Connect with us

Published

on

For 10 months, the nondescript courtroom has been home to endless discussion, accusations and speculation, as lawyers sought to answer why seven young babies had suddenly collapsed and died in the place they should have been safest.

But in the moments before nurse Lucy Letby was found guilty of their murders, there was only a thick silence in courtroom seven.

For the jury of 11 – seven women and four men – the weight on their shoulders was enormous. But after deliberating for more than 100 hours, the foreman quietly and steadily delivered its rulings.

For her victims’ parents, it has been an agonising and unimaginable wait. Many have stood at the court every day during jurors’ deliberations, waiting to learn if their children – who by now would have been approaching their final years of primary school – were among those targeted by Letby.

They have sat through graphic descriptions of their babies’ final moments, as the prosecution tried to prove Letby poisoned them, pumped them with excessive gas or milk, or violently assaulted them.

One of her victims, Child C, was found with an unexplained amount of air in his gut.

As Letby was found guilty of the baby boy’s murder, his mother sobbed and was comforted by those around her. His father stayed still, staring straight ahead.

Another parent clutched a stuffed rabbit to her face as she tried to hold back tears.

Read more: Follow live reaction from court

Lucy Letby
Image:
Lucy Letby’s mugshot has now been released. Pic: Cheshire Constabulary

How the verdicts unfolded

Letby was found guilty of seven murders and the attempted murder of six others at the Countess of Chester hospital’s neonatal unit between June 2015 and June 2016.

She was also found not guilty of two charges of attempted murder.

Sky News is one of just five news organisations that have been given a seat inside the trial, with the rest of the world’s media required to watch from the magistrates’ court across the road via a televised link.

All of the children and their parents have been granted anonymity, although their names were read out in the courtroom during the nine-month trial.

Strict reporting restrictions were put in place, which meant the media could not publish any of the verdicts until the jury had found on all counts.

First, after 76 hours of discussions, the jury unanimously found her guilty of the attempted murders of Children F and L.

They agreed with the prosecution that Letby had poisoned their IV drip bags with insulin on separate occasions, eight months apart.

Seated in the glass-fronted dock, Letby is now a shadow of the smiling, ordinary-looking woman pictured in media reports. She was in her mid-20s when she attacked her victims. She is now 33 and spent almost three years behind bars awaiting this trial.

Her once shiny blonde hair hung long and limp around her face, which is now gaunt and angular. Flanked by guards, as the first verdicts were read out, she bowed her head and wiped away tears.

Susan Letby, the mother of Lucy Letby arrives at Manchester Crown Court ahead of the verdict in the case of nurse Lucy Letby who is accused of the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of another ten, between June 2015 and June 2016 while working on the neonatal unit of the Countess of Chester Hospital. Picture date: Wednesday August 9, 2023. PA Photo. See PA story COURTS Letby. Photo credit should read: Jacob King/PA Wire
Image:
Susan Letby, the mother of Lucy Letby

Her mother, Susan, sobbed as her daughter was taken back to the custody area.

After the first two verdicts, the jury was ordered by the judge, Mr Justice Goss, to try to reach a majority decision on all other counts.

Three days later, the jury returned again and this time, quiet gasps accompanied each guilty verdict in the courtroom.

Letby was found guilty of murdering four of the infants and attempting to murder two more.

She remained emotionless, but as she stood to be taken back down to the cells her shoulders began to shake.

Susan broke down again – whispering “you can’t be serious, this can’t be right” into her husband’s arms – before howling as her only child was led out of court.

John and Susan Letby, the parents of nurse Lucy Letby, outside Manchester Crown Court
Image:
John and Susan Letby, the parents of nurse Lucy Letby, outside Manchester Crown Court

Letby refused to come up from cells

A third set of verdicts came after the jury had been discussing the case for 99 hours and 38 minutes.

But this time, the dock was empty as Letby refused to leave the cells. In her absence, she was found guilty of a further three murders and three more attempts. With this, she surpassed Beverley Allitt and became the UK’s most prolific child murderer.

She was also found not guilty of one of the attacks on Child G, a baby girl.

One mother put her head in her hands and sobbed silently as Letby was found guilty of her child’s murder. Another gasped and then cheered quietly. Their relief was visible – like 15 people had just let go of one collective breath.

This time, John and Susan Letby were silent, resigned, and leant on each other with their eyes closed.

Exclusive: Mother fears Letby attacked her baby too

Pic: Shutterstock
Image:
Pic: Shutterstock

The final verdicts

Five hours of deliberation later, Letby was cleared of another attempted murder, again in her absence, and made it clear, via her defence barrister, she would not be returning to the courtroom under any circumstances – including for sentencing.

