Connect with us

Published

on

The first college football Power Rankings are here and who else but the two-time defending national champion Georgia Bulldogs reign supreme.

Michigan and Ohio State are battling it out for second with the Wolverines narrowly edging the Buckeyes for the No. 2 spot.

The rest of the top 10 is filled with fellow blue bloods like Alabama, LSU and USC while Florida State and Texas are hoping for a return to former glory in 2023.

With the Power Rankings out, our writers break down the best and worst case scenario for each top 25 team this season.

A collection of 57 college football experts at ESPN voted on the preseason top 25 Power Rankings.


Best case: A third straight national championship. Georgia would become the first FBS program in the modern era to win three straight national titles. Minnesota was the last team to do it in 1934, 1935 and 1936. Yes, Georgia’s nonconference schedule is especially soft after the SEC ordered the Bulldogs to cancel a home-and-home series against Oklahoma, which is joining the conference next year. The Bulldogs replaced the Sooners with Ball State. They’ll also play FCS opponent UT Martin, UAB and struggling Georgia Tech. The Bulldogs play South Carolina, Kentucky, Missouri and Ole Miss at home. They’ll play only three true SEC road games — at Auburn, Vanderbilt and Tennessee — and will face Florida in Jacksonville, Florida. Georgia will be heavy favorites in every game it plays. If Carson Beck steps in and plays well at quarterback, the offense should be explosive. The defense has to replace a number of key contributors again, but four of the top five tacklers are back in Smael Mondon Jr., Jamon Dumas-Johnson, Malaki Starks and Javon Bullard.

Worst case: Two losses? For the schedule reasons stated above, it’s difficult to imagine the Bulldogs losing twice in the regular season. If we’re talking lowest floor, then Beck would have to struggle in his first season as a starter and Georgia’s running game would have to be less productive. Beck will benefit from having what might be the deepest receiver corps in school history after the Bulldogs added Missouri transfer Dominic Lovett and Mississippi State transfer Rara Thomas. All-America tight end Brock Bowers and receiver Ladd McConkey are back as well. Maybe Georgia slips up against Ole Miss at home and then falls at Tennessee on Nov. 18. Probably not. Losing at Tennessee and then falling to Alabama or LSU in the SEC championship is probably a more plausible scenario. If Georgia finishes unbeaten in the regular season and falls in the SEC championship game, will it get the benefit of doubt from the CFP selection committee? Or will its nonconference schedule keep it out of another playoff? — Mark Schlabach


​​Best case: College Football Playoff championship. After winning the Big Ten title and making it to the playoff the past two years, Michigan’s goal is to make it to the final game and win a national championship. The team is returning key starters from last season, including quarterback J.J. McCarthy and talented running back duo Blake Corum and Donovan Edwards, and filled some holes through the transfer portal in the offseason. The schedule is back-loaded, with the team starting the season with East Carolina, UNLV, Bowling Green and Rutgers, then facing Penn State, Maryland and Ohio State to finish out the season. That stretch will determine how far this team goes, but the pieces are there for the Wolverines to reach their goal.

Worst case: 10-2 with losses to Penn State and Ohio State. Maryland has an argument here to make it 9-3, but the way this team is set up, this should be its floor. The Wolverines can’t look past Penn State, though, as that team will be better than last season. Quarterback Drew Allar has all the tools to be an excellent passer for Penn State, and the offense returns running backs Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen, who combined for 1,928 yards and 22 touchdowns last season. The Buckeyes are on a mission to end their losing streak to Michigan and have spent the entire offseason focusing on the last two games of their season. Those two losses would be devastating to Michigan’s season. — Tom VanHaaren

play

2:30

Should Alabama have been ranked lower in the AP Top 25?

Greg McElroy explains why he’s surprised to find Alabama ahead of LSU and why he expects Wisconsin to climb in the first preseason AP Poll.


Best case: National championship. The top goal in Columbus never changes, but Ohio State is way overdue for a title, especially considering its historic quarterback run under coach Ryan Day. Despite the Michigan meltdown, Ohio State outplayed eventual national champion Georgia before a calamitous fourth quarter. The Buckeyes clearly must improve on defense and limit the breakdowns that surfaced in the Michigan and Georgia losses. But a second year under coordinator Jim Knowles and a potentially elite front seven fuels hope for the unit. Knowles needs his most talented players — ends J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, tackle Michael Hall Jr., linebacker Tommy Eichenberg, safeties Lathan Ransom and Sonny Styles — to be great on a consistent basis. There are questions on offense, particularly at quarterback and tackle, but Day’s overall track record with the unit inspires plenty of confidence. Ohio State’s road schedule isn’t easy, especially a Nov. 25 visit to Michigan Stadium, but the Buckeyes haven’t dropped three straight to the Wolverines since 1997.

Worst case: Ohio State has never lost more than two games in a season under Day and has only dropped three or more games in a season three times since 2001. The Buckeyes will need to be road warriors this fall, as they visit Michigan, Notre Dame and Wisconsin, as well as Indiana, Purdue and Rutgers. They also host Penn State and an ascending Maryland team with a strong offense. A four-loss season is highly unlikely but possible for the Buckeyes. It would stem from continued regression on defense and the abrupt end to a stretch of superb quarterback play. The questions at the offensive tackle spots would need to be amplified, as would health and production issues at running back. The defensive line has been ordinary lately and, in theory, could continue down the path despite so much talent and experience. Anything shy of the CFP would be disappointing for Ohio State, and 9-3 or 8-4 would trigger significant changes. — Adam Rittenberg


Best case: National championship. The roster, top to bottom, is championship-caliber. Finishing in the top three of the recruiting rankings virtually every season for the past decade will do that. But at key positions, Alabama needs things to break exactly right. Whether it’s Tyler Buchner, Jalen Milroe or Ty Simpson, someone needs to separate himself at quarterback. And while the QB doesn’t necessarily have to be another Bryce Young, he does need to take care of the football and compliment what should be a solid running game with Jase McClellan, Roydell Williams, Jam Miller and the No. 1- (Richard Young) and No. 2-ranked backs (Justice Haynes) in the 2023 class. What’s more, the Tide needs to develop at receiver, and quickly, after taking a big step back last year in terms of creating separation and drops. Do that, and the offense will be solid enough to navigate a tricky SEC schedule. Remember, Alabama’s two losses last season came on the road and on the final play. And this season, both of those games — LSU and Tennessee — are at home.

