Plan to expand North Sea oil drilling announced – as critics slam Rishi Sunak’s ‘culture war on climate’
The prime minister has announced an expansion of oil and gas drilling in the North Sea amid ongoing rows in his party over the future of its climate commitments.
Number 10 said hundreds of new oil and gas licences will be granted off the coast of Scotland to “boost British energy independence” and “reduce reliance on hostile states”.
The move puts down a marker between the government and Labour, which has proposed a block on all domestic new oil and gas drilling as part of its strategy to achieve zero-carbon electricity by 2030.
Shadow climate change secretary Ed Miliband accused Rishi Sunak of lurching towards “a culture war on climate” to make up for “13 years of failed Tory energy policy”.
Politics live: PM dodges electioneering question in awkward interview
But Mr Sunak and his ministers have stressed the need to use North Sea fossil fuel resources, especially since the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA), which is responsible for regulating the oil, gas and carbon storage industries, is currently running the 33rd offshore oil and gas licensing round, and they expect to award more than 100 new licenses in the autumn.
But such moves have prompted alarm from climate campaigners, with the government already facing opposition to any development of Rosebank, 80 miles northwest of Shetland.
The head of Oxfam Scotland, Jamie Livingstone, called the new licensing rounds a “short-sighted and selfish decision by the UK government” which “flies in the face of climate science and common sense”.
He added: “The UN has made clear that we must end our global addiction to fossil fuels, so this decision sends a wrecking ball through the UK’s climate commitments.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Government needs to pursue net zero targets – Lord Deben
The prime minister has also confirmed locations for two new carbon capture usage and storage clusters ahead of a visit to Aberdeenshire today – where he is expected to announce multi-million pound funding for the schemes.
Carbon capture sees polluting fumes collected to either be used elsewhere or stored underground instead of going into the air, and is seen as an increasingly important tool in achieving net zero.
The Acorn carbon capture project in North East Scotland – a joint venture between Shell and other firms – and the Viking project in the Humber will be “vital to driving forward and investing in clean technologies that we need to realise our net zero target”, Downing Street said.
But while ministers predict the move could support up to 50,000 jobs, the target for the two new sites to be up and running isn’t until 2030.
‘We’re choosing to power up Britain’
Ahead of his visit to Scotland, Mr Sunak said: “We have all witnessed how Putin has manipulated and weaponised energy – disrupting supply and stalling growth in countries around the world.
“Now more than ever, it’s vital that we bolster our energy security and capitalise on that independence to deliver more affordable, clean energy to British homes and businesses.
“Even when we’ve reached net zero in 2050, a quarter of our energy needs will come from oil and gas.
“But there are those who would rather that it come from hostile states than from the supplies we have here at home.
“We’re choosing to power up Britain from Britain and invest in crucial industries such as carbon capture and storage, rather than depend on more carbon-intensive gas imports from overseas – which will support thousands of skilled jobs, unlock further opportunities for green technologies and grow the economy.”
Mr Sunak will meet energy industry leaders during Monday’s trip. Pic: No 10
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said it was right to be “conscious of energy security” and keeping the large oil and gas workforce in Scotland employed, calling it a “silly position” to end all drilling.
But speaking to Sky News, he did not give his full support to the new licenses, saying Tory plans to “take every single drop” from the North Sea was “a little bit morally bankrupt”.
He added: “We need to be conscious of the fact that every single drop of oil or indeed a molecule of gas that we take out of the North Sea will have a concurrent impact on climate change.”
Mr Flynn called for “robust climate compatibility checkpoints” to be put in place for any new licenses.
Meanwhile, Labour’s Mr Miliband questioned whether the prime minister was the right person to make the decisions over future energy security.
“Every family and business is paying the price, in higher energy bills,” he said. “It is absurd that having left this country so exposed, the Conservative Party is asking the public to believe they can fix it.
“And it’s telling that while Labour focuses on lower bills and good jobs, Rishi Sunak lurches desperately towards a culture war on climate to appease his split party, losing track of what he believes from day to day, depending on which faction he’s met with.
