Proof of humanity protocol Worldcoin released its audit reports on July 28 as criticism of its data collection practices continues to mount. The new reports were conducted by security consulting firms Nethermind and Least Authority.
According to an accompanying announcement from Worldcoin, Nethermind found 26 security issues with the protocol, of which 24 were “identified as fixed” during the verification phase while one was mitigated and another was acknowledged.
Least Authority discovered three issues and made six suggestions, all of which “have been resolved or have planned resolutions,” the announcement stated.
Worldcoin first rose to prominence in 2021 when it announced that it would give away free tokens to any users who verify their humanness, which they could do by having their iris scanned by a device called an “Orb.” The project was co-founded by Sam Altman, the co-founder of AI developer OpenAI.
At the time, Altman and other team members argued that AI bots would become an increasing problem on the internet if people didn’t find a way to verify their humanness without giving up their privacy. According to the protocol’s documentation, The Orb produces a hash of the user’s iris scan but does not keep a copy of the iris scan.
Worldcoin initiated its public launch on July 25, after nearly two years of development and beta testing. But criticism of it erupted almost immediately. The United Kingdom’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) reportedly said the government body was deciding whether to investigate the project for violating the country’s data protection laws. French data protection agency CNIL also questioned Worldcoin’s legality.
The crypto community was divided over the project’s launch, with some participants seeing it as the start of a dystopian future where privacy would be eliminated. In contrast, others saw it as a necessary step towards protecting humans against malicious AIs.
The new audit reports cover a wide variety of security topics, including resistance to DDoS attacks, case-specific implementation errors, key storage and proper management of encryption and signing of keys, data leaking and information integrity, and others. Some issues found were the result of dependencies on Semaphore and Ethereum, including “elliptic curve precompile support or Poseidon hash function configuration,” the announcement stated.
All issues except one were fixed, mitigated, or have planned fixes. The one security issue that was not fixed by the time of verification has a severity of “undetermined” and is listed as “acknowledged.”
Keir Starmer was touring the UK National Nuclear Laboratory in Preston when the Bank of England halved its 2025 growth forecast, cut interest rates for the third time in six months, warned of an uptick in inflation and said the national insurance hike on employers would hit prices and jobs more than expected.
It was a blow to a prime minister and chancellor who have placed all their chips on growth, made all the more painful because of those budget decisions that – in the short term at least – have made matters worse.
Rachel Reeves said soon after: “I am still not satisfied with the growth rate.”
Keir Starmer, in Preston to talk up nuclear power generation, said “there’s more to do” as he extolled the virtues of small modular reactors – faster to build than existing larger power stations – as a way of speeding up the delivery of new nuclear power stations in England and Wales.
The government hopes the first one will be up and running by 2032.
He wants to do it by shaking up the planning system to “clear the path” for smaller reactors (there are currently just eight favoured sites for nuclear power plants in the UK).
This was a prime minister determined to channel his inner Donald Trump and – hat tip to Chris Mason at the BBC – “build baby build”.
More on Keir Starmer
Related Topics:
This is a PM determined to take on the “blockers” and get Britain building again.
But what is fast emerging, as growth flatlines, is that he and Rachel Reeves – who once said she’d be the UK’s “first green chancellor” – will also take on the blockers in the cabinet and party if that is what it takes to get growth.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:26
PM defends economic outlook
When it comes to green versus growth, the latter is going to win.
This is a prime minister who, for my money, is also prepared to “drill baby drill” in that hunt for growth.
Having signalled last month that the government is going to press ahead with a third runway at Heathrow in the face of fierce opposition from environmentalists, the prime minister all but confirmed to me on Thursday that he’s also minded to back the approval of a giant new oilfield in the North Sea.
At stake is a licence for the Rosebank development – approved by the last government, but now blocked by the courts on environmental concerns over huge carbon emissions.
When I asked the prime minister if he was minded to grant new permissions, he all but said yes: “The mindset is we know that oil and gas is going to be a big part of the future for many decades to come.
“We do need to transition to clean power, but in relation to this particular licence, it was granted in the first place, it is going back through a process.
“I can’t pre-empt the decision but, you know, we did say that where licences have already been granted, we wouldn’t interfere with them.
“But I’ll be open with you, oil and gas is part of the future mix for decades to come.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:30
Sky asks BoE governor about ‘depressing’ growth
The reality is that as growth comes hard to find, the prime minister and his chancellor are going to have to face down the environmentalists in the cabinet and the party.
Nuclear might be an example where green and growth can go hand in hand, but the third runway at Heathrow or the approval controversial licences for two major oil and gas sites in the North Sea are not.
This could get difficult.
The PM is intensely relaxed about taking on environmental “zealots” outside his party, but what about the fight within?
Just a couple of days ago on the Labour Listwebsite for activists and members, there was an article that said the PM must reject a proposal to develop this giant oil field or “risk imploding the party”.
Ed Miliband, the climate secretary, described Rosebank as “climate vandalism” when it was issued a licence by the last government.
Meanwhile, the Labour manifesto committed to no further oil and gas licences, so some will see allowing this development as a betrayal.
Note, in the response to my question, the PM was at pains to stress this was not a new licence and the government had said it “wouldn’t interfere” with licences already granted.
It is going to be hugely controversial.
It could push Labour supporters into the arms of other progressive parties, prompt cabinet splits and public rows.
But if this government doesn’t get economic growth, the Starmer project collapses.
When it comes to decisions that pit growth versus green, it seems that Starmer has decided he doesn’t have much choice.