Connect with us

Published

on

This story also ran on NPR. It can be republished for free.

Juan Campos has been working to save at-risk teens from gun violence for 16 years.

As a street outreach worker in Oakland, California, he has seen the pull and power of gangs. And he offers teens support when theyve emerged from the juvenile justice system, advocates for them in school, and, if needed, helps them find housing, mental health services, and treatment for substance abuse. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

But, he said, hes never confronted a force as formidable as social media, where small boasts and disputes online can escalate into deadly violence in schoolyards and on street corners.

Teens post photos or videos of themselves with guns and stacks of cash, sometimes calling out rivals, on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok. When messages go viral, fueled by likes and comments, the danger is hard to contain, Campos said.

Its hundreds of people on social media, versus just one or two people trying to guide youth in a positive way, he said. Sometimes his warnings are stark, telling kids, I want to keep you alive. But, he said, it doesnt work all the time.

Shamari Martin Jr. was an outgoing 14-year-old and respectful to his teachers in Oakland. Mixed in with videos of smiling friends on his Instagram feed were images of Shamari casually waving a gun or with cash fanned across his face. In March 2022, he was shot when the car he was in took a hail of bullets. His body was left on the street, and emergency medical workers pronounced him dead at the scene. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

In Shamaris neighborhood, kids join gangs when theyre as young as 9 or 10, sometimes carrying guns to elementary school, said Tonyia “Nina” Carter, a violence interrupter who knew Shamari and works with Youth Alive, which tries to prevent violence. Shamari was somewhat affiliated with that culture of gangs and guns, Carter said.

Shamaris friends poured out their grief on Instagram with broken-heart emojis and comments such as “love you brother I’m heart hurt.”

One post was more ominous: “it’s blood inna water all we want is revenge.” Rivals posted videos of themselves kicking over flowers and candles at Shamaris memorial.

Such online outpourings of grief often presage additional violence, said Desmond Patton, a University of Pennsylvania professor who studies social media and firearm violence. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

More than a year later, Shamaris death remains unsolved. But it’s still a volatile subject in Oakland, said Bernice Grisby, a counselor at the East Bay Asian Youth Center, who works with gang-involved youth.

“There’s still a lot of gang violence going on around his name,” she said. “It could be as simple as someone saying, ‘Forget him or F him’ that can be a death sentence. Just being affiliated with his name in any sort can get you killed.”

The U.S. surgeon general last month issued a call to action about social medias corrosive effects on child and adolescent mental health, warning of the profound risk of harm to young people, who can spend hours a day on their phones. The 25-page report highlighted the risks of cyberbullying and sexual exploitation. It failed to mention social medias role in escalating gun violence.

Acutely aware of that role are researchers, community leaders, and police across the country including in Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, Oakland, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, and Washington, D.C. They describe social media as a relentless driver of gun violence. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Michel Moore, the Los Angeles police chief, called its impact dramatic.

What used to be communicated on the street or in graffiti or tagging or rumors from one person to another, its now being distributed and amplified on social media, he said. Its meant to embarrass and humiliate others.

Many disputes stem from perceived disrespect among insecure young adults who may lack impulse control and conflict-management skills, said LJ Punch, a trauma surgeon and director of the Bullet-Related Injury Clinic in St. Louis.

Social media is an extremely powerful tool for metastasizing disrespect, Punch said. And of all the causes of gun violence, social media-fueled grudges are the most impenetrable. Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing. Your Email Address Sign Up

Calls for Regulation

Social media companies are protected by a 1996 law that shields them from liability for content posted on their platforms. Yet the deaths of young people have led to calls to change that. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

When you allow a video that leads to a shooting, you bear responsibility for what you put out there, said Fred Fogg, national director of violence prevention for Youth Advocate Programs, a group that provides alternatives to youth incarceration. Social media is addictive, and intentionally so.

People note that social media can have a particularly pernicious effect in communities with high rates of gun violence.

Social media companies need to be better regulated in order to make sure they arent encouraging violence in Black communities, said Jabari Evans, an assistant professor of race and media at the University of South Carolina. But he said social media companies also should help dismantle the structural racism that places many Black youth in circumstances that resign them to want to join gangs, carry guns to school, or take on violent personas for attention.