“It’s no way to govern and it’s costing working people.”
Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts
A new green dividing line in politics?
The move comes as both main parties continue to argue over their commitment to key net zero policies and environmental promises.
The Conservatives’ narrow victory in the Uxbridge and South Ruislip by-election opened a can of worms within Labour over London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s plan to expand the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) to outer boroughs – something Sir Keir Starmer blamed for the loss.
The Labour leader and Mr Khan are continuing to hold discussions over the extension, with Sir Keir calling on his colleague to “reflect” on the impact on voters.
But Mr Khan has stood by the decision on the basis it will improve air quality for five million people in London.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Sadiq Khan: ULEZ decision ‘good news for London’
Meanwhile, MPs on the right of the Conservative Party are appealing to the PM to rethink the government’s net zero commitments in light of the win, with calls for delays to a number of targets – including putting back the ban on the sale of petrol and diesel cars from 2030 to 2035.
Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith – who was among 43 signatories to a letter urging Mr Sunak to look again at the plan – told Sky News the date was “plucked out of nowhere”, adding: “If you want to get them to clean emissions, you’ve got to do it in a way that still keeps our industry going in the UK.”
The prime minister insisted on Sunday the 2030 deadline would remain, but did announce plans for a review of low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), saying he was on the side of drivers.
Downing Street has confirmed ministers are scrutinising existing pledges “in light of some of the cost of living challenges”, as the prime minister promised a “proportionate and pragmatic” approach to net zero.
Read more:
Is carbon capture a fossil fuel industry fig leaf or vital for net zero?
What are the Tories’ green policies – and what could be scrapped?
The prime minister is also set to meet industry leaders and workers while in Scotland.
The government pledged that, along with energy authorities, it would “go further than before in announcing continued decisive action to boost the capability of the North Sea industry to transition towards net zero, strengthen the foundations of the UK’s future energy mix and create the next generation of highly skilled green jobs”.
Grant Shapps, the energy security secretary, is also expected to meet figures from the oil and gas, renewable and nuclear industries over the coming week as the Conservatives focus their campaign on the topic.
Mr Shapps said: “In the wake of Putin’s barbaric invasion of Ukraine, our energy security is more important than ever.
“The North Sea is at the heart of our plan to power up Britain from Britain so that tyrants like Putin can never again use energy as a weapon to blackmail us.
“Today’s commitment to power ahead with new oil and gas licences will drive forward our energy independence and our economy for generations.”
Donald Trump has announced that most goods imported from Mexico are to be exempt from his trade tariff regime for at least four weeks, just days after the charges were imposed.
He confirmed the move following a phone call with his Mexican counterpart Claudia Sheinbaum and, according to his commerce secretary, was due to announce a similar concession to Canada later in the day.
“We are working hard, together, on the Border, both in terms of stopping Illegal Aliens from entering the United States and, likewise, stopping Fentanyl,” Mr Trump posted on Truth Social.
The latest climbdown by the US president came after he surprised financial markets on Wednesday by waiving tariffs against carmakers following pleas from motor industry bosses.
Money latest: Why are there no bananas in Tesco?
The White House revealed then that parts due to flow into the US from Mexico and Canada as part of the manufacturing supply chain would not qualify for tariffs so long as they complied with an existing trade agreement struck between the three.
‘Rules of origin’ guidelines under the USMCA deal allow goods to move between the three countries tariff-free if they qualify with a designation that they were made in North America.
US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told Sky’s US partner network CNBC that if the concession was extended to Canada, then more than half of usual cross border trade volumes would be exempt.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Why are tariffs such a big deal?
He too signalled there were signs of progress in Mr Trump’s dispute with America’s closest trading partners, saying each had worked hard to make progress in tackling imports of Fentanyl – blamed for high crime and deaths in US communities.
But Mr Lutnick explained that, as things stand, the reprieve would only last until 2 April when the Trump administration plans to impose reciprocal tariffs – on top of the 25% charges that came into force on Tuesday.
The car industry believes that no products from Canada and Mexico are currently subject to tariffs as they comply with the USMCA deal agreed in 2020.
It should spare consumers extra costs of at least $4,000 on the purchase of a new vehicle, industry data showed.
While that could still change from 2 April, Mr Trump is under intense pressure to relax his tariff regime permanently amid a backlash from US firms and financial market investors who fear it is self defeating.
Read more from Sky News:
Millions in compensation expected over Bank IT failures
Poundland up for sale as budget tax hikes loom
A closely-watched forecast has even suggested that the threats of a trade war were enough to push the US economy into recession before Mr Trump took office.
The dollar has sunk in value and US government borrowing costs have risen on the back of the turmoil.
It is widely expected that the European Union will be next to face tariffs – possibly from 2 April – after Trump threatened action “very soon” just last week.
Commenting on the threat to the eurozone from such a move, the president of the European Central Bank Christine Lagarde said on Thursday: “Just the threat of those tariff increases and potential retaliations are putting a brake on – on investment, on consumption decisions, on employment, hiring, all the rest of it.
While Mr Trump has not issued a specific threat against the UK, her counterpart at the Bank of England Andrew Bailey told a committee of MPs on Wednesday that the US should work “multi-laterally” rather than bilaterally to resolve its disputes.
Donald Trump is to exclude carmakers across North America from the pain of US tariffs levelled against Mexico and Canada, following apparent pressure from motor bosses.
The White House confirmed the concession was made after the president spoke to the bosses of Ford, General Motors and Stellantis in a call on Wednesday.
Each company has manufacturing operations and suppliers in Canada and Mexico.
There will be a tariff exemption of at least a month on vehicles made across the continent but only if a previous agreement on so-called ‘rules of origin’ is implemented in full.
It governs where a product is first sourced and where a tariff may apply during transit across borders.
“Reciprocal” tariffs are still planned from April, the president’s spokesman said.
Money latest: Inside £7m home of popstar
Manufacturers have complained of being worst affected by the imposition of 25% tariffs against both Canada and Mexico since Tuesday because flows of parts between the three countries can be hit by tariffs multiple times.
The complicated nature of their operations can mean a single component crosses a border more than once during the production process.
Such a big spike in costs from tariffs poses a big risk to sales as customers are asked to pay more to help compensate for the sanctions.
Automakers’ share prices have been among the worst hit since Mr Trump took office again in January.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Why are tariffs such a big deal?
The car bosses, according to Reuters news agency sources, pledged additional US investment but wanted clarity on tariffs ahead.
Mr Trump urged them to shift their operations to the United States, according to a White House statement.
The tariff concession marked the first compromise on the trade issue since the president signalled, on Tuesday, that there would be no U-turns and only more tariffs after Canada said it would respond in kind.
There have been growing signs this week that corporate America is uneasy, at best, with the tariff policy against both Mexico and Canada
Those US neighbours, along with China, which is facing 20% tariffs, are the country’s three biggest trading partners.
The imposition of tariffs on all goods has been received badly by financial market investors, worried that US profitability is at risk.
One closely-watched forecast for US growth suggested that the threat of tariffs since Mr Trump’s election victory was confirmed had hammered activity and plunged the country into recession.
Read more:
Trump may have talked US economy into recession
China ready for ‘any type of war’ with US
There are mounting reports of boycotts against US goods in Mexico and Canada.
The nerves were publicly admitted by the boss of Jack Daniel’s maker Brown Forman, Lawson Whiting, on Wednesday when he described Canadian provinces taking American-made alcohol off shop shelves as “worse than a tariff”.
US stock market values are sharply down since the inauguration and the dollar has lost more than three cents against rivals including the euro and the pound just this week amid the tariff turmoil.
Such is the growing investor concern for the health of the US economy, the tariff implications have been partly blamed for a steep fall in oil prices.
Brent crude was trading at $68 a barrel earlier on Wednesday – its lowest level for more than three years.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports11 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway