With a smile and a wave, Sarina Wiegman led her Lionesses on the team bus to depart for Sydney’s airport.
Their 45-day journey is over without the World Cup they came to bring home,
There will be regrets at what could have been, despite being beaten 1-0 by a Spain side that imposed technical superiority at times.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:28
World reacts to Lionesses’ defeat
But the European champions made progress by going further than ever at a World Cup and created chances that just could not be taken in the final.
The hope will be for progress now not just in the English game – in a country energised to show more support for women’s football – but progress more widely.
Is there progress on pay?
There are pay battles still being waged.
More on Lionesses
Related Topics:
The Lionesses will have to resume talks with the Football Association on performance-related bonuses that were put on hold after an impasse ahead of this tournament.
Despite the status, acclaim and interest the players have enjoyed in reaching a second consecutive final, there remains a vast gender pay gap.
Advertisement
Image: Thousands flocked to venues across the UK to watch the final
While England’s Premier League stars can be earning well over £10m a year, women’s players on £100,000 from their clubs would be on high pay.
FIFA has sought to address the imbalance with guaranteed pay for players for the first time at the Women’s World Cup (via federations) on a sliding scale based on the team’s finish – from $30,000 (£23,500) to $270,00 (£211,900) each.
By finishing runners-up, each Lioness should be receiving $195,000 (£153,000) via FIFA.
That is progress.
And FIFA is seeking prize money parity by the next World Cups – it is four times larger now for the men’s tournament – if more cash comes in.
Image: England receive their runner’s up medals
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:36
Heartbreak for England fans
‘We have to do more’
FIFA President Gianni Infantino told Sky News in Sydney: “Everyone has to play its role. I think you need partners – sponsors, broadcasters – to have to pay a fair price, to do what is fair, what is correct based on the impact that it has.
“We have to do more to promote it [the Women’s World Cup]. The players, the presidents, the federations, the clubs, the leagues.
“Everyone has to continue pushing it over the next four years.”
There is an onus on the media too.
Mr Infantino highlighted how vastly greater reporting resources are being committed to the men’s World Cup by singling out the lack of written media from Italy to cover their team’s three games at the women’s showpiece.
Image: England’s Millie Bright applauds supporters following England’s defeat
Sponsors have to play their part by handing more boot deals to players throughout squads rather than a few superstars.
And those sportswear firms have to do more than pay lip service to concerns about disparities – such as Nike’s ineffective response to Mary Earps calling them out for not making a replica England goalkeeper’s jersey.
Those companies can claim the demand is not there and producing such kits is not commercially viable.
How much of a duty is there for supporters, who dip into women’s football for tournaments, to support the women’s team at their club, rather than just turning out in bigger numbers for the men’s matches?
Image: Mary Earps blocks a penalty shot during the final. Pic: AP/Mark Baker
Improving the game’s appeal
Making the games appealing experiences is an ongoing necessity in England as is securing access to the large stadiums that are prioritised for the men’s teams.
The FA has to calculate the next steps for the Women’s Super League it launched in 2011 and became a pioneering fully-professional competition for female players.
The governing body has been figuring out whether to relinquish control – with a takeover by the Premier League or private equity funds floated.
It is a delicate decision knowing how the competition has relied on the FA’s funding to fuel growth, create a pathway of talent into the England teams and develop St George’s Park.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:51
Wiegman: ‘We can be very proud of ourselves’
Impact of Lionesses’ run
And it is the performance of the Lionesses that can shape perceptions of the progress of women’s football.
Beyond the soaring appeal of Sarina Wiegman’s side, their deepest-ever World Cup run should be a springboard to raise the game across England.
That needs investment in coaches, facilities and the next generation of talent – a challenge the world over.
It is a moment not to be squandered.
But qualifying for the Olympics – to compete as Team GB – and making it to Euro 2025 will be seen as the priority now.
So much to contemplate on the flight home for Wiegman and her Lionesses, being galvanised by the World Cup run and turning the sorrow into a springboard for success.
A major incident has been declared in Birmingham over an ongoing bin strike, which has left around 17,000 tonnes of waste on the streets of the city.
Birmingham City Council said the “regrettable” step was taken in response to public health concerns, with picket lines blocking depots and preventing waste vehicles from collecting rubbish.
Members of Unite have been on all-out strike since 11 March in a row over pay, which the union claims will leave some members of staff £8,000 worse off. A series of walkouts have also impacted refuse collections since January.
By declaring a major incident, the council will be able to increase the availability of street cleansing and fly-tip removal with an additional 35 vehicles and crews around the city.
This action will also allow the council to explore what further support is available from neighbouring authorities and the government to assist in the management of the situation.
Council leader John Cotton said it was a “regrettable” step, but the situation was “causing harm and distress” to local people.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:51
Birmingham suffers bin crisis
“I respect the right to strike and protest, however actions on the picket line must be lawful and sadly the behaviour of some now means we are seeing a significant impact on residents and the city’s environment,” he said.
Jim McMahon, the minister for local government, said the all-out strike by Unite members is causing “misery and disruption” to residents, as well as posing a “public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived”.
He said the government “stands ready” to respond to any request for extra resources, but insisted that any deal to end the bin strike must “maintain value for money”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:58
‘They can’t hold the city to ransom’
Mr McMahon told the Commons: “This is causing a public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived residents. As a result, I am aware that Birmingham has today declared a major incident to give them the mechanisms to better manage the impact on local residents.
“I support that decision, and I will back local leaders.”
The minister added that the government will “not hesitate to give support in any way that Birmingham leaders need”.
He said: “If local leaders on the ground in Birmingham feel that tackling these issues goes beyond the resources available to them and they request national support, then of course we stand ready to respond to any such request.”
Members of the Unite union met with Birmingham City Council last Thursday, but talks have so far failed.
Unite says the dispute will not end unless the “hugely damaging” cuts to bin collectors’ wages are reversed.
But Birmingham City Council says the aim of the restructuring is to create a “modern, sustainable and consistently reliable waste collection service”.
An “extensive search” is under way to find an 11-year-old girl after she fell into the River Thames in east London.
The Metropolitan Police said it was called at around 1.15pm on Monday to reports the girl had entered the river near Barge House Causeway, near London City Airport.
All emergency services are forming a “large-scale response” to the incident.
The girl’s next of kin have been made aware and are being supported by officers.
The London Ambulance Service was also called at a similar time, after receiving a report of a person in the water at Lowestoft Mews, which is close to the airport.
“We sent resources to the scene, including an ambulance crew, an advanced paramedic, an incident response officer and members of our hazardous area response team,” a spokesperson said.
“Our crews assisted our emergency services partners at the scene but were later stood down.”
London Fire Brigade Deputy Assistant Commissioner Joseph Kenny added that “firefighters responded to reports of a person in the River Thames near Lowestoft Mews, Newham”.
He said crews from East Ham, Barking, Ilford and Bexley fire stations were sent to the scene alongside other emergency services.
“The brigade also deployed its drone team and fire boat as part of its response, with crews carrying out a systematic search of the area,” he added.
“The brigade was first called about the incident at 1.23pm. Search operations for firefighters were concluded at 3.49pm when responsibility for the incident was left with the police.”
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Controversial sentencing guidelines that were due to come into force on Tuesday have been delayed after a political backlash.
The Sentencing Council, the independent body that sets out sentencing guidance to courts in England and Wales, was due to bring in new rules around how judges should determine punishment for people from ethnic minority backgrounds.
The new guidance states that a pre-sentence report – the results of which are taken into account when considering a criminal’s sentence – will “usually be necessary” before handing out punishment for someone from an ethnic, cultural or faith minority, alongside other groups such as young adults aged 18 to 25, women and pregnant women.
Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, had said the proposed guidance was “unacceptable” and amounted to “differential treatment before the law” as she urged the council to reverse it.
When the Sentencing Council initially refused her request, Ms Mahmood threatened to legislate to overturn the guidance if necessary.
She confirmed this evening that she would introduce legislation on Tuesday to block these guidelines coming into effect.
More on Ministry Of Justice
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
7:26
Robert Jenrick has hit out at what he says is
The Sentencing Council has now delayed the “in force date of the guideline pending such legislation taking effect”.
It said in a statement that the council “remains of the view that its guideline, imposition of community and custodial sentences, as drafted is necessary and appropriate”.
However, in a meeting between the chairman Lord Justice Davis and Ms Mahmood on Monday, the minister “indicated her intention to introduce legislation imminently that would have the effect of rendering the section on ‘cohorts’ in the guideline unlawful”.
The council said it is unable to introduce a guideline when there is a draft bill due for introduction that would make it unlawful.
Ms Mahmood said: “This differential treatment is unacceptable – equality before the law is the backbone of public confidence in our justice system. I will change the law to ensure fairness for all in our courts.”
The Sentencing Council also attracted criticism from shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who said its updated guidance was an example of “two-tier justice” that would lead to “blatant bias” against Christians and straight white men.
He also argued that it would make “a custodial sentence less likely for those from an ethnic minority, cultural minority, and/or faith minority community” – something the council denied.
The council previously rejected calls from the government to abandon the guidelines, which ask judges to consider offenders’ racial, cultural and religious background when deciding a sentence.
Lord Davis denied that pre-sentence reports reduced the prospect of a jail sentence.
However, he said the council would provide “some clarification of the language” to avoid confusion.