Worst case: Three regular-season losses. The offense has a lot of what-ifs. Almost too many, in fact. Everyone will focus on the quarterback, but the lackluster play at receiver is almost as glaring an issue. Bryce Young was just so good that he covered up for it. Unless Ja’Corey Brooks or Isaiah Bond or someone else steps up in a big way, Alabama will struggle to score in crunch time. And if that happens, go ahead and chalk up back-to-back losses to LSU and Tennessee. From there, it’s hard to see Alabama winning both against Texas and on the road at Texas A&M. — Alex Scarborough


Best case: College Football Playoff semifinal. Nobody saw LSU getting to the SEC championship game a year ago, especially after getting pummeled by Tennessee 40-13 at home the second week of October. But the Tigers picked themselves up off the turf, kept getting better, and Brian Kelly squeezed everything and then some out of his first LSU team. His second team will be even deeper. Kelly knows more about this team, and most importantly, the Tigers have a seasoned quarterback, Jayden Daniels, who has proven on big stages he can beat teams both passing and running. If LSU can manage to get through the month of September unscathed, that Nov. 4 game at Alabama could end up being a play-in game for the playoff.

Worst case: 8-5 with losses to Florida State, Ole Miss, Alabama, Texas A&M and the bowl opponent. The Tigers finished 10-4 last season, and that was with losses in two of their final three games. Winning just eight games as an encore to what LSU did a year ago would be a disappointment on the Bayou. But there aren’t a lot of easy outs on LSU’s schedule, and the September slate is filled with potholes. Getting Alabama in Tuscaloosa this season automatically makes it a more difficult schedule, and four of the first six games are away from Tiger Stadium. LSU’s talent level is such that there shouldn’t be a significant drop-off, but making it back to the SEC championship game will prove difficult. — Chris Low


Best case: Every player and coach at USC this season knows what they have on paper. A Heisman-winning quarterback in his final season. An explosive offense that could be deeper and better than last year. A defensive unit that has heard plenty about how much it needed to improve. A slew of talented transfers at key positions who all saw the potential in Lincoln Riley’s team when they decided to leave Arizona, Georgia, and Oklahoma State for Southern California. And perhaps most importantly, the motivation of coming up just short of a playoff spot. There’s no doubt USC has the talent and ability to not just make the playoff but compete for a title. Plenty of things have to go right, but that’s what the Trojans’ ceiling looks like in Riley’s second year on the job. The task at hand is tough given Caleb Williams will be expected to replicate a historic season, while the team as a whole has a high bar to clear given the leap they made last year and the tougher schedule they face this season. Improvement isn’t always linear, but USC has the players to prove it can be.

Worst case: It’s not easy turning around a 4-8 season into a 10-3 year. What may be harder is improving upon that in the following year. That’s what Riley and USC have to deal with this season, on top of a schedule that includes Notre Dame and Oregon on the road as well as Utah, Washington and UCLA over the last six weeks of the season. The Trojans could be and likely are a better team this season, but the turnover margin that kept their defense afloat last year could regress, as could the offense despite having a Heisman-winning quarterback under center. Injuries could always get in the way as well. But all of that being said, it’s hard to see a floor lower than competing for the Pac-12 title for this team. The Trojans are too talented on offense, especially, to not be in every game they play. — Paolo Uggetti


Best case: Florida State is at a point now where it is in position to compete for championships, so it is not hard to envision a high ceiling in 2023 as a College Football Playoff appearance. The Seminoles will have an opportunity to prove themselves in the regular season (two SEC nonconference games, including the opener against LSU) and potentially in the ACC championship game. Getting there without divisions certainly made the path easier given the way Clemson had previously dominated the Atlantic Division over the past seven seasons. The Seminoles will have one of the best, most dynamic offenses in the country with virtually all its production back — including quarterback Jordan Travis, running back Trey Benson and receiver Johnny Wilson — plus a potential top-15 NFL pick in defensive end Jared Verse. The mindset, mentality and confidence has changed in this group. They are aiming for a championship.

Worst case: Florida State just might be ahead of schedule under coach Mike Norvell, entering his fourth year in the program, considering where it was when he inherited it. Until Florida State goes back to dominating its ACC opponents, there may still be some doubts about whether it can run through its schedule without a hiccup along the way. Florida State gets LSU and Clemson in September, has tough road games against Wake Forest (the Deacs have won three straight in the series) and Pitt (in November, not fun for Florida teams!) plus rivals Miami (expected to be better) and Florida (the Seminoles barely held on last year). Given the talent returning, it is hard to envision the team winning fewer than nine games. — Andrea Adelson


Best case: College Football Playoff semifinal. If Penn State can finish as a one-loss Big Ten champion, it would be extremely difficult for the selection committee to snub the Nittany Lions — but that means they have to at least beat either Ohio State or Michigan and force a three-way tie in the Big Ten East. Even then it isn’t a guarantee, because Penn State’s nonconference schedule against West Virginia, Delaware and UMass is going to be heavily scrutinized by the committee. Without more Big Ten opponents in the CFP top 25 ranking, Penn State’s best opportunities will remain against Ohio State and Michigan. If they only get one of those wins, the Nittany Lions better look the part of a top-four team every other step of the way.

Worst case: 9-3 with losses to Ohio State, Michigan and Maryland. Considering this was an 11-win team last year, there shouldn’t be much of a drop-off with so much talent returning on both sides of the ball. It’s also the first time since 2019 Penn State has had both coordinators return for a second season. Since 2013, Penn State has faced both Ohio State and Michigan every season and has never gone 2-0 against them, only defeating the Buckeyes once during that span. The third loss might be a surprise to everyone but Maryland, which will have home-field advantage Nov. 4 and has been quietly making significant strides under coach Mike Locksley. — Heather Dinich


Best case: We all know what Clemson is capable of when its offense is hitting just right, so it stands to reason that with a new offensive coordinator and better quarterback/receiver play, the Tigers will be back in the College Football Playoff. That should always be the highest ceiling for a program that reached that level six straight years from 2015 to 2020. There will be ample opportunities for the Tigers to prove themselves, with games against Florida State, Notre Dame and South Carolina among the biggest. That South Carolina game has taken on even greater meaning this season considering how that loss affected 2022. The defense should be outstanding with another strong front and the best linebacker duo in the nation in Jeremiah Trotter Jr. and Barrett Carter. If Garrett Riley can get Cade Klubnik and company to produce the type of offensive numbers we are used to seeing out of Clemson, this will be a playoff team.

Worst case: This team has won at least 10 games for 12 straight years, so it is hard to imagine any floor that goes lower than 10 wins. But there is some degree of difficulty involved in this schedule, with road games against NC State (Clemson lost here in 2021) and South Carolina and home games against preseason-ranked Florida State, Notre Dame (Clemson lost at South Bend last year) and North Carolina. Clemson should still be favored to win all or nearly all these games. Still, there have been unexpected losses over the past two seasons, so it would no longer be a surprise if a low-floor season meant no playoff appearance. The more surprising low floor would be a nine-win season. Given the strength of the team returning, Clemson should win at least 10 games yet again. — Adelson


Best case: Steve Sarkisian has won two national championships as an assistant at USC and Alabama, and the Longhorns have the talent to play for a national championship. Week 2’s showcase against Alabama doesn’t have to make or break them, but a good showing or a win in Tuscaloosa could get Sarkisian over the hump. After that, they don’t leave Texas for a game until Nov. 18 against an Iowa State team plagued by a gambling scandal. As usual, the Oklahoma game could make or break the Longhorns. If they can dominate the Sooners again, after a 49-0 win last year, there’s a manageable schedule, with road games against Baylor and Houston before a Nov. 11 showdown in Fort Worth on Nov. 11; the Frogs are 7-3 against Texas in their past 10 games.

Worst case: Several oddsmakers have Texas with a 9.5-win over/under on the season, and Sarkisian has never won more than nine games in a season as a head coach. With two of the best backs in the country last season in Bijan Robinson and Roschon Johnson, there were still puzzling lapses where Quinn Ewers struggled and the Horns couldn’t lean on their backs. If Ewers struggles again, there could be a quarterback controversy with Maalik Murphy and Arch Manning waiting in the wings. Oklahoma should be improved, and a late-season stretch against BYU, Kansas State, at TCU and at Iowa State, then a finale against an experienced Texas Tech team, could provide plenty of upsets if Sarkisian can’t get all the pieces to work together. With all the expectations, anything less than a nine-win season going into the SEC next year could raise big questions about Sarkisian’s future given the amount of talent he has had to work with. — Dave Wilson


Best case: College Football Playoff semifinal. The Vols would have been in the playoff a year ago had it not been for the November debacle in Columbia where South Carolina won in a 63-38 rout. So Josh Heupel’s club wasn’t too far off in just his second season, as Tennessee won 11 games for the first time since the 2001 season. Despite losing Hooker and some other key players, Heupel thinks this will be the deepest and most talented roster he has had, and on defense, he anticipates the Vols being able to play more players. Tennessee gets Georgia at home in the next-to-last game of the season, so there’s a chance the SEC Eastern Division title could be on the line that Nov. 18 day in Knoxville.

Worst case: 8-5 with losses to Florida, Texas A&M, Alabama, Georgia and the bowl opponent. Even though Tennessee avoids a stout nonconference test, the SEC schedule tilts against the Vols this season with trips to Florida, Alabama and Kentucky. This is the most excitement surrounding the start of a Tennessee football season in two decades, and the Vols aren’t going to catch anybody by surprise starting the season ranked so highly and with Heupel’s offense putting up record-setting numbers a year ago. If the offense falls off some with Joe Milton at the helm, is the defense good enough to make up the difference? The pivotal game is Florida. The Vols haven’t won in Gainesville since 2003. Their season could vary wildly depending on they fare in the Swamp. — Low


Best case: CFP. After winning 11 games in coach Kalen DeBoer’s first season, the Huskies have every right to dream about the playoff. With one of the nation’s best quarterbacks (Michael Penix Jr.) returning, alongside arguably the best trio of receivers in the country, Washington has the foundation to be one of the most explosive offenses in the country. The Huskies play four preseason-ranked teams in a six-week stretch starting mid-October, which provides some obvious stumbling blocks that also serve as potential résumé enhancers.

Worst case: 6-6. If there is reason to be skeptical of the Huskies, it’s that during their 11-win season a year ago, they missed the Pac-12’s two best teams, Utah and USC. Maybe that was bad luck and took away their chances to knock both from the conference title game or maybe it boosted UW’s year-end record. There’s no way to know. And with all the offseason player movement, these sorts of preseason prognostications are even more guesswork than they had been in previous years. No chance UW misses a bowl, but everything else is plausible. — Kyle Bonagura

play

0:46

Finebaum on Harbaugh-NCAA situation: ‘A disaster on both sides’

Paul Finebaum discusses why the NCAA-Jim Harbaugh situation has escalated and what it could mean for Michigan football.


Best case: CFP. Had things broken slightly differently in either of the past two seasons, the Utes could have been there. Instead, they suffered the same fate as so many Pac-12 champions before them and earned the unglamorous distinction of being a Power 5 champion not to reach the playoff. That’s why it’s easy to forecast a possible scenario in which the Utes do, finally, break through. It would serve as some kind of poetic justice for the Pac-12 to qualify a team for the CFP as it crumbles to the ground. And what better way to build a playoff-contending team than with a two-time conference championship-winning quarterback (Cam Rising) and the most reliable coach in the conference (Kyle Whittingham)?

Worst case: 7-5. Starting the year with a pair of losses to Florida and Baylor and then a 6-3 conference season — with a schedule that currently shows four ranked opponents — isn’t hard to imagine. In the Conference of Parity, that’s just how things work. There’s rarely a significant gap from the best teams to those in the middle tier, but anything below seven wins would be quite the disaster for a program that had become a standard-bearer. — Bonagura


Best case: 11-1 and a CFP semifinal. Notre Dame has a chance to go from good to great with transfer quarterback Sam Hartman leading the offense. Hartman, though, never defeated Clemson in three tries as Wake Forest’s starting quarterback. That game is Nov. 4 at Clemson, and the Tigers could be playing for a spot in the CFP. Notre Dame gets Ohio State and USC at home. Because the independent Irish don’t have a conference title game, they can realistically afford to lose one game. They can really wow the committee, though, if they earn wins against Power 5 conference champs if Ohio State, USC and/or Clemson win their respective league titles.

Worst case: 9-3 with losses to Ohio State, USC and Clemson. It IS only Freeman’s second season — and this team has something to prove after losses to Marshall and Stanford last year. The offense features one of the best offensive lines and a talented group of running backs, but there were multiple staff moves, including the internal promotion of tight ends coach Gerad Parker to offensive coordinator. To be a complete CFP contender, the Irish will need to be more dominant on their defensive line, particularly against Ohio State. They lost top pass-rushers Isaiah Foskey and Jayson Ademilola. Marshall, Navy and USC all ran for more than 200 yards against Notre Dame last year, and the defense surrendered at least 32 points in the final four games. — Dinich


Best case: Making the College Football Playoff. The Ducks have the quarterback to do it, they have the talent and depth to do it, and, if Dan Lanning’s hire was any indication, they should have the defense to do it, too. Additions such as edge rusher Jordan Burch from South Carolina, safety Evan Williams and even true freshman Matayo Uiagalelei should give that side of the ball an improvement they badly need, while Traeshon Holden will give quarterback Bo Nix more firepower to play with. Their toughest games (Utah, USC, Washington and Oregon State) are all interrupted by a game that, on paper, should be easier for the Ducks, meaning there’s no absolutely brutal stretch to their schedule. While USC may be getting more attention, the Ducks have just as good a chance to win the conference in what will also be their final year in the Pac-12.

Worst case: The Ducks’ talent makes their floor pretty high. Things could go wrong if there’s a key injury or two, but their depth should be good enough to keep them afloat in the case of anything unforeseen. The defense needs serious improvement since it will face not just Texas Tech early on, but also the Pac-12’s gauntlet of elite quarterbacks. Matching last year’s win total of 10 should be more than doable, and it’s hard to see them dropping lower than nine wins. Missing the Pac-12 championship would make the season a disappointment, but if the Ducks don’t tighten things up on both sides of the ball, especially late in games, that’s a definite possibility once again this year. — Uggetti


Best case: Another Big 12 run is well within reach, particularly if the Horned Frogs’ additions are as good as advertised. Chandler Morris finally gets his turn in Sonny Dykes’ QB machine, Trey Sanders gives TCU a bruising back to fill Kendre Miller‘s shoes, a restocked WR corps is even deeper than last year’s star-heavy crew, and the Frogs are back lighting up scoreboards. The key will be replacing some key stars on defense, but if the defense can take a step forward, then all of a sudden, TCU will be a big player in the national scene again (they’ll have plenty of eyeballs in Week 1 against Colorado and Coach Prime). The Frogs are potential favorites in their first six games until a stretch that includes a Big 12 title rematch at Kansas State, a trip to Lubbock against a talented Texas Tech team and then the Longhorns coming to town Nov. 11. If TCU survives that stretch, there’s a big game at 11 a.m. on Black Friday against Oklahoma.

Worst case: Year 1 is a tough bar to clear for Dykes and the Frogs, as the coach debuted with one of the most remarkable seasons in college football history. A new offensive coordinator in Kendal Briles and a new starter in Chandler Morris, along with new faces all over the offense, could see some growing pains. If the defense isn’t stingy enough to cover for them, there are land mines in a trip to Houston and against Dykes’ old team when SMU visits. With a backloaded schedule, things could get messy down the stretch. It’s mathematically unlikely for TCU to win all those late games they won last year, and an 8-5 season could feel like a letdown. — Wilson


Best case: A Big 12 title repeat. The Wildcats face plenty of potential toss-up games — home games against TCU and a potentially resurgent Baylor, road trips to Missouri, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech and Texas (and rival Kansas???) — but they might only be a true underdog once, at Texas. If their remodeled receiving corps and secondary hold up and they find some of the same late-game magic that drove them win three of four one-score finishes last year, they have a clear path to another Big 12 championship appearance. And if you can make it to the big game, you can win it. They probably have too many toss-ups to win them all and reach the CFP, but an 11-2 season and title repeat are on the table.

Worst case: It’s really hard to win most or all of your close games for two straight years. If said receiver and secondary turnover flips the big-play battle in favor of KSU opponents, it could also flip quite a few games. In the Big 12, you’re constantly playing in tight contests, and if most or all of them go against the Wildcats, a floor of 6-6 or so — the same regular-season record that last year’s defending Big 12 champion (Baylor) suffered — is a possibility. — Bill Connelly


Best case: Winning the Pac-12. Seriously. The Beavers remain one of the most underrated teams — not just in the Pac-12, but in the country. There’s little flash or star power on the roster, but plenty of top-tier talent and depth that gives OSU one of the best defenses in the West. The offense is truly the question, but if the addition of D.J. Uiagalelei pays off and he fits into the current offense without a hitch, the combination of the former Clemson quarterback and rising sophomore running Damien Martinez — who had an outstanding freshman campaign — could give this team the extra boost it needs. Remember: This is a team that won 10 games last year, and two of its three losses came by a combined six points.

Worst case: As much as the Beavers’ ceiling could be higher than most people think, their floor could be pretty low if things go awry. Last year could have been an aberration, an outlier where things broke right for a team that has been on the upswing but still has a long way to go to compete for conference titles. The Uiagalelei addition could turn out to be all hype and no substance, while the defense could regress and a tough schedule that features Utah early on and Washington and Oregon to finish out the year may be too tall of a task for Jonathan Smith’s squad. A five-loss season is just as possible as a Cinderella run. — Uggetti

play

3:32

Ryan McGee’s ode to the Pac-12 Conference

Ryan McGee pays tribute to the Pac-12 by taking a look back at what made the conference so special.


Best case: The schedule suits Carolina well, with its likely toughest opponents — Duke, Clemson and NC State — coming in November, and quarterback Drake Maye should give the Heels a chance in every game this season. The key will be how much improvement there is around Maye. This offseason, UNC brought in new OC Chip Lindsey in hopes of implementing a scheme with more emphasis on the run and a little less pressure put on an overwhelmed defense. If that works out, the Heels can certainly repeat last year’s 9-3 regular season, and perhaps aim a bit higher — like an ACC title.

Worst case: For all Maye’s impressive numbers last year, his heroics likely hid a number of big flaws for a while. The Heels opened the season 8-1, but six of those wins came by a touchdown or less, including three in which UNC trailed in the fourth quarter. The four-game losing streak to cap the season marked the point at which Maye’s magic was no longer enough, and the close-call wins turned into close-call losses to Georgia Tech, NC State and Oregon. If all else is the same this year, but the close-game luck is just a bit worse, there’s a formula for a 5-7 or 6-6 campaign. — David Hale


Best case: Big Ten championship berth. The Badgers are in the West division of the Big Ten conference, so in order to get in to the conference championship, the team realistically just has to finish in front of Iowa, Illinois and Minnesota to make it in. That seems doable as long as the new offensive system under Phil Longo clicks and is firing on all cylinders. The staff brought in quarterback Tanner Mordecai from SMU to help run the Air Raid-type attack and are bringing back running back Braelon Allen. The Badgers will play Iowa on Oct. 14, Illinois on Oct. 25 and Minnesota on Nov. 25 in the final game of the season. Those three games will determine how far this team will go in Year 1 of Luke Fickell’s tenure.

Worst case: There is a stretch in the season where the Badgers have to face Iowa, Illinois and Ohio State in consecutive weeks. That could end up being a three-game losing streak that derails the season altogether. The lowest floor if that happens could be a 7-5 year with a loss to end the season at Minnesota. That wouldn’t be a terrible season, but the Badgers went 7-6 in 2022, so that would be consecutive seasons with just seven wins and no Big Ten championship berth. This team has added some good players in the offseason, but there are some roadblocks along the way that could cause problems. — VanHaaren


Best case: Alabama and LSU have been the two favorites in the West this preseason, and Ole Miss will play both teams back-to-back at the end of September. Lane Kiffin’s team started off 7-0 last season before dropping five of their past six games (including games against Alabama and LSU). An improvement at quarterback — whether that’s with Jaxson Dart or one of two transfers in Spencer Sanders or Walker Howard — would go a long way, assuming Quinshon Judkins remains one of the best players in the conference and, most importantly, Pete Golding solves the defensive woes that plagued them at the end of 2022. If those things happen, maybe they surprise people and win the SEC West, or at least finish near the top. But if nothing else, we will know if they can touch that height by October.

Worst case: There’s no such thing as an easy path in the SEC, but the Rebels certainly don’t have a road game on their schedule that looks appetizing. They visit Alabama, Auburn, Georgia and rival Mississippi State, while also making a Sept. 9 trip to New Orleans to play Tulane in their nonconference slate. If improvements aren’t made defensively and Arkansas, Auburn and Texas A&M all improve, it feels like despite any offensive prowess it has, Ole Miss could finish in the middle of the pack again in the SEC West, if not worse. — Harry Lyles Jr.


Best case: The Sooners, behind a healthy quarterback Dillon Gabriel and a revitalized defense, put it all together and return to the OU standard, claiming one more Big 12 title on their way out the door to finish off two decades of dominance. The schedule sets up nicely, with the league sending the Sooners out as the welcoming committee to Cincinnati and BYU, and on a trip to Lawrence to face the Jayhawks. The Sooners kiss Bedlam goodbye with a win in Stillwater, then get a chance to finish the season with TCU in Norman, repaying the Frogs for a big loss and a Gabriel injury that seriously derailed the Sooners’ season without a proven backup. A win over Texas might be necessary to impress the playoff committee, but a Big 12 title and a New Year’s Six bowl would still be quite the bounce-back from OU’s first losing season since 1998.

