was Mr Farage or Mr Yusuf to blame?

“Honestly, all of them,” he said.

“This was a team effort to blacken my name. If it wasn’t for my presence on X, I would have been buried under the false allegations. For that, I have to thank Elon Musk.”

He was asked about Mr Farage quoting Labour minister Mike Kane claiming after a heated Commons clash with Mr Lowe in December: “The anger displayed towards me clearly showed a man not in charge of his own faculties.”

Pic: Reuters
Image:
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the door was open. Pic: Reuters

In a Sunday Telegraph article, Mr Farage added: “I never saw anything like it in the European Parliament in 2019 when I was the leader of the Brexit Party and Mr Lowe was an MEP colleague.”

In response, Mr Lowe told Sky News: “Reform sources have been briefing that I have dementia. This is the single most appalling thing I have ever seen in politics.

“Anyone who has known someone who has suffered so hideously from dementia will understand just how offensive it is. It shows the type of people we are dealing with.”

In the same article, Mr Farage claimed there had been “too many similar outbursts from Mr Lowe, often involving the use of inappropriate language to the despair of our chief whip, Lee Anderson”.

Mr Lowe hit back, telling Sky News: “More baseless nonsense, spouted out to tarnish my reputation. Their malicious witch-hunt has fallen apart.”

Last year, when Mr Anderson was Conservative Party deputy chairman, he apologised after parliament’s watchdog on bullying and harassment found he told a security guard to “f*** off, everyone opens the door to me”.

He was found to have twice sworn at the security officer and acted in a way that “constituted bullying and also harassment” in breach of parliament’s behaviour policy, an independent expert panel concluded.

Continue Reading

Trending