Connect with us

Published

on

When Donald Trump appeared last week in a Washington, D.C., courtroom for his arraignment on federal election charges, the presiding judge gave the former president a few simple instructions for staying out of jail while he awaited trial.

Trump could not talk to potential witnesses about the case except through lawyers, Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya told him, and he could not commit a crime on the local, state, or federal level. Both are standard directives to defendants. But then Upadhyaya added a warning that seemed tailored a bit more specifically to the blustery politician standing before her: I want to remind you, the judge said, it is a crime to intimidate a witness or retaliate against anyone for providing information about your case to the prosecution, or otherwise obstruct justice.

When Upadhyaya asked Trump if he understood, he nodded. Fewer than 24 hours later, Trump appeared to flout that very warningin its spirit if not its letterby threatening his would-be foes in an all-caps post on Truth Social: IF YOU GO AFTER ME, IM COMING AFTER YOU! Over the following week, he attacked a potential witness in the case, former Vice President Mike Pence (delusional); Special Counsel Jack Smith (deranged); and the federal judge assigned to oversee his case, Tanya Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama (Smiths number one draft pick, in Trumps words).

Trumps screeds highlight a challenge that will now fall to Chutkan to confront: constraining a defendant whos both a former president and a leading candidate to take the White Houseand who seems bent on making a mockery of his legal process.

Shes in a tight spot, Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney in Michigan, says of Chutkan. Conceivably, the judge could find Trump in contempt of court and toss him in jail for violating the terms of his pretrial release. But even though in theory Trump should be treated like any other defendant, former prosecutors told me that he was exceedingly unlikely to go to prison over his pretrial statements. And Trump probably knows it. (Whether Trump will go to prison if he is convicted is another hotly debated matter.)

Read: The humiliation of Donald Trump

Im sure she would be very reluctant to do that, in light of the fact that hes running for president, McQuade told me. So I think as a result, he has a very long leash, and I think he will simply dare her to revoke [his freedom] by saying the most outrageous things he can.

At a pretrial hearing today, Chutkan issued her first warnings to Trumps lawyers about their client, according to reporting by Steven Portnoy of ABC News and Kyle Cheney of Politico. Mr. Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech, she said. But that right is not absolute. She said Trumps presidential candidacy would not factor into her decisions, and she rebuffed suggestions by a Trump lawyer, John Lauro, that the former president had a right to respond to his political opponents in the heat of a campaign. Hes a criminal defendant, she reminded him. Hes going to have restrictions like every single other defendant.

Chutkan said she would be scrutinizing Trumps words carefully, and she concluded with what she called a general word of caution: Even arguably ambiguous statements from parties or their counsel, the judge said, can threaten the process. She added: I will take whatever measures are necessary to safeguard the integrity of these proceedings.

Chutkan had called the hearing to determine whether to bar Trump and his lawyers from publicly disclosing evidence provided to them by prosecutorsa standard part of the pretrial process. The evidence includes millions of pages of documents and transcribed witness interviews from a year-long investigation, and the government argued that Trump or his lawyers could undermine the process by making them public before the trial. Despite her warnings to Trumps team, she sided with the defenses request to narrow the restrictions on what they could disclose, and she did not add other constraints on what he could say about the case.

Yet the effect of Chutkans courtroom comments was to put Trump on notice. If he continues to flout judicial warnings, she could place a more formal gag order on him, the ex-prosecutors said. And if he ignores that directive, she would likely issue additional warnings before considering a criminal-contempt citation. A further escalation, McQuade said, would be to hold a hearing and order Trump to show cause for why he should not be held in contempt. Maybe she gives him a warning, and she gives him another chance and another chance, but eventually, her biggest hammer is to send him to jail.

Judges have sanctioned high-profile defendants in other cases recently. In 2019, the Trump ally Roger Stone was barred from posting on major social-media platforms after Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that he had violated a gag order she had issued. (Stone did honor this directive.) The Trump foe Michael Avenatti, who represented Stormy Daniels in her case against Trump and briefly considered challenging him for the presidency, was jailed shortly before his trial on extortion charges after prosecutors accused him of disregarding financial terms of his bail. He was just scooped up and thrown into solitary, one of his former lawyers, E. Danya Perry, told me. She said that Avenatti was thrown into the same jail cell that had held El Chapo, the Mexican drug lord. (Avenatti later claimed that his treatment was payback ordered by thenAttorney General Bill Barr; the prison warden said he was placed in solitary confinement because of serious concerns about his safety, and Barr has called Avenattis accusation ridiculous.)

