The charity Care4Calais said their transfers from hotels were “cancelled” after lawyers challenged the decision to move them on to the barge moored off the Dorset coast.
Asked by Nigel Farage on his GB News show on Tuesday evening whether he will be apologising for the words he used, Mr Anderson said: “No.”
When questioned by the former Brexit campaigner about whether his use of the “f-word” was in bad taste, Mr Anderson replied: “No… it’s borne out of frustration.
“It’s borne out of me being absolutely furious. It’s not just me that’s being furious, it’s my constituents and millions of people up and down the country.”
Image: A general view of the Bibby Stockholm accommodation barge which is set to house up to 500 asylum seekers
And when asked if the Conservative government had failed to tackle illegal immigration effectively, Mr Anderson said: “We have failed on this, there’s no doubt about it.
Advertisement
“We said we’re going to fix it, it is a failure. But we have got policies in place – I know it’s a bit hard for the British public at the moment to understand what we’re trying to do with the Rwanda flights, and the change in legislation, the Illegal Migration Bill.
“It seems very slow and cumbersome – we’re up against it, we’ve got the lefty lawyers, the human rights campaigners, we’ve got the charities, everything’s against us.
“I’m not making excuses, but it’s slowing us down. If we had the whole of parliament behind us I’m sure this would have got through by now.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:49
Barge reminds migrant of Islamic State
Mr Anderson added it makes him feel “sick” every time a boat carrying migrants crosses the Channel and it makes him “furious” when asylum seekers are housed in hotels and on barges.
He said: “I’ve been to Calais, I’ve seen these migrants living in one-man tents, living in absolute squalor.
“Then they get here, we do our best, we bend over backwards to put them in decent accommodation, and all of a sudden they get a choice.”
The government hopes the use of the Bibby Stockholm barge and former military bases to house asylum seekers will reduce the cost of hotel bills.
Home Office minister Sarah Dines said those arriving in the country via unauthorised means should have “basic but proper accommodation” and that they “can’t expect to stay in a four-star hotel”.
She claimed hotels were part of the “pull” factor attracting people to the UK.
Mr Anderson said “grafters” in the oil industry who are “doing a job for this great country of ours” live on barges and “never complain once”.
He continued: “It makes me sick to the pit of my stomach when these lefty lawyers, the charities, the human rights campaigners, say it’s not good enough.
“If it’s not good enough, [the asylum seekers] should go back to France.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:02
The director of asylum accommodation at the Home Office, Cheryl Avery, speaks to Sky News.
What were Anderson’s initial remarks?
The Tory deputy chairman had sparked controversy when he told Express.co.uk: “If they don’t like barges then they should f*** off back to France.”
He added: “I think people have just had enough.
“These people come across the Channel in small boats… if they don’t like the conditions they are housed in here then they should go back to France, or better not come at all in the first place.”
When asked if this view represented the government, Number 10 pointed to comments made by Justice Secretary Alex Chalk, who said the “indignation” of Mr Anderson was well placed.
“The justice secretary was speaking on behalf of the government. That is the response,” the spokesperson told Sky News.
Truth Social wants to “democratize information” for its 6.3 million users with a social media prediction platform developed in collaboration with Crypto.com.
Rachel Reeves is unlikely to raise the basic rates of income tax and national insurance in order to avoid breaking a promise to protect “working people” in the budget.
It comes as Sky News has obtained an internal definition of “working people” used by the Treasury.
Officials have been tasked with protecting the income of the lower two-thirds of working people, meaning in theory people earning more than around £46,000 could face a squeeze in the budget.
However, this is likely to rule out increases to the basic rate of income tax and national insurance, since they would pay more tax.
Rachel Reeves is unlikely to hike these taxes because the Treasury says those earning £45,000 or less qualify as “working people”.
Sky News understands that ministers are still considering whether to break manifesto pledges, and these options remain on the table.
The main elements of the budget must be finalised by the middle of November, in the next two to three weeks.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:17
Chancellor faces tough budget choices
Rachel Reeves is facing a black hole in the budget that could exceed £35bn, after the latest Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast came in worse than expected.
The OBR had been anticipated to downgrade expected future productivity rates by 0.1% or 0.2% of GDP.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Each extra 0.1% point means an additional £7bn drop in revenue and a corresponding increase in the size of the black hole the Chancellor must fill in the budget.
However, now the OBR is expected to downgrade future trend growth by 0.3%. This means that the black hole left by the productivity downgrade is around £21bn.
The chancellor needs to find around £10bn because of welfare U-turns, reinstating the winter fuel allowance and other policy changes.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:03
Former Bank of England Governor Lord Mervyn King says the budget will be tough
On Monday, the chancellor also said she would increase headroom – the buffer between her spending projects and borrowing limited by her fiscal rules.
This is likely to cost another £5bn to £10bn, to get her out of the doom loop “cycle” which Ms Reeves acknowledged to Sky News she risked being stuck in.
This means the total size of the black hole likely to be needed to be filled is around £35bn or £40bn.
Sources insist that this figure is before the final forecasts from the OBR, and therefore is subject to change.
The Treasury said it does not comment on tax measures or the size of the black hole.