Police officers who are found guilty of gross misconduct will face automatic dismissal under reforms designed to toughen up the disciplinary process following a series of scandals.
Chief constables and other senior officers will be given greater powers to sack rogue staff while those who fail vetting checks can also be fired.
Under the new system, a finding of gross misconduct will automatically result in a police officer’s dismissal unless there are exceptional circumstances. Senior officers will also chair the independent panels who carry out misconduct hearings.
The move comes following a series of scandals engulfing the police, including the murder of Sarah Everard by serving Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens and the unmasking of former police constable David Carrick as a serial abuser and rapist.
“I’m grateful to the government for recognising the need for substantial change that will empower chief officers in our fight to uphold the highest standards and restore confidence in policing,” he said.
More from Politics
“The flaws in the existing regulations have contributed to our inability to fully address the systemic issues of poor standards and misconduct.
“Chief officers are held to account for the service we deliver and for the standards we uphold which is why I have been persistent in calling for us to have the powers to act decisively and without bureaucratic delays when we identify those who have no place in policing.”
Advertisement
The government said it would bring in the changes as soon as possible. It is understood officials hope they could be in place by next spring.
Government ‘too slow to raise standards’
But the Labour Party said the government had been “too slow” to raise standards and that the measures announced did not go far enough.
Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: “Labour has been calling for over two years for the complete overhaul of the police misconduct and vetting systems and these reforms are long overdue.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:52
Former Metropolitan Police officer Adam Provan has been jailed for 16 years for raping a woman and a girl.
“But as well as being too slow, the Conservatives are also not going far enough to raise standards, root out abuse and restore confidence in the vital work the police do to keep communities safe.”
She said Labour wanted police officers under investigation for rape and domestic violence to be suspended pending investigation and called for mandatory national vetting standards to end the “postcode lottery” across forces.
“We would also reform training and misconduct processes to help restore confidence in the police,” she added.
The government announcement comes just a day after six former home secretaries backed a new bill by Labour MP Harriet Harman, which would see officers automatically dismissed if convicted of a serious criminal offence, automatically suspended if charged with a serious criminal offence and automatically dismissed if they fail vetting.
Lawyers known as legally qualified chairs were brought in to oversee police disciplinary panels in 2016, in a bid to make the system more transparent.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:42
Met Police receives damning report
But critics have argued that the system has been too slow to root out rogue officers and that senior officers are more likely to sack those found guilty of wrongdoing.
Gavin Stephens, chairman of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, welcomed the “sensible” plans, saying they put police chiefs “back in control” of being able to quickly remove corrupt staff from forces.
Concerns over ‘police chiefs marking their own homework’
Under the reforms announced today independent lawyers will continue to sit on the panel but will perform only supporting roles.
The head of the police watchdog, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) previously warned against making chief constables “judge and jury” in disciplinary hearings.
The IOPC wants lawyers to be in charge of misconduct hearings but for chief constables to decide on the punishment if wrongdoing is proven.
John Bassett, a barrister representing the National Association of Legally Qualified Chairs, speaking in a personal capacity, said he was “disappointed” by the proposed changes.
“No-one has yet explained to me or can present a convincing argument as to why the present system does not fulfil that role of being an open, transparent and fair process,” he said.
“Police officers, as so-called officers of the crown, do not have a right to claim unfair dismissal, and in those circumstances the best and at present the only way of ensuring that there is a fair outcome, if it resulted in dismissal, is by having a legally qualified chair assisting and advising the panel on the proper procedure.
“Otherwise you’re going back to a situation where there is a real risk that effectively by reverting to the pre-2016 system or something similar, police officers or police chiefs are marking their own homework.
But Home Secretary Suella Braverman said: “For too long our police chiefs have not had the powers they need to root out those who have no place wearing the uniform.
“Now they can take swift and robust action to sack officers who should not be serving our communities.”
Liberal Democrats home affairs spokesman Alistair Carmichael welcomed the announcement but said: “It’s a disgrace that it’s taken so long in the first place.
“Being able to sack corrupt officers swiftly is a key step in rebuilding public trust in the police. Now, the Home Office must ensure that these new rules are properly enforced.”
“There’s a code that you don’t speak to the police, so you have to find another way to protect yourself,” says Daniel.
We are in a drill music recording studio in Birmingham. We have come here to talk frankly about why teenagers carry knives.
This is a city with a history of gang violence going back decades. But in more recent years younger people have been drawn into the postcode wars. Battles are fought over drugs and territory.
“A knife is one of the easiest things you can get,” Daniel, 27, says. “Every person has a knife in the house.”
Data reveals a shocking increase in the number of teenagers killed with a knife or sharp instrument.