Worst case: After last year’s 49-0 debacle, another humbling loss to Texas would set off alarm bells early in Venables’ career, particularly with the Sooners gearing up for the SEC. An SMU team that loaded up on transfers under coach Rhett Lashlee could prove to be a threat in Week 2 if the defense hasn’t rounded into form yet. A loss in Stillwater would send the Cowboys out of Bedlam with one final victory they can claim forever. But that’s just the beginning of a fraught November schedule in which they’ll get West Virginia (the Mountaineers beat them last year) then a long, tough trip to Provo against a physical BYU team, only to face TCU in Fort Worth six days later. Another losing season would be a complete stunner with this schedule, but if the Sooners aren’t competitive in key games, the pressure could start to mount. — Wilson


Best case: A first conference title since 1994 (and a first solo title since 1955). When the media votes you fourth in the conference, it’s naming you a contender. Joey McGuire’s second Tech team will face a deluge of tricky road trips (Wyoming, West Virginia, Baylor, BYU, Kansas, Texas) plus home games against Oregon and both of last year’s Big 12 championship-game participants. If they retain last year’s close-game magic — they were 4-0 in one-score finishes — they could maneuver through a memorable season, sneak into the title game at 7-2 or so, and then win it.

Worst case: As with K-State, it’s hard to win all your close games twice. And there are so many potential close games on the schedule that a seriously disappointing campaign, replete with a 5-7 record or so, is on the table. It’s not likely — we’re talking about lowest floors here — but Tech still has a lot to prove defensively, and there’s nothing saying the Red Raiders will be as successful on fourth downs as they were a year ago, when they attempted more fourth downs than anyone (52) and also ranked 18th in fourth-down conversion rate (64%). Turn a few more of those into turnovers on downs, and the season goes sideways. — Connelly


Best case: New Year’s Six Bowl game. Maybe Jimbo Fisher handing over the keys to the offense to Bobby Petrino really is the answer. Petrino’s shown time and time again — whether at Arkansas or Missouri State — that he can score points. And with Conner Weigman at quarterback and a talented group of receivers (Ainias Smith, Evan Stewart and Moose Muhammad III), the pieces to succeed are in place. What’s more, the early part of the schedule is favorable with games against New Mexico, Miami, Louisiana Monroe and Auburn. Come out of that 4-0 and confident, and you get Arkansas and Alabama at home, which suddenly look like winnable games.

Worst case: A .500 season would be a disaster, but can we really rule it out after last year? There’s no reason the Aggies should have lost to Appalachian State but they did. And for all the possibilities of Petrino calling plays, how sure are we that it will work? Fisher seems reluctant to completely step away from the offense, and you’re talking about two big personalities between him and Petrino. We could see fireworks — and not the good kind — if Texas A&M starts off slow and Fisher feels the pressure of being on the hot seat. Lose at Miami and the chatter will ramp up quickly. Lose at home to a rebuilding Auburn team and it could become deafening. — Scarborough


Best case: Willie Fritz’s team rides the momentum from 2022 it created after a difficult 2021, and makes another New Year’s Six bowl. The Green Wave are losing some talent on offense in star running back Tyjae Spears and receivers Duece Watts and Shae Wyatt, as well as defensive leaders Dorian Williams and Nick Anderson. However, quarterback Michael Pratt is back, along with four offensive linemen and potential in some new and returning faces. Their three toughest games (South Alabama, Ole Miss, and UTSA) are all at home, and for a team that had a comeback victory against USC in the Cotton Bowl, a little belief goes a long way. Tulane snuck up on people in 2022, but nobody will be surprised if they have another great season in 2023.

Worst case: A middle-of-the-pack AAC finish feels like the worst-case scenario here, barring any significant injuries. Opening the season against a Sun Belt favorite in South Alabama, and then an SEC West contender in Ole Miss could really set the tone for the season in either a positive or negative way, and it’s not unrealistic to think they could come out of those 0-2. Even if that were the case, this doesn’t feel like a team that has an extreme downward slide in them — especially after the challenges they faced in 2021 being displaced by Hurricane Ida, and how they’ve responded since. — Lyles Jr.

Continue Reading

Sports

The lesson of Pete Rose and ‘Shoeless’ Joe? History is messy.

Published

on

By

The lesson of Pete Rose and 'Shoeless' Joe? History is messy.

Now that Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred has removed Pete Rose, “Shoeless” Joe Jackson and other deceased players from the game’s “permanently ineligible list,” whatever former stars deemed deserving based on their on-field accomplishments should, at first opportunity, be inducted into the Hall of Fame.

In a bombshell, if long overdue, reversal of policy, first reported by ESPN’s Don Van Natta Jr. on Tuesday, Manfred removed bans for Rose (who bet on games while managing the Cincinnati Reds) and members of the 1919 Chicago White Sox (who fixed the World Series), among others.

After all, banishment was meaningless once they all had died — a life sentence, if you will, for whatever their transgression. Most died decades ago and were on the list for gambling-related offenses.

“Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a threat to the integrity of the game,” Manfred wrote in a letter to the attorney who petitioned for Rose.

The only remaining purpose of the ban was to keep them from the immortality of being inducted into Cooperstown, which bills itself officially as the “National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum.”

The last word is the most important.

Museums exist to tell about history, and history is always messy — including in sports. They shouldn’t be solely designed for the sanitized, establishment-approved version of events, or allow outside considerations to overshadow actual accomplishments. They certainly shouldn’t serve as part of some carrot-and-stick approach to desired behavior.

Should Rose and the others have done what they did? Of course not. Should they have been subject to any potential criminal or civil recourse for their actions? Absolutely. Was MLB within its rights to suspend or punish them in other ways? Definitely.

Rose, for example, should never have been allowed to work in baseball again after it was determined he bet on the Reds to win games while he was the manager.

But that doesn’t mean his record 4,256 hits, his three World Series titles, his MVP award (1973), his 17 All-Star appearances (including when he barreled over catcher Ray Fosse in the 1970 game), his “Charlie Hustle” nickname, or that epic head-first slide — shown so many times on “This Week in Baseball” that a generation of kids either crushed their chests or chipped their teeth trying to emulate it — didn’t occur.

So did his gambling scandal, a 1990 guilty plea for filing false tax returns that cost him five months in a federal prison and a 2017 sworn statement from a woman that he had committed statutory rape back in the 1970s, an allegation for which he was never criminally charged. Throughout his life, he could be indefensibly crude, difficult and confrontational.

