Connect with us

Published

on

134

I first covered the S&W 9mm Shield EZ pistol in 2022, during a post about handguns for senior citizens. Due to its unique characteristics, the EZ made the semiauto list, but it was really part of a larger picture.

Now, a year later, that particular pistol has seen more use. Conclusion: Its worthy of more thorough coverage. Rather than start from scratch, Ill use the previous post as a foundation. But this one is devoted strictly to the Shield EZ Series. Might as well look at its history while were at it.

Table of Contents Toggle Debut of the S&W Polymer M&P PistolsDevelopment of the M&P Shield SeriesShield EZ Pistol IntroductionShield EZ Pistol DetailsSafetyFeaturesThe Performance Center EZsRange ReportAccuracySight RegulationHandling & ControlReliabilityHolsters, Etc.All-Important MaintenanceCostsParting Shots Debut of the S&W Polymer M&P Pistols

Just before Smith & Wessons polymer-framed M&P pistols appeared (during 2005), I was granted an opportunity for a sneak preview. I greeted it with a yawn, but soon thereafter, we (my Agency) had an opportunity to wring out some samples. It turned out those striker-fired pistols did have several desirable qualities to include good ergonomics, enhanced through grip inserts of various sizes.

The timing was fortuitous since our metal-frame double-action S&Ws were aging so, after an extensive T&E session, we wound up purchasing a few hundred duty-sized (4 ) M&Ps. They were an instant hit with our staff, although our plain-clothed folks hoped for a smaller-sized pistol. This was around 2008. Development of the M&P Shield Series

During 2012, S&W introduced what proved to be a gamechanger for concealed-carry purposes, their micro-sized M&P Shields. These small polymer-framed pistols were quickly brought to our attention so, in short order, more samples arrived in both available calibers; 9mm and .40 S&W. The latter was pretty snappy, but the 9mms we tried (8 +1 versions) were reasonably controllable.

The example I wrung out also proved to be a tack-driver, something Ive noticed with other short-barreled S&W semiautos dating back to an inventory of D/A Model 3913s. As it turned out, a main drawback to the Shield was the force required to manually operate its slide a problem for some of our smaller-statured personnel. Still, I liked a 9mm sample so much that I wound up buying it. Ive since shot the Dickens out of it with nary a bobble, and its still in my possession (as is my trusty aluminum-framed M-3913). Shield EZ Pistol Introduction

The Shields stiff slide no doubt put the kibosh on sales among a growing segment of handgun purchasers; women, as well as others concerned about personal security. Fortunately, this situation was rectified through an unusual new Shield. Superficially there are some similarities, but the aptly named EZ is really a different pistol. S&Ws small pistol line (L-R): M&P Compact, Shield EZ, Shield, and .380 Bodyguard (the others are 9mms). The EZ strikes a nice balance of size Vs shootability. It can also accommodate a light. Shield EZ Pistol Details

The EZ first appeared during 2018 as a light-recoiling, compact .380 ACP. Designed for shootability and easy operation (EZ), the concept was a big enough hit that a slightly larger 9mm version soon followed. Either model pretty much eliminates strength-related difficulties common to many semiautos. Starting with the operation of its slide, even the 9mm EZ is much more user friendly than my trusty Shield.

Much of this is attributable to the EZs internal hammer, a departure from todays striker-fired systems), that provides easier manual slide operation. Also, theres a set of grasping ears another effort-reducing feature. The magazine is also well conceived. A set of small protruding tabs permit manual retraction of the follower, eliminating the need for a loading device. The tradeoff is reduced capacity, but the EZ is still an 8 +1 pistol, backed up by rapid reloads. Safety

S&W put some thought in the safety aspect. Beyond the standard internal drop safety, the EZ incorporates an odd-looking grip-safety similar to that of the well-respected U.S. Model 1911, .45 ACP Government Model. The EZ version is large enough to ensure full disengagement from any normal grip position, but the pistol wont fire unless its depressed.