In the year to March 2024, there were 53 teenage victims aged 13-19 in England and Wales, according to the Office for National Statistics. That is a 240% increase on the 22 teenage victims a decade earlier.
Leo Ross was fatally stabbed in the stomach as he walked home from school.
The government says it has a “mission” to halve knife crime over a decade.
These young people are not optimistic. They blame poverty, austerity and a lack of opportunities for driving teenagers growing up in the city to a life of crime.
Image: Devontae
Devontae
Devontae, 19, has witnessed fatal stabbings. He says it’s “very common” for people his age to carry knives.
“You’ve got postcode wars, postcode wars everywhere,” he says, referring to the battles fought between gangs protecting their territory.
“There’s this whole war going on that many people wouldn’t be aware of,” he explains.
“There are kids that, like, can’t even go to the shop without having the worry of getting stabbed… it’s getting beyond a joke.”
He adds: “It’s getting passed down from generation to generation and I don’t think it’ll stop. I reckon it’ll get worse.”
Image: Daniel
Daniel
“My own experience is I’ve been stabbed and I’ve been shot,” says Daniel, pointing to scars – one on his finger, others on his legs.
He says he began carrying a knife at the age of 14, around the time he was first stabbed.
He says it was “for my own protection, not because I wanted to be a gangster and not because I want to hurt nobody or scare anybody but for my own protection”.
He says he saw life on the streets as “it’s me or you and it’s not going to be me”.
“A knife is one of the easiest things you can get. It’s like a fork, right?
Image: Daniel has a scar on his hand
“Everyone, every single person has a knife… Some people might take one out to try to stab someone. Someone might take one out just to make sure that they’re safe”.
He ended up in prison. Since his release last year, he’s been mentoring teenagers, trying to steer them away from getting involved in street crime.
But he understands why so many get drawn in by the money they can earn selling drugs.
“Everyone likes the finer things of life”, he says, adding: “Nine to five is not buying that. And that’s just a simple fact.”
“The youths don’t want that. So when you’re telling the youths to leave the life of crime, you’ve got to give them an alternative”.
Image: William
William
“I carried a knife from the age of 13. I got involved in a local gang growing up in central Birmingham,” says William, who is now 23.
He says he decided to start carrying a weapon after he was stabbed in the leg during a fight.
“The only way I could still be there and not be at risk of getting stabbed again is to be ready to stab whoever tried to stab me,” he explains.
Over the last decade, he’s seen more young people arming themselves.
“Some of it is literally the same as myself – protection. Other people are carrying them because they just simply don’t know how to have a fistfight.
“And then you’ve just got the ones that carry it for the image. And social media and stuff like that has become sort of popular to be sort of the bad kid.”
He believes there’s no one explanation for why more teenagers carry knives but says “the biggest reason [is] the government. There’s no funding”.
“When I was a kid, there was funding, there was youth centres… Now there’s none in my local catchment.”
“Parents having to work stupidly long hours – 40 to 60 hours a week – just to pay rent with the rent prices,” he says. “So children are going home to empty houses.”
Image: Rachel Warren set up Birmingham Says No
‘We weren’t able to pursue the police route’
Rachel Warren set up the charity Birmingham Says No to campaign against knife crime and youth violence after her son was robbed at knifepoint when he was 15.
“Obviously that left me feeling very upset and angry,” she says.
“It was very difficult to know what to do. We weren’t able to pursue the police route, obviously for fear of reprisal.”
She says knife crime is such a complex issue that “for any organisation to say, you know, that they could solve knife crime, it’s not realistic. It’s never going to be realistic”.
A recent report by the YMCA found local authority expenditure on youth services has fallen by 73% in England since 2010.
The report also revealed there are 54% fewer local authority-run youth centres in England compared with 2011-2012.
The vice chair of the Local Government Association’s safer and stronger communities board, Councillor Tom Hunt, told Sky News: “Councils work hard to provide services that help to prevent people being drawn into serious, violent crime, and have a key role to play in responding when it occurs.
“However, ongoing financial pressures have had an impact on councils’ ability to provide services that can help address this issue.
“We are working with the government in developing the Young Futures Programme, but councils need resources to provide youth services”.
Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson told us: “Knife crime has a devastating impact on families and communities across our country. Our mission to halve knife crime over a decade will be delivered through tougher enforcement and stronger prevention.”
Two worlds will collide in London today as the UK and the US lobby other countries with very different visions for the future of energy security.
Labour will tell ministers from 60 countries gathered for its Energy Security Summit that the transition from fossil fuels to clean power will make energy more secure because it’s produced at home – as well as being a win for the climate.
The stakes are high: just the small matter of stabilising the climate for years to come, as well as our energy bills.
But hopes for the summit are modest, due to, unsurprisingly, Donald Trump.
He isn’t sending his energy secretary Chris Wright to attend, but acting assistant secretary Tommy Joyce.
More from UK
The more junior official will still espouse Trump’s vision to “unleash US energy dominance”, which basically means keeping the world hooked on US fossil fuels – good news for the world’s biggest oil and gas producer.
This idea that the energy transition threatens energy security is taking root in the UK’s Reform party, but is at odds with the view of the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, who is also attending, and the United Nations.
One report by RMI found solar and wind are the cheapest option for new electricity in more than 80% of the world.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:55
‘Tropical nights’ soar in European hotspots as climate changes
But underneath it will be hoping that the 60 other countries attending the summit will hold the line on ditching fossil fuels as fast as possible and boosting clean tech supply.
That’s even more urgent as the UK tries to reduce its reliance on China, which currently dominates manufacturing of clean power infrastructure like solar panels and critical minerals.
That’s also why the prime minister is today announcing £300m to help build wind turbines in the UK to reduce imports.
But China itself is not attending – good news for rival America but a setback for the summit, given China’s outsized role in the clean industries of the future.
The elephant in the room
Then there’s the real elephant in the room, which is Trump’s erratic tariffs and trade wars. No one knows how this will play out in the extremely complicated energy sector.
Trump has ordered Europe to buy more of its liquefied natural gas as a way to avoid tariffs. Europe needs it: it’s running low on storage and Russian pipeline supplies are dwindling.
But on the flipside, his policies could paradoxically hurt both Europe’s gas demand and America’s gas producers, caught between fears of a recession and shaky global demand.
The UK’s reputation as a climate saint is not unblemished though, as it expands airports and moots further North Sea oil and gas after all.
All this complexity and uncertainty forms the backdrop for the summit. Little concrete is expected to come from it – though the UK may use it to court investment.
Other than that, we can expect little more than a paper summary on what energy security really means.
But this is all about a fight for the narrative.
And so if the IEA and other countries hold the line on clean power meaning energy security, the UK government will count that as a win.
She told Sky News how returning feels like the society has “made good on something that was wrong”.
Image: Sophie Lloyd, who tricked the Magic Circle into believing she was a man
How did she infiltrate that exclusive group that nowadays counts the likes of David Copperfield and Dynamo as members?
In March of that year, she took her entry exam posing as a teenage boy, creating an alter-ego called Raymond Lloyd.
“I’d played a boy before,” she explained, but “it took months of preparation” to secretly infiltrate the Circle’s ranks half a year before it would officially vote to let women in.
More from Ents & Arts
“Really, going back 30 years, men’s clubs were like, you know, just something you accepted.”
The men-only rule had been in place since the Circle was formed in 1905. The thinking behind it being that women just couldn’t keep secrets.
Aware of the frustration of female magicians at the time, Lloyd felt she was up for the challenge of proving women could be as good at magic as the men.
The idea was, in fact, born out of a double act, thought up by a successful magician called Jenny Winstanley who’d wanted to join herself but wasn’t allowed.
She recognised the hoax would probably only work with a much younger woman posing as a teenage boy, and met Lloyd through an acting class.
Image: Sophie Lloyd as teenage magician Raymond Lloyd. Pic: Sophie Lloyd
Lloyd said: “We had to have a wig made… the main thing was my face, I had plumpers made on a brace to bring his jawline down.”
To hide her feminine hands, she did the magic in gloves, which she says “was so hard to do, especially sleight of hand.”
The biggest test came when she was invited for a drink with her examiner, where she had to fake having laryngitis.
“After the exam, which was 20 minutes, he invited Jenny and I – she played my manager – and I sat there for one hour and three quarters and had to say ‘sorry, I’ve got a bad voice’.”
Raymond Lloyd passed the test, and his membership certificate was sent through to Sophie.
Then, in October of the same year, when whispers started circulating that the society was going to open its membership to both sexes, she and Jenny decided to reveal all. It didn’t go down well.
Rather than praise her performance, members were incandescent about the deception and, somewhat ironically, Raymond Lloyd was kicked out just before women members were let in.
Lloyd said: “We got a letter… Jenny was hurt… she was snubbed by people she actually knew, that was hurtful. However, things have really changed now…”
Three decades later the Magic Circle put out a nationwide appeal stating they wanted to apologise and Lloyd was recently tracked down in Spain.
While Jenny Winstanley died 20 years ago in a car crash, as well as Sophie receiving her certificate on Thursday, her mentor’s contribution to magic is being recognised at the special show that’s being held in both their honour at the Magic Circle.
Lloyd says: “Jenny was a wonderful, passionate person. She would have loved to be here. It’s for her really.”