The following day, family members who had already received a verdict for their child returned to court, in a show of solidarity for those who had not.

But on six counts, the jury could not reach a decision.

The father of one child stormed out of the room, and several members of the jury cried, while others put their heads in their hands and looked down.

The jury was discharged from its service and sentencing was scheduled for Monday morning at 10am.

Both Letby and her parents were absent from court.

Court artist Elizabeth Cook drawing outside Manchester Crown Court ahead of the verdict in the case of nurse Lucy Letby who is accused of the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of another ten, between June 2015 and June 2016 while working on the neonatal unit of the Countess of Chester Hospital. Picture date: Friday August 11, 2023.
Image:
Court artist Elizabeth Cook drawing outside Manchester Crown Court

The trial

The high-profile case against Letby contrasted with the unremarkable surroundings of courtroom seven at Manchester Crown Court, where the trial sat over for almost a year.

Unlike in the movies, there was no grand wooden interior – instead a small and fairly clinical space where defence barrister Ben Myers KC and Nick Johnson KC, for the prosecution, pored over medical notes, texts, photos and other evidence to make their arguments.

For most of the trial, Letby sat in a dock in front of prison guards, watching as her former friends gave evidence against her, her WhatsApp messages were read out, her Facebook searches revealed and the details of her horrendous crimes made public.

To the right of the dock sat the public gallery which was always filled with the parents of the victims, often teary-eyed but always stoic in their dedication to find out what had happened to their children.

Read more:
More families told their children could be victims
Inside court and the trial of a baby killer
Parents of boys Letby tried to kill criticise hospital
Video shows moment of Letby arrest

Lucy Letby Still 1 [IB1706]. Forensics shorthand

Letby’s parents were positioned in the gallery opposite, frequently making eye contact with their daughter as she was led from the room at the end of each day.

When she was called to give evidence in May, some seven months after the trial started, Letby sat at a small table with two guards on either side of her.

She mostly answered questions calmly but became emotional when photographs of her bedroom after a police search were shown to the court. She spoke quietly and was repeatedly told to raise her voice.

As she was cross-examined she repeatedly contradicted herself, muddling her story, and grew frustrated with the prosecution’s questions. She was accused of only crying for herself – something she denied.

J124 [IB1210]. Forensics shorthand

Justice at last for families changed forever

Letby’s fate rested in the hands of 12 ordinary men and women. Partway through deliberations, one had to be discharged for “good personal reasons”, reducing the number to 11.

For 10 months they have listened closely to everything that has been said, studiously making notes, the importance of this job not lost on any of them.

During one set of verdicts, a female member of the jury put her head down and cried, while her fellow jurors looked down at their desks.

No motive has ever been established, and perhaps it will never be known why the “evil” nurse chose to target defenceless infants.

Lucy Letby
Image:
Lucy Letby

Families have been changed forever, and may never truly be able to come to terms with the loss of lives that had only just begun.

And now, Letby could likely face a record-breaking sentence.

For her victims’ families, her imprisonment may finally bring some small justice that has been eight years in the making.

Continue Reading

UK

‘My lungs felt like they were filled with blood’: Stab victim reveals reality of knife crime

Published

on

By

'My lungs felt like they were filled with blood': Stab victim reveals reality of knife crime

As we pulled back the hospital curtain, he was hunched over and clearly in pain.

He had climbed off the hospital bed to greet us with a polite smile, then hobbled back to lie down again.

Every breath was uncomfortable, but he wanted to share the horrible reality of knife crime.

The young victim
Image:
The young knife attack victim in Manchester

“I’ve never in my life been stabbed so I don’t know how it’s meant to even feel,” he said.

“The pain came when I realised the blood’s just spitting out of the side of my rib cage and that’s when I started panicking.

“My lungs felt like they were filled with blood… I thought each breath that I take, I’m going to drown in my own blood.

“I just felt as though I was slowly slipping away.”

Paramedics helped save his life and got him to the hospital in Manchester.

The young victim was clearly in pain

Sky News cannot name the young victim or go into the details of the attack because the police are investigating his case.

We were alongside a support worker called Favour, who is part of a growing team called Navigators. They go into hospitals to help young victims of violence.

While checking on how his recovery is going, she gently asked what he wanted to do next.

“You should have the right to feel safe,” she said to him.

“So don’t blame yourself for what happened… we are going to be there to help you.”

Favour talks with the victim
Image:
Favour talks with the victim

‘Scarring and traumatic’

In a corridor outside the major trauma ward at the Manchester Royal Infirmary, Favour said: “They are often scared, often really tired from being in hospital.