It’s all part of the story of Pete Rose.

So let him in, then tell the good, the bad and the ugly so the public can decide what to think. This is the Baseball Hall of Fame, not the pearly gates. It’s about a nice day in central New York State with your family, complete with a gift shop.

If the museum is there to tell the history of the sport, well, how do you do it without Pete Rose? If Hall of Fame induction is reserved for the greatest players, then how could Rose not be among them? His foolishness as a manager shouldn’t have eclipsed his impact as a player.

This is where baseball’s policy was always wrong. It used the prospect of barred entry to the Hall as a deterrence. That isn’t what a museum should be about. The risk of criminal charges, lost wages from suspension and general shame should be enough. If it isn’t, so be it.

Manfred isn’t ready to release those still living from the ineligible list. He’s clinging to the concept of scaring current players straight. “It is hard to conceive of a penalty that has more deterrent effect than one that lasts a lifetime with no reprieve,” he wrote in the letter.

Perhaps, but should that be the point?

The Hall is already filled with assorted louts, drunks and racists who just happened to be able to either hit or throw a baseball really well. So what? Their personal disgrace is part of their history.

In fairness, their personal failings didn’t affect baseball the way Rose might have as a managerial gambler, and certainly not as the Black Sox did back in the day.

Still, there are owners and commissioners in the Hall who worked for decades to stop baseball from racial integration. That’s a far more widespread impact on the integrity of the game than betting on your team to beat the Dodgers.

Yes, sports wagering is always a concern and was once a major taboo. But public opinion and business realities changed. There are sportsbooks inside MLB stadiums these days, including, for a stretch, with Rose’s old team in Cincinnati.

History is history. The game is the game. The museum is the museum. Tell the story, the whole story, with all the best players and best teams and best tales, no matter how colorful, criminal or regrettable.

America can handle it. Our real national pastime is scandal, after all.

Continue Reading

Sports

Granlund nets 3 for Stars, but ‘job is not done’

Published

on

By

Granlund nets 3 for Stars, but 'job is not done'

The Dallas Stars3-1 win in Game 4 against the Winnipeg Jets on Tuesday night was a contrast in offensive efficiency. The Jets converted just once on 72 shot attempts. Dallas center Mikael Granlund, meanwhile, needed only three shot attempts in the game to score three goals. His hat trick was all the offense the Stars needed to take a commanding 3-1 series lead, moving one win away from their third straight trip to the Western Conference finals.

“Obviously, the job is not done. We’ve got a lot of work to do. [But] that was a good win,” Granlund said.

It was the first career hat trick for Granlund, a 13-year veteran whom the Stars acquired from the San Jose Sharks in a trade back in February. Three goals on three shots, all of them sailing past Jets goalie Connor Hellebuyck, who remained winless on the road in the 2025 postseason.

Granlund’s first goal came at 8:36 on the power play, as he skated in on three Jets defensemen and fired a snap shot past Hellebuyck from the top of the slot.

“I was just shooting it somewhere and it went in,” Granlund said.

“I got a clean enough look. It was just a damn perfect shot, just above my pad and below my glove,” Hellebuyck lamented.

“Obviously, he probably wants the first one back, the wrister,” Jets coach Scott Arniel said of Hellebuyck. “At the end of the day, we’ve got to get him some run support. Get him a lead.”

Granlund’s second shot and second goal came on a play started by Mikko Rantanen, whose league-leading point total now stands at 19 for the playoffs. His outlet pass found Granlund in the neutral zone, sparking a 2-on-1 with Roope Hintz. Granlund kept the puck and roofed it to give Dallas a 2-1 lead after Nik Ehlers had tied the game for Winnipeg earlier in the second period.

“When you pass all the time, you can surprise the goalie sometimes when you shoot the puck. It’s good to shoot once in a while,” said Granlund, who had twice as many assists (44) as goals (22) in the regular season.

Granlund’s third and final shot attempt of the game was on another Dallas power play in the third period, following a double-minor penalty to defenseman Haydn Fleury for high-sticking Hintz.

Defenseman Miro Heiskanen, in the lineup for the first time since Jan. 28 after missing the last 32 regular-season games and first 10 playoff games because of a knee injury, collected the puck after Matt Duchene rang it off the post. Heiskanen slid it over to Granlund for a one-timer that brought him to his knees on the ice. After the shot beat Hellebuyck at 7:23 of the third period, waves of hats hit the ice in celebration of Granlund’s three-goal night.

It was fitting that Rantanen and Heiskanen had points on Granlund’s hat trick. This was the first game that the Stars’ so-called “Finnish Mafia” played together, as Heiskanen was injured before Granlund and Rantanen joined the team. Those three skaters joined countrymen Hintz and defenseman Esa Lindell in helping Dallas to victory.

“It was fun for sure. Fun to finally be on the ice with them,” Heiskanen said.

Goaltender Jake Oettinger did the rest with 31 saves, many of them on dangerous Winnipeg chances. But in the end, all the Stars needed were three shot attempts, while the Jets’ voluminous offensive night produced only one goal.

“Oettinger made some big stops. But we had 70 shot attempts. We have to get more than one goal,” Arniel said. “If we can’t find more than one goal, we’re not going to win hockey games, especially [against] this team.”

Dallas will attempt to close out the series on Thursday night in Winnipeg.

Continue Reading

Sports

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, ‘Shoeless’ Joe Jackson

Published

on

By

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson

Pete Rose, Joe Jackson, seven other members of the 1919 Chicago “Black Sox”, six other former players, one coach and one former owner are now eligible to be voted on for the Hall of Fame after commissioner Rob Manfred removed them from Major League Baseball’s permanently ineligible list.