L.A.s Moore described social media companies as serving in a reactionary role. They are profit-driven. They dont want to have any type of control or restrictions that would suppress advertising.

Social media companies say they remove content that violates their policies against threatening others or encouraging violence as quickly as possible. In a statement, YouTube spokesperson Jack Malon said the company prohibits content reveling in or mocking the death or serious injury of an identifiable individual. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Social media companies said they act to protect the safety of their users, especially children.

Rachel Hamrick, a spokesperson for Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the company has spent about $16 billion in the past seven years to protect the safety of people who post on its apps, employing 40,000 people at Facebook who work on safety and security.

We remove content, disable accounts and work with law enforcement when we believe there is a genuine risk of physical harm or direct threats to public safety, Hamrick said. As a company, we have every commercial and moral incentive to try to give the maximum number of people as much of a positive experience as possible on Facebook. Thats why we take steps to keep people safe even if it impacts our bottom line.

Meta platforms generated revenue of over $116 billion in 2022, most of which came from advertising.

A spokesperson for Snapchat, Pete Boogaard, said the company deletes violent content within minutes of being notified of it. But, Fogg noted, by the time a video is removed, hundreds of people may have seen it. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Even critics acknowledge that the sheer volume of content on social media is difficult to control. Facebook has nearly 3 billion monthly users worldwide; YouTube has nearly 2.7 billion users; Instagram has 2 billion. If a company shuts down one account, a person can simply open a new one, said Tara Dabney, a director at the Institute for Nonviolence Chicago.

Things could be going great in a community, Fogg said, and then the next thing you know, something happens on social media and folks are shooting at each other.

Playing With Fire

At a time when virtually every teen has a cellphone, many have access to guns, and many are coping with mental and emotional health crises, some say its not surprising that violence features so heavily in childrens social media feeds.

High school fight pges are now common on social media, and teens are quick to record and share fights as soon as they break out.

Social media puts everything on steroids, said the Rev. Cornell Jones, the group violence intervention coordinator for Pittsburgh. (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Like adults, many young people feel validated when their posts are liked and shared, Jones said.

We are dealing with young people who dont have great self-esteem, and this love they are getting on social media can fill some of that void, Jones said. But it can end with them getting shot or going to the penitentiary.

While many of todays teens are technologically sophisticated skilled at filming and editing professional-looking videos they remain naive about the consequences of posting violent content, said Evans, of the University of South Carolina.

Police in Los Angeles now monitor social media for early signs of trouble, Moore said. Police also search social media after the fact to gather evidence against those involved in violence.

People want to gain notoriety, Moore said, but theyre clearly implicating themselves and giving us an easy path to bring them to justice.

In February, New Jersey police used a video of a 14-year-old girls vicious school beating to file criminal charges against four teens. The victim of the assault, Adriana Kuch, died by suicide two days after the video went viral.

Preventing the Next Tragedy (Oona Tempest/KFF Health News)

Glen Upshaw, who manages outreach workers at Youth Alive in Oakland, said he encourages teens to express their anger with him rather than on social media. He absorbs it, he said, to help prevent kids from doing something foolish.

Ive always offered youth the chance to call me and curse me out, Upshaw said. They can come and scream and I wont fuss at them.

Workers at Youth Advocate Programs monitor influential social media accounts in their communities to de-escalate conflicts. The idea is to get on it as soon as possible, Fogg said. We dont want people to die over a social media post.

Its sometimes impossible, Campos said. You cant tell them to delete their social media accounts, he said. Even a judge wont tell them that. But I can tell them, If I were you, since youre on probation, I wouldnt be posting those kinds of things.

When he first worked with teens at high risk of violence, I said if I can save 10 lives out of 100, Id be happy, Campos said. Now, if I can save one life out of 100, Im happy.

For an illustrated version of this article, click here.

Liz Szabo: lszabo@kff.org, @LizSzabo Related Topics Mental Health Multimedia Public Health Children's Health Guns Contact Us Submit a Story Tip

Continue Reading

World

‘Daylight robbery of land – sanctioned by Israeli authorities’: Inside ‘terrorised’ West Bank village

Published

on

By

'Daylight robbery of land - sanctioned by Israeli authorities': Inside 'terrorised' West Bank village

What’s unfolding in the Palestinian village of Ras al-Ayn is more than a land dispute – according to human rights groups, it is the systematic displacement of an entire community.

