Tory MPs have called for Sir Keir Starmer to “get off the fence” and tell Sadiq Khan to axe the expansion of the Ultra Low Emissions Zone (ULEZ) after a court ruled the plans are lawful.
Government ministers stressed the matter was out of their hands as they turned their attention to the Labour leader’s position on the controversial policy.
But a senior Starmer ally appeared to rule out an intervention on Friday night, saying while Sir Keir is against the ULEZ expansion, it is a devolved matter so the party “will have to take it on the chin”.
On Friday, London’s Labour mayor Mr Khan hailed a “landmark” ruling after a judge said he had the power to expand ULEZ, the zone where polluting vehicles can be charged £12.50 a day.
But Transport Secretary Mark Harper said: “Just because he has the right to doesn’t mean he should clobber hard working Londoners.”
Mr Harper said the government opposes the scheme but because transport is a devolved matter there is nothing they can do to stop it.
More on Labour
Related Topics:
“It’s a Labour London Mayor that’s made this decision. We’ve called on the leader of the Labour party to tell the London mayor not to roll out this scheme,” he said.
Image: London’s Ultra Low Emissions Zone (ULEZ) is to be expanded in August
Business Secretary Grant Shapps also called out Sir Keir directly.
Advertisement
In a tweet he said: “Labour will take this as a win, but hardworking people will lose because Sadiq Khan doesn’t care about hitting drivers with unneeded costs.
“Lets see what kind of Leader @Keir_Starmeris. Time to get off the fence & tell your Mayor to do the right thing and stop the ULEZ expansion.”
Deputy prime minister Oliver Dowden said the High Court ruling was a “loss for hardworking people” in his constituency, which borders Greater London, adding: “Keir Starmer should tell his Mayor to abandon this unnecessary and unfair expansion.”
Labour’s failure to win Boris Johnson’s old seat – which seemed ripe for the taking amid a double digit lead in the polls – was widely blamed on the issue.
Tory MPs are now eyeing an opportunity to draw a dividing line with Labour on environmental policies that impose a direct cost on consumers.
Mr Khan has a statuary duty to improve London’s air quality.
But Mr Harper claimed: “This is about raising money, that’s what people can see and it’s part of the reason for the result in the Uxbridge by-election.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:29
Sadiq Khan says ULEZ ‘landmark decision is good news for London’.
Labour ‘will have to take ULEZ on the chin’
Mr Khan was standing by his plan for ULEZ following Friday’s court challenge, which was brought by five Tory-led councils in outer London areas.
It poses a fresh headache for Sir Keir, who in recent days has declined to say if London’s charge on polluting vehicles should go ahead.
Senior party figures were quick to urge Mr Khan to reflect on the policy in the wake of the by-election and on Thursday, shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said now is not the right time to “clobber” Londoners with the ULEZ charge.
However on Friday, shadow cabinet minister Wes Streeting went further and told Times Radio: “I think Keir has been very clear that he doesn’t want it to go ahead at this stage, as has [shadow Chancellor] Rachel Reeves. I would agree with them.
“But Sadiq is the Mayor of London. He doesn’t answer to us, he answers to Londoners.”
Mr Streeting said that “If you believe in devolution you believe in his right to do that”.
“We’re going to have to take it on the chin. And he’s going to take the criticism on the chin and we’ll see what happens.”
Mr Khan argues ULEZ will incentivise people to use cleaner transport alternatives and, as a result, help improve the city’s air quality.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:21
ULEZ expansion ruled legal
Speaking after the judgement he told Sky News: “The decision to expand ULEZ was a difficult one for me to take, it wasn’t taken lightly, but it’s essential we make more progress cleaning up the air in our city.”
Referencing the opposition to the scheme and the debate surrounding it, Mr Khan said: “I have been listening and I will carry on listening” but added that the High Court ruling was “quite clear”.
Later, he tweeted a reference to the climate emergency.
“Everything we hold dear depends on a world that we can live in. From the shores of the Mediterranean to the Canadian Rockies, the earth is burning. Our global leaders must keep to the promises they have made to secure the future of our planet against the climate crisis.”
The STREAMLINE Act would update anti–money laundering rules by lifting decades-old thresholds for transaction reporting, cutting red tape for banks and crypto companies.
There were some wins for the UK at the Western Balkans Summit at Lancaster House in central London today.
The UK unveiled a fresh list of sanctions – and believes it has made some headway convincing the EU to follow suit by placing restrictions on the likes of Kosovo passport forgers.
British participants also claimed to be pleased that Serbia and Montenegro were added to a joint migration taskforce and said UK and EU law enforcement would work even more closely.
But was it a moment where Sir Keir Starmer could convincingly claim to have taken a decisive step towards smashing the gangs, which was one of the goals he claimed he had for the summit this afternoon? Absolutely not.
While presented domestically as a means to tackle illegal immigration, in fact, the Western Balkans Summit was not primarily about migration, and I understood the talks focused on many other areas, including growth opportunities and EU enlargement.
Indeed, I was told that return hubs were not even on the prime minister’s agenda.
Image: The leaders posed for a ‘family photo’. Pic: PA
Perhaps unsurprisingly, western Balkan leaders did not want to talk about that and the summit was not designed in the first place to focus on that agenda, regardless of how it was presented to the domestic media.
More on Migrant Crossings
Related Topics:
The backdrop for the summit couldn’t have been more tricky. The number of immigrants who crossed the Channel exceeded the number in 2024 on Wednesday.
Meanwhile, the first of the 46 migrants returned to France made their way back over the Channel, claiming France is an unsafe country.
There was finger pointing from British officials about why the French police had not done more to detain and deter this man from returning.
And the truth is, migrants who leave the UK are returning – because in many cases we are giving them the cash to do so.
That aside, there is also a nervousness that the French one-in, one-out deal may collapse entirely in a matter of weeks.
Only 42 individuals have been removed from the UK to date but the EU has to authorise this plan for the long-term and it is far from clear that it will survive.
To have secured the long term future of that deal at an international summit would be a big success. Today’s were on a much smaller scale.