Hall of Fame chairwoman Jane Forbes Clark said in a statement: “The National Baseball Hall of Fame has always maintained that anyone removed from Baseball’s permanently ineligible list will become eligible for Hall of Fame consideration. Major League Baseball’s decision to remove deceased individuals from the permanently ineligible list will allow for the Hall of Fame candidacy of such individuals to now be considered.”

Due to Hall of Fame voting procedures, Rose and Jackson won’t be eligible to be voted on until the Classic Era Baseball committee, which votes on individuals who made their biggest impact prior to 1980, meets in December of 2027.

Let’s dig into what all this means.


Why were these players banned?

All individuals on the banned list who were reinstated had been permanently ineligible due to accusations related to gambling related to baseball — either throwing games, accepting bribes, or like Rose, betting on baseball games.

Most of the banned players, including Jackson and his seven Chicago White Sox teammates who threw the 1919 World Series, played in the 1910s, when gambling in baseball was widespread. As historian Bill James once wrote, “Few simplifications of memory are as bizarre as the notion that the Black Sox scandal hit baseball out of the blue. … In fact, of course, the Black Sox scandal was merely the largest wart of a disease that had infested baseball at least a dozen years earlier and had grown, unchecked, to ravage the features of a generation.”

The most famous player, of course, was Jackson, one of baseball’s biggest stars alongside Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker in the 1910s. While many have tried to exonerate Jackson through the years, pointing out that he hit .375 in the 1919 World Series, baseball historians agree that Jackson was a willing participant in throwing the World Series and accepted money from the gambling ring that paid off the White Sox players.

While the White Sox players were acquitted in a criminal trial in 1921, commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis banned the eight players in a statement that began with the words “Regardless of the verdict of juries …”

If there was an innocent member in the group, it was third baseman Buck Weaver, not Jackson. Weaver had participated in meetings where the fixing of the World Series was discussed, and Landis banned him for life for guilty knowledge.

As for Rose, he was banned in 1989 by commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti for betting on games while he was manager of the Cincinnati Reds, including those involving his own team. While Rose denied the accusations for years, he eventually confessed. He died last September at age 83.


Who else is impacted?

Phillies owner William Cox was banned in 1943 and forced to sell the team for betting on games. Cox had just purchased the team earlier that season. None of the other non-White Sox players are of major significance, although Benny Kauff was the big star of the Federal League in 1914-15, winning the batting title both seasons. The Federal League was a breakoff league that attempted to challenge the National and American leagues.


When is the soonest Rose and Jackson could go into the Hall of Fame?

The Hall of Fame voting process for players not considered by the Baseball Writers’ Association of America — such as Rose and Jackson, who never appeared on the ballot due to their banned status — includes two eras: the Contemporary Baseball Era (1980 to present) and the Classic Baseball Era (pre-1980). The voting periods are already set:

December 2025: Player ballot for the Contemporary Era.

December 2026: Contemporary Era ballot for managers, executives and umpires.

December 2027: Classic Era ballot for players, managers, executives and umpires.

Each committee has an initial screening to place eight candidates on the ballot, so Rose and Jackson will first have to make the ballot. While it’s unclear how a future screening committee will proceed, it’s possible that both will make the ballot. While comparisons to players with PED allegations aren’t exactly apples to apples — since they were never placed on the ineligible list — it’s worth noting that Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Rafael Palmeiro were included on the eight-player Contemporary Era ballot in 2023.

Once the ballot is determined — a 16-person committee consisting of Hall of Fame players, longtime executives and media members or historians — convenes and votes. A candidate must receive 12 votes to get selected. In the most recent election in December, Dave Parker and Dick Allen were on the Classic Era ballot.


Which players have the best HOF cases?

Obviously, Rose would have been a slam-dunk Hall of Famer had he never bet on baseball and had he appeared on the BBWAA ballot after his career ended. The all-time MLB leader with 4,256 hits, Rose won three batting titles and was the 1973 NL MVP. And while he’s overrated in a sense — his 79.6 career WAR is more in line with the likes of Jeff Bagwell, Brooks Robinson and Robin Yount than all-time elite superstars — and hung on well past his prime to break Ty Cobb’s hits record, his popularity and fame would have made him an inner-circle Hall of Famer.

Whether he’ll get support now is complicated. Bonds and Clemens both received fewer than four votes in 2023. The committee usually consists of eight former players, and they may not support Rose given the one hard and fast rule that every player knows: You can’t bet on the game.

Jackson, meanwhile, was a star of the deadball era, hitting .408 in 1911 and .356 in his career, an average that ranks fourth all time behind only Cobb, Negro Leagues star Oscar Charleston and Rogers Hornsby. He finished with 62.2 WAR and 1,772 hits in a career that ended at age 32 due to the ban. Those figures would be low for a Hall of Fame selection, although the era committees did recently elect Allen and Tony Oliva, both of whom finished with fewer than 2,000 hits. And again, it is hard to say how the committee will view Jackson’s connection to gambling on the sport.

The only other reinstated player with a semblance of a chance to get on a ballot is pitcher Eddie Cicotte, who won 209 games and finished with 59.7 WAR. While his final season came at 36, the knuckleballer was still going strong, having won 29 games for the White Sox in 1919 and 21 in 1920 before Landis banned him.

For what it’s worth, the top position players in career WAR who made their mark prior to 1980 and aren’t in the Hall of Fame are Rose, Bill Dahlen (75.3), Bobby Grich (71.0), Graig Nettles (67.6), Reggie Smith (64.6), Ken Boyer (62.8), Jackson and Sal Bando (61.5).

Pitching candidates would include Luis Tiant (65.7), Tommy John (61.6) and Wes Ferrell (60.1). John was on the recent ballot and received seven votes. Others on that ballot included Steve Garvey, Boyer, Negro Leagues pitcher John Donaldson, Negro Leagues manager Vic Harris and Tiant.

Other potential pre-1980 candidates could include Thurman Munson, Bert Campaneris, Dave Concepcion and Stan Hack.

Continue Reading

Trending