Activists on the ground report a surge in violence and intimidation by Israeli settlers aimed at driving Palestinian families from their homes.

Footage captured by Rachel Abramovitz, a member of the group Looking The Occupation In The Eye, shows activists trying to block settlers from seizing control of the village centre.

Palestinians are being pushed out by settlers in the West Bank
Palestinians say they are being forced off their land by intimidation
Image:
Palestinians say they are being forced off their land by intimidation

“They gradually invade the community and expand. The goal is to terrorise people, to make them flee,” Ms Abramovitz said.

Our visit comes as Israel said it would establish 22 new Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank – including new settlements and the legalisation of outposts already built without government authorisation.

The settler movement traces back to 1967, when Israel captured the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza, and the Golan Heights during the Six-Day War.

Settlements began as small, often unofficial outposts. Over the decades, they’ve grown into towns and cities with state-provided infrastructure, roads, and security.

More on Benjamin Netanyahu

Today, 700,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, in communities considered illegal under international law – a designation Israel disputes.

Since the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October 2023 and Israel’s subsequent 19-month military bombardment of Gaza, violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians in the West Bank has escalated sharply.

According to the UN and human rights groups such as B’Tselem, the overwhelming number of these attacks are carried out with impunity, further pressuring Palestinians to flee.

Salaam Ka'abneh says they face daily assaults
Image:
Salaam Ka’abneh says they face daily assaults

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Nine of Gazan doctor’s children killed

Salaam Ka’abneh, a lifelong resident of the Bedouin village of Ras al-Ayn in the Jordan Valley, says his family has lived on the land for more than 50 years. He fears they could be forced to leave.

Mr Ka’abneh said: “About a year and four months ago, settlers cut off our access to water and grazing land. They also stole more than 2,000 sheep from us in the Tel Al-Auja compound. We face daily assaults, day and night.

“They terrorise our children and women, throwing stones, firing bullets, and creating chaos with their vehicles. We are under siege. We no longer have access to pasture or water, and our sheep remain caged.”

Gaza: Fight for Survival Sky News teaser/promo image

Footage from the area shows settlers driving freely through Palestinian communities, some armed.

While the Israeli army officially governs Area C of the West Bank, where Ras al-Ayn is located, human rights groups say settler violence almost always goes unchecked.

Under international law, an occupying power is obligated to protect civilians under its control. But Sarit Michaeli of B’Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, says Israel is failing to uphold its responsibility.

“Israel doesn’t hold settlers accountable. On the contrary – settlers know that if they act violently, they’ll receive support from all branches of the government. There’s full impunity. In fact, it’s more accurate to say settlers function as a branch of the government.

“It’s daylight robbery of land – sanctioned by Israeli authorities,” Michaeli continues.

“And it amounts to ethnic cleansing – displacing large parts of the Palestinian population to make the area available for Israeli use.”

To understand more, we travelled to a hilltop outpost occupied by settlers overlooking Salaam’s village. But we did not get far. Our car was quickly surrounded, and the atmosphere turned hostile.

His family has lived on the land for more than 50 years, but Salaam Ka'abneh fears they could be forced to leave
Image:
Salaam Ka’abneh and his family has lived on the land for more than 50 years

It was clear: we were not welcome. We left with no answers but with a deeper understanding of the fear these Palestinian communities live with daily.

International pressure is growing. The British government recently imposed sanctions on several settlers, including Daniella Weiss.

Read more from Sky News:
Key events since 7 October Hamas-led attack
Hamas’ Gaza chief ‘eliminated’

Known as the ‘godmother’ of the settler movement, Weiss has been a key figure in expanding settlements across the West Bank.

“There will never be a Palestinian state between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean. Never,” Weiss declares. “We annex with facts on the ground. The goal is to block any possibility of a Palestinian state in the heartland of Israel.

“If Netanyahu wanted to stop me, he could.”

The Israeli government calls allegations of ethnic cleansing “baseless and without foundation”.

But human rights groups argue that what’s happening in the West Bank has gone far beyond creeping annexation.

Palestinian land is rapidly being consumed by settlements, military zones, and settler outposts – shrinking the space in which a future Palestinian state might one day exist.