“It does stay with you, not just for a couple of weeks, but it can go on for months, years, because it is something very scarring and traumatic.

“Having someone to talk to, being able to be very vulnerable with… that can lead you to find different spaces that are safe for you, can make a huge difference.”

In the adjacent Children’s Hospital in Manchester, we met the clinical lead at the Greater Manchester Violence Reduction Unit.

Support worker Favour is part of a team called Navigators
Image:
Support worker Favour is part of a team called Navigators

Dr Rachel Jenner is a senior consultant who expanded her emergency department work into the wider mission of violence reduction after treating one particular young stab victim.

“When he arrived at the hospital, he was obviously very distressed and stressed,” she said. “A little bit later on, when things were stable, I asked him if he wanted me to call his mum.

“When I asked that question, he just kind of physically crumpled on the bed and just looked like the vulnerable child that he was, and that was really impactful for me.”

Dr Rachel Jenner
Image:
Dr Rachel Jenner

‘Positive results’

The Violence Reduction Unit was established in 2019 with a commitment from the city’s authorities to work together better to prevent violence and deal with it efficiently when it occurs.

Dr Jenner still treats young knife crime victims, but revealed the number of stab-related admissions is falling in her hospital.

“The trend is downwards,” she confirmed. “We’ve definitely seen some positive results.”

The latest statistics in England and Wales show the number of hospital admissions for assault by a sharp object fell by 3% to 3,735 admissions in the year ending September 2024.

“We’re never complacent,” Dr Jenner said. “You reality check yourself all the time, because obviously if… someone gets stabbed, then it’s quite possible that I’ll be treating them.”

She said the Navigators are crucial to working with young patients.

“They have a really different way of engaging with young people, they’re much better at it than many other professionals,” she said.

“It’s not a one-size-fits-all model, they actually wrap around that support according to circumstances… that’s a really positive improvement.”

Tacking violence ‘like infectious disease’

Dr Jenner added: “We try and take a public health approach to violence reduction. In the same way that we would address an infectious disease, if we can use those methods and principles to look at violence.

“Not just reacting when it happens, but actually looking at how we can prevent the disease of violence, that in the long term will have a bigger impact.”

The key is teamwork, Dr Jenner said. Collaboration between the police, community leaders, victim support, health workers and people in education has noticeably improved.

Read more:
What are UK’s knife crime laws?
Plans for two types of ID to buy knives online

Students practise stopping a bleeding
Image:
Students practise stopping a bleed

Children describe knife crime threat

The hospital also sends consultants into schools to teach pupils how to stop bleeds as part of an annual nationwide initiative that reaches 50,000 young people.

At a Stop The Bleed session in Bolton, Greater Manchester, we met 11 and 12-year-olds growing up with the threat of knife crime.

One Year 7 boy said: “There was a stabbing quite near where I live so it does happen, but it’s very crucial to learn how to stop this bleed and how to stop deaths.”

Another two friends talked about a boy their age who had been involved in an incident with a knife.

“No one would expect it for someone that young,” one said. “They’re just new to high school, fresh out of primary, and they shouldn’t just be doing that, too young.”

Teacher
Image:
Sanaa Karajada

‘We are dealing with it every day’

Their school has decided to tackle the problem of knife crime head-on rather than pretend it isn’t affecting their pupils.

The pastoral lead at the school, Sanaa Karajada, told Sky News: “We are dealing with it every single day, so we have policies and procedures in place to prevent any escalations in our schools or in the community.

“It is very, very worrying and it’s upsetting that [students] are having to go through this, but you know we’ve got to be realistic… if we are shying away from it, we’re just saying it’s not a problem.

“But it is a problem within the community, it’s a problem in all of the UK.”

The government has pledged to halve knife crime within a decade.

These signs of progress may offer some hope, but there is still so much work to do.

Continue Reading

UK

Criminal investigation launched into Glastonbury performances of Kneecap and Bob Vylan

Published

on

By

Criminal investigation launched into Glastonbury performances of Kneecap and Bob Vylan

A criminal investigation has been launched into the Glastonbury performances of Kneecap and Bob Vylan.

Police announced the decision on Monday afternoon after reviewing video footage and audio of both sets, which took place on Saturday.

It comes after the BBC said it regretted the decision not to pull the live stream for Bob Vylan’s Glastonbury performance, during which frontman Bobby Vylan shouted anti-IDF (Israel Defence Forces) chants.

The punk-rap duo have also had US visas revoked and been dropped by their US representative, United Talent Agency.

Later on Monday, as the story had made headlines throughout the day, drummer Bobbie Vylan released a video statement on Instagram, saying politicians who have spent time criticising the band should be “utterly ashamed” for giving “room” to this over other issues.

He also addressed what was said on stage, saying: “Regardless of how it was said, calling for an end to the slaughter of innocents is never wrong. To civilians of Israel, understand this anger is not directed at you, and don’t let your government persuade you that a call against an army is a call against the people.”

Moglai Bap and Mo Chara of Kneecap perform at Glastonbury. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Moglai Bap and Mo Chara of Kneecap perform at Glastonbury. Pic: Reuters

In a statement, Avon and Somerset Police said that after reviewing footage of both performances, further enquiries are required and a criminal investigation is now being undertaken.

“A senior detective has been appointed to lead this investigation,” a spokesperson said. “This has been recorded as a public order incident at this time while our enquiries are at an early stage.”

The force said the investigation will be “evidence-led and will closely consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes”.

“We have received a large amount of contact in relation to these events from people across the world and recognise the strength of public feeling,” it added. “There is absolutely no place in society for hate.”

What happened?

Bob Vylan performing on the West Holts Stage, during the Glastonbury Festival at Worthy Farm in Somerset. Yui Mok/PA Wire
Image:
Bob Vylan performing on the West Holts Stage, during the Glastonbury Festival at Worthy Farm in Somerset. Yui Mok/PA Wire

During Bob Vylan’s set, the duo performed in front of a screen that showed several messages, including one that said Israel’s actions in Gaza amount to “genocide”.

Bobby Vylan also led chants of “death to the IDF”.

The set was live streamed by the BBC as part of its Glastonbury coverage, but has not been made available on demand.

Politicians including the prime minister have criticised the performance. Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis said the chants “crossed a line” and that there was no place at the festival for “antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence”.

A BBC spokesperson said the broadcaster respected freedom of expression “but stands firmly against incitement to violence”.

They added: “The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves…

“The team were dealing with a live situation, but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What’s the Glastonbury controversy?

Media watchdog Ofcom said it was in talks with the BBC and that the broadcaster “clearly has questions to answer” over the stream.

Irish-language rap trio Kneecap were on stage afterwards. Before their appearance at the festival, there had been calls for Glastonbury to remove them from the bill – as rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh (who performs as Mo Chara) is facing a terror charge, accused of displaying a flag in support of the proscribed group Hezbollah at a gig in London last November.

Glastonbury organisers kept them on the line-up, but the BBC chose not to stream their set live. An edited version was later made available on demand.

On stage, the band led chants of “f*** Keir Starmer”.

O hAnnaidh’s bandmate Naoise O Caireallain (Moglai Bap) said they would “start a riot outside the courts” for O hAnnaidh’s next appearance, before clarifying: “No riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine.”

Hundreds of people turned out in protest for his first court appearance earlier this month.

After the police investigation was announced, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy criticised the “appalling and unacceptable” scenes at Glastonbury and said the government would not tolerate antisemitism.

She said she had called BBC director-general Tim Davie after the broadcast of Bob Vylan’s set to find out why it had aired, and why the feed had not been cut.

“I expect answers to these questions without delay,” she said.

Ms Nandy said she had spoken to members of the Jewish community, including attendees at Glastonbury, who said they were concerned by imagery and slogans and ended up creating their own “safe space”.

Christopher Landau, the US deputy secretary of state, said the band had been banned from the US ahead of a tour later this year due to their “hateful tirade” at the festival.

Bob Vylan were set to perform in Chicago, Brooklyn and Philadelphia in the autumn. They are due to perform at Radar Festival in Manchester on Saturday and Boardmasters, a surfing and music festival in Newquay, Cornwall, in August.

Sharing a statement on Instagram after the Glastonbury set, Bobby Vylan said: “Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place.

“As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us.”

The war in Gaza, which has continued for more than 18 months, began after Hamas militants launched attacks in Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages.

More than 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, more than 400 of them during the fighting in Gaza.

Israel’s offensive in Gaza has devastated the enclave and killed around 56,500 people, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, which does not differentiate between civilians and combatants, but says more than half of the dead are women and children.

Continue Reading

UK

Man, 92, found guilty of rape and murder nearly 60 years ago

Published

on

By

Man, 92, found guilty of rape and murder nearly 60 years ago

A 92-year-old man has been found guilty of raping and murdering a woman born 133 years ago – in what’s thought to be the UK’s longest cold case to reach trial.

Ryland Headley was convicted at Bristol Crown Court of killing 75-year-old mother of two, Louisa Dunne, at her home back in June 1967.

Latest DNA technology – as well as matching palm prints taken at the scene more than 57 years ago – led a jury to find Headley guilty on both charges.

Ryland Headley, now aged 92, has been found guilty of rape and murder. Pic Avon and Somerset Police
Image:
Ryland Headley, now aged 92, has been found guilty of rape and murder. Pic Avon and Somerset Police

The front of Louisa Dunne's home. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image:
The front of Louisa Dunne’s home. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Detective Inspector Dave Marchant from Avon and Somerset Police said forces across the country are investigating whether Headley could be linked to other unsolved crimes.

“This investigation was a blend of new and old forensic techniques – DNA being the latest and greatest…but we were able to utilise that original investigative material,” he said.

On the morning of 28 June 1967, neighbours noticed that Louisa Dunne, born in 1892, wasn’t standing on her doorstep as usual.

They found her lying dead inside her home in the Easton area of Bristol – bruised, blood coming from one ear, vomit in her mouth and her underwear around her ankles.

More on Crime

The police investigation at the time found traces of semen on intimate swabs and on the skirt she was wearing, but it was around 20 years before DNA testing.

Louisa Dunne's skirt. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image:
Louisa Dunne’s skirt. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Map showing original house-to-house coverage. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image:
Map showing original house-to-house coverage. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary

A palm print was also found on one of the rear windows inside the house.

“The original investigation was, by all accounts, massive,” DI Marchant told Sky News.

“Over 19,000 palm print eliminations were taken from men and boys in the Bristol area and beyond. Over 8,000 house-to-house records were completed and several thousand statements were taken,” he added.

But Headley – in his 30s at the time – lived just outside the ring of houses where palm prints were taken.

A post-mortem examination found she had “extensive abrasions” on her face and that the most likely explanation was that a hand had been pressed against her mouth.

The back of Louisa Dunne's house. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image:
The back of Louisa Dunne’s house. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Palmprint images. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image:
Palmprint images. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Around 20 crates of evidence were stored in Avon and Somerset Police HQ for nearly six decades alongside other cold cases.

The case was reviewed in 2024, with new DNA testing on the sperm found on the skirt Ms Dunne had been wearing.

Investigating officers were told the results showed a DNA match on the national database that was “a billion times” more likely to belong to Headley than anyone else.

“I had to read that email several times to fully digest the content of it and believe what I was reading. Then it was, okay, game on, let’s get this investigation going,” said DI Marchant.

Headley was arrested at his home in Ipswich in November 2024 – he did not give evidence during the trial.

Headley during his arrest. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image:
Headley during his arrest. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Louisa Parker (later Dunne) in 1933. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Image:
Louisa Dunne in 1933. Pic: Avon and Somerset Constabulary

The jury heard that forensic experts had matched Headley’s palm print, taken on arrest, to that of the one found on Ms Dunne’s window at the time.

The judge allowed the prosecution to raise the fact that Headley had already spent time in jail for committing two other rapes, around a decade after Ms Dunne’s murder.

Both those cases involved attacks against elderly women in similar circumstances.

Prosecutor Anna Vigars KC told the jury these offences demonstrate to all of us that Headley “has a tendency” to act in exactly the same way that we say that he did back in 1967.

“In other words, to break into people’s homes at night and, in some cases, to target an elderly woman living alone, to have sex with her despite her attempts to fend him off, and to threaten violence,” she said.

Ryland Headley is on trial for the 1967  rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne.
Pic: PA
Image:
Ryland Headley is on trial for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Pic: PA

Speaking before the verdict, Louisa Dunne’s granddaughter recalled the moment police told her of progress in the cold case, nearly six decades on: “She said, ‘this is about your grandmother’, and I said, ‘have they caught him?’ It came out, I never thought I’d say anything like that. Have you caught him? and she said, ‘we have a suspect’.”

She described the impact of the attack on her grandmother and that a conviction would bring relief:

“I accepted it. I accepted that some murders just never get solved. And some people just have to live with that emptiness and that sadness.

“I think it’s appalling, absolutely appalling. The poor woman – it must have been absolutely terrifying. And the reality of a rape, I don’t like thinking about, I don’t think anybody does,” she added.

Read more from Sky News:
Weight loss jabs linked to potentially fatal side effect
Reform would win most seats in general election, poll suggests

The Crown Prosecution Service told Sky News that it was not aware of a cold case with a longer period between the offence and trial.

DI Marchant told Sky News it demonstrates the value of reviewing such cases: “I think this investigation shows you should never give up.

“You should never look at an investigation and say, ‘oh, it’s too old, it happened X number of years ago’ and have an arbitrary cut off point. At the time we re-instigated it in 2024… there was a chance a suspect could still be alive and as it turned out – he was.”

Continue Reading

Trending