Interestingly, the initial M-1911 submissions lacked an external safety lever. The Army wanted one so John Browning obliged. You can buy an S&W EZ either way. The EZs will also fire sans a magazine but a tactile loaded chamber indicator is standard. Comparison of the original 9mm Shield (top) to the EZ: Both incorporate a chamber-check feature but the EZs is tactile. Both are also equipped with night sights which came standard on the EZ PC version. The XS Big Dots on the older Shield are an aftermarket set. Features

Unlike the full-sized M&Ps, the EZdoesnt feature interchangeable grips. Still, it manages to strike a nice balance of size and shootability, with a more than acceptable accuracy. Part of this is attributable to its pre-cocked internal hammer. A true single-action, this system provides a clean feeling 4 -pound trigger pull with a distinct reset.

Also, the EZs sight-radius is long enough to provide precise sight alignment (the standard EZs have fixed three-dot sights). The barrel measures 3 -inches, long enough that it doesnt give up much velocity. The EZs empty weight is listed as 23.8 ounces. It lacks the ambidextrous slide-stops of a full-size M&P, but the magazine release can be reversed. The Performance Center EZs

Once the dust settled, S&W launched a series of catchy Performance Center EZs. No longer able to resist, I bought the example pictured here. The foundation is pretty much the same, but it does have a few spiffy features. For starters, the barrel is ported. Advertised to reduce recoil, it extends a bit beyond the face of the slide for an overall length of 3.8-inches. The slide features a series of racy looking ports that mostly just save a bit of weight.

Despite its coolness, I bought this PC model primarily for its fiber-optic/tritium Hi-Viz sights. Theyre highly visible in all lighting conditions to include darkness. And, unlike the striker-fired Shields, an accessory rail is standard throughout the EZ line, permitting the easy attachment of a light (or laser).

Being no stranger to a 1911, I opted for an EZ with an active safety. Some consider one an impediment to a defensive response, but Ive noticed many detractors also own an AR-15 equipped with a safety lever. If you go this route, unlike a cocked & locked 1911, the EZs slide can be retracted while on-safe. In contrast to the original Shield, its levers are both generous and bilateral. Rapid access is a non-issue so the key to their effective use boils down to practice and consistent use of this feature. Range Report

For accuracy testing, I fired four tried and true favorites off sandbags from 25 yards. Some evaluators test pistols of this size at 15 yards but, as noted above, shorter-barreled S&Ws can print decent groups often tighter than their full-size relatives. The EZ also has a crisp trigger, and my PC version is fitted with a good set of sights. Accuracy Good accuracy despite the lack of an aiming point: The red-circled group is Federals 124-grain AE FMJ. The other was produced by 124-grain Speer Gold Dot JHPs. Both loads, fired over a sandbag rest from 25 yards, were well-regulated to the EZs Hi-VIZ LiteWave fixed sights.

During the initial 2022 test I shot Speer Gold Dot 124-grain JHPs, and Federal American Eagle 124-grain FMJs (see ammo sites for purchase options). Five-shot groups with either load averaged a more than respectable 2 -inches off sandbags.

During 2023, a repeat test of these loads produced identical results. An additional box of Federals 124-grain Hydra Shok JHPs did the same consistently good performance! Nine Federal 124-grain Hydra Shok JHPs firedoff sandbags from 25 yards. This representative cluster measured a very acceptable 2 1/2-inches. POI was close but could be adjusted by drifting the rear sight in its dovetail.

I had high hopes for another longstanding favorite, Speer Lawman 124-grain TMJs, but no such luck. Groups ran an abysmal 4-inches. Two M&Ps on hand that day averaged well under 2-inches from the same box, proving that nothings etched in stone (also both are fitted with aftermarket Apex barrels). Sight Regulation

Its been my experience that S&W does a good job regulating their fixed sights. Thus, it came as no surprise that my 9mm EZ shot close to its sights at 25 yards with common 124-grain loads. Elevation is fixed, but windage can be tweaked by drifting the rear sight in its dovetail (secured by a setscrew underneath the slide). Point of impact test: A full load (9 rounds) of Federal American Eagle 124-grain FMJs fired offhand from 15 yards. No need for any adjustments. The group formed directly atop the EZs sights. Handling & Control

The EZ was fast and intuitive from the ready or a holster. Despite its ported barrel, the above loads did generate some recoil, a consequence of the PC EZs 23-ounce weight. Still, it was on par with many other compacts. The textured grip helps maintain control but, if recoil is a concern, Hornady offers a solution through their 100-grain 9mm Lites.

