Connect with us

Published

on

Anytime there’s a bipartisan consensus and a preachy New York Times op-ed, you can assume something you enjoy is about to get regulated out of existence or made worse in quality.

“Giant digital platforms have provided new avenues of proliferation for the sexual abuse and exploitation of children, human trafficking, drug trafficking and bullying and have promoted eating disorders, addictive behaviors and teen suicide,” write Sens. Lindsey Graham (RS.C.) and Elizabeth Warren (DMass.) in today’sNew York Times. “Nobody elected Big Tech executives to govern anything, let alone the entire digital world,” so the senators are introducing a bill to create a new regulatory agency that will fix the problem.

What follows is a litany of untrue statements and gross exaggerations about the way Big Tech operates and the purported harm done by the cluster of websites that millions of Americans willingly use on a daily basis.

“Platforms are protected from legal liability in many of their decisions, so they operate without accountability,” Warren and Graham claim. This refers to Section 230, sometimes called the internet’s First Amendment, which was adopted in 1996 as a means of protecting platforms from being held liable for the content their users post (and without which platforms might choose not to host much speech at all). It also “ensured online platforms’ ability to regulate posts that violate their terms of service,” per First Amendment lawyer Robert Corn-Revere. Warren and Graham seem to think that somehow politicians and regulators would be better at determining which speech is permissible on different platforms.

“Google uses its search engine togive preference to its own products, like Google Hotels and Google Flights, giving it an unfair leg up on competitors,” they continue. “Amazon sucks up information from small businesses that offer products for sale on its platform, then uses that information to run its own competing businesses.”

“Appleforces entrepreneurs (and thereby consumers) to pay crushing commissions to use its App Store,” even.

But they fail to argue for how consumers are made worse off by these purportedly destructive tactics. Google Flights makes travel planning far easier than the days before search. No person is prevented from going directly to an individual airline’s website to book their flight if they prefer. Amazon has increasingly started developing Basics, its generic brand of commonly purchased household goods (just as Target has Target Brand products on offer); if someone needs a phone charger, they can get it more cheaply and quickly than ever before. As for Apple, of course other app developers must pay to place their products in the company’s digital storefront; how nice that customers have access to products made by developers other than those at Apple!

“A few Big Tech companies stifle all competition before it poses any serious threat,” the senators claim, ignoring that we’re in an era where previously indomitable companies are crumbling before our eyes: Meta’s Facebook is shedding daily active users (TikToka competitorhas long been on the rise) and Mark Zuckerberg’s Metaverse augmented reality pet project has struggled to get off the ground; Twitter’s U.S. ad sales are plummeting and traffic has declined each month since January (some users may be migrating to Meta-run competitor Threads, others to censorship-resistant protocols like Nostr). Hulu and YouTube are seeing drop-offs in weekly users (and some industry watchers are even noting a broader decline in the amount of time Americans spend on screens, post-pandemic).

But Big Tech companies are predatory, sucking up our data, claim Warren and Graham. Never mind the fact that we’re not forced to use them, and that it’s unclear what harm is actually done by them accessing our data. Most people, for example, aren’t privacy hawks interested in setting up two-factor authentification, using only encrypted messaging, opting out of any governmental use of their biometric information, and the like, and just express vague concerns about data and algorithms, without any specific complaint as to how their life is made worse because of Meta knowing their birthdate.

Warren and Graham go on to announce they’re introducing legislation to create an “independent, bipartisan regulator charged with licensing and policing the nation’s biggest tech companies” which will be “nimble” and “adaptable” (just like all those other government agencies). The regulator will “prevent online harm” (by waving a magic wand and ensuring no bad actors ever go online); “promote free speech and competition” (by scrapping Section 230 and cracking down on mergers instead of trusting the existing process through which companies have cycled in and out of dominance); “guard Americans’ privacy” (because government agencies do a great job at cybersecurity!); all while “protect[ing] national security” (it is unclear how banning Google Hotels will safeguard the homeland).

Contra Warren and Graham’s implications, it’s not easy to predict which new companies will emerge from the ashes of our discards. It’s not clear that the existing landscape is detrimental to consumers (again, who use these products willingly) or immune from competition. Will Threads be successful? Will Elon Musk drive Twitter into the ground? Will the future be Substack? Patreon? X? More group messaging and less interest in expansive social networks? Are people losing interest in streaming, in favor of shorter-form content like Reels? Will Amazon’s grocery delivery business succeed? Will its movie studios? Maybe neither, and it will actually be a health care industry disruptor, offering cheaper pharmaceuticals than ever before. And why is it that Microsoftthe still-massive company under investigation right now in the E.U., and the target of much 1990s antitrust ireis so infrequently mentioned today?

Warren and Graham have indeed reached a bipartisan consensus: They sell short the good done by these large companies, exaggerate the harms, and display the type of extraordinary hubris that commonly emanates from government officials.

Continue Reading

Technology

Salesforce pledges to invest $1 billion in Singapore over five years in AI push

Published

on

By

Salesforce pledges to invest  billion in Singapore over five years in AI push

Marc Benioff, Chairman & CEO of Salesforce, speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box outside the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Jan. 22nd, 2025.

Gerry Miller | CNBC

Salesforce on Wednesday announced plans to invest $1 billion in Singapore over the next five years.

The cloud software giant said the investment is designed to accelerate the country’s digital transformation and the adoption of Salesforce’s flagship AI offering Agentforce.

Salesforce is among the many technology companies hoping to boost revenue with generative AI features.

The company launched the newest version of Agentforce last month. It has previously described the system — which it says can tackle sophisticated questions in Salesforce’s Slack communications app, based on all available data — as the first digital AI platform for enterprises.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff is scheduled to speak at CNBC’s CONVERGE LIVE at around 9:25 a.m. Singapore time (9:25 p.m. ET) on Wednesday.

“We are in an incredible new era of digital labor where every business will be transformed by autonomous agents that augment the work of humans, revolutionizing productivity and enabling every company to scale without limits,” Benioff said in a statement.

“Singapore is at the forefront of this shift, and as the world’s largest provider of digital labor through our Agentforce platform,” he added.

Salesforce said Agentforce can help Singapore to “rapidly expand” its labor force in several key service and public sector roles at a time when the country is grappling with an aging population and declining birth rates.

Jermaine Loy, managing director of the Singapore Economic Development Board, welcomed Salesforce’s investment, saying it will help to boost the country’s efforts “to build a vibrant hub for AI innovation.”

— CNBC’s Jordan Novet contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Business

Donald Trump climbs down from threat to escalate trade war with Canada by doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium

Published

on

By

Donald Trump climbs down from threat to escalate trade war with Canada by doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium

Donald Trump briefly threatened to escalate his trade war with Canada by doubling his planned tariffs on its steel and aluminium from 25% to 50%.

The US president stepped back from his order after the provincial government of Ontario rowed back on a plan to charge 25% more for electricity it supplies to over 1.5 million American homes and businesses.

Canada’s most populous province provides electricity to Minnesota, New York and Michigan.

As a result, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said Mr Trump would not double steel and aluminium tariffs – but the federal government still plans to place a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports from Wednesday.

Donald Trump with Elon Musk in a Tesla after he promised to buy one of the electric cars. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Donald Trump with Elon Musk in a Tesla after he promised to buy one of the electric cars. Pic: Reuters

Ontario’s response

In his initial response to Mr Trump’s threat, Ontario’s premier Doug Ford said he would not back down until the US leader’s tariffs on Canadian imports were “gone for good”.

But he later suspended the change temporarily, saying “cooler heads need to prevail” and he was confident the US president would also stand down on his plans.

Meanwhile, Canada’s incoming prime minister Mark Carney said he will keep other tariffs in place until Americans “show respect” and commit to free trade.

Mr Carney called the new tariffs threatened by Mr Trump an “attack” on Canadian workers, families and businesses.

Read more:
Analysis: Uncertainty index spikes amid on/off confusion over Trump tariffs

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Canada will win’, country’s next prime minister says

Why is Trump threatening tariffs?

A worldwide 25% tariff on steel and aluminium is due to come into effect on Wednesday as a way to kickstart US domestic production.

Separate tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada covered by a previous trade agreement (the US Mexico Canada, or USMCA deal) were delayed by a month to 2 April.

President Trump seems to bear a particular grudge against Canada because of what he sees as rampant fentanyl smuggling and high Canadian taxes on dairy imports, which penalise US farmers.

He has called for Canada to become part of the United States as its “cherished 51st state” as a solution, which has angered Canadian leaders.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What’s the impact of US tariffs?

Economic impact

Mr Trump’s turnaround comes after markets fell in response to his threat of doubling tariffs.

The stock market has fallen over the last two weeks and Harvard University economist Larry Summers put the odds of a recession at 50-50.