Neither Stone nor Avenatti, however, is as high-profile as Trump, arguably the most famous federal defendant in American history. And Perry doubts that Chutkan would imprison him before a trial. Trump has ignored warnings from judges overseeing the various civil cases brought against him over the years and has never faced tangible consequences. He has done it so many times and he has managed to skate so many times that he certainly is emboldened, Perry said.

Indeed, Trump has also suggested he would ignore a gag order from Chutkan. I will talk about it. I will. Theyre not taking away my First Amendment rights, Trump told a campaign rally in New Hampshire on Wednesday.

Trumps political motives for vilifying his prosecutors and once again portraying himself as the victim of a witch hunt are obvious: Hes trying to rile up his Republican base. Trump also seems to be executing something of a legal strategy in his public statements about the trial. Hes called Washington, D.C., a filthy and crime-ridden embarrassment, possibly reasoning that these remarks will force the court to agree to his request to shift the trial to a venue with a friendlier population of potential jurors, such as West Virginia.

David A. Graham: Trump is acting like hes cornered

Thats less likely to work, according to the former prosecutors I interviewed. Id be shocked to see that be successful, Noah Bookbinder, a former federal prosecutor who heads the anti-corruption advocacy group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told me. Its sort of like the old joke about the child who kills his mother and father and then asks for mercy because hes an orphan. I just dont see a court going for that.

Trumps attacks also present a problem for Smith, the special counsel. On one hand, prosecutors have a clear interest in ensuring that their witnesses do not feel intimidated; on the other, Smith could feel that trying to silence Trump would play into the former presidents victim narrative. Justice Department prosecutors alerted Chutkan to Trumps Im coming after you post in a court filing, and during todays hearing they voiced concerns that if not restricted, Trump could disclose evidence to benefit his campaign. (A Trump spokesperson said the former presidents warning was the definition of political speech, and that it referred tospecial interest groups and Super PACs opposing his candidacy.) But Smiths team did not ask Chutkan to fully gag Trump or even admonish him. You see the prosecutors being very, very restrained, Bookbinder said. With a lot of defendants who were bad-mouthing the prosecutor and witnesses, they would have immediately gone in and asked for an order for the defendant to stop doing that.

Bookbinder described the citation of Trumps post as a brushback pitch by the government, a signal that they are watching the former presidents public statements closely. But like Chutkan, Smith might be reluctant to push the matter very far. Fighting with Trump over a gag order could distract from where the government wants to focus the caseon Trumps alleged crimesand it could indulge his desire to drag out the trial, Bookbinder noted. But the special counsel has to weigh those concerns against the possibility that an out-of-control defendant could jeopardize the safety of prosecutors and witnesses. My strong suspicion is that Jack Smith doesnt want to go there, Bookbinder said. I think at some point he may have little choice.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Snow White: Little people feel ‘erased’ by Disney’s use of CGI instead of real actors

Published

on

By

Snow White: Little people feel 'erased' by Disney's use of CGI instead of real actors

Disney’s use of CGI to create the seven miners at the heart of the live-action remake of Snow White And The Seven Dwarves has left little people feeling “disregarded” and “erased,” according to a disability activist.

Comedian, model and content creator Fats Timbo, who has spoken about being bullied as a child, told Sky News she believes Disney has missed a golden opportunity to educate children in what is likely to be their first encounter with someone with dwarfism.

Fats Timbo is a comedian, model, author and content creator
Image:
Fats Timbo is a comedian, model, author and content creator

Timbo, who has dedicated her activism to raising the profile of people of short stature, has achondroplasia, a genetic condition that inhibits growth and affects around one in 27,500 people.

Award-winning actor Peter Dinklage, who has the same condition, previously criticised the film, telling the WTF With Marc Maron podcast: “It makes no sense to me. You’re progressive in one way, but then you’re still making that f***ing backward story about seven dwarves living in a cave together?”

Following the remarks, Disney said it consulted with members of the dwarfism community to “avoid reinforcing stereotypes from the original animated film”.

It was the 1937 classic that established Disney’s name as an industry leader. But the remake has been beset by controversy.

Early on it was labelled “woke” due to its casting of Latina actress Rachel Zegler, who is of Colombian-Polish descent, in the lead role.

Zegler also faced backlash after suggesting the early version of the film had content that was unsuitable for the 21st century – namely the fact the prince “literally stalks” Snow White.

There was then speculation as to whether Zegler and Israeli actress Gal Gadot, who plays the evil queen, got on as they have previously expressed very different views over the Gaza war.

Pic: Disney
Image:
Pic: Disney

Pic: Disney
Image:
Gal Gadot as the evil queen. Pic: Disney

Not dwarves but ‘animated magical creatures’

Now the erasing of the dwarves – first from the title, then from the film, at least in human form – is proving highly divisive.

Disney used computer-generated images (CGI) to create what they called “animated magical creatures” rather than using little people in the roles.

Timbo tells Sky News: “Our representation is already small as it is – no pun intended. It’s already limited. To erase that and use CGI, like we’re mythical creatures or people that could be made on computers, it’s disregarding us in general.”

She goes on: “Let’s say kids have never seen somebody that has my condition and they’ve seen a CGI version of me. It’s going to be a bit baffling to children. It could have been a real educational piece to have actors that have the condition and give them the role they deserve.”

Timbo says lack of visibility for small people has real-world consequences.

“I used to get made fun of all the time. [Kids would be] saying ‘You’re one of the dwarves from Snow White,’ that kind of thing. I think now when somebody sees a little person, they’re not going to believe it’s real. They’re going to see that CGI version on Snow White instead of seeing a real little person that has real character with real depth.”

(L-r) TIMOTHÉE CHALAMET as Willy Wonka and HUGH GRANT as an Oompa Loompa in Warner Bros. Pictures and Village Roadshow Pictures’ “WONKA,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release
Image:
Timothee Chalamet and Hugh Grant in Wonka. Pic: Warner Bros Pictures

‘Snow White And The Little People’

Timbo says other children’s films were also used to taunt her, including Charlie And The Chocolate Factory: “The Oompa Loompas – I got called that all the time.”

In the Snow White remake, Martin Klebba voices CGI Grumpy, while George Appleby has a physical character, playing one of a band of seven robbers – both actors are little people.

But the decision not to use people of small stature to play all seven dwarves on-screen has left many scratching their heads.

And it’s not the first time small people have been edited out of movies.

Charlie And The Chocolate Factory’s 2023 re-make, Wonka, used special effects to shrink down Hugh Grant to play an Oompa Loompa, while 2012 film Snow White And The Huntsman replaced its dwarves with able-bodied actors Ian McShane, Ray Winstone and Nick Frost.

Not a fan of the term dwarfism, Timbo says she thinks Disney would also have done well to tackle the title differently, too: “If they had put a different spin on it where it was Snow White And The Little People, that would have sounded great.”

She says that in an attempt to avoid controversy, Disney chose “the safe option” of simply cutting the physical roles completely, and letting CGI fill the void.

It’s a decision Timbo calls “upsetting,” due to the fact it “reaffirms the negative stereotypes of little people not being actual people”.

Pic: Disney
Image:
Pic: Disney

Disney’s poisoned apple

Timbo’s 2023 book Main Character Energy, about living fearlessly in the face of adversity, seems like it could be a good read for the bosses of Disney right now, as they face growing criticism over the decision.

With a muted release (no Leicester Square premiere, and a limited LA debut) it’s been a less-than-fairytale opening for a movie which had been intended to rival the success of 2017 remake Beauty And The Beast. Many might say it has turned into something of a poisoned apple.

Proving controversial and polarising, the response couldn’t be more removed from Disney’s brand proposition if it tried. Early reviews are so far mixed.

Timbo says she will give the movie a shot: “I want to see if it lives up to the hype or the bad press.”

Box office figures and audience ratings will soon deliver a verdict, and Timbo remains generous despite reservations: “I want it to surprise me, I want to enjoy it… I hope it does do well. But obviously, I think Disney could have done things a bit differently.”

Sky News has contacted Disney for comment.