To reduce recoil even more, S&W still sells .380 ACP EZs. Theyre slightly lighter versions (18-ounces) of the same pistol in a lighter-kicking caliber. Hornady has an effective .380 load to match this choice, too. I can vouch for its ability to expand, having witnessed the results during FBI testing protocols. S&Ws Shield EZ .380 in basic form. Lots in common with the 9mm version, in a softer-shooting pistol. Note the absence of an optional safety lever. Reliability

No stoppages to report with my 9mm, shooting with either hand and a loose or firm grip. Also, consistent ejection patterns, no deformed cases, and solidly struck primers. I stretched it to 200 rounds between cleanings (bulk ammo sites to purchase your own). Holsters, Etc.

I started out with a basic Comp-Tac holster, formed from Kydex and its worked well enough that Ive stuck with it, rigged for OWB carry on a durable belt. A spare magazine slides into an open-topped pouch with enough clearance to allow for its protruding finger tabs, something worth checking. Comp Tacs EZ 9 Holster fits standard EZs or Performance Center models. Note the location of the magazines loading assist buttons relative to the pouch. Plenty of clearance here.

Of course, we need to be sure of our target. At the moment, my EZ is equipped with a small but bright O-light Baldr Mini, which also has a built-in laser. So far so good but, if it quits, I still have the bright set of night-sights for insurance. This system presently serves as a bump-in-the-night handgun largely for this reason (secondary to a 9mm AR). The QD light/laser unit repeats its zero, so I simply detach it when the EZ is carried in its holster. All-Important Maintenance The Shield EZ (top) is hammer-fired, shown here un-cocked. The original Shield is striker-fired. The small yellow dogleg arm is its sear deactivation lever, flipped forward to permit disassembly. Both are equipped with external safety levers but theres a considerable difference in their sizes.

Periodic disassembly is part of the cleaning process but is sometimes skipped with fiddly designs. Fortunately, disassembly of the EZ is about as easy as it gets. Flip the disassembly lever and the slide assembly can be drawn off the frame for routine cleaning (the recoil spring is captive on the guide rod).

Unlike many striker-fired designs, the trigger doesnt need to be pulled. S&Ws M&Ps circumvent this through a sear deactivation tab, but the EZs hammer-fired system completely eliminates such concerns. Mine shipped with a useful cleaning kit and clear directions. Follow them and youll be good to go with quality ammunition. EZ disassembled for routine maintenance. Clear the pistol, lock its slide open and rotate the takedown lever 90 degrees. Then simply dismount the slide assembly. The barrel and guide rod can be easily removed. Costs

An 8 +1 pistol might not seem too reassuring nowadays but, unlike some higher-capacity competitors, the EZs magazines are easy to top off. Also, its ergonomics shouldnt be discounted. Despite a comprehensive collection of M&Ps, I find myself reaching for my EZ because it just feels right. A basic three-dot sight version retails for $521.

S&W lists the PC versions at $643. My older Shield started out as a basic version, but I wound up investing in a set of aftermarket night sights. The EZs sights are mounted in dovetails so similar upgrades are possible, but the PC version is good to go as is. In any case, real-world prices often run lower. The Shield EZ 9mm PC as it arrived. No extras required other than carry gear. Nice cleaning kit, too! Parting Shots

Still, since more is generally deemed advantageous, S&W recently launched a higher-cap version of the EZ, the Equalizer. It weighs the same but boosts capacity. Beyond a flush-fit 10-shot magazine, two extended types boost capacity to 13 +1, and 15 +1. Like most other S&Ws, these pistols are available with or without external safety levers for an MSRP of $599.

Which begs the question: Do you really need an external safety? My older Shield has one, but its small and difficult to access. As noted above, like a 1911 Government Model, the EZ fires from a cocked hammer the reason its slide is easier to manipulate (helps delay unlocking).

Out of sight, out of mind, I guess. Unlike an original 1911, the EZ does feature a firing pin block (drop safety) and the grip safety is still there although no one I know carries a 1911 off safe. Which takes us to S&Ws recent CSX with an external hammer equipped with a non-optional safety lever.