You can watch a Sky News special programme on the conflict in Gaza on TV and mobile, at 9pm UK time, on Thursday.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla has been testing robotaxi service without drivers for ‘several days’, says Elon Musk

Published

on

By

Tesla has been testing robotaxi service without drivers for 'several days', says Elon Musk

Tesla has started testing its robotaxi service in Austin, Texas without safety drivers over the last few days, according to Elon Musk.

The automaker reportedly aims to launch its robotaxi service on June 12.

Earlier this month, it was reported that Tesla had yet to start testing its planned robotaxi service in Austin without safety drivers.

It was worrying a month away from the start of the service and in comparison to Waymo, which tested its system with safety driver for 6 months and without safety drivers for another 6 months before launching in Austin earlier this year.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Now, CEO Elon Musk has confirmed that the previous report was true as he announced that Tesla has been testing the service with “no one in driver’s seat” only for the “past several days”:

For the past several days, Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no one in driver’s seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents. A month ahead of schedule.

He claimed that it is “a month ahead of schedule”, but he has also said that Tesla would launch the service to paid customers in June.

If true, it would imply that Tesla didn’t plan to test the service without a safety driver in the vehicle.

The CEO then added that Tesla will deliver a car to a customer from the factory using self-driving next month:

Next month, first self-delivery from factory to customer.

Tesla is planning to launch a small fleet of 10 to 20 Model Y vehicles for its robotaxi service in Austin next month.

Bloomberg recently reported that Tesla is aiming for June 12, but the date could change.

The service is expected to be using “heavy teleoperation.” Musk nor Tesla confirmed the level of teleoperation, but it could be significant as one teleoperator per car.

Over the last few days, several reports came out pointing to Tesla not having communicated important part of the planned rollout of the service to local authorities.

Electrek’s Take

At this point, I think this is either going to be fake, meaning an extremely high level of teleoperation, or a complete shit show, or both.

Musk claims to be “a month ahead of schedule” even though Tesla started testing its service without safety driver about 2 weeks before the planned start of the service. That’s ridiculous.

It’s not victory to have “no incidents” after a few days of testing. You need to have no incidents over months of testing and hundreds of thousands of miles before launching.

At this point, I’m praying that Tesla is launching this in a small geo-fenced area without highways or any high speed driving to limit potential dangers and to ensure teleoperators can increase safety. But even then, I fear there will be avoidable crashes.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Technology

China’s DeepSeek quietly releases upgraded R1 AI model, ramping up competition with OpenAI

Published

on

By

China's DeepSeek quietly releases upgraded R1 AI model, ramping up competition with OpenAI

Deepseek’s logo on Jan. 29, 2025.

Andrey Rudakov | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Chinese startup DeepSeek, which caused shockwaves across markets this year, quietly released an upgraded version of its artificial intelligence reasoning model.

The company did not make an official announcement, but the upgrade of DeepSeek R1 was released on AI model repository Hugging Face.

DeepSeek rose to prominence this year after its free, open-source R1 reasoning model outperformed offerings from rivals including Meta and OpenAI. The low-cost and short time of development shocked global markets, sparking concerns that U.S. tech giants were overspending on infrastructure and wiping billions of dollars of value of major U.S. tech stocks like AI stalwart Nvidia. These companies have since broadly recovered.

Just as was the case with DeepSeek R1’s debut, the upgraded model was also released with little fanfare. It is a reasoning model, which means the AI can execute more complicated tasks through a step-by-step logical thought process.

The upgraded DeepSeek R1 model is just behind OpenAI’s o4-mini and o3 reasoning models on LiveCodeBench, a site that benchmarks models against different metrics.

DeepSeek has become the poster child of how Chinese artificial intelligence is still developing despite U.S. attempts to restrict the country’s access to chips and other technology. This month, Chinese technology giants Baidu and Tencent revealed how they were making their AI models more efficient to deal with U.S. semiconductor export curbs.

Nvidia CEO Huang on export controls: China market is home to 50% of the world's AI researchers

Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, which designs the graphics processing units required to train huge AI models, slammed U.S. export controls on Wednesday.

“The U.S. has based its policy on the assumption that China cannot make AI chips,” Huang said. “That assumption was always questionable, and now it’s clearly wrong.”

“The question is not whether China will have AI,” Huang added. “It already does.”

Continue Reading

Trending