Snow White is in cinemas now.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Celebrities urge government to reverse ‘shameful’ welfare cuts

Published

on

By

Celebrities urge government to reverse 'shameful' welfare cuts

A swathe of celebrities including Sir Stephen Fry and Succession star Brian Cox have urged the government to reverse its “shameful” cuts to welfare.

Sir Stephen said the cuts should not be targeted at “the most vulnerable and overlooked of all our population”, while Mr Cox recalled his own experience of child poverty and argued the plans would “have a lasting impact on the lives of so many people already finding it difficult to afford life’s essentials”.

They were joined in their criticism by actor Stanley Tucci, who branded the plans “wrong” and said they would force parents in disabled families to “skip meals so that they can feed their children”.

Politics latest: PM demands ‘military plans’ for Ukraine

The celebrities’ intervention comes after Sir Keir Starmer defended his government’s shakeup to the welfare system, designed to shave £5bn from the disability benefits bill for working-age people, which is set to balloon to £75bn by the end of the decade.

The prime minister has branded the current system “morally and economically indefensible” and said the government cannot simply “shrug its shoulders” and pretend the welfare system is “progressive”.

He told Sky News political correspondent Serena Barker-Singh that he understands why some of his backbenchers are uncomfortable, referencing his late mother, who was “very ill all her life” and brother who recently died of cancer.

But he said it was “morally indefensible that a million young people are going essentially from education on to benefits”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM defends ‘vital’ welfare reforms

“All the evidence shows if young people are in that position and so early in their lives, they’re going to find it really difficult ever to get out of that,” he added.

“There aren’t many people who genuinely argue the status quo is working,” Sir Keir added.

However, the changes to the system – which will make it harder to qualify for the main disability benefit, the personal independence payment (Pip), have drawn strong criticism from charities and thinktanks.

The Resolution Foundation thinktank said the tightening of Pip eligibility would mean between 800,000 and 1.2 million people losing support of between £4,200 and £6,300 per year by the end of the decade.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Govt ‘rushed’ welfare reforms

The Trussell Trust, which runs food banks across the country, said around three-quarters of the people referred to one of its services live in a household where someone is disabled.

It warned the measures will have a “significant impact on people who are already facing hunger and hardship”.

And Comedian Rosie Jones, who has cerebral palsy, said the cuts will “only deepen the hardship” disabled people are already facing.

“Disabled people are scared of what the future holds if there’s cuts to disability payments, as they are already not enough to cover life’s essentials,” she said.

Read more:
What is PIP?
Key welfare changes explained

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: “Our reforms will build a social security system that’s fairer, more sustainable and fit for the future – so it can always be there for those with the greatest needs to live with the dignity and support they deserve.

“Helping people into good work is at the heart of our approach to tackling poverty and inequality, but the broken social security system we inherited is failing people who can and have the potential to work, as well as the people it’s meant to be there for.

“That’s why we’re introducing a new premium and ending reassessments for those who will never be able to work to improve the safety net for them, while delivering a £1bn employment support package to break down barriers for disabled people into work.

“We’re also rebalancing Universal Credit payment levels so the benefit’s main rate rises above inflation for the first time in a boost for working families.”

Continue Reading

Sports

McDavid exits Oilers’ loss with lower-body injury

Published

on

By

McDavid exits Oilers' loss with lower-body injury

EDMONTON, Alberta — Oilers captain Connor McDavid suffered a lower-body injury and did not return in the third period of a 4-3 overtime loss to the Western Conference-leading Winnipeg Jets on Thursday night.

Goalie Stuart Skinner also was hurt when he was involved in a late-game collision and removed due to concussion protocols. Calvin Pickard stopped three shots in Skinner’s place.

Speaking after the game, coach Kris Knoblauch said there was no update on the statuses of either McDavid or Skinner.

McDavid appeared to get hurt while attempting to chase down the puck in the Jets’ zone when he was bumped by Winnipeg defenseman Josh Morrissey.

In the second period, McDavid assisted on Jeff Skinner‘s goal to extend his point streak to 13 games. McDavid has combined for four goals and 15 assists in the span.

McDavid’s injury came at the same time the Oilers held out NHL leading scorer Leon Draisaitl for precautionary reasons after the forward was hurt in a 7-1 win over Utah on Tuesday. Knoblauch said Draisaitl is day-to-day.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Continue Reading

Trending