FYI, the centerfire EZs are an offshoot (pun intended) of S&Ws hammer-fired M&P .22 LR Compact pistol. The rimfire lacks a grip safety but has always had a thumb-safety, and it functions nearly identically. Because rimfire ammo is much more affordable, this close cousin could be the ticket to meaningful practice.

Lastly, for more info about handguns in general, heres a link to Handguns: A Buyers and Shooters Guide: Handguns: A Buyer's and Shooter's Guide (Survival Guns) Markwith, Steve (Author)English (Publication Language) $23.68 Buy on Amazon

Continue Reading

Sports

Scherzer has eyes on winning title with 3rd team

Published

on

By

Scherzer has eyes on winning title with 3rd team

TORONTO — Max Scherzer joined the Toronto Blue Jays convinced he can win a World Series with a third team following titles with Washington and Texas.

“Winning cures everything,” the 40-year-old right-hander said Friday, three days after his $15.5 million, one-year contract was announced. “All you need to do to wake up in the morning is to have that drive to win, and the rest kind of takes care of itself.”

A three-time Cy Young Award winner, Scherzer was 2-4 with a 3.95 ERA last year for the Rangers. He started the season on the injured list while recovering from lower back surgery and was on the IL from Aug. 2 to Sept. 13 because of shoulder fatigue. He didn’t pitch after Sept. 14 because of a left hamstring strain.

Scherzer feels healthy.

“Normal ramp-up kind of in the lifting, normal ramp-up in the throwing, right where I need to be in terms of my bullpen progression,” he said during a Zoom news conference. “So I’m looking to come in here into spring training at full tilt.”

He joined a rotation projected to include José Berríos, Kevin Gausman, Chris Bassitt and Bowden Francis.

“The backbone of any team is always the starting rotation,” Scherzer said. “It doesn’t matter how much offense you got, if you don’t have a starting staff, you’re always going to be in trouble if you don’t have starters going out there and eating innings.”

Scherzer learned about the current Blue Jays when he spoke with Bassitt, a New York Mets teammate in 2022, and assistant hitting coach Hunter Mense, a University of Missouri teammate from 2004 to 2006.

“Just understanding how the team is, how the organization is, how they treat the families and how the guys on the team are, where the state of the organization is, how they want to improve,” Scherzer said. “I had a good chat with those guys how the Blue Jays handle everything and felt like this was going to be a fit.”

A Florida resident, Scherzer had geography in mind when considering teams.

“First and foremost is kind of staying here on the East Coast, especially with my family here in Florida. The kids are in school,” he said. “That makes it very easy to be able to get back and forth, be able to see them and have them be able to travel in, as well.”

Scherzer is 216-112 with a 3.16 ERA over 17 seasons with 3,407 strikeouts in 2,878 innings. His average fastball velocity dropped from 94.7 mph in 2020 to 92.5 mph last year.

“I still feel I can pitch at a very high level here. I frankly got all the pitches to be able to navigate a lineup,” he said. “It’s not about throwing 98. If you can throw 94, 95, you can get a lot of people out.”

He limits his use of analytics.

“There’s too much data, actually,” he said. “What we’re talking about with pitching now, I actually completely disagree with. And so, for me I understand what I do well, what I need to look at, what I actually need to be thinking about in terms of all my pitches, in terms of everything I’m doing … there’s some data that’s good, but a lot of data is bad.”

Though Scherzer spent parts of parts of nine seasons in the NL East, this will be his first time in the AL East.

“You got five teams that can all beat each other up. So, that’s the good news,” he said. “When you’re in a highly competitive division, that only makes you better. … It makes you battle-tested.”

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. negotiations are ongoing, meanwhile. The star first baseman has said he won’t negotiate a long-term contract after Toronto starts full-squad workouts Feb. 18.

The 25-year-old, a four-time All-Star, has a $28.5 million, one-year contract and can become a free agent after the World Series.

“You all know our desire to have him here for a long time, and we’ll continue to work towards that,” Blue Jays general manager Ross Atkins told reporters during the news conference.

