Connect with us

Published

on

This story also ran on NPR. It can be republished for free.

Juan Campos has been working to save at-risk teens from gun violence for 16 years.

As a street outreach worker in Oakland, California, he has seen the pull and power of gangs. And he offers teens support when theyve emerged from the juvenile justice system, advocates for them in school, and, if needed, helps them find housing, mental health services, and treatment for substance abuse. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

But, he said, hes never confronted a force as formidable as social media, where small boasts and disputes online can escalate into deadly violence in schoolyards and on street corners.

Teens post photos or videos of themselves with guns and stacks of cash, sometimes calling out rivals, on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok. When messages go viral, fueled by likes and comments, the danger is hard to contain, Campos said.

Its hundreds of people on social media, versus just one or two people trying to guide youth in a positive way, he said. Sometimes his warnings are stark, telling kids, I want to keep you alive. But, he said, it doesnt work all the time.

Shamari Martin Jr. was an outgoing 14-year-old and respectful to his teachers in Oakland. Mixed in with videos of smiling friends on his Instagram feed were images of Shamari casually waving a gun or with cash fanned across his face. In March 2022, he was shot when the car he was in took a hail of bullets. His body was left on the street, and emergency medical workers pronounced him dead at the scene. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

In Shamaris neighborhood, kids join gangs when theyre as young as 9 or 10, sometimes carrying guns to elementary school, said Tonyia “Nina” Carter, a violence interrupter who knew Shamari and works with Youth Alive, which tries to prevent violence. Shamari was somewhat affiliated with that culture of gangs and guns, Carter said.

Shamaris friends poured out their grief on Instagram with broken-heart emojis and comments such as “love you brother I’m heart hurt.”

One post was more ominous: “it’s blood inna water all we want is revenge.” Rivals posted videos of themselves kicking over flowers and candles at Shamaris memorial.

Such online outpourings of grief often presage additional violence, said Desmond Patton, a University of Pennsylvania professor who studies social media and firearm violence. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

More than a year later, Shamaris death remains unsolved. But it’s still a volatile subject in Oakland, said Bernice Grisby, a counselor at the East Bay Asian Youth Center, who works with gang-involved youth.

“There’s still a lot of gang violence going on around his name,” she said. “It could be as simple as someone saying, ‘Forget him or F him’ that can be a death sentence. Just being affiliated with his name in any sort can get you killed.”

The U.S. surgeon general last month issued a call to action about social medias corrosive effects on child and adolescent mental health, warning of the profound risk of harm to young people, who can spend hours a day on their phones. The 25-page report highlighted the risks of cyberbullying and sexual exploitation. It failed to mention social medias role in escalating gun violence.

Acutely aware of that role are researchers, community leaders, and police across the country including in Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, Oakland, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, and Washington, D.C. They describe social media as a relentless driver of gun violence. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Michel Moore, the Los Angeles police chief, called its impact dramatic.

What used to be communicated on the street or in graffiti or tagging or rumors from one person to another, its now being distributed and amplified on social media, he said. Its meant to embarrass and humiliate others.

Many disputes stem from perceived disrespect among insecure young adults who may lack impulse control and conflict-management skills, said LJ Punch, a trauma surgeon and director of the Bullet-Related Injury Clinic in St. Louis.

Social media is an extremely powerful tool for metastasizing disrespect, Punch said. And of all the causes of gun violence, social media-fueled grudges are the most impenetrable. Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing. Your Email Address Sign Up

Calls for Regulation

Social media companies are protected by a 1996 law that shields them from liability for content posted on their platforms. Yet the deaths of young people have led to calls to change that. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

When you allow a video that leads to a shooting, you bear responsibility for what you put out there, said Fred Fogg, national director of violence prevention for Youth Advocate Programs, a group that provides alternatives to youth incarceration. Social media is addictive, and intentionally so.

People note that social media can have a particularly pernicious effect in communities with high rates of gun violence.

Social media companies need to be better regulated in order to make sure they arent encouraging violence in Black communities, said Jabari Evans, an assistant professor of race and media at the University of South Carolina. But he said social media companies also should help dismantle the structural racism that places many Black youth in circumstances that resign them to want to join gangs, carry guns to school, or take on violent personas for attention.

L.A.s Moore described social media companies as serving in a reactionary role. They are profit-driven. They dont want to have any type of control or restrictions that would suppress advertising.

Social media companies say they remove content that violates their policies against threatening others or encouraging violence as quickly as possible. In a statement, YouTube spokesperson Jack Malon said the company prohibits content reveling in or mocking the death or serious injury of an identifiable individual. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Social media companies said they act to protect the safety of their users, especially children.

Rachel Hamrick, a spokesperson for Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the company has spent about $16 billion in the past seven years to protect the safety of people who post on its apps, employing 40,000 people at Facebook who work on safety and security.

We remove content, disable accounts and work with law enforcement when we believe there is a genuine risk of physical harm or direct threats to public safety, Hamrick said. As a company, we have every commercial and moral incentive to try to give the maximum number of people as much of a positive experience as possible on Facebook. Thats why we take steps to keep people safe even if it impacts our bottom line.

Meta platforms generated revenue of over $116 billion in 2022, most of which came from advertising.

A spokesperson for Snapchat, Pete Boogaard, said the company deletes violent content within minutes of being notified of it. But, Fogg noted, by the time a video is removed, hundreds of people may have seen it. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Even critics acknowledge that the sheer volume of content on social media is difficult to control. Facebook has nearly 3 billion monthly users worldwide; YouTube has nearly 2.7 billion users; Instagram has 2 billion. If a company shuts down one account, a person can simply open a new one, said Tara Dabney, a director at the Institute for Nonviolence Chicago.

Things could be going great in a community, Fogg said, and then the next thing you know, something happens on social media and folks are shooting at each other.

Playing With Fire

At a time when virtually every teen has a cellphone, many have access to guns, and many are coping with mental and emotional health crises, some say its not surprising that violence features so heavily in childrens social media feeds.

High school fight pges are now common on social media, and teens are quick to record and share fights as soon as they break out.

Social media puts everything on steroids, said the Rev. Cornell Jones, the group violence intervention coordinator for Pittsburgh. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Like adults, many young people feel validated when their posts are liked and shared, Jones said.

We are dealing with young people who dont have great self-esteem, and this love they are getting on social media can fill some of that void, Jones said. But it can end with them getting shot or going to the penitentiary.

While many of todays teens are technologically sophisticated skilled at filming and editing professional-looking videos they remain naive about the consequences of posting violent content, said Evans, of the University of South Carolina.

Police in Los Angeles now monitor social media for early signs of trouble, Moore said. Police also search social media after the fact to gather evidence against those involved in violence.

People want to gain notoriety, Moore said, but theyre clearly implicating themselves and giving us an easy path to bring them to justice.

In February, New Jersey police used a video of a 14-year-old girls vicious school beating to file criminal charges against four teens. The victim of the assault, Adriana Kuch, died by suicide two days after the video went viral.

Preventing the Next Tragedy (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Glen Upshaw, who manages outreach workers at Youth Alive in Oakland, said he encourages teens to express their anger with him rather than on social media. He absorbs it, he said, to help prevent kids from doing something foolish.

Ive always offered youth the chance to call me and curse me out, Upshaw said. They can come and scream and I wont fuss at them.

Workers at Youth Advocate Programs monitor influential social media accounts in their communities to de-escalate conflicts. The idea is to get on it as soon as possible, Fogg said. We dont want people to die over a social media post.

Its sometimes impossible, Campos said. You cant tell them to delete their social media accounts, he said. Even a judge wont tell them that. But I can tell them, If I were you, since youre on probation, I wouldnt be posting those kinds of things.

When he first worked with teens at high risk of violence, I said if I can save 10 lives out of 100, Id be happy, Campos said. Now, if I can save one life out of 100, Im happy.

For an illustrated version of this article, click here.

Liz Szabo: lszabo@kff.org, @LizSzabo Related Topics Mental Health Multimedia Public Health Children's Health Guns Contact Us Submit a Story Tip

Continue Reading

World

What are West Bank settlements, who are settlers, and why are they controversial?

Published

on

By

What are West Bank settlements, who are settlers, and why are they controversial?

There are increasing reports of violence and intimidation by Israeli settlers in occupied Palestinian territory.

Sky News chief correspondent Stuart Ramsay has been inside the West Bank, where he’s found settlers feeling emboldened since the October 7 attack by Hamas on Israel.

With the government largely supporting them, they act with impunity and are in many ways enabled by Israel security forces.

But what are the settlements, and why are they controversial?

What are settlements?

A settlement is an Israeli-built village, town, or city in occupied Palestinian territory – either in the West Bank or East Jerusalem.

The largest, Modi’in Illit, is thought to house around 82,000 settlers, according to Peace Now.

There is also a growing movement of Israelis wanting to build settlements in Gaza.

Settlements are illegal under international law and have been condemned by the UN. They are, however, authorised by the Israeli government.

As well as official, government-approved settlements, there are also Israeli outposts.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Israeli settlers attack Palestinian villages

These are established without government approval and are considered illegal by Israeli authorities. But reports suggest the government often turns a blind eye to their creation.

Israel began building settlements shortly after the 1967 Six-Day War.

The Etzion Bloc in Hebron, which was established that year, now houses around 40,000 people.

Read more:
Israel-Hamas war: A glossary of terms
Israeli-Palestinian conflict: A century of war, heartbreak, hope
What is the two-state solution?

According to the Israel Policy Forum, the settlement programme is intended to protect Israel’s security, with settlers acting as the first line of defence “against an invasion”.

The Israeli public appears divided on the effectiveness of the settlements, however.

A Palestinian man walks next to a wall covered with sprayed Hebrew slogans. Pic: Reuters
Image:
A Palestinian man walks next to a wall covered with sprayed Hebrew slogans. Pic: Reuters

A 2024 Pew Research Centre poll found that 40% of Israelis believe settlements help Israeli security, 35% say they hurt it, and 21% think they make no difference.

Why are they controversial?

Israeli settlements are built on land that is internationally recognised as Palestinian territory.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The activists trying to stop Israeli settlers

Sky News has spoken to multiple Palestinians who say they were forced out of their homes by Israeli settlers, despite having lived there for generations.

“They gradually invade the community and expand. The goal is to terrorise people, to make them flee,” Rachel Abramovitz, a member of the group Looking The Occupation In The Eye, told Sky News in May.

Settlers who have spoken to Sky News say they have a holy right to occupy the land.

American-born Israeli settler Daniel Winston told Sky’s chief correspondent Stuart Ramsay: “God’s real, and he wrote the Bible, and the Bible says, ‘I made this land, and I want you to be here’.”

Settlers make up around 5% of Israel’s population and 15% of the West Bank’s population, according to data from Peace Now.

How have things escalated since 7 October 2023?

Since the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October 2023 and Israel’s subsequent military bombardment of Gaza, more than 100 Israeli outposts have been established, according to Peace Now.

In May, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government approved 22 new settlements, including the legalisation of outposts that had previously been built without authorisation.

Settler violence against Palestinians has also increased, according to the UN, with an average of 118 incidents each month – up from 108 in 2023, which was already a record year.

The UK government has sanctioned two members of Mr Netanyahu’s cabinet, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for “repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian civilians” – notably in the West Bank.

The UN’s latest report on Israeli settlements notes that in October 2024, there were 162 settler attacks on Palestinian olive harvesters, many of them in the presence of IDF soldiers.

Of the 174 settler violence incidents studied by the UN, 109 were not reported to Israeli authorities.

Most Palestinian victims said they didn’t report the attacks due to a lack of trust in the Israeli system; some said they feared retaliation by settlers or the authorities if they did.

Continue Reading

World

‘There is no more time’: Madonna urges the Pope to go to Gaza

Published

on

By

'There is no more time': Madonna urges the Pope to go to Gaza

Madonna has urged the Pope to go to Gaza and “bring your light” to the children there.

In a plea shared across her social media channels, the pop star told the pontiff he is “the only one of us who cannot be denied entry” and that “there is no more time”.

“Politics cannot affect change,” wrote the queen of pop, who was raised Catholic.

“Only consciousness can. Therefore I am reaching out to a Man of God.”

The Like A Prayer singer told her social media followers her son Rocco’s birthday prompted her post.

“I feel the best gift I can give to him as a mother – is to ask everyone to do what they can to help save the innocent children caught in the crossfire in Gaza.

“I am not pointing fingers, placing blame or taking sides. Everyone is suffering. Including the mothers of the hostages. I pray that they are released as well.”

Pope Leo XIV leads a Mass for young people in Rome. File pic: AP
Image:
Pope Leo XIV leads a Mass for young people in Rome. File pic: AP

Pope Leo has been outspoken about the crisis in Gaza since his inauguration, calling for an end to the “barbarity of war”.

“I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, of indiscriminate use of force and forced displacement of the population,” he said in July.

Read more from Sky News:
Warning over water shortfall

Trump gaffe speaks volumes
Lords under fire over rule change

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Gaza: ‘This is a man-made crisis’

WHO chief thanks Madonna

Every child under the age of five in Gaza is now at risk of acute malnutrition, according to UNICEF – “a condition that didn’t exist in Gaza just 20 months ago”.

At the end of May, the NGO reported that more than 50,000 children had been killed or injured since October 2023.

World Health Organisation director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus thanked Madonna for her post, saying: “humanity and peace must prevail”.

“Thank you, Madonna, for your compassion, solidarity and commitment to care for everyone caught in the Gaza crisis, especially the children. This is greatly needed,” he wrote on X.

Sky News has approached the Vatican for comment.

Continue Reading

Politics

House of Lords under fire for dropping rule that once caught out cricket legend and historian

Published

on

By

House of Lords under fire for dropping rule that once caught out cricket legend and historian

Campaigners have criticised a change to the rules around declarations of interest in the House of Lords as a “retrograde step” which will lead to a “significant loss of transparency”. 

Since 2000, peers have had to register a list of “non-financial interests” – which includes declaring unpaid but often important roles like being a director, trustee, or chair of a company, think tank or charity.

But that requirement was dropped in April despite staff concerns.

Tom Brake, director of Unlock Democracy, and a former Liberal Democrat MP, wants to see the decision reversed.

“It’s a retrograde step,” he said. “I think we’ve got a significant loss of transparency and accountability and that is bad news for the public.

“More than 25 years ago, the Committee on Standards in Public Life identified that there was a need for peers to register non-financial interests because that could influence their decisions. I’m confused as to what’s happened in the last 25 years that now means this requirement can be scrapped.

“This process seems to be all about making matters simpler for peers, rather than what the code of conduct is supposed to do, which is to boost the public’s confidence.”

Westminster Accounts: Search for your MP

MPs and peers alike have long faced scrutiny over their interests outside Westminster. File pic
Image:
MPs and peers alike have long faced scrutiny over their interests outside Westminster. File pic

Rules were too ‘burdensome’, say peers

The change was part of an overhaul of the code of conduct which aimed to “shorten and clarify” the rules for peers.

The House of Lords Conduct Committee argued that updating non-financial interests was “disproportionately burdensome” with “minor and inadvertent errors” causing “large numbers of complaints”.

As a result, the register of Lords interests shrunk in size from 432 pages to 275.

MPs have a different code of conduct, which requires them to declare any formal unpaid positions or other non-financial interests which may be an influence.

A source told Sky News there is real concern among some Lords’ staff about the implications of the change.

Non-financial interest declarations have previously highlighted cases where a peer’s involvement in a think tank or lobbying group overlapped with a paid role.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Protesters disrupt House of Lords

Cricket legend among peers to breach code

There are also examples where a peer’s non-financial interest declaration has prompted an investigation – revealing a financial interest which should have been declared instead.

In 2023, Lord Skidelsky was found to have breached the code after registering his role as chair of a charity’s trustees as a non-financial interest.

Lord Skidelsky. Pic: UK Parliament
Image:
Lord Skidelsky. Pic: UK Parliament

The Commissioner for Standards investigated after questions were raised about the charity, the Centre for Global Studies.

He concluded that the charity – which was funded by two Russian businessmen – only existed to support Lord Skidelsky’s work, and had paid his staff’s salaries for over 12 years.

In 2021, Lord Botham – the England cricket legend – was found to have breached the code after registering a non-financial interest as an unpaid company director.

The company’s accounts subsequently revealed he and his wife had benefitted from a director’s loan of nearly £200,000. It was considered a minor breach and he apologised.

Former cricketer Lord Botham. File pic: PA
Image:
Former cricketer Lord Botham. File pic: PA

‘Follow the money’

Lord Eric Pickles, the former chair of the anti-corruption watchdog, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, believes focusing on financial interests makes the register more transparent.

“My view is always to follow the money. Everything else on a register is camouflage,” he said.

“Restricting the register to financial reward will give peers little wriggle room. I know this is counterintuitive, but the less there is on the register, the more scrutiny there will be on the crucial things.”

Lord Eric Pickles
Image:
Lord Eric Pickles

‘I was shocked’

The SNP want the House of Lords to be scrapped, and has no peers of its own. Deputy Westminster leader Pete Wishart MP is deeply concerned by the changes.

“I was actually quite horrified and quite shocked,” he said.

“This is an institution that’s got no democratic accountability, it’s a job for life. If anything, members of the House of Lords should be regulated and judged by a higher standard than us in the House of Commons – and what’s happened is exactly the opposite.”

Public confidence in the Lords is already at a low ebb after the PPE controversy surrounding Baroness Michelle Mone, who took a leave of absence in 2022.

Michelle Mone attends the state opening of parliament in 2019. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Michelle Mone attends the state opening of parliament in 2019. Pic: Reuters

The government has pledged to reform the House of Lords and is currently trying to push through a bill abolishing the 92 remaining hereditary peers, which will return to the House of Commons in September.

But just before recess the bill was amended in the Lords so that they can remain as members until retirement or death. It’s a change which is unlikely to be supported by MPs.

Read more from Sky News:
Warning over water shortfall

Trump gaffe speaks volumes

MPs and peers alike have long faced scrutiny over their interests outside Westminster. File pic
Image:
MPs and peers alike have long faced scrutiny over their interests outside Westminster. File pic

A spokesperson for the House of Lords said: “Maintaining public confidence in the House of Lords is a key objective of the code of conduct. To ensure that, the code includes rigorous rules requiring the registration and declaration of all relevant financial interests held by members of the House of Lords.

“Public confidence relies, above all, on transparency over the financial interests that may influence members’ conduct. This change helps ensure the rules regarding registration of interests are understandable, enforceable and focused on the key areas of public concern.

“Members may still declare non-financial interests in debate, where they consider them directly relevant, to inform the House and wider public.

“The Conduct Committee is appointed to review the code of conduct, and it will continue to keep all issues under review. During its review of the code of conduct, the committee considered written evidence from both Unlock Democracy and Transparency International UK, among others.”

Continue Reading

Trending