“All the emphasis on tariffs and all the ambiguity and uncertainty has both chilled demand and caused prices to go up,” the former treasury secretary for the Clinton administration posted on X on Monday.

“We are getting the worst of both worlds – concerns about inflation and an economic downturn and more uncertainty about the future and that slows everything.”

Investment bank Goldman Sachs revised down its growth forecast for this year from 2.2% to 1.7% and moderately increased its recession probability to 20% “because the White House has the option to pull back policy changes if downside risks begin to look more serious”.

Mr Trump has tried to reassure the American public that his tariffs will cause a bit of a “transition” to the economy as taxes spur more companies to begin the years-long process of relocating factories to the US to avoid tariffs.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Trump refuses to rule out recession

Mr Trump did not rule out the possibility of a recession during an interview with Fox News on Sunday, where he said: “I hate to predict things like that.”

On Tuesday, he was asked about a potential recession and said “I don’t see it at all” and claimed the US is “going to boom”.

On Monday, the S&P 500 stock index fell 2.7% and on Tuesday it was around 10% below its record set last month.

Continue Reading

US

Donald Trump climbs down from threat to escalate trade war with Canada by doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium

Published

on

By

Donald Trump climbs down from threat to escalate trade war with Canada by doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium

Donald Trump briefly threatened to escalate his trade war with Canada by doubling his planned tariffs on its steel and aluminium from 25% to 50%.

The US president stepped back from his order after the provincial government of Ontario rowed back on a plan to charge 25% more for electricity it supplies to over 1.5 million American homes and businesses.

Canada’s most populous province provides electricity to Minnesota, New York and Michigan.

As a result, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said Mr Trump would not double steel and aluminium tariffs – but the federal government still plans to place a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports from Wednesday.

Donald Trump with Elon Musk in a Tesla after he promised to buy one of the electric cars. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Donald Trump with Elon Musk in a Tesla after he promised to buy one of the electric cars. Pic: Reuters

Ontario’s response

In his initial response to Mr Trump’s threat, Ontario’s premier Doug Ford said he would not back down until the US leader’s tariffs on Canadian imports were “gone for good”.

But he later suspended the change temporarily, saying “cooler heads need to prevail” and he was confident the US president would also stand down on his plans.

Meanwhile, Canada’s incoming prime minister Mark Carney said he will keep other tariffs in place until Americans “show respect” and commit to free trade.

Mr Carney called the new tariffs threatened by Mr Trump an “attack” on Canadian workers, families and businesses.

Read more:
Analysis: Uncertainty index spikes amid on/off confusion over Trump tariffs

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Canada will win’, country’s next prime minister says

Why is Trump threatening tariffs?

A worldwide 25% tariff on steel and aluminium is due to come into effect on Wednesday as a way to kickstart US domestic production.

Separate tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada covered by a previous trade agreement (the US Mexico Canada, or USMCA deal) were delayed by a month to 2 April.

President Trump seems to bear a particular grudge against Canada because of what he sees as rampant fentanyl smuggling and high Canadian taxes on dairy imports, which penalise US farmers.

He has called for Canada to become part of the United States as its “cherished 51st state” as a solution, which has angered Canadian leaders.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What’s the impact of US tariffs?

Economic impact

Mr Trump’s turnaround comes after markets fell in response to his threat of doubling tariffs.

The stock market has fallen over the last two weeks and Harvard University economist Larry Summers put the odds of a recession at 50-50.

“All the emphasis on tariffs and all the ambiguity and uncertainty has both chilled demand and caused prices to go up,” the former treasury secretary for the Clinton administration posted on X on Monday.

“We are getting the worst of both worlds – concerns about inflation and an economic downturn and more uncertainty about the future and that slows everything.”

Investment bank Goldman Sachs revised down its growth forecast for this year from 2.2% to 1.7% and moderately increased its recession probability to 20% “because the White House has the option to pull back policy changes if downside risks begin to look more serious”.

Mr Trump has tried to reassure the American public that his tariffs will cause a bit of a “transition” to the economy as taxes spur more companies to begin the years-long process of relocating factories to the US to avoid tariffs.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Trump refuses to rule out recession

Mr Trump did not rule out the possibility of a recession during an interview with Fox News on Sunday, where he said: “I hate to predict things like that.”

On Tuesday, he was asked about a potential recession and said “I don’t see it at all” and claimed the US is “going to boom”.

On Monday, the S&P 500 stock index fell 2.7% and on Tuesday it was around 10% below its record set last month.

Continue Reading

Trending