Continue Reading

Sports

Sources: Mancini, D-backs agree to new deal

Published

on

By

Sources: Mancini, D-backs agree to new deal

Veteran first baseman/outfielder Trey Mancini and the Arizona Diamondbacks are in agreement on a minor league contract with an invitation to spring training, sources told ESPN, launching a comeback for the 32-year-old who sat out the 2024 season.

Mancini, who has played parts of seven major league seasons, missed 2020 after being diagnosed with stage 3 colon cancer. He returned to the Baltimore Orioles in 2021 before being traded to the Houston Astros the next season and signing with the Chicago Cubs in 2023.

After signing with the Miami Marlins last year, Mancini was released toward the end of spring training and did not play the rest of the season. He continued working out in Nashville and will compete for a job with the Diamondbacks, who had the best offense in baseball last year and traded for Josh Naylor to play first base, with incumbent Christian Walker signing a three-year, $60 million free agent contract with Houston.

For half a decade, Mancini was a powerful right-handed presence in the middle of Baltimore’s lineup. In 831 career games, he has 129 home runs and 400 RBIs, hitting .263/.328/.448 with a 110 OPS+.

Drafted in the eighth round out of Notre Dame in 2013, Mancini debuted in 2016 and by 2017 was a full-time player, splitting time between first and left field. His best season came in 2019, when he hit .291/.364/.535 and finished sixth in the American League with 75 extra-base hits (including 35 home runs) and 322 total bases.

Mancini will have plenty of competition for a roster spot. In addition to Naylor, Arizona has a loaded outfield, with Corbin Carroll, Lourdes Gurriel Jr., Jake McCarthy, Pavin Smith, Randal Grichuk, Alek Thomas as well as non-roster invitations for Garrett Hampson and Cristian Pache.

Continue Reading

Environment

Renewables provided 90% of new US capacity in 2024 – FERC

Published

on

By

Renewables provided 90% of new US capacity in 2024 – FERC

Renewable energy – solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower, biomass – accounted for more than 90% of total US electrical generating capacity added in 2024, according to data released yesterday by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and reviewed by the SUN DAY campaign.

Solar alone accounted for over 81% of the new capacity. Moreover, December was the 16th month in a row in which solar was the largest source of new capacity.

Renewables made up the lion’s share of new generating capacity in December and in 2024. In its latest monthly “Energy Infrastructure Update” report (with data through December 31, 2024), FERC says 105 “units” of solar totaling 4,369 megawatts (MW) came online in December, along with two units of wind (324 MW) and two units of biomass (45 MW). Combined, they accounted for 86.9% of all new generating capacity added during the month. Natural gas provided the balance: 717 MW.

During the full 2024 calendar year, solar and wind added 30,816 MW and 3,128 MW, respectively. Combined with 213 MW of hydropower, 51 MW of biomass, and 29 MW of geothermal steam, renewables accounted for 90.5% of added capacity. The balance consisted of the 1,100 Vogtle-4 nuclear reactor in Georgia, plus 2,428 MW of natural gas, 13 MW of coal, 11 MW of oil, and 28 MW of “other.”

Solar was 80.1% of new capacity in December and 81.5% during 2024. Solar accounted for 81.5% of all new generating capacity placed into service in 2024 – 50% more than the solar capacity added in 2023.

In December alone, solar comprised 80.1% of all new capacity added.

New solar capacity added in 2024 is almost nine times that added by natural gas and nuclear power combined.

Solar has now been the largest source of new generating capacity added each month for 16 months straight, from September 2023 – December 2024.

Adjusting for the differences in capacity factors among solar, nuclear, and natural gas, the new solar capacity added in 2024 is likely to generate seven times as much electricity as the new nuclear capacity and about five times as much as might be expected from the new natural gas capacity.

Solar + wind are now almost 22% of US utility-scale generating capacity. New wind accounted for much of the balance (8.3%) of capacity additions, which is more than either the new natural gas capacity (6.4%) or nuclear power capacity (2.9%).

Taken together, the installed capacities of just solar (10.2%) and wind (11.7%) now constitute more than one-fifth (21.9%) of the US’s total available installed utility-scale generating capacity.

However, approximately 30% of US solar capacity is in the form of small-scale (e.g., rooftop) systems that aren’t reflected in FERC’s data. Including that additional solar capacity would bring the share provided by solar + wind closer to a quarter of the US total.

With the inclusion of hydropower (7.7%), biomass (1.1%), and geothermal (0.3%), renewables now claim a 31.0% share of total US utility-scale generating capacity. If small-scale solar capacity is included, renewables are now about one-third of total US generating capacity.

Solar’s share of US generating capacity is now 10x greater than a decade ago. As noted, by the end of 2024, solar and wind accounted for 10.2% and 11.7%, respectively, of all installed utility-scale generating capacity in the US, while the mix of all renewables accounted for 31.0%.

In December 2023, FERC reported that solar and wind were 7.9% and 11.7% of installed capacity while the mix of all renewables provided 29.0%.

Five years ago (December 2019), FERC released data showing solar and wind to be 3.5% and 8.5% of total capacity while all renewables combined were 22.1%.

A decade ago (December 2014), FERC reported that solar and wind were 1.0% and 5.5% of total capacity, while the combination of all renewables accounted for 16.6% of capacity.

Solar will soon become the second-largest source of US generating capacity. FERC reports that net “high probability” additions of solar between January 2025 and December 2027 total 91,558 MW – an amount almost four times the forecast net “high probability” additions for wind (23,601 MW), the second-fastest growing resource. FERC also foresees growth for hydropower (1,345 MW), geothermal (90 MW), and biomass (61 MW).

Taken together, the net new “high probability” capacity additions by all renewable energy sources would total 116,655 MW, with solar comprising over 78% and wind providing another 20%.  

On the other hand, there is no new nuclear capacity in FERC’s three-year forecast, while coal, oil, and natural gas are projected to contract by 23,925 MW, 2,293 MW, and 833 MW, respectively.

If FERC’s current “high probability” additions materialize, by January 1, 2028, solar will account for nearly one-sixth (16.1%) of the US’s installed utility-scale generating capacity. That would be greater than either coal or wind (both 12.6%) and substantially more than either nuclear power or hydropower (both 7.3%).

In fact, assuming current growth rates continue, the installed capacity of utility-scale solar is likely to surpass coal and wind within the next two years, placing solar in second place for installed generating capacity, behind natural gas.

Meanwhile, the mix of all renewables is now adding about two percentage points each year to its share of generating capacity. Thus, by January 1, 2028, renewables would account for 37.3% of the total available installed utility-scale generating capacity – rapidly approaching that of natural gas (40.2%) – with solar and wind constituting more than three-quarters of the installed renewable energy capacity.

All renewables combined are on track to exceed natural gas within three years. As noted, FERC’s data don’t account for the capacity of small-scale solar systems. If that’s factored in, within three years, total US solar capacity could surpass 320 GW. In turn, the mix of all renewables would then exceed 40% of total installed capacity while the share of natural gas share would drop to about 37%.

Moreover, FERC reports that there may actually be as much as 222,443 MW of net new solar additions in the current three-year pipeline in addition to 68,815 MW of new wind, 8,659 MW of new hydropower, 199 MW of new geothermal, and 127 MW of new biomass. By contrast, the net new natural gas capacity potentially in the three-year pipeline totals just 19,438 MW. Thus, the share of renewables share could be even greater by early 2028.

“For more than a decade, renewable energy sources – led by solar – have dominated growth in US generating capacity,” noted the SUN DAY Campaign’s executive director Ken Bossong. “Consequently, efforts by the Trump Administration to reverse this trend are both illogical and likely to fail.” 

Electrek’s Take

FERC’s latest data further illustrates how utterly ridiculous Trump’s “national energy emergency” executive order is. The steady growth of clean energy, which has kept large energy markets like Texas out of trouble during weather events, disproves Trump’s claims that the US clean energy supply is “precariously inadequate and intermittent.”

Further, his refusal to even define solar and wind as “energy” in that executive order isn’t going to stop their progress, and both he and his new secretary of energy, Chris Wright, telling lies about renewables isn’t going to make them any less clean, affordable, or reliable.

Read more: Thanks to wind and solar, Texas has kept the power on and the costs down


To limit power outages and make your home more resilient, consider going solar with a battery storage system. In order to find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and you share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –trusted affiliate link*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending